What's new

See things through Modi's eyes...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
1,446
Reaction score
-6
Country
United States
Location
United States
Modi-ji has toured China half a dozen times before becoming the Prime Minister. He has frequently expressed admiration for China's rapid development, but it's difficult for ordinary people like myself to picture China's development.

With the help of this incredible website, you too can see for yourself what Modi-ji had witnessed on his many trips to China!

Enjoy!

http://v3.720yun.com/activity/tour/map
 
Last edited:
Impressive virtual tour, but cheap attempt to leach off on Modi's popularity.
 
With Modi-ji in charge, India has quickly recovered from 60 years of Kangress misrule. India has already surpassed China in GDP growth. The future is bright!

Don't blame democracy for bad governance

Don't blame democracy for bad governance
This is a week when I feel especially hopeless about India's future. A week in China has caused this gloomy mood. I have just returned from the World Economic Forum's 'Summer Davos' in the city of Tianjin. I had not heard of Tianjin till two weeks ago and, because I was told that it was near Beijing, expected an obscure dormitory town. So when I found myself in a magnificent, modern city of shiny skyscrapers, spectacular bridges and fine boulevards, I was stunned. Even more so when I heard that the city has been built in the past decade and then I found myself reduced to speechless wonder when I heard that Tianjin's amazing, futuristic Convention Centre took just nine months to build. There were Indian officials and businessmen at the meeting whose mouths fell open when they heard.

We chattered amongst ourselves in Hindi about why such a Convention Centre would take ten years to build in India and agreed that it could be because democratic processes take longer than totalitarian ones. Then we went to Tianjin railway station to take the high speed train to Beijing and we stopped making excuses for the Motherland. Tianjin railway station looks like Delhi's new international airport and the train that covered the 130 kilometres to Beijing in thirty minutes is faster and more modern than any I have ever been on. When we got to Beijing, the Indians I was with, were as angry as I was at how far India had been left behind by a country that till the seventies was at least twenty years behind us.

There are those who blame democracy for this and they are wrong. If there is one thing that makes us better than China it is democracy, but to come back to India and find our biggest political leaders, and the whole of our media, absorbed by ancient political problems only added to my gloomy mood. What is the point in discussing Kashmir if all we can come up with is the idea of sending yet another all-party delegation to the Valley? What for? We have been doing this for decades. And, what is the point in all this sudden new excitement over Ayodhya when we know that the issue does not fall in the realm of reasoned debate or judicial solutions. What difference can next week's court judgment make to a problem that is caused by religious hysteria and not historical facts?

Why are we discussing temples and mosques at all when we know that the biggest political problem in India is governance? If China has overtaken us in infrastructure, in urban development, education, sanitation and healthcare, it is because China has understood that the key to delivering these things is governance. It is not the fault of democracy that we have bad governance, but the fault of our political leaders. Of the present lot, only the Prime Minister understands that India cannot hope to become a fully developed country in this century unless we begin a massive process of administrative reforms, but he does nothing about it.

Our ruling family appears to have no interest in governance at all and prefers to fritter away their years in power by taking us back towards an economic model that caused us to get left behind in the first place. In 1978, when Deng Xiaoping realised that Mao's Marxist economic model had served mostly to keep China poor and starving, he made dramatic changes that we should have paid attention to. If we had, we might have kept pace with China. We did not and so we wasted another two decades investing in a totalitarian economic model that gave enormous power to the public sector and killed private enterprise. Only when we changed course in the nineties did things improve. Today we can be proud of a middle class of more than 200 million people and Indian companies that are recognised as world class. But, there is a huge section of Indian public opinion, led by the ex-novelist, that hates what has happened. In yet another one of her lengthy diatribes last week, she praised Sonia and Rahul Gandhi for being on the right track. If I were them, I would be more worried about this endorsement than anything else. There is a growing impression in the business community and among those who understand economics better than the ex-novelist does, that our ruling family is moving us back towards socialism Indian 'ishtyle'.

Meanwhile, the country from which our Lefties, Liberals and Maoists get inspiration, has moved with spectacular success towards a market economy. When I twittered about this, someone twittered back that perhaps we should lease India to the Chinese for the next 200 years. It might come to that if we do not buck up.


 
With Modi-ji in charge, India has quickly recovered from 60 years of Kangress misrule. India has already surpassed China in GDP growth. The future is bright!

Don't blame democracy for bad governance

Don't blame democracy for bad governance
This is a week when I feel especially hopeless about India's future. A week in China has caused this gloomy mood. I have just returned from the World Economic Forum's 'Summer Davos' in the city of Tianjin. I had not heard of Tianjin till two weeks ago and, because I was told that it was near Beijing, expected an obscure dormitory town. So when I found myself in a magnificent, modern city of shiny skyscrapers, spectacular bridges and fine boulevards, I was stunned. Even more so when I heard that the city has been built in the past decade and then I found myself reduced to speechless wonder when I heard that Tianjin's amazing, futuristic Convention Centre took just nine months to build. There were Indian officials and businessmen at the meeting whose mouths fell open when they heard.

We chattered amongst ourselves in Hindi about why such a Convention Centre would take ten years to build in India and agreed that it could be because democratic processes take longer than totalitarian ones. Then we went to Tianjin railway station to take the high speed train to Beijing and we stopped making excuses for the Motherland. Tianjin railway station looks like Delhi's new international airport and the train that covered the 130 kilometres to Beijing in thirty minutes is faster and more modern than any I have ever been on. When we got to Beijing, the Indians I was with, were as angry as I was at how far India had been left behind by a country that till the seventies was at least twenty years behind us.

There are those who blame democracy for this and they are wrong. If there is one thing that makes us better than China it is democracy, but to come back to India and find our biggest political leaders, and the whole of our media, absorbed by ancient political problems only added to my gloomy mood. What is the point in discussing Kashmir if all we can come up with is the idea of sending yet another all-party delegation to the Valley? What for? We have been doing this for decades. And, what is the point in all this sudden new excitement over Ayodhya when we know that the issue does not fall in the realm of reasoned debate or judicial solutions. What difference can next week's court judgment make to a problem that is caused by religious hysteria and not historical facts?

Why are we discussing temples and mosques at all when we know that the biggest political problem in India is governance? If China has overtaken us in infrastructure, in urban development, education, sanitation and healthcare, it is because China has understood that the key to delivering these things is governance. It is not the fault of democracy that we have bad governance, but the fault of our political leaders. Of the present lot, only the Prime Minister understands that India cannot hope to become a fully developed country in this century unless we begin a massive process of administrative reforms, but he does nothing about it.

Our ruling family appears to have no interest in governance at all and prefers to fritter away their years in power by taking us back towards an economic model that caused us to get left behind in the first place. In 1978, when Deng Xiaoping realised that Mao's Marxist economic model had served mostly to keep China poor and starving, he made dramatic changes that we should have paid attention to. If we had, we might have kept pace with China. We did not and so we wasted another two decades investing in a totalitarian economic model that gave enormous power to the public sector and killed private enterprise. Only when we changed course in the nineties did things improve. Today we can be proud of a middle class of more than 200 million people and Indian companies that are recognised as world class. But, there is a huge section of Indian public opinion, led by the ex-novelist, that hates what has happened. In yet another one of her lengthy diatribes last week, she praised Sonia and Rahul Gandhi for being on the right track. If I were them, I would be more worried about this endorsement than anything else. There is a growing impression in the business community and among those who understand economics better than the ex-novelist does, that our ruling family is moving us back towards socialism Indian 'ishtyle'.

Meanwhile, the country from which our Lefties, Liberals and Maoists get inspiration, has moved with spectacular success towards a market economy. When I twittered about this, someone twittered back that perhaps we should lease India to the Chinese for the next 200 years. It might come to that if we do not buck up.



Interesting article, but the author's view was too superficial. The difference between India and China is not just about "governance", but it is much more deep-rooted. The religion, the cultural, the history, and the social structure are very different between these two countries. Chinese style governance will not work in India, and vise versa. After all, a government is only the product of the people in a democratic country, so ultimately Indian people are responsible for whatever Indian state of affair is.

Leasing India to China for the next 200 years will not solve India's problems. You need to have your own version of Mao, to eliminate the social ills that still plagues current day India 70 years after the independence, then build a brand new country on top of the ruins.
 
Impressive virtual tour, but cheap attempt to leach off on Modi's popularity.

Or an expensive attempt to show Indians..what Modi saw..and how far they lack behind..
 
India lags China by less than 4 years. There is no doubt that India will surpass China by 2020.

More like 40 Years..all such predictions assume..that China will be at idle like a sleeping tortoise and India will take a leap like a rabbit..but we all know the story is other way around...slow and steady tortoise wins over fast and reactive rabbit..
 
More like 40 Years..all such predictions assume..that China will be at idle like a sleeping tortoise and India will take a leap like a rabbit..but we all know the story is other way around...slow and steady tortoise wins over fast and reactive rabbit..


By implementing Vedic statistics, India has increased her GDP growth rate from 4% to 7.3%. So it shouldn't be a problem for the Statistics Ministry to declare India's GDP as the largest in 2020. The Vedas teach us that if you believe it, then it must be true.
 
Lol RisingShiningSuperpower By 2020 India will have hand grenade sized megaton yield Antimatter warheads and self replicating nanobots that can cure all diseases. By 2050 the Andromeda galaxy will be part of India. What will happen by 2100? Any idea?


The Vedas teach us that things are only real if you believe them. If you don't believe them, then they are not real. Therefore, if Indians believe the things you mentioned, then they will become true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom