What's new

Solar scale-up in Pakistan hits roadblock after payments cut

Kabira

BANNED
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
-20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
BAHAWALPUR: An effort to boost large-scale solar energy production in Pakistan has hit a roadblock after the government slashed the rate it pays for solar electricity, frustrating investors.

The Punjab government set up the 100-megawatt Quaid-i-Azam Solar Park in the Cholistan desert in March 2015 as a pilot project to lure foreign investment for an additional 900MW of power.

Zonergy Limited, a Chinese-owned firm, then agreed to invest $1.5 billion to produce the power, with a promise to complete the work by June 2016.

But last December, the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) reduced the amount the country pays to buy solar electricity from 14.5 cents to 9.25 cents per kilowatt-hour, citing falling costs for solar panels and other equipment.

The cut has prompted a lawsuit by Zonergy officials, who last month brought online just 200MW of the promised 900MW of power in Punjab’s Bahawalpur district, said Muhammad Amjad, chief executive officer of the solar park, in an interview with the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“Zonergy has gone into litigation over the reduction of the tariff and this is delaying completion of the project,” he said. “We are trying to resolve it as soon as possible.” Zonergy officials in Pakistan could not be reached for comment.

Mr Amjad said the tariff reduction was justified as the price of solar panels and other accessories needed to produce the power had declined significantly in the international market in the last year and a half.

Even after the reduction, Pakistan still offers one of the world’s most generous payments for solar power fed into a national grid, he said.

6,500 ACRES OF PANELS: The solar park has been promoted as one of the largest in the world, spread over 6,500 acres in the Cholistan desert in east-central Pakistan. It is located about 20 kilometres from the city of Bahawalpur, and a special security unit has been established for protection of its workers, along with a 22.5km security wall around the facility.

Muhammad Hassan Askari, the park’s operations manager, said the solar panels feed into the national grid for around 8-10 hours each day. There is no battery system to store energy for night-time distribution.

The original 100MW plant, installed by the Punjab government from its own budget, produces about 150 gigawatt hours a year, he said, enough to light about 100,000 homes in the country.

“The Cholistan desert is one of the best locations in Pakistan for solar energy production,” he said, calling the project “financially viable”.

Mr Askari said that over one million solar panels have been installed so far to produce the combined 300MW of power, and they should help avoid about 280,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide each year.

Dust and sand are the greatest technical challenges to deal with at the solar plant, he said, with a permanent team of about 100 labourers hired to wash the panels each week.

“The solar park is offering green jobs to around 2,000 workers as they have been trained to install the solar panels and do other related work,” Mr Askari said.

POWER SHORTAGES: Pakistan faces a year-round electricity shortfall that hits around 7,000MW in the summer, the period of peak demand. The country’s rural areas often suffer blackouts of more than 14 hours a day while urban areas can experience up to 10 hours a day without power.

Syed Zahir Salahuddin, a Karachi-based electrical energy expert, said that Pakistan’s electricity demand is increasing at 8-10 per cent each year, and can be met only through a sustainable energy mix including solar power.

“Pakistan should introduce a uniform tariff policy instead of considering it on a case-to-case basis, to encourage competition for private investment in renewable energy,” he said. Without private sector investment, solar energy projects will not take off in the country, he warned.

He called solar energy a viable power solution for off-grid areas of Pakistan as well as grid-connected ones, as it does not require the government to spend large amounts of money to install transmission lines.

About 44pc of households in Pakistan are not connected to the grid. More than 80pc of those are in rural areas, according to the World Bank.

Mr Salahuddin suggested the government map all potential sites for solar power plants in the country and then seek investors, offering government financial support for things like transmission lines and land purchases.

Mr Askari said he hoped differences between the government and investors over the Cholistan desert project could be resolved in order to drive further investment into solar energy in Pakistan.

Published in Dawn September 20th, 2016
 
.
A new rate will likely be negotiated.

However, it does not look good for the Pakistani government. NS will likely come under pressure to stop meddling in these projects, especially from the army.

The opposition will likely use this as a way to reduce NS's position.
 
.
I think the Tarrif can't be reduced company is 100% correct
But also when production level is 80%-90% of Total capacity

Solar is 100% way to go for Villages
 
.
A new rate will likely be negotiated.

However, it does not look good for the Pakistani government. NS will likely come under pressure to stop meddling in these projects, especially from the army.

The opposition will likely use this as a way to reduce NS's position.

I don't blame NEPRA,14.5 cent per unit just doesn't seem right. Army should stay away because they are not the ones paying the bills.
 
.
I don't blame NEPRA,14.5 cent per unit just doesn't seem right. Army should stay away because they are not the ones paying the bills.

Pakistanis would be better off just putting panels on their home roofs.

The average US is 12 cents, the range for solar is 12 to 30 cents.

14.5 cents is about right, but too much for Pakistan.

If Zonergy has been unable to provide the contracted units of electricity, then there should have been an agreed upon compensation in the initial contracts.
 
.
I don't blame NEPRA,14.5 cent per unit just doesn't seem right. Army should stay away because they are not the ones paying the bills.
It's solar power, not coal, so it is likely to be expensive; regardless, the company should have been notified before hand, this was a boneheaded move to unilaterally move ahead with this.

As for the military, there is a lot of things that the military and the government shouldn't do, but reality is different. The military has already indicated that it will not tolerate political bickering hampering CPEC, which is one of the main reasons why there is some sort of consensus on CPEC between between the various political parties of Pakistan.
 
.
But last December, the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) reduced the amount the country pays to buy solar electricity from 14.5 cents to 9.25 cents per kilowatt-hour, citing falling costs for solar panels and other equipment.

Rates are coming down all over the world..so why should we pay more?
 
.
It's solar power, not coal, so it is likely to be expensive; regardless, the company should have been notified before hand, this was a boneheaded move to unilaterally move ahead with this.

As for the military, there is a lot of things that the military and the government shouldn't do, but reality is different. The military has already indicated that it will not tolerate political bickering hampering CPEC, which is one of the main reasons why there is some sort of consensus on CPEC between between the various political parties of Pakistan.

CPEC doesn't mean paying 50% more per unit just to please Chinese company. 9.25 cent per unit is already more then enough. India pays 6 cent per unit for solar power if I'm not wrong.

Rates are coming down all over the world..so why should we pay more?

Pakistan needs to be careful here, don't look at short term basis just to score points in 2018 election. N league is desperate to end load shedding but this doesn't mean paying well over market rates.
 
.
I think they (SS, NS) are hungry for more kickbacks.

CPEC doesn't mean paying 50% more per unit just to please Chinese company. 9.25 cent per unit is already more then enough. India pays 6 cent per unit for solar power if I'm not wrong.
Yes but then why did they negotiate and accepted those rates in the first place?
 
.
Well when you get into an agreement , it is not effected by what is happening around the world
  • Provided company can meet the goals for energy production (80-90% of target)
  • The date when they promised they would deliver

If you anticipate change in future , you write that down before you sign the paper , if company feels they should get more then Pakistan will have to pay unfortunately (if it is not on paper)

The present oil / energy crisis is quite unprecedented it has not happen before so many contracts are now , in hot zone

The aim should be to let them reach 80-90% production , first before any renegotiation is done
May be they can get an incentive of a different project
 
Last edited:
.
CPEC doesn't mean paying 50% more per unit just to please Chinese company. 9.25 cent per unit is already more then enough. India pays 6 cent per unit for solar power if I'm not wrong.
I don't think that's true.

Also, solar is expensive, especially if you're allowing a foreign corporation set up the power plant. If this was a government initiative alone, a price drop would be far more understandable.

As well, this seems like a unilateral move, one that they did not notify the company prior to taking this decision.
 
.
A new rate will likely be negotiated.

However, it does not look good for the Pakistani government. NS will likely come under pressure to stop meddling in these projects, especially from the army.

The opposition will likely use this as a way to reduce NS's position.
So what's new . NS never should have meddled in these projects, even to a layman it should have been obvious the cheapest route was of coal and that also of resources you have i.e. thar coal even if it is high in sulphur and contributes to air pollution. Ns shouldn't have tried to take credit of a failed project as nandipur , he has been blessed with low energy coats worldwide, should've completed Iran Pakistan has pipeline
 
.
So what's new . NS never should have meddled in these projects, even to a layman it should have been obvious the cheapest route was of coal and that also of resources you have i.e. thar coal even if it is high in sulphur and contributes to air pollution. Ns shouldn't have tried to take credit of a failed project as nandipur , he has been blessed with low energy coats worldwide, should've completed Iran Pakistan has pipeline
Not really a criticism, my comment is more of an observation.
 
. .
14.5 cents per kilo watts is beyond crazy. Who the hell negotiated the contract? Why is chinese company asking for ridiculous amount. Chinese solar is one of the cheapest around.

Even if their is bribery included, 14.5 is wayyyyy out of line. Even 9.5 cents is a lot. It needs to be negotiated down.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom