Settling border disputes critical: NSA

[Hindustani78]

Updated: May 22, 2015 17:53 IST
India-China ties
Need a larger plan for tackling border issues with China, says NSA - The Hindu

National Security Adviser, Ajit Doval delivering the lecture on the occasion of birth anniversary of K F Rustamji in New Delhi on Friday. Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

"While India’s relations with China are looking up, there was a need to remain at a "very very high alert", says National Security Adviser
The settlement of the border issue is “critical” for India-China ties, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval said on Friday, as he called for a “larger plan” for “tackling” that country to resolve all ticklish matters.

Mr. Doval also said that while India’s relations with China “are looking up” there was a need to remain at a “very very high alert”.

Speaking at the annual K F Rustamji lecture, Mr. Doval , who leads the Indian side at the talks of Special Representatives with China, also dwelt on China’s emergence as world’s economic power and its relations with Pakistan.

The event is organised by the BSF in memory of Rustamji, the founder Director General of of the force who retired in late 1960’s but was reemployed as first Special Secretary in Ministry of Home Affairs. He is the only police officer who has been awarded with Padma Vibushan, country’s second highest civilian award.

Mr. Doval, a former Intelligence Bureau Chief, said “...we might have to see China border in a different way once the boundary is settled...

“We have got a very long border we have got 3,488-km long border, a very difficult and mountainous terrain snow-clad...now for the bilateral relations with China, border is the critical and vital issue,” he said speaking on the topic ‘Challenges of Securing India’s Borders; Strategising the Response’.

He said all the advancement made in the “relationship” with China gets centred around and becomes important on settlement of the border.

“We are particularly concerned about the Eastern sector where the claims have been made on Tawang (in Arunachal Pradesh) which is totally in contravention of accepted principles,” Mr. Doval said and expressed surprise that while McMahon line was agreed till Burma by China, the same was not accepted thereafter.

The line is named after Sir Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of the British-run Government of India and the chief negotiator of settling disputes with China in 1914.

“The fact is there is settled population in these areas particularly in Tawang and other areas which have been participating in the national mainstream all through.

“So, these are the ticklish issues. But these ticklish issues have to be talked about, deliberated and worked out, he said, adding there was a need for working out a “larger plan for tackling China“.

The comments by Mr. Doval came days after Prime Minister Narendra Modu during his visit to China asked Beijing to “reconsider its approach on some issues that hold us back”, an apparent reference to the long-pending boundary issue.

 

[OrionHunter]

Mr. Doval said and expressed surprise that while McMahon line was agreed till Burma by China, the same was not accepted thereafter.

That's because the Chinese claim that the agreement was signed by Tibet which was not a sovereign nation and therefore is illegal!

For China it's a zero sum game. Arunachal they claim is part of South Tibet which is an autonomous region of China. However, the Tibetan Govt in Exile claims that Tibet was an independent state until the PRC invaded Tibet in 1949/50. The McMahon line was demarcated in 1914 by the British.

China is famous for twisting facts to suit its doctrine of hegemony - land grab (and sea grab) by devious means! So it won't be easy to ask them to lay off Arunachal.