What's new

Rumour, rumour, everywhere

Nahraf

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
0
DAWN.COM | Columnists | Rumour, rumour, everywhere
By Cyril Almeida
Friday, 27 Aug, 2010

This much is clear: the powers-that-be abroad and the kingmakers at home aren’t very enthused by the idea of another round of Nawaz Sharif in charge. By itself, however, that is unlikely to be a deal-breaker for him. If Mian Sahib wants something badly enough, nothing will stand in his way. But what does Sharif want? - File Photo.
When gossip is your oxygen, expect all sorts of silly rumours to proliferate. And when politics is your national sport, the silliness tends to grow exponentially.

Like the monster hiding in the cupboard that parents use to scare their children, the government is being warned, ‘Shape up or Kayani will come and eat your dinner’.

The MQM’s warning to the PPP has been lapped up by conspiracy theorists eager to see the back of the government. This largely because the MQM is seen as the army’s other version of a non-state actor, the one meant to balance out internal ‘threats’ like the PPP. If the MQM is saying it, then something must be up, goes the theory.

But wait a minute, weren’t we at a similar stage in the non-too-distant past? The time when the MQM suddenly withdrew its support for the NRO, sending the media into a speculative frenzy, trying frantically to connect the dots between the MQM’s sudden baulkiness and Zardari’s imminent ouster?

What lies in the hearts and minds of politicians is often fairly easy to figure out — self-preservation, power, self-aggrandisement, greed etc — but it is even easier to figure out in the case of the MQM: control of Karachi.

Karachi is the MQM’s bread, butter, jam and marmalade all rolled into one. Everything the party does begins and ends with the aim of tightening its grip over the city.

Right now, the MQM doesn’t need the army. With the numbers in parliament falling a certain way, the party knows it can slap around the PPP, strut around a bit, flex its muscles, be a pain in the neck — and get away with it all.

The public doesn’t get to hear about the pound of flesh that is extracted, the further prizes and concessions that the MQM walks away with each time, but that doesn’t mean it’s not real. In this case, if no one is around to hear a tree falling in the forest, it still makes a noise, thank you very much. So leave aside that silliness.

The real problem with the ‘Kayani is coming’ rumour is that it doesn’t make any sense. Yes, much of what the army has done in the past doesn’t make any sense, but ousting the government right now makes even less sense.

Game theorists and political scientists and psephologists could probably articulate it in a more sophisticated way, but the basic logic isn’t very difficult to grasp. Before you do A — oust a government — you need to ask yourself, one, what’s in it for me?; and two, what will I replace it with?

To neither question would Kayani have a very good answer right now.

Start with the first one, what’s in it for Kayani? His job is secure for another three years; the political government has surrendered the national security and foreign policy domains to his guys; he’s got his favourite bugaboo, India, and his favourite whipping boy, the US, to play with in his favourite backyard, Afghanistan — he’s got pretty much everything a soldier can dream of.

Altruism isn’t a motivating factor here. (If you believe it can be, then off to the land of fairy tales and flying pigs for you.) Survey the land before you. Government has no money, land is flood-ravaged, economy is on the verge of collapse, inflation is looking to fire on all cylinders again, security is tenuous in swathes of the country — why exactly would anyone want to take on that challenge? (Remember, altruism isn’t a motivating factor here.)

When you have what you prize most, job security and the levers to control your favourite toys and pastimes, why would you want to bite into a ******* apple? Answer: you don’t.

Which renders moot the question of what would you replace the present government with. Bangladesh model, mid-term elections, all have their own set of problems. But that’s irrelevant because Kayani isn’t about to intervene.

Aha, but there’s always his friend, the adjudicator, who could do the job instead, some argue. But that’s problematic, too.

By now it’s pretty clear there is at least some convergence of interests between Kayani, the adjudicator and Nawaz Sharif. But convergence of interests doesn’t mean acting in consort.

Much as the court’s disdain for the present government is clear, it has been impeded by at least one thing: the need to keep the wider legal community — high-profile lawyers, retired judges and a unified bench — on board.

A move against the government, whether a blunt hatchet job or a clean surgical strike, would be controversial and would split the court’s core constituency, and possibly the court itself.

Thus far, the saviour complex hasn’t overwhelmed some judges’ concern for personal reputation and that’s unlikely to change. Besides, playing sidekick to another army chief may be too much for an ‘independent’ court to swallow.

What about Mian Sahib, surely he will strike soon, some speculate/hope. He remains a bit of a mystery, at least to me.

This much is clear: the powers-that-be abroad and the kingmakers at home aren’t very enthused by the idea of another round of Nawaz Sharif in charge. By itself, however, that is unlikely to be a deal-breaker for him. If Mian Sahib wants something badly enough, nothing will stand in his way. But what does Sharif want?

Here’s where opinion is divided. Some think the lion has gone long in the tooth, that he’s lost the will to fight or perhaps he’s taken all that talk of democracy a bit too seriously. Others think that, like one of those predators on Discovery, Sharif has settled into the sand, lying motionless until, snap!

Which is it? Your guess is as good as mine. The floods, however, have made an election in the near term impossible. Tune in to Raiwind later this year to find out more.

So is Zardari safe for now? Probably.

And how he must be grinning. In the Usual Suspects, Kevin Spacey’s character remarks, “The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” Zardari may have even outdone Spacey’s Devil — he’s right there, in plain sight, frustratingly out of reach of his enemies. His inner child may even be tempting him into a dancing a little jig.

But Zardari shouldn’t be too smug. His greatest problem remains what it has always been: Zardari himself.

cyril.a@gmail.com
 
.
Effort to block mly action in Karachi | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online

Effort to block mly action in Karachi
By: Maqbool Malik | Published: August 27, 2010


ISLAMABAD – Although the military establishment continues it’s mum over MQM Chief Altaf Hussain’s statement seeking imposition of martial law in the country, many believed it was pre-emptive move by the political party having its headquarter in Karachi to counter the looming threat of military action in the port city.
‘No comment’ was the cautious reaction of the Director General ISPR Maj Gen Ather Abbas when this scribe approached him. However, well-placed sources informed TheNation on Thursday that it was MQM’s political move to put pressure on the PPP-led government ostensibly in a bid to warn the major coalition partner of the consequences if the ANP leadership continued demanding deployment of the army in Karachi.
Sources were of the view that MQM’s move was more of political nature out of its rivalry with the ANP which for the first time in Karachi’s political history has been successful in securing two provincial assembly seats and was getting popular.
Interestingly, both the MQM and ANP are PPP’s junior coalition partners in Sindh Assembly as well as at the Centre. Except his party, nobody has glorified Altaf Hussain’s statement rather it had sent ripples within all the major political parties including the PPP itself.
Initially, many had thought that by the virtue of unique history of the country, the move had been prompted by the military establishment, but well-placed military sources strongly refuted these notions.
Sources said that the statement of Altaf Hussain has been taken within the defence establishment as ‘contemptuous’ especially at a time when the entire nation was facing an unprecedented calamity caused the floods, sources said.
“No sane person including the military leadership can think of such an eventuality in view of the enormous challenges confronting the country,” they said.
Sources were of the view that despite all the hue and cry the MQM would never quit the PPP-led coalition in Sindh, instead it might quit the federal cabinet to further its pressure on the PPP.
 
.
DAWN.COM | National | MQM chief unaware of ground realities: Badar

MQM chief unaware of ground realities: Badar
Bureau Report
Friday, 27 Aug, 2010

HYDERABAD: Central General Secretary of the PPP Senator Jahangir Badar has said that since MQM chief Altaf Hussain is not in the country for the last so many years, he is not fully aware of ground realities in Pakistan.

He said Pakistan was facing the worst flood of its history and called upon all political and religious parties to unite and face the natural calamity.

Addressing a news conference here on Thursday, he said people were in dire need of drinking water, food and medicines for survival.

He said the PPP and its leadership was trying to provide relief to the victims of floods.

Answering a question, he said that the prime minister was considering the proposals given by Mian Nawaz Sharif and the final decision would be taken in consultation with the coalition partners.

He pointed out that COAS General Pervez Kayani had said on several occasions that the Army, with the cooperation of other institutions, wanted to strengthen democracy in the country.

He said these were very difficult times for Pakistan because on the one hand it was facing terrorism and on the other a massive natural calamity.

He said that quite a few PPP activists had also been killed in target killing in Karachi and did not rule out foreign hand in such activities.

About Kalabagh dam, he said it was a controversial issue and if the parliament approved its construction and the three provinces also supported the decision, the PPP would honour it.

The aid being given by the international community would be spent in a transparent manner, he said.

Answering a question about artificial breaches in embankments, he said it was premature to say anything on this issue and added that top priority was rehabilitation of flood victims.

Answering a question, he condemned the Sialkot incident in which two brothers had been beaten to death and said that only the Punjab government could answer this question.
 
.
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

Friday, August 27, 2010
Tough time awaits MQM in parliament
By Muhammad Akram

LAHORE: The PML-N is mulling another political bail-out package for the PPP by either not raising or pressing hard the issue of its proposed flood relief and management commission comprising ‘men of integrity’, accepted by Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, and which could not be constituted in its original spirit due to opposition by three provinces, excluding Punjab.

PML-N sources confided in Daily Times that the PML-N’s parliamentary party would be instructed to focus on what they termed a ‘seditious’ statement by the MQM’s self-exiled leader, Altaf Hussain. Recently, during a telephonic address Altaf had invited a ‘patriotic general’ to take action against ‘corrupt’ politicians and feudal lords by imposing a martial law-like situation in the country.

The PML-N sources said the party was gearing up for the upcoming parliament session, likely to be held on September 2, to correct all the wrongs done by military regimes in the country and the political parties that had come to their aid, including the MQM and PML-Q. “The party has moved a privilege motion against the MQM chief following his controversial statement that calls for a trial under Article 6 on sedition charges, knowing that the dirt would affect the party leadership,” the source said, adding that “parliament needs to debate on past military interventions to shut the doors for future adventurisms”.

Among the questions the PML-N would ask from the MQM, the source said, the fundamental question would be that why Altaf was not returning to the country despite his party being in power for over 12 years now. The PML-N would also like to demand a judicial probe into the May 2007 events in Karachi where dozens of political workers and members of the civil society had been killed, stopping them from receiving the then sacked chief justice at the behest of military dictator Gen (r) Pervez Musharraf, the source added.

The PML-N’s parliamentary party would be advised to seek the House’s approval to get Altaf extradited from London to face the courts on charges of murder, attempt to murder, extortions and, above all, inciting the armed forces to take over the country by abrogating the constitution, said the source.

It said as far as the two privilege motions moved by the MQM in parliament against PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif were concerned, the courts had already absolved Nawaz from all charges framed against him by Musharraf.

As for the second motion regarding the meetings between Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif and army chief Gen Ashfaq Kayani, the source said the PML-N had nothing to hide about those meetings as they pertained to the Punjab government’s working along with the armed forces at the time of another crisis.

The sources clarified that except for the first meeting that had been held without seeking permission from the party chief, no meeting had been held in the wee hours. The PML-N would also not like to side with the forces inside and outside parliament, unduly criticising the government for poor management following unprecedented devastation due to the floods, considering it was beyond the control of a government, as no government in the past had worked to put disaster management institutions in place, the sources added.

They said the PML-N would propose the government to constitute a more effective disaster management mechanism under civilian control to avoid a situation similar to the one existing as well as the one created following the October 2005 earthquake.

However, sources in the PPP revealed that the party leadership was gearing up to face the opposition in parliament during the session being convened by the former to discuss plight of the flood victims, government efforts to provide relief to them and rehabilitation activities across the country. The sources said the party would not like to be dragged in the saga of Altaf’s controversial statement, but when a situation arises, it would not help its ally that ditched it on at least three occasions during its current stint in power.

The PPP could not stand with a party that did not respect democracy, parliament and the constitution, the source said, adding that the party would like to adopt a wait-and-see policy and jump into the fray only when the iron is hot and is ready to be shaped the way that best suits the country and its democratic institutions.

The sources said the PPP doesn’t need to prepare an agenda on the pending privilege motions on the PML-N and MQM, as it had a policy regarding the damage caused by military interventions and the fruits of democracy.

As for the party’s support to the PML-N’s privilege motion against Altaf, the sources said the PPP welcomed it and would support it. However, the sources said, the PPP would reveal its cards only at an appropriate time, but nobody should doubt the party’s support for democracy and the constitution’s supremacy.

According to political observers, the floods that have grappled the country for four weeks, and Altaf’s controversial statement had provided the PPP and PML-N an opportunity to revive the spirit they had evolved while signing the Charter of Democracy.

The two parties, political pundits said, had shown maturity by desisting from mudslinging after initial incidents of acrimony when the flood hit Punjab and after realising they would not earn anything but a bad name if they kept holding each other from their collars when people were suffering and needed aid, not politics.

They opined that Altaf’s statement had united parliamentary forces that were already looking for an opportunity to reconcile since they had exhausted the only available option of ‘blame game’ on the face of a catastrophe that proved beyond the control of any government.

The PPP is best advised to stay focused on relief and rehabilitation work of flood victims with the help of the UN and friendly governments and leave the politics surrounding Altaf’s statement to the ‘friendly opposition’, the observers said.
 
.
MQM submits motions against Nawaz – The Express Tribune

MQM submits motions against Nawaz

Party also calls into question Punjab govt’s handling of the Sialkot lynching

ISLAMABAD: The explosive weekend statement by Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader Altaf Hussain encouraging intervention by ‘patriotic’ military generals in order to save Pakistan from ‘corrupt’ politicians continues to shake the country’s chaotic political landscape for a third day running.

The latest among the developments triggered by the ‘controversial’ statement was the submission of two motions by the MQM, including a privilege motion and an adjournment motion, to the National Assembly Secretariat against former premier Nawaz Sharif.

One of the party’s top leaders and its parliamentary leader in the National Assembly Dr Farooq Sattar submitted the motions on Wednesday, carrying the signatures of 25 parliamentarians, questioning the democratic credentials of Sharif. The move came a day after Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) filed motions against Altaf’s statement, blaming him for attempting to drag the military into politics.

The MQM’s privilege motion seeks a debate on the agreement between Musharraf and Nawaz under which the Sharif family was sent on a 10-year exile to Saudi Arabia, without the nation being informed of this agreement.

Sattar told the media that Sharif must come clean as to why he betrayed the nation and chose to leave for Saudi Arabia along with his family after the 1999 military coup. He alleged that Sharif denied having an agreement with the then military dictator, Pervez Musharraf, for more than seven years. “The reality must come before the public,” said Sattar, emphasising that the nation should be informed as to how the penalty of the Sharifs was forgiven. He added that the false statements of the PML-N chief had dishonored the nation and democratic institutions.

In the adjournment motion, the MQM slammed PML-N leadership for its ‘non-democratic behaviour’, accusing it of enjoying good relations with the Army in the past. It said that the Nawaz’s younger brother, Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, as well as another one of the party’s top leaders, Chaudhry Nisar, have had secret meetings with the Chief of Army Staff Pervaiz Ashfaq Kayani but failed to take the nation into confidence on these meetings, which is against the Charter of Democracy (CoD) which states that political leadership cannot hold secret meetings with the military. Furthermore, the motion questioned the PML-N led Punjab government regarding the lack of immediate action over the lynching of two brothers in Sialkot.

In the meantime, a spokesperson for the PML-N blasted the MQM for submitting a privilege motion in favor of a person (Altaf Hussain) who is no more Pakistani citizen. “A person who is in self-imposed exile for past 20 years has no right to interfere into the country’s affairs,” said federal lawmaker Ahsan Iqbal.

Altaf’s statement continued to draw more criticism from various political parties on Wednesday. The latest outburst came from Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan, who saw a ‘conspiracy’ and termed the statement ‘meaningful’.

ANP central leader Bashir Bilour on Wednesday said that as MQM was the product of martial law, it was now calling the army generals to interfere in the affairs of a democratically-elected government. He said that at a time when the nation was confronting the worst ever catastrophe in the country’s history, the MQM chief was busy with conspiracies against the democratic system.

The Jamaat-e-Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) also filed a motion in the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa assembly against the MQM leader’s remarks.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 26th, 2010.
 
.
MQM set for Senate clash – The Express Tribune

MQM set for Senate clash

MQM, PML-N, ANP and JI have all submitted privilege motions thus far.

ISLAMABAD: A day after submitting two separate privilege motions against PML-N chief and his party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) in the National Assembly, the MQM did the same in the Senate on Thursday.

The move was initiated in response to PML-N’s criticism of MQM chief Altaf Hussain for his ‘controversial’ statement, inviting ‘patriotic’ military generals to step in to save the country from the clutches of ‘corrupt and feudalistic’ politicians. The assertion has since been rocking the national political scene, triggering angry reaction from almost all political parties.

Federal Ports and Shipping Minister Senator Babar Ghauri led a group of MQM lawmakers to submit privilege motions in the upper house of parliament.

On Wednesday, Dr Farooq Sattar told reporters after submitting the motions in the National Assembly that Nawaz Sharif “must come clean on why he betrayed the nation and chose to leave for Saudi Arabia along with his family after the 1999 military coup”.

He also called on the PML-N chief to clarify the issue of signing any agreement with the then military dictator, Pervez Musharraf, which he had been denying for more than seven years.

One of the two privileged motions is seeking to initiate a debate on the agreement between Musharraf and Nawaz under which the Sharif family was sent on 10-year exile to Saudi Arabia.

“The reality must be presented before the public…We want this,” Dr Sattar said about the alleged deal.

In the second motion, the MQM criticised the PML-N for its ‘non-democratic behavior’, accusing it of having enjoyed “good relations with the army” in the past.

It said that Shahbaz Sharif, the Punjab chief minister and younger brother of Nawaz, and Chaudhry Nisar, one of the party’s top leaders, have held secret meetings with the Chief of Army Staff Parvez Ashfaq Kayani, but failed to take the nation into confidence about the outcome of these meetings.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom