What's new

still think its a Conspiracy theory ??

rockstar08

BANNED
Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
11,096
Reaction score
-16
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
here look at this video and than judge , is it fair to close all arguments and ignore all hard scientific fact by calling " Conspiracy theory " ? ?

 
here look at this video and than judge , is it fair to close all arguments and ignore all hard scientific fact by calling " Conspiracy theory " ? ?
As soon as the guy came on and said that never before has fire collapse a steel building, I stopped watching. This so called 'documentary' will be nothing but a slick rehash of debunked arguments. Nicely produced ? Yes. But ultimately a waste of time.
 
As soon as the guy came on and said that never before has fire collapse a steel building, I stopped watching. This so called 'documentary' will be nothing but a slick rehash of debunked arguments. Nicely produced ? Yes. But ultimately a waste of time.
Yes. Its a conspiracy theory.
 
Like I said on here many times before: Leave the subject alone long enough, and someone will post debunked crap as 'new'.
 
Excellent video. Proves to me without a doubt it was an inside job.
 
As soon as the guy came on and said that never before has fire collapse a steel building, I stopped watching. This so called 'documentary' will be nothing but a slick rehash of debunked arguments. Nicely produced ? Yes. But ultimately a waste of time.

its foe educated peoples with scientific proved facts ,,,, no wonder its waste of time for you :enjoy:

Yes. Its a conspiracy theory.

have you even open the link ? :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
its foe educated peoples with scientific proved facts ,,,, no wonder its waste of time for you
It is a waste of time because the producers did not provide opposition views that are also based on scientific facts. It is not a real 'documentary'.

Since you tacitly declared yourself to be a 'scientific' person because you believe this 'documentary', then explain why Leslie Robertson, the lead structural engineer for the WTC towers, did not come to your side.
 
It is a waste of time because the producers did not provide opposition views that are also based on scientific facts. It is not a real 'documentary'.

Since you tacitly declared yourself to be a 'scientific' person because you believe this 'documentary', then explain why Leslie Robertson, the lead structural engineer for the WTC towers, did not come to your side.

Someone needs to inform the poor fellow that with enough aviation fuel steel will melt much like his face would had he been there.
 
could 9/11 be a conspiracy? Maybe, but the problem is does it matter?

America and the middle east has conflicting interests, like Middle East thinks it can have them.

One side has to back down, and it sure as hell isn't going to be the one with the 700 billion dollar a year army.

So if it's not this it will be something else, like if Saddam look at a map of America funny or something.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom