Going safe and practical doesnt mean we don't innovate. Your US space shuttle is a great example. It end up a white elephant project that cost billion for US. Same as Zumalt destroyer.
Going safe and practical doesnt mean we don't innovate. Your US space shuttle is a great example. It end up a white elephant project that cost billion for US. Same as Zumalt destroyer.
Isn't Space X aim is to make practical for every launch? Wait for it to land safe before call me again . In the meantime it just an unsafe big fire work.
Lol.. white elephant is better than no show? Of cos, China would do such stupid thing and treat lives cheaply with killing so many astronaut. US space shuttle is so brilliant and end up US need to humiliate themselves and take Soyuz capsule to ISS for so many years.
Don't worry you will get that call soon.Going safe and practical doesnt mean we don't innovate. Your US space shuttle is a great example. It end up a white elephant project that cost billion for US. Same as Zumalt destroyer.
Isn't Space X aim is to make practical for every launch? Wait for it to land safe before call me again . In the meantime it just an unsafe big fire work.
apnews.com
www.pri.org
www.popsci.com
The mental gymnastics these shills have to go trough to spend days spamming retarded yellow paper propaganda and declare an entire nations space project as a failure and hazard when a single out of a dozen companies new gen rocket prototype launch fails, while simultaneously still trying to spin a positive ring onto the fifth or fourth explosion of the same rocket in a matter of two years with barely more test vehicles in operation than that because the dud was developed in their own country.
So have your China -- or anyone else for that matter -- achieved what the Space Shuttle program did via those 'other methods'? We are asking 'achieved' in the past tense, not what 'could' be done which means speculations. So show the world what your China ACHIEVED to the same degrees as the Space Shuttle in the same time frame.Congratulation for the spectacular landing..
China wouldn't do such expensive and yet useless thing.. See how mighty US space shuttle end up. There are better ways to do it.
Over price , dangerous and poor return which can be achieved by many other methods.
Lol.. China wouldn't want to do a suicide shuttle. Tell me why NASA abandon the space shuttle? Becos it's over expensive and unsafe. There are better method to launch large object into space.
When heavier than air powered flight came, your China was absent. Considering how many lives lost since 1903, I guess China was 'wise' in not entering that arena, eh?
Stop diverting topic when we are talking about space instead of air travel. I guess u ran out of counter argument. If NASA is not stupid to continue space shuttle. Tell me why China need to do the stupid just to prove something?When heavier than air powered flight came, your China was absent. Considering how many lives lost since 1903, I guess China was 'wise' in not entering that arena, eh?
Am not 'diverting'. Am just expanding your criticism of the Space Shuttle on how it could be apply to everything else technologically that your China has been absent. So yes, absolutely your China have been 'wise' to stay out of the technology race, content to let others lead in terms of pushing the boundaries of human achievements and unfortunately losing lives in the process. The Chinese people must be grateful that they lost tens of millions lives in experimenting with communism instead of technology.
Yeah China is now doing what Spacex has been doing. This unsafe method which Spacex has done for years now.Going safe and practical doesnt mean we don't innovate. Your US space shuttle is a great example. It end up a white elephant project that cost billion for US. Same as Zumalt destroyer.
Isn't Space X aim is to make practical for every launch? Wait for it to land safe before call me again . In the meantime it just an unsafe big fire work.
