What's new

Russia Floats Out First Yasen-M-Class Nuclear Submarine

Subs don't have to move much. They get rearmed with cruise missiles at ports. It's cheaper overall for striking land targets than carrier.
your disease has no cure, Soviet/Russian nuke subs patrolling all year through Atlantic and Pacific Oceans , so there no Terrorists in Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, so tell me what is the purpose of these patrols, and tell me in your point of view Yasen is enough for bombing terrorists, why they put fighter jets in Syria, and Tu-160 launches CMs from black sea on terrorist targets in Syria:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
.
your disease has no cure, Soviet/Russian nuke subs patrolling all year through Atlantic and Pacific Oceans , so there no Terrorists in Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, so tell me what is the purpose of these patrols, and tell me in your point of view Yasen is enough for bombing terrorists, why they put fighter jets in Syria, and Tu-160 launches CMs from black sea on terrorist targets in Syria:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy::crazy:

They travel where they like. It's up to them. The sea does not belong to humans. The sea belongs to fish.
 
. . .
US and West have good relation with Russia.
This doesn't matter that USA/Russia have good relation, for defense deterrence these patrols always on, you're 21 kid trying to being a Smart @$$ and being self proclaim defense expert:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy:
 
.
This doesn't matter that USA/Russia have good relation, for defense deterrence these patrols always on, you're 21 kid trying to being a Smart @$$ and being self proclaim defense expert:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy:

So? US navy sails all over European waters too. Doesn't mean it's for deterrence. They sail where they like.
 
. .
It's cheaper than carriers.

Okay...the sub itself is cheaper....but the ammo isn't cheap either and it can only fire so much...it can't do reconnaissance either.

For fighting terrorists in M.E., Russia can just use the land bases...

Please don't talk on issues of which you have no knowledge.
 
.
Okay...the sub itself is cheaper....but the ammo isn't cheap either and it can only fire so much...it can't do reconnaissance either.

For fighting terrorists in M.E., Russia can just use the land bases...

Please don't talk on issues of which you have no knowledge.

They mostly use drones for recon.


 
. . . . .
Cheaper to use nuke subs. Jets use jet fuel. And might even crash. 1 Su-30 crashed in Syria. Nuke subs shoot cruise missiles near ports and get rearmed at ports and don't need refueling.
And please tell me how many times Russian subs fired CMs in Syria, only few times, mostly jets are used to bomb out terrorist targets on daily bases in Syria
 
.
And please tell me how many times Russian subs fired CMs in Syria, only few times, mostly jets are used to bomb out terrorist targets on daily bases in Syria

How should I know how many times? Maybe a few hundred CMs fired. Jet attacks are more visible. Sub attacks are more stealthy.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom