What's new

Rise of China, US Civil War "Reconstruction," and Marshall Plan

Martian2

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,809
Reaction score
-37
When you put the Rise of China into its proper historical context, you will realize this is the third time in recent history (relatively speaking) that you've seen the accelerated economic and technological development of a country.

American Civil War Reconstruction (1865-1877)

Let's begin with the American Civil War Reconstruction. The Union (or northern United States) devastated the Confederacy (or southern United States). Sherman's March to the Sea in 1864 through Georgia was particularly destructive. General Sherman destroyed railroads, telegraph poles, civilian property, etc.

"Reconstruction" began in 1865 and officially ended in 1877, but it was just the beginning of the economic recovery for the American South. It would take another 100 years for the American South to fully recover, when the per-capita Southern income was 90% of the US national average.

PzTVQyN.jpg


The lesson from the American effort by the North (Union) to economically redevelop the South (former Confederacy) is that it takes a massive downpayment (or Reconstruction 1865-1877) and another 100 years to fully recover from the economic devastation caused by the American Civil War (1861-1865).

Three things are needed for economic development on a grand scale.

1. massive amounts of money (e.g. official Reconstruction from 1865-1877)
2. lots of time (official Reconstruction was 12 years, but total redevelopment/recovery time was actually 100 years for Southern per-capita income to reach 90% of US national average)
3. the benefactor has to be a technologically-advanced country (the goal is to bring a backwards economic region to the forefront of modern technology and economy)

US Marshall Plan 1948-1951 ("approximately $132 billion in current dollar value as of October 2017")

To achieve victory against Nazi Germany, the United States bombed Europe back to the Stone Age during World War II (1941-1945).

After World War II, the United States wanted to strengthen Western Europe against the encroaching Soviet Union and Soviet Eastern European Allies (or Warsaw Pact). The United States launched a massive reconstruction of Western Europe. The Marshall Plan provided the equivalent of $132 billion in today's money to rebuild Western Europe's industries.

Though the Marshall Plan ended in 1951, it took fifty more years for German per-capita income to approach the US national average (see chart in bottom left-hand corner below).

Nominal GDP per capita | International Monetary Fund

qZ5jReI.jpg


Rise of China (1978-2017)

After World War II, China was an economically devastated country. The Japanese aggressors had bombed China from 1937-1945.

After 1945, China was in the same position as war-devastated Europe. The story gets worse for China. China entered into a civil war between the Nationalists and Communists from 1945 to 1949. The Communists won and the Nationalists fled to Taiwan.

Things get worse for China again. China had to fight the US in the Korean War from 1950-1953 to prevent the US Army from camping out on the Yalu River, which is on China's doorstep.

China just can't catch a break. In 1962, American military advisers enter South Vietnam. Another major war breaks out next to China. The US-Vietnam War lasted from 1962-1975. China is economically exhausted from diverting Chinese economic production to supply the North Vietnamese army with military equipment and economic supplies.

After the death of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping comes to power in 1976. In 1978, Deng Xiaoping instituted an Open Door policy and welcomed foreign investment.

However, China's infrastructure was in really bad shape. Only the Taiwanese were willing to invest in the Pearl River Delta (Shenzhen) and Yangtze River Delta (Shanghai) regions in the 1980s.

The Taiwanese investment in mainland China totals US$200-$400 billion (references: Investing in Cross-Strait Relations - WSJ and ‘Lost years’ showcase Taiwan’s true story | Taipei Times).

The sum of Taiwanese investment in mainland China surpasses the value of the Marshall Plan (US$132 billion in current dollars). However, China is a much larger country geographically and population-wise than western Europe. Thus, the overall effect is a comparable level of redevelopment.

No one should be surprised by the Rise of China. It is the third time in the last 150 years that we have seen a major economic redevelopment.

For the American South (former Confederacy), the Union/American North provided the technology, "Reconstruction" redevelopment fund, and open markets for the rejuvenation of the American South.

For western Europe, the United States provided the technology, Marshall Plan redevelopment fund, and open markets for the rejuvenation of western Europe.

For mainland China, Taiwan provided the technology, US$200-$400 billion redevelopment capital, and open markets (Taiwan served as a conduit to the worldwide market) for the rejuvenation of mainland China.

The Rise of China is a surprise to people today, because they have forgotten about the redevelopment of the American South and Western Europe. When you place the Rise of China in its proper historical context, the outcome is expected. The Marshall Plan was approximately $132 billion in current dollars. Taiwan probably invested about $400 billion in mainland China. Taiwan funded the equivalent of THREE MARSHALL PLANS for mainland China. The result is an expected modernized China, which you see today.
 
Last edited:
.
截至2014年底2月底,内地累计批准港资项目362291个,实际使用港资6783.7亿美元。按实际使用外资统计,港资占内地累计吸收境外投资总额的47.9%。
(注: 港资指在香港注册并投资大陆的资金, 不一定是香港本地的公司).

截至2013年12月底,大陆累计批准台资项目90018个,实际使用台资591.3亿美元。
按实际使用外资统计,台资占我累计实际吸收境外投资总额的4.2%。
 
.
截至2014年底2月底,内地累计批准港资项目362291个,实际使用港资6783.7亿美元。按实际使用外资统计,港资占内地累计吸收境外投资总额的47.9%。
(注: 港资指在香港注册并投资大陆的资金, 不一定是香港本地的公司).

截至2013年12月底,大陆累计批准台资项目90018个,实际使用台资591.3亿美元。
按实际使用外资统计,台资占我累计实际吸收境外投资总额的4.2%。
Stop claiming Hong Kong had a role in China's modernization. You can't point to a single multi-billion dollar Hong Kong project in China.

Hong Kong is a port city with tourism as its major industry. Hong Kong is only a tax haven for the rich to hide their money. That's it. There is nothing else in Hong Kong.

Hong Kong runs huge trade deficits to pay for the importation of food, energy, and technology products (such as computers).

In sharp contrast, Taiwan generates tens of billions of US dollars in trade surplus every year.

The funding for China's modernization came from Taiwan's massive multi-billion dollar trade surpluses.

It did not come from Hong Kong's huge TRADE DEFICITS.
Hong Kong city generates no money. It consumes money to pay for imported food and fuel that keep the city functioning.
----------

Taiwan earns billions of US dollars from its trade surplus every year. Part of this money is used to fund Taiwanese investment plants in mainland China. Taiwanese multi-billion dollar plants include semiconductor fabrication, 8.5G LCD display manufacturing plants, notebook computer manufacturing plants, computer tablet production, etc.

Taiwan is a mighty industrialized country with over 150,000 cumulative USPTO patents during the last 30 years. Taiwan manufactures a wide array of high-tech advanced products on mainland China for export and this has driven China's economic boom for the last 40 years.

seMAFyZ.jpg

----------

Unlike Taiwan, Hong Kong holds virtually no USPTO patents. As far as I know, Hong Kong companies manufacture almost ZERO high-tech products on the Chinese mainland. Hong Kong had no role in China's modernization.

Hong Kong has run huge trade deficits for the last 25 years (see chart below). Hong Kong is in no position to fund anybody's development, including its own.

Hong Kong Balance of Trade | Trading Economics

"Balance of Trade in Hong Kong averaged -7015.21 HKD Million from 1952 until 2017"

nKUe6og.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
When you put the Rise of China into its proper historical context, you will realize this is the third time in recent history (relatively speaking) that you've seen the accelerated economic and technological development of a country.

American Civil War Reconstruction (1865-1877)

Let's begin with the American Civil War Reconstruction. The Union (or northern United States) devastated the Confederacy (or southern United States). Sherman's March to the Sea in 1864 through Georgia was particularly destructive. General Sherman destroyed railroads, telegraph poles, civilian property, etc.

"Reconstruction" began in 1865 and officially ended in 1877, but it was just the beginning of the economic recovery for the American South. It would take another 100 years for the American South to fully recover, when the per-capita Southern income was 90% of the US national average.

PzTVQyN.jpg


The lesson from the American effort by the North (Union) to economically redevelop the South (former Confederacy) is that it takes a massive downpayment (or Reconstruction 1865-1877) and another 100 years to fully recover from the economic devastation caused by the American Civil War (1861-1865).

Three things are needed for economic development on a grand scale.

1. massive amounts of money (e.g. official Reconstruction from 1865-1877)
2. lots of time (official Reconstruction was 12 years, but total redevelopment/recovery time was actually 100 years for Southern per-capita income to reach 90% of US national average)
3. the benefactor has to be a technologically-advanced country (the goal is to bring a backwards economic region to the forefront of modern technology and economy)

US Marshall Plan 1948-1951 ("approximately $132 billion in current dollar value as of October 2017")

To achieve victory against Nazi Germany, the United States bombed Europe back to the Stone Age during World War II (1941-1945).

After World War II, the United States wanted to strengthen Western Europe against the encroaching Soviet Union and Soviet Eastern European Allies (or Warsaw Pact). The United States launched a massive reconstruction of Western Europe. The Marshall Plan provided the equivalent of $132 billion in today's money to rebuild Western Europe's industries.

Though the Marshall Plan ended in 1951, it took fifty more years for German per-capita income to approach the US national average (see chart in bottom left-hand corner below).

Nominal GDP per capita | International Monetary Fund

qZ5jReI.jpg


Rise of China (1978-2017)

After World War II, China was an economically devastated country. The Japanese aggressors had bombed China from 1937-1945.

