Should the U.S just nuke North Korea?

[Styx]

incorrect.

supposedly socialist nehru's india ( establishment/military ) took part in the korea war ( 1950-53 ) on the nato side ( under "uno" flag ), and against ussr and prc on the other side.

under UN flag means under UN flag

1 medical unit

for the sake of argument, though, let's assume what you're implying is true.. that India fought in the Korean war on the US's side.. how does that explain our love affair with the soviets all through the cold war, and continuing strategic partnership with Russia ?

the 2003 iraq invasion

the US was asking the whole world, we didn't send any troops.

the indian government supporting the illegal nato invasions of libya and syria in 2011.

how ? we abstained from voting on the no fly zone along with Russia, China, Germany and Brazil.

Putin has since rued this fact many times, Russia and China should have vetoed it.

spilt milk though, can't do anything about it.

we did condemn the heavy handedness of the Syrian regime in the early days of the protests, which was legit.

lot more.

like ?

 

[TruthSeeker]

No. The USA should just nuke Iran. They are more deserving. Of course, doing that might give the USA a bad reputation here at the PDF. So, probably we should just mind our own business ......

 

[Khan_patriot]

without pyongyang they will give themselves up.

dear leader will have been atomized along with all his stooges and lackeys.
obviously you just don't nuke and do nothing. you'll have to send in special forces to secure their nuclear and chemical stockpiles, and have humanity aid ready for the liberated populace.


china would have to do it's share part.

''liberated populace''....