Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The size of the island cannot support agriculture, the inhabitants lived on fishing and I'm sure our Chinese friends have photos of the their fishing vessels.
By using the word inhabitant you have to show evidence of their habitation....i.e that they had houses at the place in question.
A picture of some boats they used to get to the place is not evidence of them living there permanently.
I saw the photo, I think I saw homes in the background.
Probably true.
But we are discussing here, how the ruling is going to effect the nations involved in South China issue. India is not a party to it.
Post it here again please. Let me see.
the organisation who make the arbitration about South china sea, they only rented the same location. the whole thing has nothing to do with united nation .
from UN official weibo .
Sir,Now you're being modest! India is not a party to it but on behalf of the indian politicians Hindustan Times is trying its best to show what a great loss the big bad wolf would incur if does not bite China.
What was the thread? There are so many of them, it's difficult to keep track!
I use search feature....of Taiping and greenwood for user (for convenience).
Here are the pics he posted:
Ignoring proving that these pictures are even what they claim to be, I don't think a case can be made that any clear houses are in view.
Unless you got some other pictures?
Do you see the roof of a home behind the 9th person from the right? I see it.
Sir,
Newspapers are entitled for their own views and so are politicians, but my firm belief is foreign policy is over and beyond individual views of person(s).
If you would've noticed, many countries issued statements yesterday after The Hague court ruling, urging to be mature in making comments and not see it as victory or loss to parties. there are gains to some surely, but to make South China issue as a battle in some kind of fictional war against China is certainly absurd, imho.
Thats not going to hold up in court I am afraid. Need a better clear picture. It could practically be anything.