UnitedPak
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,242
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Sir, the crux of entire argument is India is not willing to conduct the UN vote. We wanted that in Nehru's time now we don't. No-one cane force us and the UN resolution is not binding. Taking a pragmatic view, we are in possession of larger part of land and any solution which possibly can have a negative impact of the position is unacceptable to us. We do not want to raise the issue - Pakistan does, so it will take this initiative (dropping plebiscite as an option) to even bring the issue to negotiation table.
If Pakistan wants a resolution of this issue, certain concessions will be required.
You proved a very good point by disregarding Kashmiri wishes altogether and stating the matter as it is. India simply wants to hold the land.
And as a matter of fact Pakistan holds the strategic parts which are linked to Afghanistan and Central Asia.
Pakistans stake in this conflict is the Kashmiri people. The UN vote is a Kashmiri right. The same right every other region of the British Indian Empire was granted. Your opinion that India no longer wants a vote is irrelevant, hypocritical, selfish, very undemocratic and certainly wont help India in the UNSC.