After 1945, China was in the same position as war-devastated Europe. The story gets worse for China. China entered into a civil war between the Nationalists and Communists from 1945 to 1949. The Communists won and the Nationalists fled to Taiwan.

Things get worse for China again. China had to fight the US in the Korean War from 1950-1953 to prevent the US Army from camping out on the Yalu River, which is on China's doorstep.

China just can't catch a break. In 1962, American military advisers enter South Vietnam. Another major war breaks out next to China. The US-Vietnam War lasted from 1962-1975. China is economically exhausted from diverting Chinese economic production to supply the North Vietnamese army with military equipment and economic supplies.

After the death of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping comes to power in 1976. In 1978, Deng Xiaoping instituted an Open Door policy and welcomed foreign investment.

However, China's infrastructure was in really bad shape. Only the Taiwanese were willing to invest in the Pearl River Delta (Shenzhen) and Yangtze River Delta (Shanghai) regions in the 1980s.

The Taiwanese investment in mainland China totals US$200-$400 billion (references: Investing in Cross-Strait Relations - WSJ and ‘Lost years’ showcase Taiwan’s true story | Taipei Times).

The sum of Taiwanese investment in mainland China surpasses the value of the Marshall Plan (US$132 billion in current dollars). However, China is a much larger country geographically and population-wise than western Europe. Thus, the overall effect is a comparable level of redevelopment.

No one should be surprised by the Rise of China. It is the third time in the last 150 years that we have seen a major economic redevelopment.

For the American South (former Confederacy), the Union/American North provided the technology, "Reconstruction" redevelopment fund, and open markets for the rejuvenation of the American South.

For western Europe, the United States provided the technology, Marshall Plan redevelopment fund, and open markets for the rejuvenation of western Europe.

For mainland China, Taiwan provided the technology, US$200-$400 billion redevelopment capital, and open markets (Taiwan served as a conduit to the worldwide market) for the rejuvenation of mainland China.

The Rise of China is a surprise to people today, because they have forgotten about the redevelopment of the American South and Western Europe. When you place the Rise of China in its proper historical context, the outcome is expected. The Marshall Plan was approximately $132 billion in current dollars. Taiwan probably invested about $400 billion in mainland China. Taiwan funded the equivalent of THREE MARSHALL PLANS for mainland China. The result is an expected modernized China, which you see today.
You again with your biases.

No Europe was not bombed into Stone Age. Take Germany, the most bombed country. True the cities as Dresden, Hamburg, Köln or Berlin were bombed to rubbles but the majority of Germany industrial complex remained intact.

No China did suffer nothing when delivering some yuan to Vietnam. Otherwise you can claim Chinese face economic hardship because the Chinese government donated some rifles to Durtete.

But you can say Chinese suffered delay of economic reform for years because the PLA consumed lots of money when attacking VN.

I think have said about the role of TW, no need to repeat again.
 
.
You again with your biases.

No Europe was not bombed into Stone Age. Take Germany, the most bombed country. True the cities as Dresden, Hamburg, Köln or Berlin were bombed to rubbles but the majority of Germany industrial complex remained intact.

No China did suffer nothing when delivering some yuan to Vietnam. Otherwise you can claim Chinese face economic hardship because the Chinese government donated some rifles to Durtete.
Your argument is stupid.

If Germany was left mostly intact, there would be no need for an American Marshall Plan.

The US did bomb Germany back to the Stone Age, because the Germans couldn't feed themselves.
----------

CARE packages prevented starvation in post-war Germany | Deutsche Welle

U7DSqxo.jpg
 
.
Full of bullshit. HK captials are from all over the world, at early stage a large portion is from ASEAN. Marshal Plan is a cold war product, not American's charity. American also aid Japan, TW and South Korea. The rise of China is what Taiwan establishment want? Business is business, don't bullshit reconstruction of economy. The reputation of Taiwan firms in China mainland is among one of the worst.
 
.
When you put the Rise of China into its proper historical context, you will realize this is the third time in recent history (relatively speaking) that you've seen the accelerated economic and technological development of a country.

American Civil War Reconstruction (1865-1877)

Let's begin with the American Civil War Reconstruction. The Union (or northern United States) devastated the Confederacy (or southern United States). Sherman's March to the Sea in 1864 through Georgia was particularly destructive. General Sherman destroyed railroads, telegraph poles, civilian property, etc.

"Reconstruction" began in 1865 and officially ended in 1877, but it was just the beginning of the economic recovery for the American South. It would take another 100 years for the American South to fully recover, when the per-capita Southern income was 90% of the US national average.

PzTVQyN.jpg


The lesson from the American effort by the North (Union) to economically redevelop the South (former Confederacy) is that it takes a massive downpayment (or Reconstruction 1865-1877) and another 100 years to fully recover from the economic devastation caused by the American Civil War (1861-1865).

Three things are needed for economic development on a grand scale.

1. massive amounts of money (e.g. official Reconstruction from 1865-1877)
2. lots of time (official Reconstruction was 12 years, but total redevelopment/recovery time was actually 100 years for Southern per-capita income to reach 90% of US national average)
3. the benefactor has to be a technologically-advanced country (the goal is to bring a backwards economic region to the forefront of modern technology and economy)

US Marshall Plan 1948-1951 ("approximately $132 billion in current dollar value as of October 2017")

To achieve victory against Nazi Germany, the United States bombed Europe back to the Stone Age during World War II (1941-1945).

After World War II, the United States wanted to strengthen Western Europe against the encroaching Soviet Union and Soviet Eastern European Allies (or Warsaw Pact). The United States launched a massive reconstruction of Western Europe. The Marshall Plan provided the equivalent of $132 billion in today's money to rebuild Western Europe's industries.

Though the Marshall Plan ended in 1951, it took fifty more years for German per-capita income to approach the US national average (see chart in bottom left-hand corner below).

Nominal GDP per capita | International Monetary Fund

qZ5jReI.jpg


Rise of China (1978-2017)

After World War II, China was an economically devastated country. The Japanese aggressors had bombed China from 1937-1945.

After 1945, China was in the same position as war-devastated Europe. The story gets worse for China. China entered into a civil war between the Nationalists and Communists from 1945 to 1949. The Communists won and the Nationalists fled to Taiwan.

Things get worse for China again. China had to fight the US in the Korean War from 1950-1953 to prevent the US Army from camping out on the Yalu River, which is on China's doorstep.

China just can't catch a break. In 1962, American military advisers enter South Vietnam. Another major war breaks out next to China. The US-Vietnam War lasted from 1962-1975. China is economically exhausted from diverting Chinese economic production to supply the North Vietnamese army with military equipment and economic supplies.

After the death of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping comes to power in 1976. In 1978, Deng Xiaoping instituted an Open Door policy and welcomed foreign investment.

However, China's infrastructure was in really bad shape. Only the Taiwanese were willing to invest in the Pearl River Delta (Shenzhen) and Yangtze River Delta (Shanghai) regions in the 1980s.

The Taiwanese investment in mainland China totals US$200-$400 billion (references: Investing in Cross-Strait Relations - WSJ and ‘Lost years’ showcase Taiwan’s true story | Taipei Times).

The sum of Taiwanese investment in mainland China surpasses the value of the Marshall Plan (US$132 billion in current dollars). However, China is a much larger country geographically and population-wise than western Europe. Thus, the overall effect is a comparable level of redevelopment.

No one should be surprised by the Rise of China. It is the third time in the last 150 years that we have seen a major economic redevelopment.

For the American South (former Confederacy), the Union/American North provided the technology, "Reconstruction" redevelopment fund, and open markets for the rejuvenation of the American South.

For western Europe, the United States provided the technology, Marshall Plan redevelopment fund, and open markets for the rejuvenation of western Europe.

For mainland China, Taiwan provided the technology, US$200-$400 billion redevelopment capital, and open markets (Taiwan served as a conduit to the worldwide market) for the rejuvenation of mainland China.

The Rise of China is a surprise to people today, because they have forgotten about the redevelopment of the American South and Western Europe. When you place the Rise of China in its proper historical context, the outcome is expected. The Marshall Plan was approximately $132 billion in current dollars. Taiwan probably invested about $400 billion in mainland China. Taiwan funded the equivalent of THREE MARSHALL PLANS for mainland China. The result is an expected modernized China, which you see today.

Seen from this vantage point, the Rise of China is indeed a natural outcome that was bound to happen. China's post-Japanese war regional and global environment was definitely worse than the post civil war environment in the US or post-war environment in Europe. Nonetheless, China has achieved explosive growth, albeit some two decades later than the NEA economic countries and regions due to unfavorable conditions, including facing the US and its allies right after its declaration of nationhood.

I think it is the result of a cumulative effort. Taiwan stands out due to its special status as a technological powerhouse (and a historical Chinese land). Hence, China received investment and tech that it would not otherwise have received from Japan or Korea, let alone the West.

We also need to keep in perspective that, in 1949, Taiwan had a much favorable conditions, including economic wealth and human capital (taken from the Mainland) and a lenient and amicable US support (Taiwan played significant role during the Vietnam War as a military outpost of the US).
 
