What's new

Shimon Peres: Israel and Iran could negotiate

Surenas

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
-6
Speaking exclusively to The Daily Telegraph, Mr Peres said Israel has no natural antipathy towards Iran and even praised Cyrus the Great, an ancient Persian monarch, for freeing the Jews from exile in Babylon.

But the Nobel laureate who, at age 89, is the world's oldest head of state said Iran's present Islamic-rulers were bent on building an atom bomb and destroying the Jewish State.

He expressed bewilderment over their aims and goals, saying: "You know what, I don't understand what the hell do they want."

Asked if Iran and Israel could ever have direct negotiations with each other, he replied: "Why not? The Iranians are not our enemies. We have nothing against Iran. The great king of Iran was the first Zionist in the world. King Cyrus called for the Jewish people in Iran to go and settle in Israel and build a second [temple] "That was 3,000 years ago. So I don't have any hatred to the Iranians."

Mr Peres was speaking before the surprise election as Iran's new president of Hassan Rowhani – a comparatively moderate cleric who has vowed to lower tensions with the outside world.

Mr Rowhani's landslide win has bred hope in Western capitals of a diplomatic thaw after relations were cast into deep freeze during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who raised antagonisms by repeatedly forecasting Israel's demise and denying the Holocaust.

Shimon Peres: Israel and Iran could negotiate
 
Only if our arab mullahs weren't so ******* thick and dumb

sigh...

Israel, the only civilized nation in the region, and our only natural ally, somehow became our enemy b/c of the stupid arab revolution of 1978.

Time fixes everything, it always has.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lol: I cannot believe he called Cyrus a zionist. :lol:

Anyway it would be well if Iran and Israel would work their sht out but its a non start because Khameini would never directly negotiate and even if he did, the zionist's arrogance would demand full stoppage of any and all nuclear activity. You can already see signs of less than 20% enrichment not being enough.
 
Battle for Cyrus. Ahmadinejad threw a keffiyeh around his neck, while Peres' calls him a Zionist. :lol:

I can imagine Iranian government will have something to say about them calling Cyrus a zionist but nothing about the overture towards direct talks. :P
 
:lol: I cannot believe he called Cyrus a zionist. :lol:

Anyway it would be well if Iran and Israel would work their sht out but its a non start because Khameini would never directly negotiate and even if he did, the zionist's arrogance would demand full stoppage of any and all nuclear activity. You can already see signs of less than 20% enrichment not being enough.

Once Iran and Israel kiss and make up, the Israelis will hand nukes to iran.

Iran and Israel share a long and friendly history. Israelis are actually quite open minded about having peace with Iran. It's our arab mullahs that are the problem. Yeah, they obviously don't want Iran to get nukes with the mullahs in power and they want them stopped at any cost, but at the same time they will always talk about the past history between the two nations and how we must work together again etc...

Today, it's Iran that's the problem, not the Israelis. We started this conflict, we can end. By we I mean our arab leaders and their followers (i.e. Soheil).
 
Once Iran and Israel kiss and make up, the Israelis will hand nukes to iran.

Iran and Israel share a long and friendly history. Israelis are actually quite open minded about having peace with Iran. It's our arab mullahs that are the problem. Yeah, they obviously don't want Iran to get nukes with the mullahs in power and they want them stopped at any cost, but at the same time they will always talk about the past history between the two nations and how we must work together again etc...

Today, it's Iran that's the problem, not the Israelis. We started this conflict, we can end. By we I mean our arab leaders and their followers (i.e. Soheil).

I do not believe that is the case. First they wanted negotiations of enrichment less than 20% but now reports came out that Iran may consider it and they responded that enrichment must be fully stopped.

They obviously don't want peace they want to overthrow your government. I know you do not like your regime but seriously would you rather it be overthrown from the inside by your own people or by American bombers because I can tell you that not many people here in the states are looking forward to the war but if that Zionist lobby pushes hard enough you never know.

Also I don't see how you started any conflict, yeah you supported the Palestinians but your history is full of examples where you came to the aid of the weak. Heck they mentioned Cyrus, do you think it was because he was a zionist that he saved the Jews? :lol: No sir it is because they were oppressed and ironically today they are oppressors.
 
Column from Tehran: Israel and Iran must settle differences through dialogue

TEHRAN - I am a writer. Writers in Iran generally oppose our government’s policies. Writers in Iran are usually identified as “intellectuals” who seek liberty and freedom of thought and expression.

It is natural that when I, as an Iranian, am asked to write about another country, I would voice a hope for friendship, peace and an improvement in relations. It is natural that when asked to assess the significance of the election of Hasan Rowhani as president and its impact on Iran’s relations with another country - whatever it may be - I will obviously first of all hope for peace and good relations. And yet two issues should be considered: First of all, who is Rowhani, and secondly, what are the countries in question?

More than anything, people’s minds in Iran and elsewhere should be put to rest (or perhaps quite the opposite, disturbed): Rowhani is not meant to be an opposition leader. He is not even supposed to lead the reformists. Rowhani is not the savior. Rowhani is simply trying to calm things down. Thus, no one should expect that upon Rowhani assuming office Iran will become a sister state to Israel and to the United States. After all, we are dealing with deeply-rooted political thinking, whether correct or not, that has taken hold in the minds of Iranian politicians a long time ago.

I don’t know much about Israel, other than a few nice music albums, apples from Israel and Palestinian children.

I’m a writer, but I must confess that I don’t know many historic details. In Iran, this is considered a great weakness for a writer. Then again, my life is made easier by this fact: I don’t have to consider divine promises, Jerusalem and Palestine. I’m not even concerned with street battles between Israeli soldiers and stone-wielding youth. What my eyes do see are children who are continuously being killed.

Therefore, let me write now not as a writer, but as an observer, as a person who once in a while turns on his TV and once in a while watches the news. I have doubts regarding Israel’s just cause, the same doubt that is expressed more extremely by many Iranian politicians. I don’t want to upset anyone’s hopes, but even if there are changes in the government and its policies here, I have great doubts whether compromising their natural rights in exchange for an improvement in relations with Israel will appeal to many Iranians. Undoubtedly such an improvement would alleviate many of the problems caused by sanctions on Iran, but I believe that the chances for establishing relations with the United States are much better than with Israel.

A new wave of hope has been launched in Iran. Rowhani is not the ideal president for us. When I say us, I refer to the artists, writers, intellectuals and students, as well as the educated and rational sectors of society. But he is a man who talks of hope and is trying to patch up the rifts between different sectors. I don’t know if and to what extent he will succeed, but our hopes are rising daily.

It's important to note that if there is a dispute between Iran and Israel, the best solution would be to settle it through dialogue, as was proposed by [former] President [Mohammed] Khatami 12 years ago, but which was rejected out of hand by the enlightened world. I believe that threats of boycott and warmongering are inhumane.

As a young Iranian writer, I am eager to establish relations between Iran and Israel. I am eager for talk. I am eager for peace. I am eager to avoid war. If we are destined not to be friends, it’s alright if we’re not enemies. I’m not concerned with what should or shouldn’t be done. That’s for politicians to decide. As a poet and a writer I would prefer to see all borders dissolved, but I am silenced by politicians who tell me this is impossible. Speaking is forbidden! So I have no choice but to remain silent and to cling to hope, as we have had to for years and continue to do.

Maybe we can imagine a day when issues of land and borders do not play into the hands of politicians. I believe that collaboration between artists in both countries is essential for attaining that vision. After all, if politicians were supposed to solve the world’s problems they have had all of history to do so.

Maybe it’s time to slowly change the system so that humanity can imagine better days. Maybe these days will arrive during Rowhani’s tenure. Maybe years later. We have no choice but to give hope a virtual color, because otherwise it is black.

Nima Dinti is the alias of a 27-year-old Iranian writer playwright who resides in Tehran.

Column from Tehran: Israel and Iran must settle differences through dialogue - Features - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
 
Once Iran and Israel kiss and make up, the Israelis will hand nukes to iran.

Iran and Israel share a long and friendly history. Israelis are actually quite open minded about having peace with Iran. It's our arab mullahs that are the problem. Yeah, they obviously don't want Iran to get nukes with the mullahs in power and they want them stopped at any cost, but at the same time they will always talk about the past history between the two nations and how we must work together again etc...

Today, it's Iran that's the problem, not the Israelis. We started this conflict, we can end. By we I mean our arab leaders and their followers (i.e. Soheil).

I don't think it's that simple.

Israel would not allow any neighboring country to get nuclear weapons, they even assassinated the Turkish Scientist. Everyone knows Turks and Israeli have good relationship. Although there was a rocky period recently, they've made up for the most part. They still wouldn't allow them to get nukes, what makes you think they will be ok with Iran having them?
 
Mr. Peres says he does not know what the Iranians want - well, to me, it makes sense to talk, and he makes an excellent point, there is no natural or historic antipathy between Iran and Israel -- Ok, so nothing concrete comes out of the talks, but at least a path, an opening, will have been created to least discuss issues.
 
Mr. Peres says he does not know what the Iranians want - well, to me, it makes sense to talk, and he makes an excellent point, there is no natural or historic antipathy between Iran and Israel -- Ok, so nothing concrete comes out of the talks, but at least a path, an opening, will have been created to least discuss issues.

He is one of the most sensible people out of Israel, especially when compared to Barak, Sharon or Nethenyahu.
 
Better for Iran to settle with the Israelis. All what we'd like to see is terrorism-free state of Iran.

I don't think it's that simple.

Israel would not allow any neighboring country to get nuclear weapons, they even assassinated the Turkish Scientist. Everyone knows Turks and Israeli have good relationship. Although there was a rocky period recently, they've made up for the most part. They still wouldn't allow them to get nukes, what makes you think they will be ok with Iran having them?

The Turks have the nuke know-how by now form their NATO experience.

Once Iran and Israel kiss and make up, the Israelis will hand nukes to iran.

Iran and Israel share a long and friendly history. Israelis are actually quite open minded about having peace with Iran. It's our arab mullahs that are the problem. Yeah, they obviously don't want Iran to get nukes with the mullahs in power and they want them stopped at any cost, but at the same time they will always talk about the past history between the two nations and how we must work together again etc...

Today, it's Iran that's the problem, not the Israelis. We started this conflict, we can end. By we I mean our arab leaders and their followers (i.e. Soheil).

The better way to deal with this is very simple. Leave the Arab nations alone and you'll be left alone. It's good for three parties involve.
 
One thing is obvious, the main issue btw us and the USA is israel and its existence ... the rest of the problems like our nuclear and missile program have been merely escalated by virtue of this matter, what's more is even we'd had a normal relation with israel, the USA would have kept israel as superior power in region ... that's why whatever we attempt to step into it they try to halt us ... now if you are ready to accept their supremacy by all means go and indulge yourself .
 
Back
Top Bottom