What's new

Singapore Turns Colonial Airstrip Into Hub for Jet Engine Makers

mike2000 is back

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
8,513
Reaction score
19
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Singapore Turns Colonial Airstrip Into Hub for Jet Engine Makers

Andrea Tan @andreatanjourno
February 16, 2016 — 10:00 PM GMT

  • City is home to Rolls-Royce's most modern factory outside U.K.
  • Push comes as Asia set to be world's biggest aircraft market

Asia’s ascent toward the top of the world’s aerospace market is being powered by a former colonial airbase in northern Singapore.

Once known for making mosquito coils and hair wigs, Singapore is now a hub for manufacturing the massive engines propelling Airbus Group SE’s superjumbo A380 and Boeing Co.’s Dreamliner. Those efforts are centered across the water from Malaysia at the Seletar Aerospace Park, a former mangrove swamp cleared for a British landing strip.

The area, about the size of New York’s Central Park, has spurred a $6 billion industry that is growing by at least 10 percent a year, according to government data. Pratt & Whitney is boosting spending on a local fan-blade factory by a third, and Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc is diversifying its S$700 million ($500 million) Seletar complex with repair and research facilities.


“Singapore is a hub,” Danny Di Perna, senior vice president of engineering and operations at Pratt & Whitney, said at this week’s Singapore Airshow, where companies are meeting to plan for the industry’s tilt toward Asia. “These are very critical components we are making here. It’s not just anybody that can make them.”
RR%20Singapore%20Trent%201000.jpg

Britain's Rolls-Royce unveils first Trent 1000 engine made in Singapore

The push comes as surging travel in Asia fuels demand for $2.2 trillion worth of airplanes during the next 20 years, according to estimates by Boeing. Singapore, already a regional powerhouse in aircraft maintenance, is home to Rolls-Royce’s most modern factory outside the U.K. and the only engine-fan facility for Pratt & Whitney outside the U.S.

Engine Backlog
“We don’t have the base for making airplanes so the next-most important thing is the engine and everything else in the plane,” said Song Seng Wun, an economist at CIMB Private Banking in Singapore.

Pratt & Whitney, the engine-making unit of United Technologies Corp., said Monday it planned to spend as much as another $40 million after a $110 million investment on the factory for fan blades and turbine disks. The company has a backlog of more than 7,000 engine orders, and production will ramp up during the next 18 months, Di Perna said.


A skilled, educated workforce and support from the national Economic Development Board prompted the engine maker to choose Singapore, Di Perna said. Singapore already is home to the world’s two biggest manufacturers of oil rigs, and the government has encouraged companies to move up the value chain in sectors such as pharmaceuticals.

“They have a very good strategy to create high-tech, advanced capability in the island,” Di Perna said.



In Pictures: Asia's Biggest Air Show


488x-1.jpg

From plush private jets to the latest military aircrafts



Indonesia Challenge
Singapore’s aerospace industry generated S$8.7 billion and employed 19,800 workers in 2013, according to the latest EDB data. The industry has expanded at an average of 10 percent in the past two decades, according to the economic agency. By comparison, the nation’s gross domestic product has expanded by an annual average of 5.3 percent in the two decades through 2015, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

There have been some recent challenges for Singapore. The maintenance arm of Lion Air, a key customer for Airbus and Boeing in Southeast Asia, is spending $250 million tobuild a maintenance facility at Batam, an Indonesian island just a short ferry ride from Singapore. It will have the capacity to service four Boeing 747s or 12 single-aisle planes.

Rolls-Royce chose to open its customer-service center at the Seletar park because about 20 percent of its large civil-aircraft engines are in use in Asia, the company said.

“The government is extremely focused on a chosen endeavor and is nimble enough to embrace the ripple effect,” the London-based company said in an e-mail. The city-state is rated by the World Bank as the globe’s easiest place to do business.

It also has strong intellectual-property protections, said Alastair Fallon, an analyst with the U.K.-based consultancy International Bureau of Aviation.

“Engines are politically sensitive technology, and Singapore is a better place geographically in Asia for engine makers to base their factory operations other than their home countries,” Fallon said.

Singapore Turns Colonial Airstrip Into Hub for Jet Engine Makers - Bloomberg Business

Singapore sure is a small but very advanced/developed country indeed, Respect to this small city state.:tup:.
 
