Saudi's MBC launching new drama series ‘exposing Ottoman tyranny’

[Nein]

Well its aggressor/warmongers that must be ashamed of it act not the one whom defended his lands.

Safavids stoked up rebellions in Anatolia and cut the Sunnis up. The Ottomans gave what you deserve.

By the way the Safavids were Turkic not Persian they only became Persianised thanks to Abbas. Safavids, Afsharids and the Qajars were all Turkic. Before them the Akkoyunlus and Karakoyunlus along with the Timurids ruled Persia. Persians were mainly dominated by Turks, Arabs and the Mongols.

Ottomans vs Safavids were Turks vs Turks.

Nothing to do with Persians at all you only became the footsoldiers of the Safavids.

Bloody Saudis if the Ottomans did not reach Makkah and Madinah the Portuguese would have been there to destroy the holy cities.

May Allah grant Yavuz Sultan Selim the highest place in heaven for his services to Islam.

When they invaded Egypt a few Ottoman troops committed atrocities and Yavuz Sultan Selim punished them with death for committing atrocities unlike Saudis that throw missiles at school buses.

Look at that even us Turks punish our soldiers for trangressing their boundaries.

 

[Quasar]

The word Mamluk means ‘owned’ and the Mamluks were not native to Egypt but were always slave soldiers, mainly Qipchak Turks from Central Asia.
Therefore simply Saudi's MBC launching A new drama series of TURK VS TURKS

 

[Aramagedon]

Safavids stoked up rebellions in Anatolia and cut the Sunnis up. The Ottomans gave what you deserve.

By the way the Safavids were Turkic not Persian they only became Persianised thanks to Abbas. Safavids, Afsharids and the Qajars were all Turkic. Before them the Akkoyunlus and Karakoyunlus along with the Timurids ruled Persia. Persians were mainly dominated by Turks, Arabs and the Mongols.

Ottomans vs Safavids were Turks vs Turks.

Nothing to do with Persians at all you only became the footsoldiers of the Safavids.

Bloody Saudis if the Ottomans did not reach Makkah and Madinah the Portuguese would have been there to destroy the holy cities.

May Allah grant Yavuz Sultan Selim the highest place in heaven for his services to Islam.

When they invaded Egypt a few Ottoman troops committed atrocities and Yavuz Sultan Selim punished them with death for committing atrocities unlike Saudis that throw missiles at school buses.

Look at that even us Turks punish our soldiers for trangressing their boundaries.

Those turks were Iranians (they born, lived and died in our territory) they did not Turkified Iranians but they did it to you.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkification

Iranians are proud of our empires be it with Persian background or Turkic background.

 

[dani92]

The word Mamluk means ‘owned’ and the Mamluks were not native to Egypt but were always slave soldiers, mainly Qipchak Turks from Central Asia.
Therefore simply Saudi's MBC launching A new drama series of TURK VS TURKS

The burjis were mostly Circassian and Georgian while the bahri were cumans and kipchaks

 

[SubWater]

Those turks were Iranians (they born, lived and died in our territory) they did not Turkified Iranians but they did it to you.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkification

Iranians are proud of our empires be it with Persian background or Turkic background.

They can not understand Iran mean all of us(Persians, Arabs, Kurds, Turks, Lurs, Baloch, Azeris, .....).

Do not forget TURKS VS TURKS phrase that several times repeated in this topic.
It seems Turks love to kill and fight with each other in the eyes of some people here.

 

[dani92]

Those turks were Iranians (they born, lived and died in our territory) they did not Turkified Iranians but they did it to you.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkification

Iranians are proud of our empires be it with Persian background or Turkic background.

These wars were religious and about land gains mostly and not about nationalism

 

[insight-out]

We support those that supported us on the Kashmir issue. Where were the arabs?

I try to see things objectively. I don't always succeed, but I try.

You're right, the GCC did not support us on Kashmir, at least not ostensibly. But they helped us avoid a serious economic crisis - on several occasions. Granted they have their interests - who doesn't? But their help came at a time when we were in pretty dire straits.

Would you acknowledge that?

 

[xenon54 out]

The drama is directed by British Director Peter Weber

Lol, its like im having a deja-vu.

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Safavids stoked up rebellions in Anatolia and cut the Sunnis up. The Ottomans gave what you deserve.

By the way the Safavids were Turkic not Persian they only became Persianised thanks to Abbas. Safavids, Afsharids and the Qajars were all Turkic. Before them the Akkoyunlus and Karakoyunlus along with the Timurids ruled Persia. Persians were mainly dominated by Turks, Arabs and the Mongols.

Ottomans vs Safavids were Turks vs Turks.

Nothing to do with Persians at all you only became the footsoldiers of the Safavids.

Bloody Saudis if the Ottomans did not reach Makkah and Madinah the Portuguese would have been there to destroy the holy cities.

May Allah grant Yavuz Sultan Selim the highest place in heaven for his services to Islam.

When they invaded Egypt a few Ottoman troops committed atrocities and Yavuz Sultan Selim punished them with death for committing atrocities unlike Saudis that throw missiles at school buses.

Look at that even us Turks punish our soldiers for trangressing their boundaries.

Safavids were Iranic from paternal ancestry. Gokturks were ruled by an Iranic clan (Ashina), aryan Wusun people founded Turkic mythology. Mostly Turks were footsoldiers, persians were governors and diplomats. Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar was the eunuch Monarch. They were shameless, weak, influenced by jews and british.

 

[dalvash]

Safavids were Iranic from paternal ancestry. Gokturks were ruled by an Iranic clan (Ashina), aryan Wusun people founded Turkic mythology. Mostly Turks were footsoldiers, persians were governors and diplomats. Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar was famously the eunuch Monarch.

What about Qazilbash? Iranic or Turkic?

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

What about Qazilbash? Iranic or Turkic?

Majority turkic, minority were lurs, kurds, persians, talish etc.

 

[dani92]

Safavids were Iranic from paternal ancestry. Gokturks were ruled by an Iranic clan (Ashina), aryan Wusun people founded Turkic mythology. Mostly Turks were footsoldiers, persians were governors and diplomats. Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar was famously the eunuch Monarch.

Ironic I was reading the internet and I saw how they hate Iranians yet they claim Iranian history,

What about Qazilbash? Iranic or Turkic?

Shia version of Isis I think some say they were like Christian monks and they were nice people

 

[Nein]

They can not understand Iran mean all of us(Persians, Arabs, Kurds, Turks, Lurs, Baloch, Azeris, .....).

Do not forget TURKS VS TURKS phrase that several times repeated in this topic.
It seems Turks love to kill and fight with each other in the eyes of some people here.

Us Turks love fighting each other because only one Turk can rule the world. Times have changed no more brother wars.

Dont act like as if Iranians never fought among themselves. Here is a quote from Yavuz Sultan Selim Himself.

2 Sufis can share a prayer carpet but the world is not enough for two kings.

 

[dani92]

Safavids stoked up rebellions in Anatolia and cut the Sunnis up. The Ottomans gave what you deserve.

By the way the Safavids were Turkic not Persian they only became Persianised thanks to Abbas. Safavids, Afsharids and the Qajars were all Turkic. Before them the Akkoyunlus and Karakoyunlus along with the Timurids ruled Persia. Persians were mainly dominated by Turks, Arabs and the Mongols.

Ottomans vs Safavids were Turks vs Turks.

Nothing to do with Persians at all you only became the footsoldiers of the Safavids.

Bloody Saudis if the Ottomans did not reach Makkah and Madinah the Portuguese would have been there to destroy the holy cities.

May Allah grant Yavuz Sultan Selim the highest place in heaven for his services to Islam.

When they invaded Egypt a few Ottoman troops committed atrocities and Yavuz Sultan Selim punished them with death for committing atrocities unlike Saudis that throw missiles at school buses.

Look at that even us Turks punish our soldiers for trangressing their boundaries.

From what I read the conflict between Safavids and ottomans started with the era of Uzun Hassan to control the sold trade routes and the the one who control more land doesn’t have to pay fees for the goods

 

[doorstar]

Pakistanis taking sides with Turks hating on Arabs

Pakistanis taking sides with Turks/iranis/injuns and hating Arabs probably because they can't bear the fact that they survive due to Arab generosity (billion upon billions of dollars deferred payments and "loans" converted in to grants/written off etc.) or could be that they aren't Pakistanis at all but injun/turk/irani/afghani working to estrange Pakistan from the Arabs