Then what about those great warriors of Islam who won so many battles while they were outnumbered, away from home, without proper military background etc etc etc
Please dont taint the heros of islam by comparing them with janglees of tableegi jamat. Technically speaking, the tableegi jamat agenda would conflict with millitary policies of Islamic state.
Making ill informed comments without looking into History serves no purpose.
The Hasmite clan of Quraysh tribe has a history of producing able generals and fierce warriors.
Prophet Muhammed, Umar Ibn Khattab, Ali Ibi Talib, Khalid Ibn Walid, Husayn Ibn Ali, Abu Sufiyan Ibn Harb and many others came from quraysh tribe.
Islamic warriors and generals can be reprsented in four rough ethinic division.
The first group of Arab generals came from Quraysh tribe of Makkah which was known for sheer millitary prowess. The Bani Tamim of central arabia, the staunch opponents of Hashmities are dubbed "one man army". It was Islam which united the two and give the Muslims its first powerful and unitied Army under command of Umar Ibn Khattab which launched multi-pronged attacks against Zorostatian Persia.
The second group of Islamic generals and warriors came from Damascus and Bhagdad, both of which were tradionat strongholds of east-roman empire as well the largest pool of able soldiers.
The third group of muslim warrior and generals are made up of Berber, Egyptian & Kurdish communities all of which are historically proven for martial skills.
The fourth and modern group of Muslim general came from Central Asia (Turks, Pashtuns and Mongolid etc), Persian & Indian Rajput (MA Jinnah, Rashid Minhas, etc). All of them have fine history of millitary prowess.
Among the fourth group were also the so called Mamluks (eg: Qutubudin Aybak) whose make up was mixture of turk, mongoliod, indian, persian and egyptian slave soldiers however their fighting prowess was piviotal in sustience of Islamic kingdoms.
Marine Corps history states that a sword of this type was presented to Marine First Lieutenant Presley O'Bannon by the Ottoman Empire viceroy, Prince Hamet, on December 8, 1805, during the First Barbary War, as a gesture of respect and praise for the Marines' actions at the Battle of Derne.[3] Upon his return to the United States, the state of Virginia presented him with a silver-hilted sword featuring an eaglehead hilt and a curved blade modeled after the original Mameluke sword given him by Hamet. Its blade is inscribed with his name and a commemoration of the Battle of Tripoli Harbor.[4]
Perhaps due to the Marines' distinguished record during this campaign, including the capture of the Tripolitan city of Derna after a long and dangerous desert march, Marine Corps Commandant Archibald Henderson adopted the Mameluke sword in 1825 for wear by Marine officers. After initial distribution in 1826, Mameluke swords have been worn except for the years 1859-75 (when Marine officers were required to wear the U.S. Model 1850 Army foot officers' sword), and a brief period when swords were suspended during World War II. Since that time, Mameluke swords have been worn by Marine officers in a continuing tradition to the present day.
Alternatively, it can be argued that Islam is a martial religion because tradionally it has been adopted and propganted by tribes, clans and communities with strong millitary traditions.