Last edited:
. .
One of the greatest success stories of modern times. Singapore is a model to follow. Good to see Asia making great strides.
True, it's amazing what they have achieved in such a short period of time(not withstanding their location and status as a former crown British colony). To think they seceded from Malaysia as recently as 1965 and had barely anything after seceding from the racists Malays. However, by 1990(barely 30 or so) the country had become one of the world's most prosperous nations, with a highly developed free market economy, strong international trading links, and the highest per capital gross domestic product in Asia (outside Japan, I think they now have the highest in Asia ahead of even Japan). Truly an inspirational story for all developing countries in Asia and the world.:cheers:
 
. .
True, it's amazing what they have achieved in such a short period of time(not withstanding their location and status as a former crown British colony). To think they seceded from Malaysia as recently as 1965 and had barely anything after seceding from the racists Malays. However, by 1990(barely 30 or so) the country had become one of the world's most prosperous nations, with a highly developed free market economy, strong international trading links, and the highest per capital gross domestic product in Asia (outside Japan, I think they now have the highest in Asia ahead of even Japan). Truly an inspirational story for all developing countries in Asia and the world.:cheers:

Thanks in part to the strong and hard work of the Hakka/ Cantonese People of China, who make up majority of Singapore! Hong Kong and Macao as well as Malaysia bears testament to their contribution to economy and total development.
 
.
LoL, the Singapore success is much to do with their policy program as country not just for individual and an ethnic race. And the support they've got is come from the so called western banking institutes and finance center. And fortunately the Singaporean government is working because of merit, not racist attitude some pdf member clearly shown here.
 
.
Policy program that was due in part to Confucian based meritocracy ; and against affirmative action prone societies. Hakka people in Singapore and Malaysia and Thailand have driven economic growth. It is called Confucian work ethic ; a trait of Chinese, Japanese and Koreans.

Meritocracy is centered in Confucian ideology.

Hence the dichotomy of meritocracy in Singapore from Bumiputra in Malaysia. The latter is a form of entitlement, which propagates laziness, and dependency on federal interventionism.

Bumiputra is in itself a racist policy of preference; Meritocracy is not.
 
.
That's why i LoL you @Nihonjin1051 because it's clearly you are know nothing about the Singaporean and their point of view

The Singapore and Singaporean i know is never and clearly never attributed their success story as confucian model or whatsoever racist PoV you clearly indicated here trying to licks the Chinese Mainland. The nation's core principles are meritocracy, multiculturalism and secularism. It is noted for its effective, pragmatic and incorrupt governance and civil service, which together with its rapid development policies, is widely cited as the "Singapore model". Yes they will uphold their development model as the thing in which had bring their City State into a different stages compared to other countries in this world. If they ever attributed their success story toward Hakka or any group races affiliated efforts they will only inciting social unrest from the rest and will undermine their efforts and taint their image globally.

Well before you sprouting the Hakka things i will gently reminded you, most of the Chinese in Singapore came from the southeastern coast of China in the provinces of Fujian, Guangdong and Hainan. The Hoklo, Teochew, and Cantonese together form more than three-quarters of the Chinese population. The likes of Hakka and Hainanese is forming the rest. And the Chinese descent Singaporean will generally pissed off if you put them in the same basket as the Mainland Chinese, there is a lot of differences between the Singaporean Chinese and mainland Chinese in terms of mindset, culture, and languages. While mainland Chinese are largely Sino-centric in their outlook of the world, Singaporean Chinese are educated in English medium schools (but also are taught the Chinese language) and are exposed to western influences. As such, the local Singaporean Chinese culture is a blend and mix of southern Chinese culture, local Singaporean culture (with various influences from cultures of other ethnicity) and western culture.

There are also some differences in the Singaporean Chinese culture compared to that of China. Some traditional Chinese religious and folks custom are preserved by the Chinese community in Singapore, but are no longer practised or seen in China after the Cultural Revolution.


--------------------------------
 
.
Thanks in part to the strong and hard work of the Hakka/ Cantonese People of China, who make up majority of Singapore! Hong Kong and Macao as well as Malaysia bears testament to their contribution to economy and total development.

Excuse me? Their ancestors may be from China, but don't forget about the Malays, Indians and Eurasians that assisted in the development of Singapore as well. For your information, neither the Chinese in Singapore would be pleased to associate themselves with China as well. We are Singaporeans first, then Chinese, Malay, Indian etc.
 
