What's new

Sunni Rivalries Threaten Iraq's Local Elections

Homajon

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
1
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Germany
Sunni Rivalries Threaten Iraq's Local Elections

Violence is rising again in parts of Iraq that are dominated by the country's Sunni minority.

But whereas disputes between Sunnis and Iraq's Shi'a majority were the underlying cause in years past, experts are attributing the latest violence to a power struggle within the Sunni community.

And this time the violence includes a wave of political assassinations that are disrupting upcoming local elections and threatens to destabilize the entire country.

So far 11 candidates -- all of them Sunni Muslims -- have been assassinated in the run-up to the April 20 vote.

Six slain candidates were members of Al-Iraqiyah -- the secular, mostly Sunni-backed political bloc within Shi'a Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's governing coalition.

'Real Fragmentation'

Yahya al-Qubaisi, a political analyst at the Iraqi Center for Strategic Studies in Amman, sees a link between the violence and the disintegration of Al-Iraqiyah -- which has been plagued by defections since Sunnis launched daily mass demonstrations against Maliki's government in late December.

"This wave of violence shows there is a real fragmentation of Sunni unity," Qubaisi says. "We are now talking about a security situation that is different than the sectarian fighting in 2007, when there were groups fighting against the government and against those who cooperated with the government. We now have two main groups in the Sunni community and they both accept the political process. But each one wants to be the sole representative of the Sunnis within the government and within the provincial councils."

The recent defections from Al-Iraqiyah have ravaged the bloc's clout in Baghdad, leaving its power dispersed across three different political factions.

In Anbar Province, the power struggle also has divided Sunni tribal leaders who once fought together against Al-Qaeda as part of the U.S.-funded Awakening Councils.

On one side of the Anbar rift are tribal leaders with ties to Sunni militias that Maliki has incorporated into the central government's security forces.

On the other side are politicians and tribal leaders who feel sidelined by the Shi'ite dominated government. Like most of the 11 assassinated Sunni candidates, they support the growing anti-Maliki protests.

The Sunni protesters accuse Maliki of using Iraq's antiterrorism laws to unfairly target his Sunni political rivals and consolidate his power.

They are calling for Maliki's ouster, the release of Sunni prisoners, and the scrapping of Iraq's constitution.

'Especially Complicated Case'

"Today, the political conflict has become very rough -- especially between politicians within the Al-Iraqiyah bloc and especially in Anbar Province," says Watheq al-Hashimi, who heads the Center for Strategic Studies in Baghdad. "The security situation remains a very big problem facing the government and the Iraqi people. But in Anbar it has become an especially complicated case because of the presence of Al-Qaeda fighters there and [rebel Syria fighters] from the Syrian Free Army. Now we see how the different voices in Anbar reveal the extent of the fragmentation there."

One influential Sunni tribal leader in Anbar who supports Maliki's government is Sheik Hamid al-Hayes. He was the deputy leader of Anbar's Awakening Council when it was created in 2006 to fight against Al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Hayes tells RFE/RL that the rift within the Anbar Awakening began to form in September 2007 after the movement's founding leader, Sheikh Abdul Sattar Abu Risha, was killed by a roadside bomb near his Ramadi home.

Hayes blames the rift on Abu Risha's brother, Sheikh Ahmed Abu Risha, who took over as the group's leader.

"The problem with Ahmed is that he was not one of the founders," Hayes says, "and all he did was to take over from his late brother. He alienated many founders who had greater experience in the Awakenings' affairs. He moved toward Islamism and showed support for the [anti-Maliki] demonstrators, who include terrorists and militant religious figures. In contrast, we are civilians without such leanings."

Rival Fighters

Both Hayes and another Anbar Awakening founder, Wisam al-Hardan, have split from the movement due to their differences with Ahmed Abu Risha.

Hayes formed his own political group and has joined Maliki's National Coalition.

His older brother, Muhammed al-Hayes, now leads more than 3,000 fighters in Ramadi who are part of a Sunni militia called The Sons of Iraq. They each are paid $400 a month by the Baghdad government and operate under the auspices of Iraq's Defense and Interior ministries.

Hardan has become the leader of another Awakening group -- the Iraqi Awakening -- which also supports Maliki.

That means there are now rival Awakening fighters in Anbar Province -- some that support Maliki's government and some who oppose it.

Iraq's Electoral Commission has reacted to the assassinations in Anbar and Ninevah Province by recommending the local elections be postponed there until May 16.

But that has political observers concerned that more Sunni candidates will be killed before the ballots are cast.


Sunni Rivalries Threaten Iraq's Local Elections
 
.
Rivalries aren't problem when it comes to elections. The karma, however, comes in if the minority resorted to violence for the sake of appointing an anti Malki PM. What the minority should have done is to elect the qualified candidate to fulfill the demands they would like to get in return. Last week, Al-Qeada took full responsibility for 3 bombings in Iraq as well as mass shootings. I can see that Iraq is heading for another civil war if it continues to be this way. However, the issue doesn't seem to be coming from the minority side solely, some Shias also demanding the overthrow of Al-Malki regime for plenty of reasons and claiming that the Govt couldn't make any notable progress over the years, Corruption allegations and failing to countering terrorism ,so I guess impeaching Al-Malki isn't something new neither among minority or the majority led-opposition such as Moqtada Al-Sader.

I can predict a dark future for Iraq if things continues this way.
 
.
The news headlines that these news Channels and websites make up are pure hate speeches!
 
.
The news headlines that these news Channels and websites make up are pure hate speeches!

Iraq is now going through a sectarian upheaval. This will result in to creating a havoc environment and Iraq shall never be rebuilt again ,God forbid.
 
.
Iraq is now going through a sectarian upheaval. This will result in to creating a havoc environment and Iraq shall never be rebuilt again ,God forbid.

It takes a man to speak from the heart...
You're not a man.


How hard is it to speak your mind?

Iraq will never be what it was before, you got that part right, but what it was before was not Iraq. Also the only havoc being caused is by your gang of thugs. Salafis blowing up here, blowing up there, blowing up everywhere.

Every single day Kurds are getting stronger, shias the same. Meanwhile blowing up is the only weapon you got left. Iraq is being rebuilt, but not by you guys. This time Iraqis are building Iraq.

Short of 200,000 Bin Ladens invading Iraq at the same time, there aint no way in f'ing hell that the country we know as Iraq today is going to be taken away from the hands of Kurds and shias. They run the show now, stay back and watch. Backwater desert provinces like Anbar are now the only strongholds of salafis in Iraq. The more they fight, the less investment they will attract from the central govt and foreign companies. In 2 decades Kurdish regions and shia regions will become developed while desert rgions of Iraq (salafi strongholds today) will stay worse than Afghanistan.


Anyway, you need to man up and stop beating around the bush. Say what's on your mind salafi.
 
.
Hold on a second, Can you chile out for a little while to stop flaming with rage? Please? I don't wish to trade any derogatory comments get that?

In addition to that, I just want to inform you that the ones who hate me the most, are the ones who don't scare me the most ,please next time you quote me bear that in mind.

Back to the topic

I didn't say that a specific religious sect of people in Iraq is fighting the other. What I denoted was that Al-Malki's regime can no longer handle the situation anymore. For that reason, the ineffectiveness of the Govt will eventually lead to the creation of a chaotic environment. If you claim that the violence is restricted to one municipality ,then I think you shouldn't post in the first place. Perhaps you will want to go through the recent terror attacks ,and see how dangerous the situation is. If you failed to do so, then there's nothing much that I could tell to you. Iraqis have been bleeding for more than a decade now and it ought to be stop once for all. You can't blame all Shias or Sunnis or Christians for the turmoil in there now, they're all equal and have been living in peace and harmony together for hundreds of years. I just can't take your poor judgement; inspired by hatred and intolerance. I'm sure many Iraqis share the same opinion as mine. :wave:


It takes a man to speak from the heart...
You're not a man.


How hard is it to speak your mind?

Iraq will never be what it was before, you got that part right, but what it was before was not Iraq. Also the only havoc being caused is by your gang of thugs. Salafis blowing up here, blowing up there, blowing up everywhere.

Every single day Kurds are getting stronger, shias the same. Meanwhile blowing up is the only weapon you got left. Iraq is being rebuilt, but not by you guys. This time Iraqis are building Iraq.

Short of 200,000 Bin Ladens invading Iraq at the same time, there aint no way in f'ing hell that the country we know as Iraq today is going to be taken away from the hands of Kurds and shias. They run the show now, stay back and watch. Backwater desert provinces like Anbar are now the only strongholds of salafis in Iraq. The more they fight, the less investment they will attract from the central govt and foreign companies. In 2 decades Kurdish regions and shia regions will become developed while desert rgions of Iraq (salafi strongholds today) will stay worse than Afghanistan.


Anyway, you need to man up and stop beating around the bush. Say what's on your mind salafi.
 
.
I personally don't like Malikis internal policies, but to put the blame on him for every failure is an exaggeration, the reason why their has been slow progress is because his political opponents are trying to stop development, hence make the government look like a a failed government. I really hope he doesn't go for a third round. But he came through elections, and he will leave through elections as well.

Sad thing is all his political opponents have done is get him more support because of their foolish actions. I wouldn't be exaggerating if I say 80% of the security forces have become pro-Maliki.

Iraqi police during provincial elections yesterday, the picture in the background gives a good idea about who they voted for.

58566_490456427688056_1410754745_n.jpg
 
.
The only fear is that some forces do not divide Iraq. There were some efforts to partition it in three parts.

Whenever Iraq tries to rebuild itself, something happens. Maliki is also to be blamed. His party could have done a lot more in negotiations.
 
.
The only fear is that some forces do not divide Iraq. There were some efforts to partition it in three parts.

Whenever Iraq tries to rebuild itself, something happens. Maliki is also to be blamed. His party could have done a lot more in negotiations.

Joe biden the zionist wants it.
In Iraq only Kurds hope for this, and the Kurds do not have as much power as in 2005 so the chance of this is small
 
.
Joe biden the zionist wants it.
In Iraq only Kurds hope for this, and the Kurds do not have as much power as in 2005 so the chance of this is small

Its not about who wants what. The circumstances is what matters. If a situation is created, it can be difficult for Iraq.
 
.
That's justifiable; AlMalikis makes more friend than gaining support and this what the opposition has been waiting for. For those of you who believes that the matter is based upon Sunni vs Shia, you're dead wrong! I like the way Al-Sader slams Al-Mailki :rofl:, Al-Sader is genius, he knows nobody can mess with him D:. Do you remember Al-Sader historic visit to Qatar?

I personally don't like Malikis internal policies, but to put the blame on him for every failure is an exaggeration, the reason why their has been slow progress is because his political opponents are trying to stop development, hence make the government look like a a failed government. I really hope he doesn't go for a third round. But he came through elections, and he will leave through elections as well.

Sad thing is all his political opponents have done is get him more support because of their foolish actions. I wouldn't be exaggerating if I say 80% of the security forces have become pro-Maliki.

Iraqi police during provincial elections yesterday, the picture in the background gives a good idea about who they voted for.

58566_490456427688056_1410754745_n.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
o_O so Sadr has become a good guy now? Just yesterday the entire Arab people and media were calling the government sectarian for not dealing with the Mahdi Army. When Maliki decided to fight the Mahdi Army in 2008 and forced them to disbanded the militia, all of a sudden Moqtada is no longer secterian..

Hey, atleast we can agree that the Iraqi government is not secterian like some people claim :lol:

Well just in case you don't know why Sadr is against Maliki, I'll give you a clue. There are thousands of criminals belonging to the Mahdi army in prison. Moqtada wants them out. That's why he sided with the "Sunni" blocks whom also want thousands of criminals belonging to different "Sunni" factions out of prison though a general amnesty law. This includes thousands of terrorists who were involved directly or indirectly in acts of terrorism.
The majority of Iraqis are against Giving a green card to these prisoners.

I wouldn't depend on Moqtada on anything though, he is known to change his mind in the last seconds.
 
.
Doesn't he deserve a second chance? Why n't? We don't hate people upon what they believe in ,but their deeds. I don't give snow flakes off the media out let. It's no longer a secret that the media is a political tool. Governments used the best of them to put it up on the air ,and hide their dirty work under skin.
Being a Shina/Sunni/Agnostic living in Iraq doesn't concern me as a Saudi ,of course you know that. What I long to see is a joyful ,flourishing,and prosperous Iraq ,and all.

They would better not to release any f*cking terrorist.
o_O so Sadr has become a good guy now? Just yesterday the entire Arab people and media were calling the government sectarian for not dealing with the Mahdi Army. When Maliki decided to fight the Mahdi Army in 2008 and forced them to disbanded the militia, all of a sudden Moqtada is no longer secterian..

Hey, atleast we can agree that the Iraqi government is not secterian like some people claim :lol:

Well just in case you don't know why Sadr is against Maliki, I'll give you a clue. There are thousands of criminals belonging to the Mahdi army in prison. Moqtada wants them out. That's why he sided with the "Sunni" blocks whom also want thousands of criminals belonging to different "Sunni" factions out of prison though a general amnesty law. This includes thousands of terrorists who were involved directly or indirectly in acts of terrorism.

The majority of Iraqis are against Giving a green card to these prisoners.

I wouldn't depend on Moqtada on anything though, he is known to change his mind in the last seconds.
 
.
When al Nusra and the ISI said we'll control Syria, part of Lebanon and West Iraq, it means there will be another chaos in Iraq if it happens so brace yourself al Maliki, you don't wanna waste billions of dollars on constructions. It is better to do it after the Syrian civil war finishs because most likely they'll fight Iraq next since 95% of the Middle East are anti Maliki
 
.
When al Nusra and the ISI said we'll control Syria, part of Lebanon and West Iraq, it means there will be another chaos in Iraq if it happens so brace yourself al Maliki, you don't wanna waste billions of dollars on constructions. It is better to do it after the Syrian civil war finishs because most likely they'll fight Iraq next since 95% of the Middle East are anti Maliki

Or you wait for him to leave, cause we have democracy right.
He said he would not run for 3rd term, we will see if he will hold himself to this promise.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom