Shenyang J-15 aircraft carrier-based aircraft

[LKJ86]

Via http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2022-05/28/content_10158533.htm

 

[LKJ86]

 

[LKJ86]

Via @航空工业 from Weibo

 

[Deino]

View attachment 854458
Via @航空工业 from Weibo

Bus isn't this an old image posted already last year?

 

[LKJ86]

Bus isn't this an old image posted already last year?

Just to celebrate the launch of Type 003.

 

[Deino]

Just to celebrate the launch of Type 003.

Indeed ... but I cannot wait to see the first clear image of a J-15B!

 

[johncliu88]

Those are great pictures. I also want to see clear pictures of J-15T since 003 is officially launched.

 

[kungfugymnast]

Those are great pictures. I also want to see clear pictures of J-15T since 003 is officially launched.

Everyone is waiting for that. If the EMALS is efficient able to propel heavy fully loaded on maximum fuel & payload J-15B at over 72,000lb into the air easily, expect J-15B aerodynamic to be reduced for better low speed maneuverability and stability making carrier approach speed ideal and safest like F/A-18E & Rafale M. The earlier J-15A is made most aerodynamic & fastest (Mach 2.4) amongst Flankers family because it needed fast acceleration to take off safely from ski ramp of Liaoning carrier in order to carry more fuel and armaments but still can't carry full tank of fuel & maximum payload.

While waiting, let's guess the new top speed of J-15B:
Mach 2.0
Mach 1.9
Mach 1.8

Based on US Navy finding, aircraft capable of flying faster than Mach 2 makes carrier landing approach speed higher and at higher risk. F-14 has swing-wing to reduce aerodynamic but the accident rate is still higher than F/A-18. Should we start a poll on J-15B/D/T top speed?

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Everyone is waiting for that. If the EMALS is efficient able to propel heavy fully loaded on maximum fuel & payload J-15B at over 72,000lb into the air easily, expect J-15B aerodynamic to be reduced for better low speed maneuverability and stability making carrier approach speed ideal and safest like F/A-18E & Rafale M. The earlier J-15A is made most aerodynamic & fastest (Mach 2.4) amongst Flankers family because it needed fast acceleration to take off safely from ski ramp of Liaoning carrier in order to carry more fuel and armaments but still can't carry full tank of fuel & maximum payload.

While waiting, let's guess the new top speed of J-15B:
Mach 2.0
Mach 1.9
Mach 1.8

Based on US Navy finding, aircraft capable of flying faster than Mach 2 makes carrier landing approach speed higher and at higher risk. F-14 has swing-wing to reduce aerodynamic but the accident rate is still higher than F/A-18. Should we start a poll on J-15B/D/T top speed?

MAX PAYLOADS/ MAX SPEED IS JUST A MARKETING STUNT AND NOTHING ELSE

 

[kungfugymnast]

MAX PAYLOADS/ MAX SPEED IS JUST A MARKETING STUNT AND NOTHING ELSE

Tell this to USAF, USN, IAF pilots that have been to war for real, they'll laugh at you. An F-16C for example has 6900lb internal fuel tank and able to carry 13,500lb payload with G-limit reduced to 6G when fully loaded. When really necessary & being overwhelmed, the F-16C could take off on full load destroying as many air and ground targets as possible. F/A-18C, F-15E could do the same too. That's why many countries air force would want to participate in military exercises with US because they get to learn much from US proven combat experience.

With Type 003 EMALS, if they really good, the J-15B could fill full tank 18,000-20,000lb and carry up to 17,600lb armament payload without issue unike the J-15A that needs to sacrifice fuel for armament or armament for fuel due to limit on 60,000lb safe takeoff weight. If you filled the J-15A with only 10,000lb fuel can't go far and would get bingo fuel real soon (less loiter time) compared to you filling 10,000lb fuel in more fuel efficient F/A-18C which is almost its maximum internal fuel 11,000lb.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Tell this to USAF, USN, IAF pilots that have been to war for real, they'll laugh at you. An F-16C for example has 6900lb internal fuel tank and able to carry 13,500lb payload with G-limit reduced to 6G when fully loaded. When really necessary & being overwhelmed, the F-16C could take off on full load destroying as many air and ground targets as possible. F/A-18C, F-15E could do the same too. That's why many countries air force would want to participate in military exercises with US because they get to learn much from US proven combat experience.

With Type 003 EMALS, if they really good, the J-15B could fill full tank 18,000-20,000lb and carry up to 17,600lb armament payload without issue unike the J-15A that needs to sacrifice fuel for armament or armament for fuel due to limit on 60,000lb safe takeoff weight. If you filled the J-15A with only 10,000lb fuel can't go far and would get bingo fuel real soon (less loiter time) compared to you filling 10,000lb fuel in more fuel efficient F/A-18C which is almost its maximum internal fuel 11,000lb.

Ok Mr fake expert, with full PAYLOADS and full FUEL a fighter jets can only crawl on runways

 

[kungfugymnast]

Ok Mr fake expert, with full PAYLOADS and full FUEL a fighter jets can only crawl on runways

That's the maximum limit for an aircraft to take off. An aircraft will only crawl on runway if you loaded heavier than the specified maximum take off weight for example max take off weight for J-15B at 72,000lb, you loaded it to 76,000lb then it might crawl on runway unable to go airborne.

 

[Deino]

Everyone is waiting for that. If the EMALS is efficient able to propel heavy fully loaded on maximum fuel & payload J-15B at over 72,000lb into the air easily, expect J-15B aerodynamic to be reduced for better low speed maneuverability and stability making carrier approach speed ideal and safest like F/A-18E & Rafale M. The earlier J-15A is made most aerodynamic & fastest (Mach 2.4) amongst Flankers family because it needed fast acceleration to take off safely from ski ramp of Liaoning carrier in order to carry more fuel and armaments but still can't carry full tank of fuel & maximum payload.

While waiting, let's guess the new top speed of J-15B:
Mach 2.0
Mach 1.9
Mach 1.8

Based on US Navy finding, aircraft capable of flying faster than Mach 2 makes carrier landing approach speed higher and at higher risk. F-14 has swing-wing to reduce aerodynamic but the accident rate is still higher than F/A-18. Should we start a poll on J-15B/D/T top speed?

Can you stop spreading lies again!?? You lied in the J-15 thread, you lie again even facing the proof of your lies and now you lie again … take this as a warning. Any next such lie will be rated as repeated trolling! As such: SHUT UP!

 

[White and Green with M/S]

That's the maximum limit for an aircraft to take off. An aircraft will only crawl on runway if you loaded heavier than the specified maximum take off weight for example max take off weight for J-15B at 72,000lb, you loaded it to 76,000lb then it might crawl on runway unable to go airborne.

Ok Mr fake expert no in the world can fly with full PAYLOADS and with full FUEL because thrust to weight ratio and lift to drag ratio are too low to airborne

Can you stop spreading lies again!?? You lied in the J-15 thread, you lie again even facing the proof of your lies and now you lie again … take this as a warning. Any next such lie will be rated as repeated trolling! As such: SHUT UP!

Deino just ban him he called himself as a expert

 

[LKJ86]

Via @Oneninety from Weibo