. .
What I learn in international management, culture is one of important variable shaping behavior of people in a nation. Of course success of a nation is not merely on culture variable, there are other thing like political, location, corruption level, etc.

China - Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam share the same cultur dimension:
China - Geert Hofstede
Singapore - Geert Hofstede
Vietnam - Geert Hofstede
Taiwan - Geert Hofstede

1. low uncertainty avoidance
2. long term orientation

Also hard working which is not mentioned by hofstede.

I believe those are the factor that support their success in economy.
That of low uncertainty avoidance also belong to US, British and some other european culture.
Thats why gambling has potential to flourish in US, Hongkong, China, Malaysia, Taiwan, Singapore (if government doesnt regulate tightly).

bit different with Japan:
Japan - Geert Hofstede

1. high uncertainty avoidance (Japanese prefer orderlines, and avoid risk)

What make Japan success in Economy is: spirit (Bushido), discipline, and hardworking.

But I am wondering how confusion contribute to the advancement.

Policy program that was due in part to Confucian based meritocracy ; and against affirmative action prone societies. Hakka people in Singapore and Malaysia and Thailand have driven economic growth. It is called Confucian work ethic ; a trait of Chinese, Japanese and Koreans.

Meritocracy is centered in Confucian ideology.

Hence the dichotomy of meritocracy in Singapore from Bumiputra in Malaysia. The latter is a form of entitlement, which propagates laziness, and dependency on federal interventionism.

Bumiputra is in itself a racist policy of preference; Meritocracy is not.


I agree with you on this point.

I believe Meritocracy is one of the variables besides "hard working", "long term orientation", and "low uncertainty avoidance" (referring to Geert Hofstede) that support advancement.

But assuming that people vested to govern do corruption, then the nation could be doomed as well.

Bell believes that what makes the China model unique is its blend of meritocracy at the central level of government and democracy at the local level.
Our democracy can learn from China's meritocracy
 
.
The Singapore and Singaporean i know is never and clearly never attributed their success story as confucian model or whatsoever racist PoV you clearly indicated here trying to licks the Chinese Mainland. The nation's core principles are meritocracy, multiculturalism and secularism. It is noted for its effective, pragmatic and incorrupt governance and civil service, which together with its rapid development policies, is widely cited as the "Singapore model". Yes they will uphold their development model as the thing in which had bring their City State into a different stages compared to other countries in this world. If they ever attributed their success story toward Hakka or any group races affiliated efforts they will only inciting social unrest from the rest and will undermine their efforts and taint their image globally.

I agree with you on this one. It has more to do with meritocracy,effective,pragmatic and incorrect governance, civil service, it's central/important location which makes her a shipping hub, her open/free market economy. Confucian/racial/cultural factors are all secondary. In fact even China was at one point among the top 6 most backward poorest country in Asia before they finally abandoned their outdated soviet based commie model and open up their country,the rest is history. So it's not so much about culture\Confucian society or whatever, but most of all governance, system, and leaders ability to effectively rule their country.:)

Excuse me? Their ancestors may be from China, but don't forget about the Malays, Indians and Eurasians that assisted in the development of Singapore as well. For your information, neither the Chinese in Singapore would be pleased to associate themselves with China as well. We are Singaporeans first, then Chinese, Malay, Indian etc.
Agree
 
.
And the support they've got is come from the so called western banking institutes and finance center..
True, You are right that our banking and financial institutions also played a big part in their success. However, it's also because Singaporean leaders had already laid down a open/solid foundation which attracted several western institutions to invest in the country. Without their leaders foresight and will to make their country prosperous, no western company/country would have ever choose to invest so much in Singapore.
Additionally, their single-minded/smart focus on one of their most important advantage in the 1960s (and the reason why the British Empire claimed it too) i.e their deep waters, and hence a trading port role..

On Location again, Singapore also tried its best to build a world-class airport as soon as possible. It wanted to be a "sanctuary" for the many Western business executives that plied the air routes of Asia. This sounds simple but one has to understand how unsafe and undeveloped many other regional Asian countries (and their airports) were in the 1960-1970s. The Singapore regime understood that FIRST IMPRESSION COUNTS.:agree: Singapore, if it was to attract foreign investment effectively, needed an awesome visual image, upon touchdown.:woot::angel: Hence the incredible focus on making sure the airport had a long runway to accommodate big planes, everywhere was spotlessly clean and even details all the way to making sure the highways connecting the airport to the hotels was lined with lush greenery to make sure its foreign guests had a great first impression. Singapore's airport is still number 1 today.:enjoy:

Talent played a big part too. Lee Kuan Yew alias LKY (despot some might say. lol ) was an earlier version of Steve Jobs, with a keen eye for intellectual excellence and zero patience for mediocrity. A fresh lawyer out of Cambridge universiy in Brirain, i red that he basically had this amazing Dutch adviser called Winsemius to lean on for experience , he opened many doors in Europe, particularly this story where Britain asked Singapore to try its hand at financial services, as its time-zone was great as an Asian financial clearinghouse between the US West Coast and Europe. Some have credited this for Singapore's rise as a major financial service hub in Asia today as our gorgeous @madokafc just mentioned.:P

In fact, with location and talent guarding its only core value, Singapore is almost like a startup. lol A smart team builds additional features that complements the core value prop, such as an educated population, modern infrastructure, low or zero taxes for "pioneer" industries and a global "sales" team to convince companies from rich developed nations to set up Asia-Pac operations in Singapore.
As the directors of British and U.S engine makers put it from the article above:
“The government is extremely focused on a chosen endeavor and is nimble enough to embrace the ripple effect,” the London-based company said in an e-mail. The city-state is rated by the World Bank as the globe’s easiest place to do business.

It also has strong intellectual-property protections, said Alastair Fallon, an analyst with the U.K.-based consultancy International Bureau of Aviation.

“Engines are politically sensitive technology, and Singapore is a better place geographically in Asia for engine makers to base their factory operations other than their home countries,” Fallon said.
A skilled, educated workforce and support from the national Economic Development Board prompted the engine maker to choose Singapore, Di Perna said. Singapore already is home to the world’s two biggest manufacturers of oil rigs, and the government has encouraged companies to move up the value chain in sectors such as pharmaceuticals.

“They have a very good strategy to create high-tech, advanced capability in the island,” Di Perna said.

Inspiring indeed.:cheers:
 
.
What I learn in international management, culture is one of important variable shaping behavior of people in a nation. Of course success of a nation is not merely on culture variable, there are other thing like political, location, corruption level, etc.

China - Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam share the same cultur dimension:
China - Geert Hofstede
Singapore - Geert Hofstede
Vietnam - Geert Hofstede
Taiwan - Geert Hofstede

1. low uncertainty avoidance
2. long term orientation

Also hard working which is not mentioned by hofstede.

I believe those are the factor that support their success in economy.
That of low uncertainty avoidance also belong to US, British and some other european culture.
Thats why gambling has potential to flourish in US, Hongkong, China, Malaysia, Taiwan, Singapore (if government doesnt regulate tightly).

bit different with Japan:
Japan - Geert Hofstede

1. high uncertainty avoidance (Japanese prefer orderlines, and avoid risk)

What make Japan success in Economy is: spirit (Bushido), discipline, and hardworking.

But I am wondering how confusion contribute to the advancement.




I agree with you on this point.

I believe Meritocracy is one of the variables besides "hard working", "long term orientation", and "low uncertainty avoidance" (referring to Geert Hofstede) that support advancement.

But assuming that people vested to govern do corruption, then the nation could be doomed as well.

Bell believes that what makes the China model unique is its blend of meritocracy at the central level of government and democracy at the local level.
Our democracy can learn from China's meritocracy

In long ancient history, for example, every a Confucian elite have chance to marry emperor's daughter. They are called Dragon's son in law, who are most front rank scholar through national exam. We are very proud of this experience in history. Those elites' family background could be farmer, trader, craftsman, teacher, official, every social class.
Since Sui (581-618)and Tang dynasty (618-907), China started to select officials through the imperial examination (The Civil Service Examination System). The content of examination are mainly Confucianism classics.
Those Confucian elite can enter into imperial' top political level, such as central govt's premier minister, ministers and province governors, county governor.
Of course, Qing dynasty (1636-1912) damaged this system a little because of Manchurian military junta ( Eight Flag System), the main damage is mainly Han majority elites hard to enter into top political rank, until Opium War, the dynasty met crisis, Han elites again entered into top national political rank.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom