What's new

Supreme Court declares presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa invalid

ASKardar

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
647
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

ISLAMABAD – Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa illegal and declared it invalid.

According to detailed verdict in Justice Qazi Faez Isa case, the top court nullified the presidential reference against Justice Isa besides ordering Inland Revenue Commissioner to issue a notice to the judge’s family members including his wife and children within seven days to seek details of his properties.

Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W5VEsbliNcVYel5YOb03EnQOx-w2mTja/preview
 

Attachments

  • const.p._17_2019_detailed_reasoning.pdf
    902.6 KB · Views: 51
Last edited:
. .
Supreme Court should just declare PM Imran Khan's foreign funded incompetent PTI Government as null and void.

All they've done so far is decimate the economy, cheeni chori and aatta khori, allowed India to annex Indian Occupied Kashmir, take political prisoners to silence criticism and handed the country over to the IMF to list a few of their achievements.

I just want to ask a brain dead PML-N supporter one thing, How did Imran Khan or Pakistan allowed India to annex Indian occupied Kashmir? Didn't India did this to take revenge of 27 FEB humiliation ? I want a factual answer from brain dead PML-N supporters for once. To see what is their thought process goes in their mind when they Claim Pakistan Or PTI allowed India to annex Kashmir. In your Opinion what should Imran would have done ?
 
. .
Supreme Court should just declare PM Imran Khan's foreign funded incompetent PTI Government as null and void.

All they've done so far is decimate the economy, cheeni chori and aatta khori, allowed India to annex Indian Occupied Kashmir, take political prisoners to silence criticism and handed the country over to the IMF to list a few of their achievements.
wah... itnay zaheen aap pehlay tou na thay... were u dead like before IK government. ya bs dou saal hue hain paida hue? coz only two two options will justify wat u r saying... plz dont tell me someone from ur immediate relative is in PMLN? coz phir tou banta hai... warna itne andhee tou laathee bhee nahin hote. Mafia, cartels, hoarding these are new concepts to u right??????
I just want to ask a brain dead PML-N supporter one thing, How did Imran Khan or Pakistan allowed India to annex Indian occupied Kashmir? Didn't India did this to take revenge of 27 FEB humiliation ? I want a factual answer from brain dead PML-N supporters for once. To see what is their thought process goes in their mind when they Claim Pakistan Or PTI allowed India to annex Kashmir. In your Opinion what should Imran would have done ?
sorry woh answer nahin daay sakta let me answer on his behalf, Diesel with his 2 ton body was sitting in Kashmir committee, drinking lassi worth millions was the the real hurdle in this. coz ussay move karna mushqil he nahin na mumkin tha, thus annexation ka india kaise soch sakta tha....

Sorry for thinking like patwari but this should answer u. Patwari logic at its best:p:
 
.
  • "The source of funds for this purchase and the mode by which these funds were transferred abroad require explanation," says the judgment.
Fahad Zulfikar Updated 23 Oct 2020

Facebook


Twitter


Whatsapp


Comments

5f92884b22e1a.jpg

According to the Supreme Court's detailed judgment, the reference filed against Justice Faiz Isa suffered from "grave legal defects", finds no intent of malice in the proceedings, but adds that these deficiencies in the reference are the result of "careless and casual preparation".
However, the judgment adds that "these errors or defects do not erase Mrs. Isa's ownership of the London properties", and adds that while the ownership of these properties is not disputed, "the source of funds for this purchase and the mode by which these funds were transferred abroad require explanation" - indicating that there is a substance in the basis of the reference. The judgment also mentions that an "unexplained investment by the spouse of a Judge of the Superior Courts" only serves to compromise the integrity and credibility of the institution as a whole.
Becoming the first judge of the Supreme Court to make his belongings public, Justice Qazi Faez Isa, and his family members declared their assets, media has reported.
The step has been taken by Justice Isa in the light of a request filed by the Women's Action Forum (WAF) where they invoked Article 19-A of the Constitution and the Right to Information laws to seek the information from, amongst others, the judges of the Supreme Court.
Income and tax
As per details, Justice Isa received a sum of Rs54.34 million on account of salaries during 2018 to 2020 and paid Rs6.7 million as tax.
The SC judge revealed that his income for the year 2018 was Rs15.11 million, Rs17.145 million for 2019 and Rs21.237 million for fiscal year 2020. He paid Rs2.2 million as tax in 2018, Rs1.8 million in 2019 and Rs2.3 million in 2020.
Details of properties
Justice Isa revealed that he owns a house on 800 square yards in Phase 2 of the Defence Housing Authority, Karachi. He also owns 800 square yards residential open plot in Phase 2 of the Defence Housing Authority, Karachi. He also owns a 200 yards commercial plot in Phase 5, Defence Housing Authority, Karachi, which he bought when he was practicing law, according to information.
Justice Isa transpired he inherited property from his father, the late Qazi Mohammad Isa, including half-share in a plot situated in Ziarat, Balochistan, next to the Quaid's Residency, a sizeable portion of which has been illegally encroached by the government.
He also showed an old house in his assets which measured one kanal in Block B, Phase I, Defence Housing Authority, Lahore, which is rented out and was bought from the partial utilisation of the sale proceeds of his share in two acres house and land situated at two Lytoon Road, Quetta City, which was sold.
Justice Isa has also revealed an account worth Rs41.4 million and foreign currency accounts worth Rs 4.1 million in Pak rupees. He also owned three vehicles -- Honda Accord, Honda Civic and Mini Jeep.
Perks and privileges
He declared that had an official residence in Islamabad, two servants, one cook, part-time gardener and cleaners, Honda Civic 2017 model and 2015 model with up to 600 liters of petrol and free medical treatment at approved hospitals.
The retired judge also gets 300 free local calls, 2,000 units of electricity, 25HM of gas, water and 300 liters of petrol per month and 20 per cent medical allowance.
Wife's assets
Justice Isa mentioned that his wife, Sarina Isa, is not his dependent and files her own income tax returns in the United Kingdom and in Pakistan.
Sarina declared her immovable properties namely 50-Coniston Court in London, 40-Oakdale Road, London and 90-Adelaide Road, London.
She has had savings worth Rs21,650,000 in the National Savings Center, DHA Karachi. Sarina Isa also has had an investment worth Rs25,454,310. Her foreign income remained Rs4,731,076 in tax year 2019.
She also has had Rs25,454,310 in her foreign bank account in England and paid over Rs2.4 million as tax in the past three years.
Her agriculture property includes 24.7 acre land at Deh Korar, Tapa Zangipur, Jacobabad. She also showed another piece of land of 148.21 acre in Jacobabad. The agriculture land was also shown in Dera Murad Jamali, commercial and industrial land in Shah Latif Town in Karachi and Clifton.
Regarding her daughter, Sarina Isa revealed that she paid over Rs2 million as tax in the past three years where she had income of around Rs16 million during this period. She said her son lives in London and he told her that he is a tax compliant with UK tax laws.

According to the Supreme Court's judgement, the reference filed against Justice Faiz Isa suffered from "grave legal defects", finds no intent of malice in the proceedings, but adds that these deficiencies in the reference are the result of "careless and casual preparation".
However, the judgement adds that "these errors or defects do not erase Mrs. Isa's ownership of the London properties", and adds that while the ownership of these properties is not disputed, "the source of funds for this purchase and the mode by which these funds were transferred abroad require explanation" - indicating that there is substance in the basis of the reference. The judgement also mentions that an "unexplained investment by the spouse of a Judge of the Superior Courts" only serves to compromise the integrity and credibility of the institution as a whole.
 
.
Crux of judgment: Reference is quashed on malafide in law not malafide in facts.
No adverse finding/observation against military institutions.
There are strong observations against president, law minister & AGP but no direction in this regard.
But Justice Qazi Faez Isa is secured.
 
.
Great decision. :pakistan: I have been very vocal on this issue rom the start.



At least the higher judiciary in Pakistan is independent. I saw that when they punished Nawaz, Musharaf and now despite pressure dismissed petition against Justice Issa.



Landmark day in Pakistan's judicial history. :pakistan::smitten:
 
.
My only thing is how can a teacher amass such wealth beyond her income grade --

I've had a husband/wife couple both tenured professors with one being department chair at university both educated from Cornell University with PhDs in Statistics and wife in Human Resources. Combined their income before taxes was $ 240,000. Till this day they are driving a beater corolla with only one new SUV purchased two years ago, and a small house.

I don't see them amassing agricultural lands, off shore properties, millionaire style savings accounts etc.
 
.
.
My only thing is how can a teacher amass such wealth beyond her income grade --

I've had a husband/wife couple both tenured professors with one being department chair at university both educated from Cornell University with PhDs in Statistics and wife in Human Resources. Combined their income before taxes was $ 240,000. Till this day they are driving a beater corolla with only one new SUV purchased two years ago, and a small house.

I don't see them amassing agricultural lands, off shore properties, millionaire style savings accounts etc.
Judges and lawyers already come forward to help there brother. Accountability of judges, establishment, bureaucracy, politicians is impossible.

only ...

1603470973757.png
 
. .
I just want to ask a brain dead PML-N supporter one thing, How did Imran Khan or Pakistan allowed India to annex Indian occupied Kashmir? Didn't India did this to take revenge of 27 FEB humiliation ? I want a factual answer from brain dead PML-N supporters for once. To see what is their thought process goes in their mind when they Claim Pakistan Or PTI allowed India to annex Kashmir. In your Opinion what should Imran would have done ?
I have been trying for a while now to get an answer how exactly did India annexed Kashmir, but all i hear is IK helped India annexed Kashmir like a broken record.
 
.
Syed I am not an expert in Law. My question is simple has the case been dismissed?
No... This is just the written version of the SC verdict that had been given in June. The SC dismissed the presidential reference because it had some legal errors but SC essentially upheld what the reference was asking that is to investigate the assets beyond means held by Faiz Isa's spouse. Since he is a judge of the SC his wife's assets are of importance. As per SC directive FBR will investigate Faiz Isa's wife and submit report to Supreme Judicial Council (an arm of the SC to question judges for corruption/malpractice). Based on the June verdict FBR had already initiated it's investigation and found that Faiz Isa's wife could not prove how she acquired the assets that she possesses. I think FBR has submitted report to SJC and further proceedings are awaited.
 
.
Crux of judgment: Reference is quashed on malafide in law not malafide in facts.
No adverse finding/observation against military institutions.
There are strong observations against president, law minister & AGP but no direction in this regard.
But Justice Qazi Faez Isa is secured.

oo highest leve lof chutyee how Qazi Faez Esa your new abu is secured when in the verdict clearly mentioned about unexplainedable wealth?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom