What's new

Syria: Questions that can not be Answered?

it sounds nice and easy... but not for Arabs... every Arab leader wants the seat, and yes that includes Alasad, but Alasad now has the people support in this war, which is something different...
GCC tried to include Jordan, and Morocco ( all the way in North Africa) to their groups to keep the Kingdom and monarchy powerful, and to all support each other... if you look at Bahrain and how Saudi "Arabia" sent its army to Bahrain to stop the REAL PEACEFUL REVOLUTION... and most of GCC countries army are not from their citizens, they "buy" them from different nations.. yes trust me they "buy" soldiers...

Honestly, without an Arabic superman who is perhaps even a stronger leader than Putin, it is hard to see the Arabic world to become united.

Assad is a good man, but he is not that strong to fit the role, it seems Hafez must have some very high expection for his son and hope his son can accomplish his dream. Good luck to him and he will defend Syria against the terrorism, but the prosperity for the Arabic world still has a long way to go.
 
.
Honestly, without an Arabic superman who is perhaps even a stronger leader than Putin, it is hard to see the Arabic world to become united.

Assad is a good man, but he is not that strong to fit that role, it seems Hafez must have some very expection for his son and hope his son can accomplish his dream. Good luck to him and he will defend Syria against the terrorism, but the prosperity for the Arabic world has a long way to go.
and especially after the Iraqi, Libyan, and now Syrian wars, I see no way for United Arabs.... the Arab world is now ALMOST COMPLETELY destroyed, the only obstacle for the west is now Syria, they thought Syria would fall in month... but they failed, because after Syria, its GCC turn... which is why GCC want to long the Syrian crisis...
 
.
and especially after the Iraqi, Libyan, and now Syrian wars, I see no way for United Arabs.... the Arab world is now ALMOST COMPLETELY destroyed, the only obstacle for the west is now Syria, they thought Syria would fall in month... but they failed, because after Syria, its GCC turn... which is why GCC want to long the Syrian crisis...

GCC also wants to control the whole Arabic world, wonder what would the reaction of the West.
 
.
GCC also wants to control the whole Arabic world, wonder what would the reaction of the West.

yes, but GCC itself has internal problem... Qatar and Saudi "Arabia" are fighting over ruling the Arab world, Qatar is trying to play something bigger than its size... the west might let them rule the Arab world, because gcc is their puppet, thus that will make the Arab world their puppets also, but they will never happen because there is Syria, which is an obstacle for them.... so GCC might rule most of the "Arab" world but not Syria... The west have all the rest in their pocket but for Syria...
 
.
yes, but GCC itself has internal problem... Qatar and Saudi "Arabia" are fighting over ruling the Arab world, Qatar is trying to play something bigger than its size... the west might let them rule the Arab world, because gcc is their puppet, thus that will make the Arab world their puppets also, but they will never happen because there is Syria, which is an obstacle for them.... so GCC might rule most of the "Arab" world but not Syria... The west have all the rest in their pocket but for Syria...

In fact, GCC has a special relationship with China, since they believe that China is their card to counter against USA.

GCC is always pretty friendly toward China, even we know they are following their own national interest and we also don't like their behavior in the issue of Syria, but we have no major resentment against them.

However, we dislike Qatar much more than GCC, since that propaganda media Al Jazeera is always making anti-China news.
 
.
In fact, GCC has a special relationship with China, since they believe that China is their card to counter against USA.

GCC is always pretty friendly toward China, even we know they are following their own national interest and we also don't like their behavior in the issue of Syria, but we have no major resentment against them.

However, we dislike Qatar much more than GCC, since that propaganda media Al Jazeera always making anti-China news.

Qatar is trying to be key player in the GCC and the M.E region.... Qatar will bring destruction on itself someday...
Aljazeera recently bought an American TV network, so now they will spreading propaganda to feed Americans really bad.... and Americans will fall for it... and of course, Qatar will start with its propaganda against Syria, Iran, China and Russia...
 
.
I have always respected the Ba'ath party and Nasser for their anti-imperialist and Arab nationalist stance. I understand Ba'athist ideology had a strong intellectual and secular-socialist foundation, with one of the founders being Christianity adherent I believe, and proved itself to be relevant and an impetus to Arab unity in the 50`s and 60`s.

But why did it start to go so wrong after that? Even despite the west`s underhanded attempts to destroy it, shouldn`t greater wisdom amongst the Arab countries have prevailed throughout the Cold War? Why did not the people resist against their leaders becoming Western slaves and being instrumental in attempting to destroy the Palestinian cause.

Palestinians under the leadership of Arafat and Habash, received so much support from common people in the Arab world, but amongst political parties or governments, why only Ba'ath party and Nasser? I understand King Faisal was the last leader on the peninsula who was serious about their cause, but did he support the Black September operations?

Anyhow I hope Syria keeps up this struggle for the self respect, territorial integrity and unity of Arab people. The West tried one by one to bring down the leaders of Arab unity, but always failed in the face of resistance by the late Hafez al Assad. However, after his passing, their campaign seems to have intensified. May God be with you in your efforts, and may you suceed in warding of imperialist forces from this region.
 
.
Qatar is trying to be key player in the GCC and the M.E region.... Qatar will bring destruction on itself someday...
Aljazeera recently bought an American TV network, so now they will spreading propaganda to feed Americans really bad.... and Americans will fall for it... and of course, Qatar will start with its propaganda against Syria, Iran, China and Russia...

Then GCC should be careful of getting backstabbed by Qatar some day.

In some old Chinese idiom, we know that the snake can sometimes try to devour an elephant, now Qatar is a prime example.
 
.
I have always respected the Ba'ath party and Nasser for their anti-imperialist and Arab nationalist stance. I understand Ba'athist ideology had a strong intellectual and secular-socialist foundation, with one of the founders being Christianity adherent I believe, and proved itself to be relevant and an impetus to Arab unity in the 50`s and 60`s.

But why did it start to go so wrong after that? Even despite the west`s underhanded attempts to destroy it, shouldn`t greater wisdom amongst the Arab countries have prevailed throughout the Cold War? Why did not the people resist against their leaders becoming Western slaves and being instrumental in attempting to destroy the Palestinian cause.

Palestinians under the leadership of Arafat and Habash, received so much support from common people in the Arab world, but amongst political parties or governments, why only Ba'ath party and Nasser? I understand King Faisal was the last leader on the peninsula who was serious about their cause, but did he support the Black September operations?

Anyhow I hope Syria keeps up this struggle for the self respect, territorial integrity and unity of Arab people. The West tried one by one to bring down the leaders of Arab unity, but always failed in the face of resistance by the late Hafez al Assad. However, after his passing, their campaign seems to have intensified. May God be with you in your efforts, and may you suceed in warding of imperialist forces from this region.

The Arab nationalism was started by an Arab Christian, that's why it is wrong to say the Arab Christians aren't the real Arabs according to some member from the Gulf states.
 
.
If Alasad has no support , then, Why does the west, and GCC refuse dialogue? why do they refuse Elections under the UN monitoring? Some will say its to late, I say late better than never. If the west, gcc, and puppet opposition cared about Syrian people, they would have done anything to stop the bloodshed, at least support election and/or dialogue. Instead the west, gcc, and outside opposition support more bloodshed by encouraging fighting and killing Syrians.


How can Alasad still be in power? If majority of Syrians rose up against Alasad, Alasad would have been gone long time ago... no power on this earth can overcome the will and the power of the people... in addition , the Syrian Army is the Syrian people, so then why there is still an army? which will lead to these questions...

Why there is still Syrian Army? We all know that about 70% of Syrians are Sunnis (or under the Sunni category) thus that means 70% of the soldiers are Sunni, wouldn't be easy for that soldier to turn their guns against the government? Yes there are defectors, but those defectors are nothing, and most known defectors run and leave the country and now live in Turkey, Jordan, Qatar and Europe and etc, they play no role inside Syria.


Why doesn't NATO start a war against Syria? Turkey and other Arab countries have requested many times for an invasion and war against the people of Syria, just like in Libya, however NATO always refused? Why? Does NATO know that Alasad has the majority support? does NATO know that Alasad Army is still united? Isn't easy for NATO to just attack Syria since Syria is already at war?


Why does F$A, outside opposition ask for foreigner fighters and foreigner support ( why do they want the west support? don't they have the people of Syria support?), if they claim that Syrians are with them? Many sources from the west and the east, provide evidence that F$A is mainly composed of Alqaeda and foreigners ( need links?, look at my previous threads) terrorists from Europe, Australia, Arabs, and Turkish are fighting in Syria...

Why is there something called "outside opposition"? many claim that F$A control 70% of Syria, why doesn't the outside opposition return to that 70% controlled by them?

Again your Question itself are wrong , Its already too late for any dialogue or Election. Assad armed forces have spilled too much blood of Syian civilians , The best time of dialogue was in 2011 when public have started protest against regime , At then your own Establishment have chosen the same path massacre as watever they had done in 1980's and still following the same path . You guys really mis-calculated the intensity of protest this time , and as result your nation direct fall into a civil war . Syrian Lion , Your own answers/ behaviour have proved that your establishment consist a Pro-massacre mentality .

Al-assad policey over opposition had simply helped him alot to maintain his government in Syria , Plus Your Military have always played a major role in your internal and external politics to contain the regime in every case and Yes, as you said that 20% of Syria do supports Al-assad. But current conflict have already weaken Regime hold in most parts of Syria and result can be seen that Al-Assad is ready for peace talk now , Opposotion have already demanded save exit for him . You have to understand that things will not remain same forever , at-last you have to accept someone else , Assad would not be there forever .

As far as Libya is concerned then it will recover , It would take atleast one or two decade but Remember that it was Qaddafi who had financially supported Al-qaeda linked
Groups of Mali . Do you support him? you are linking FSA with Al-Qaeda because They are your opponents but the fact is that your Government itself have supported militia i.e Shabiha and Hezbollah , So that proves your regime a terrorist in front of world . Accept it Mate your regime itself not a saint. but A most brutual one , Your Army is no more capable enough to stand against any other country . your institution are destroyed and now you guys are totally depending on Lebanese and Iraqi militia+ Iranian revolutionary guards and on Remaining loyals. Are you denying the fact that your regime itself is depending on Russian-China Support . Trust me Mate ,Pakistan was the most closest ally of China , But we never fought any war at same time, Its all about interest , Soviat Union even engaged in our neighbour and you know actual players of that time , but they even end up by getting divided into 15 separate nation . See , Its all about interest , All they really do care for are their interest and nothing more then that . they don't care on what happened in Syria . Syria will never get back to prosperity until Al-assad would not be punished for his crimes .
 
.
Assad will step down by 2014 as his presidential term is over, so ignore these clowns.

BTW, i think it is wise for Syria not to strike back against Israel because it was obviously a provocation that wanted Syria to step on the trap.
From which planet are you speaking with us today? Israel attacked a convoy transferring highly advanced weaponry to a known terrorist organization.

Israel does not support either side and i, personally, do not want to see Syria fall to the hands of Saudi funded Salafists...
 
.
The Indians and Pakistanis are clueless. Don't worry about them.
I support Syria and Assad.

I don't understand the supporting of a dictator, but I do understand the terrorist elements involved in Syria.

Why only Syria though is my question? Why don't people start rebelling in Jordan? Saudi Arabia? Etc
 
.
Again your Question itself are wrong , Its already too late for any dialogue or Election. Assad armed forces have spilled too much blood of Syian civilians , The best time of dialogue was in 2011 when public have started protest against regime , At then your own Establishment have chosen the same path massacre as watever they had done in 1980's and still following the same path . You guys really mis-calculated the intensity of protest this time , and as result your nation direct fall into a civil war . Syrian Lion , Your own answers/ behaviour have proved that your establishment consist a Pro-massacre mentality .

Al-assad policey over opposition had simply helped him alot to maintain his government in Syria , Plus Your Military have always played a major role in your internal and external politics to contain the regime in every case and Yes, as you said that 20% of Syria do supports Al-assad. But current conflict have already weaken Regime hold in most parts of Syria and result can be seen that Al-Assad is ready for peace talk now , Opposotion have already demanded save exit for him . You have to understand that things will not remain same forever , at-last you have to accept someone else , Assad would not be there forever .

As far as Libya is concerned then it will recover , It would take atleast one or two decade but Remember that it was Qaddafi who had financially supported Al-qaeda linked
Groups of Mali . Do you support him? you are linking FSA with Al-Qaeda because They are your opponents but the fact is that your Government itself have supported militia i.e Shabiha and Hezbollah , So that proves your regime a terrorist in front of world . Accept it Mate your regime itself not a saint. but A most brutual one , Your Army is no more capable enough to stand against any other country . your institution are destroyed and now you guys are totally depending on Lebanese and Iraqi militia+ Iranian revolutionary guards and on Remaining loyals. Are you denying the fact that your regime itself is depending on Russian-China Support . Trust me Mate ,Pakistan was the most closest ally of China , But we never fought any war at same time, Its all about interest , Soviat Union even engaged in our neighbour and you know actual players of that time , but they even end up by getting divided into 15 separate nation . See , Its all about interest , All they really do care for are their interest and nothing more then that . they don't care on what happened in Syria . Syria will never get back to prosperity until Al-assad would not be punished for his crimes .

You didn't answer any of my questions, and you removed some of what I said...
nice try...
 
.
If Alasad has no support , then, Why does the west, and GCC refuse dialogue? why do they refuse Elections under the UN monitoring?

Decades of attempts show that unless you have something they want, talking to the Asads is a waste of time.

How can Alasad still be in power? If majority of Syrians rose up against Alasad, Alasad would have been gone long time ago... no power on this earth can overcome the will and the power of the people... in addition , the Syrian Army is the Syrian people, so then why there is still an army? which will lead to these questions...
A tyranny is a minority ruling a minority by will rather than law. I can rule an ant farm of 10,000 beings to my satisfaction if I wish; the ants can't do anything about it.

Why doesn't NATO start a war against Syria? Turkey and other Arab countries have requested many times for an invasion and war against the people of Syria, just like in Libya, however NATO always refused? Why?
Probably because NATO doesn't perceive who the "good guys" are, nor does it want to empower Turkey to once again illegally occupy a neighbor's territory (as Turkey does to this day in northern Cyprus.)

At the end I will say this, If the so called Syrian opposition and its masters cared about Syrian people, they would have done anything to end this bloodshed... that means ELECTIONS... Alasad leaving as a condition for a dialogue is not DEMOCRACY!
Asad wants to be trusted with counting the votes. He can't even be trusted with a fountain pen to sign treaty documents.
 
.
Decades of attempts show that unless you have something they want, talking to the Asads is a waste of time.

A tyranny is a minority ruling a minority by will rather than law. I can rule an ant farm of 10,000 beings to my satisfaction if I wish; the ants can't do anything about it.

Probably because NATO doesn't perceive who the "good guys" are, nor does it want to empower Turkey to once again illegally occupy a neighbor's territory (as Turkey does to this day in northern Cyprus.)

Asad wants to be trusted with counting the votes. He can't even be trusted with a fountain pen to sign treaty documents.

Alasad has been calling for elections for over a year and under the UN eyes, you took that part out and then you replied your comment, which shows that you only take what you want and ignore the reality...

Please answer my questions fully, answer all of them because they are connected.. you cant just pick and choose which to answer, because if you answer a question, but you don't answer it fully, because all of those questions are ONE QUESTION
 
.
Back
Top Bottom