Syria's Assad admits sending weapons to PYD

[IronEagle]

So, are you saying that Russia dissolved the Assad-ISIS alliance by bombing the latter?

They mean 9% of areas controlled by daesh, you know you can drop some bombs on those areas it doesnt mean they're really targetting them however opposition and Turkmens are gettting attacked for real

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

kid answer but what to expect from islamist Erdogan fanboys in this forum

And your country is also ruled by Islamists!!!

 

[mike2000 is back]

No, until now Russia contributed a lot to such alliance with giving weapons to PYD and with the remaining 90 percent of airstrikes targetin moderate opposition forces on Turkish border.

Well, it is a wet dreaming after all.

“Turkey is ready with 15,000 troops and tanks," Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan replied to a question about Turkey's possible reaction against the Democratic Union Party (PYD) in the event of any untoward moves.''

I put my signature on it :
View attachment 278410

Well, i dont really see what is surprising or new about what you just said. Everybody(well, anyone that is fairly well informed) knows that Russia NEVER INTERVENED IN SYRIA BECAUSE OF ISIS AND EVEN LESS SO THEIR BOMBINGS HAVE NOT BEEN FOCUSED ON ISIS BUT ON OTHER SYRIAN REBEL GROUPS. Russia intervened to protrct its huge interests in Syria and the region by maintaining/protecting its military/naval bases in Syria which enables it to project power in the region and give it access to the Mediterranean where it can counter/face off with western powers like U.S,U.K,France and that means Russia maintaining/keeping Assad in power. I don't blame Russia though, since its very normal for big powers to protect their interest by all means necessary giving they have the capabilities, even if i was in Russia's position i will do the same thing.i.e i will obviously intervene in Syria to protect my country's interests/sphere of influence and maintain my puppet Assad by targeting/destroying all groups that are opposed to/fighting him. This means i will target the Syrian opposition/rebel groups since they are by far the largest force still fighting Assad, ISIS will merely be used as media poster boy to legitimize my intervention and justify any bombing i will carry out against Syrian rebel groups. lol
Its an old trick in the book that Russia is using here.

 

[damm1t]

His father was also a PKK supporter what else do you expect from those scumbags. But the irony is their country is now a terrosist nest divided by them into pieces...

 

[mike2000 is back]

His father was also a PKK supporter what else do you expect from those scumbags. But the irony is their country is now a terrosist nest divided by them into pieces...

Well, i cant blame him completely though, since Assad regime was openly supporting PKK and even Al Qaeda/other terrorist groups in Iraq against U.S/U.K forces in the mid 2000s for his own interests, anything is legitimate in Geo politics. I only blame him for not taking responsibilities for his actions and instead running away from assuming them today. If you want to play big power games make sure you can keep up and that you are able to sustain it. Assad regime definitely wasn't strong/powerful enough to do so, he took on more than he could chew/handle(especially against far more powerful enemies), as we can all see today what his country/regime has become..

 

[oproh]

Good job Assad, arm anyone who is willing to crush isis, maybe the Kurds should crush the isis supporters too.

 

[Madali]

They're definitely not allies but they don't fight each other much. ISIL concentrates on the Kurds and the other Islamists while Assad (minus the Kurds) does the same

As per the original post, the two sides (government & isis) made an actual deal, where they decided to share the northern syrian territory and not fight each other. This is different than "they dont fight each other much". This would mean they would not fight each other AT ALL.

 

[bsruzm]

Well, i dont really see what is surprising or new about what you just said. Everybody(well, anyone that is fairly well informed) knows that Russia NEVER INTERVENED IN SYRIA BECAUSE OF ISIS AND EVEN LESS SO THEIR BOMBINGS HAVE NOT BEEN FOCUSED ON ISIS BUT ON OTHER SYRIAN REBEL GROUPS

That's great. You should tell @Madali that, he seems surprised.
Though I disagree with you on Russia to counter UK and France in Syria