he challenged the writ of state in damn Capital & they killed people in front of whole damn world yet he was released on bail, I just can't understand WHY that pseudo bi was released, what ever the theory is whether it was Zardari behind it or someone else SC must not have granted a idiot like him, bail
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/18/world/asia/18pstan.html?_r=1&ref=maulana_abdul_aziz
this para is from the same article link you provided
Cyril Almeida, an editor at Dawn, the country’s most prestigious daily newspaper, said in an interview that the release of Mr. Aziz was a result of the country’s weak judicial system. “Pakistan has a broken judicial system,” he said. “Aziz was booked in over two dozen cases, but the cases were pursued in such a haphazard, unprofessional manner that any court would eventually have to release him anyway.”
I said it in another thread, too. A criminal's indictment mostly relies on the investigation and proof gather by the police and how it's presented in a court of law by the prosecutor attorneys. You present a solid case with conclusive evidence, how is a judge going to release the culprit. You know much trouble he will get into, no one wants to see their hard work going down the drain. I'm very certain that if the evidence against these terrorist was strong and a judge had released them based on whatever sympathy or fear they feel for them or from them, lawyers procecuting would be out on the street, in front of media telling tales what unfairness that been victims of.