.
Full of bullshit. HK captials are from all over the world, at early stage a large portion is from ASEAN. Marshal Plan is a cold war product, not American's charity. American also aid Japan, TW and South Korea. The rise of China is what Taiwan establishment want? Business is business, don't bullshit reconstruction of economy. The reputation of Taiwan firms in China mainland is among one of the worst.
I'll go first. Taiwan exports 150 MILLION notebook computers from mainland China every year. The last Taiwanese notebook computer manufacturing plant in Taiwan closed in 2005 and moved to China (citation: Taiwan's last notebook factory closes | Taipei Times (September 19, 2005)).

Now, it's your turn. Tell me, what does Hong Kong export from mainland China?

RvxnHU0.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
http://www.haijiangzx.com/2017/1005/1926541.shtml

日前,谷歌与HTC签署了的协议,谷歌将以11亿美元换取HTC移动设备部门负责Pixel手机开发的团队,并获取HTC的部分非独家知识产权。HTC变卖部分手机业务,标志着中国台湾曾经辉煌一时的手机产业彻底衰弱。其实在此之前,由于中国台湾当局对中国政府的敌视态度和一些台商的台独立场,已经使台湾面板、集成电路设计等行业的诸多公司损失惨重。

1507184590577.jpg


敌视大陆台湾面板产业由盛转衰

在21世纪初,中国台湾企业生产的TFT-LCD液晶面板市场份额高达34.9%,一度曾经与韩国并驾齐驱,并涌现出瀚宇彩晶、奇美电子、广辉电子、中华映管、友达光电等面板厂商。在2008年金融危机爆发后,全球面板厂商相继收缩战线备战寒冬。由于中国大陆拥有一大批彩电整机厂,以及中国国内市场蕴含巨大的潜力,使中国大陆对电视液晶面板的需求不减反增。为了拯救陷入严冬的中国台湾面板企业,国家连续两次组织中国大陆九大彩电厂商赴中国台湾采购液晶面板,采购总金额高达44亿美元,此举甚至一度被评价为“将中国台湾企业拉出了金融危机泥沼”。

面对中国大陆释放的善意,台湾企业却不领情,反而与韩国企业签订协议合谋涨价(联合涨价最终由韩国三星公司做污点证人告发)。在接下来的6个月时间里,面板价格涨幅达到了30%以上,导致中国大陆彩电企业再次陷入困境。中国台湾企业此举,令中国政府痛定思痛,决心扶持本土面板企业发展。

经过数年时间的发展,中国面板厂商京东方的出货量占据全球22.3%,位列世界第一,并实现了全球业内年新增专利申请量、产品首发覆盖率、智能手机和平板电脑面板市占率、高性能超大尺寸产品市占率、毛利率五个全球第一。而中国台湾的面板厂商则在走下坡路,最典型的事例莫过于台湾面板厂商在苹果Macbook air显示面板供应商列表中被剔除,并由中国京东方与韩国面板企业吃下绝大部分订单。

严防死守而非拥抱中国大陆

由于众所周知的原因,中国台湾当局对高科技企业转移到大陆讳莫如深,即使允许在大陆投资设厂,也要求在大陆投资的工厂必须与台湾工厂保持“N-1”代的技术落差,而且主导权要由台湾半导体产业掌控,且在大陆开设的工厂的产能所占比重不超过企业总产能的10%。最典型的例子莫过于台积电和联电在中国南京和厦门的工厂,两地的工厂不仅产能受限,而且在技术上也比台积电和联电在中国台湾的工厂落后一代甚至二代。特别是联电在厦门的工厂,签署协议中建设的40nm工艺线比中国大陆企业中芯国际已经掌握的28nm工艺线还要落后一代。

在中国对外开放的大潮中,像之前提到的面板产业,日本NEC、韩国三星等公司纷纷在中国合资设厂,中国台湾的友达和奇美也非常愿意在中国大陆设厂,可惜受阻于台湾当局的政令,没能在最佳时机分享中国大陆快速发展的红利。

不仅在中国大陆设厂被严格限制,中国台湾企业的技术人员跳槽到中国大陆企业也要承担很高的法律风险。由于收购受阻,中国大陆企业开始以2-3倍的薪酬从在中国台湾挖人,不仅台积电前CEO蔡力行、台积电前共同运营长蒋尚义、台湾“存储教父”高启明加盟中国大陆企业,联电、华亚科分别有数十位和上百位工程师集体跳槽中国大陆公司。

面对这种人才的自由流动,台湾当局也以行政手段加以遏制,离职的华亚科前员工从中国大陆返回台湾后立即遭到台湾“调查局”搜索询问,还有一名受聘于中国上海华力微电子的前台积电员工被指控在离职前窃取台积电的28纳米工艺制程技术。最终,台湾新竹检方认定该工程师触犯营业秘密法第13条之2第1项,意图在大陆地区非法使用营业秘密罪嫌,以及刑法第342条第1项背信罪嫌,对其提起公诉。中国台湾当局这些举措显然是杀鸡儆猴,震慑那些想跳槽到中国大陆半导体企业的中国台湾工程师。

拒绝中国大陆投资使台湾企业痛失发展机遇期

随着中国经济的腾飞,中国企业在全球范围内发起了大量并购。中国台湾当局效法美国政府直接以危害国家安全为由否决中资针对德国爱思强、美国莱迪思等公司的并购,不仅以行政命令的形式干预了自由市场,还在舆论上将中国大陆对台湾企业的收购形容为是“清兵入关”、“中国大陆意图控制台湾封测产业命脉……打烂整个半导体产业……发展了35年的台湾半导体产业逐渐落入红色版图”,这种做法使台湾企业深受其害。

在2015年10月,清华紫光集团先与台湾力成科技签署策略联盟契约及认股协议书,紫光集团拟向力成科技斥资6亿美元,获得力成科技约25%的股份。2个月后,又分别出资111.33亿元、23.94亿元收购台湾矽品精密24.9%的股权和南茂科技25%的股权。清华紫光对收购上述台湾企业,既可以向台湾企业注入大量资金,使台湾企业有更加雄厚的资本去升级技术,更新设备,提升市场竞争力,又能使台湾企业能分享中国大陆经济发展红利,实现两岸人民“同呼吸、共命运”。然而就是这样对海峡两岸都有利的好事,中国台湾民进党主席蔡英文却表示“务必小心处理”,同时要求“经济部”投审会不得让紫光并购案审查通过,并强调“因为这是台湾经济的命脉,必须巩固”。

紫光董事长赵伟国也曾向中国台湾集成电路设计的龙头企业联发科提出邀请:“若台湾法令愿意开放,我愿意马上和联发科董座蔡明介见面,促成紫光旗下展讯、锐迪科与联发科合并,携手超越高通”。联发科也给予积极回应:“只要政策许可,联发科愿意采开放的态度,携手两岸,共同提升华人企业在半导体产业的地位及竞争力”。只是受阻于大家都懂的原因,清华紫光与联发科携手对抗高通的一幕未能实现,联发科反而在市场竞争中,被高通和清华紫光麾下的展讯打的节节败退,股价一度腰斩,在今年第二季度净利润同比暴跌66.5%。

此外,对于中国大陆投资台湾企业,中国台湾企业家虽然喜欢中国大陆的钱,但依旧抱着敌视防备的心里。台积电董事长张忠谋曾表示,“对大陆紫光集团有意入股台积电持开放态度......大陆投资者不能进入台湾公司的董事会”。

握机遇互利共赢,固步自封自取灭亡

HTC在巅峰时期的市场份额占有曾高达21%,市值一度高达335亿美元,超越曾经的手机霸主诺基亚。然而短短6、7年间,HTC手机的市场份额仅为0.68%,市值相对于巅峰时期下跌了约95%。类似的事情在中国台湾IC设计龙头联发科和VIA,面板厂商瀚宇彩晶、奇美电子、广辉电子、中华映管、友达光电等公司身上已经发生或即将发生。

客观的说,中国大陆主动拥抱中国台湾,是给予台湾一个互利共赢的机会,而非有求于台湾。实践已经证明对中国进行技术封锁是做无用功,正如毛泽东同志那句话:“封锁吧,封锁十年八年,中国的一切问题都解决了”。中国台湾追随西方敌视中国大陆的做法不仅没能延缓中国大陆的技术进步和产业升级,反而是将中国大陆市场拱手相让,错失了发展良机,搬起石头砸自己的脚。希望台湾当局和社会能公正、客观、理性地看待问题,这样才真正有利于两岸经济和产业发展,有利于两岸民众福祉。
 
.
http://www.haijiangzx.com/2017/1005/1926541.shtml

日前,谷歌与HTC签署了的协议,谷歌将以11亿美元换取HTC移动设备部门负责Pixel手机开发的团队,并获取HTC的部分非独家知识产权。HTC变卖部分手机业务,标志着中国台湾曾经辉煌一时的手机产业彻底衰弱。其实在此之前,由于中国台湾当局对中国政府的敌视态度和一些台商的台独立场,已经使台湾面板、集成电路设计等行业的诸多公司损失惨重。

1507184590577.jpg


敌视大陆台湾面板产业由盛转衰

在21世纪初,中国台湾企业生产的TFT-LCD液晶面板市场份额高达34.9%,一度曾经与韩国并驾齐驱,并涌现出瀚宇彩晶、奇美电子、广辉电子、中华映管、友达光电等面板厂商。在2008年金融危机爆发后,全球面板厂商相继收缩战线备战寒冬。由于中国大陆拥有一大批彩电整机厂,以及中国国内市场蕴含巨大的潜力,使中国大陆对电视液晶面板的需求不减反增。为了拯救陷入严冬的中国台湾面板企业,国家连续两次组织中国大陆九大彩电厂商赴中国台湾采购液晶面板,采购总金额高达44亿美元,此举甚至一度被评价为“将中国台湾企业拉出了金融危机泥沼”。

面对中国大陆释放的善意,台湾企业却不领情,反而与韩国企业签订协议合谋涨价(联合涨价最终由韩国三星公司做污点证人告发)。在接下来的6个月时间里,面板价格涨幅达到了30%以上,导致中国大陆彩电企业再次陷入困境。中国台湾企业此举,令中国政府痛定思痛,决心扶持本土面板企业发展。

经过数年时间的发展,中国面板厂商京东方的出货量占据全球22.3%,位列世界第一,并实现了全球业内年新增专利申请量、产品首发覆盖率、智能手机和平板电脑面板市占率、高性能超大尺寸产品市占率、毛利率五个全球第一。而中国台湾的面板厂商则在走下坡路,最典型的事例莫过于台湾面板厂商在苹果Macbook air显示面板供应商列表中被剔除,并由中国京东方与韩国面板企业吃下绝大部分订单。

严防死守而非拥抱中国大陆

由于众所周知的原因,中国台湾当局对高科技企业转移到大陆讳莫如深,即使允许在大陆投资设厂,也要求在大陆投资的工厂必须与台湾工厂保持“N-1”代的技术落差,而且主导权要由台湾半导体产业掌控,且在大陆开设的工厂的产能所占比重不超过企业总产能的10%。最典型的例子莫过于台积电和联电在中国南京和厦门的工厂,两地的工厂不仅产能受限,而且在技术上也比台积电和联电在中国台湾的工厂落后一代甚至二代。特别是联电在厦门的工厂,签署协议中建设的40nm工艺线比中国大陆企业中芯国际已经掌握的28nm工艺线还要落后一代。

在中国对外开放的大潮中,像之前提到的面板产业,日本NEC、韩国三星等公司纷纷在中国合资设厂,中国台湾的友达和奇美也非常愿意在中国大陆设厂,可惜受阻于台湾当局的政令,没能在最佳时机分享中国大陆快速发展的红利。

不仅在中国大陆设厂被严格限制,中国台湾企业的技术人员跳槽到中国大陆企业也要承担很高的法律风险。由于收购受阻,中国大陆企业开始以2-3倍的薪酬从在中国台湾挖人,不仅台积电前CEO蔡力行、台积电前共同运营长蒋尚义、台湾“存储教父”高启明加盟中国大陆企业,联电、华亚科分别有数十位和上百位工程师集体跳槽中国大陆公司。

面对这种人才的自由流动,台湾当局也以行政手段加以遏制,离职的华亚科前员工从中国大陆返回台湾后立即遭到台湾“调查局”搜索询问,还有一名受聘于中国上海华力微电子的前台积电员工被指控在离职前窃取台积电的28纳米工艺制程技术。最终,台湾新竹检方认定该工程师触犯营业秘密法第13条之2第1项,意图在大陆地区非法使用营业秘密罪嫌,以及刑法第342条第1项背信罪嫌,对其提起公诉。中国台湾当局这些举措显然是杀鸡儆猴,震慑那些想跳槽到中国大陆半导体企业的中国台湾工程师。

拒绝中国大陆投资使台湾企业痛失发展机遇期

随着中国经济的腾飞,中国企业在全球范围内发起了大量并购。中国台湾当局效法美国政府直接以危害国家安全为由否决中资针对德国爱思强、美国莱迪思等公司的并购,不仅以行政命令的形式干预了自由市场,还在舆论上将中国大陆对台湾企业的收购形容为是“清兵入关”、“中国大陆意图控制台湾封测产业命脉……打烂整个半导体产业……发展了35年的台湾半导体产业逐渐落入红色版图”,这种做法使台湾企业深受其害。

在2015年10月,清华紫光集团先与台湾力成科技签署策略联盟契约及认股协议书,紫光集团拟向力成科技斥资6亿美元,获得力成科技约25%的股份。2个月后,又分别出资111.33亿元、23.94亿元收购台湾矽品精密24.9%的股权和南茂科技25%的股权。清华紫光对收购上述台湾企业,既可以向台湾企业注入大量资金,使台湾企业有更加雄厚的资本去升级技术,更新设备,提升市场竞争力,又能使台湾企业能分享中国大陆经济发展红利,实现两岸人民“同呼吸、共命运”。然而就是这样对海峡两岸都有利的好事,中国台湾民进党主席蔡英文却表示“务必小心处理”,同时要求“经济部”投审会不得让紫光并购案审查通过,并强调“因为这是台湾经济的命脉,必须巩固”。

紫光董事长赵伟国也曾向中国台湾集成电路设计的龙头企业联发科提出邀请:“若台湾法令愿意开放,我愿意马上和联发科董座蔡明介见面,促成紫光旗下展讯、锐迪科与联发科合并,携手超越高通”。联发科也给予积极回应:“只要政策许可,联发科愿意采开放的态度,携手两岸,共同提升华人企业在半导体产业的地位及竞争力”。只是受阻于大家都懂的原因,清华紫光与联发科携手对抗高通的一幕未能实现,联发科反而在市场竞争中,被高通和清华紫光麾下的展讯打的节节败退,股价一度腰斩,在今年第二季度净利润同比暴跌66.5%。

此外,对于中国大陆投资台湾企业,中国台湾企业家虽然喜欢中国大陆的钱,但依旧抱着敌视防备的心里。台积电董事长张忠谋曾表示,“对大陆紫光集团有意入股台积电持开放态度......大陆投资者不能进入台湾公司的董事会”。

握机遇互利共赢,固步自封自取灭亡

HTC在巅峰时期的市场份额占有曾高达21%,市值一度高达335亿美元,超越曾经的手机霸主诺基亚。然而短短6、7年间,HTC手机的市场份额仅为0.68%,市值相对于巅峰时期下跌了约95%。类似的事情在中国台湾IC设计龙头联发科和VIA,面板厂商瀚宇彩晶、奇美电子、广辉电子、中华映管、友达光电等公司身上已经发生或即将发生。

客观的说,中国大陆主动拥抱中国台湾,是给予台湾一个互利共赢的机会,而非有求于台湾。实践已经证明对中国进行技术封锁是做无用功,正如毛泽东同志那句话:“封锁吧,封锁十年八年,中国的一切问题都解决了”。中国台湾追随西方敌视中国大陆的做法不仅没能延缓中国大陆的技术进步和产业升级,反而是将中国大陆市场拱手相让,错失了发展良机,搬起石头砸自己的脚。希望台湾当局和社会能公正、客观、理性地看待问题,这样才真正有利于两岸经济和产业发展,有利于两岸民众福祉。
I asked you a simple question: What does Hong Kong export from mainland China?

A post about Taiwan's HTC is not on-topic.

You asserted Hong Kong is a major investor in China. Well, what did Hong Kong invest in and what is the high-value export that has helped China earn large amounts of foreign hard currency?

I have already provided a citation to show Taiwan exports 150 MILLION high-tech and expensive notebook computers from mainland China every year. This is a significant Taiwanese contribution in helping mainland China earn an annual US$500 billion trade surplus.

I want you to reciprocate and tell me what is Hong Kong's contribution in helping China earn vast sums of money from international trade to fund China's internal modernization.
 
Last edited:
.
废话。港资大多是注册在香港的海外资本,不一定是香港本地,东南亚很多公司都注册在香港, 欧美也很多。
谈台湾重建大陆经济是很搞笑的说法,国共内战根本没结束,关系时好时坏,而且台商投资企业基本都是技术含量较低的劳动力密集型的企业。台商企业总体而言在大陆名声很差,好一点的人才根本不会去台湾企业就业,典型的农民工和较低教育水平的群体扎堆的企业。

台湾是中华民族伟大复兴之路的一个障碍,竟然自诩是重建中国经济的大功臣,真是滑天下之大稽。这篇奇文放到知乎上必定被群嘲。脸面可以很多种方式来赢取,但肯定不是这种搞笑的腔调。

台湾要知道自己几斤几两,美国援助欧洲重建尚可说的过去,台湾重建大陆经济? WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING BECAUSE I ALSO WANT SOME...
 
.
Your argument is stupid.

If Germany was left mostly intact, there would be no need for an American Marshall Plan.

The US did bomb Germany back to the Stone Age, because the Germans couldn't feed themselves.
----------

CARE packages prevented starvation in post-war Germany | Deutsche Welle

U7DSqxo.jpg
It is you who is ignorant. Yes the Germans suffered hunger and hardship but Germany industrial and manufacturing complex were almost intact. The US pumped money into Germany because the german armed forces were needed to counter possible onslaughts of the Red Army.

The Germans would recover from the war without US money just they needed a bit longer.
 
.
It is you who is ignorant. Yes the Germans suffered hunger and hardship but Germany industrial and manufacturing complex were almost intact. The US pumped money into Germany because the german armed forces were needed to counter possible onslaughts of the Red Army.

The Germans would recover from the war without US money just they needed a bit longer.
You're delusional. The US and Russia bombed German cities to rubble.

To win the war, the US and Russia had to bomb German industrial production until the Germans couldn't manufacture any more war equipment.

Furthermore, the US opened its market to German cars to allow the Germans to earn hard currency. Without US assistance, Germany's economy would never have recovered.
 
.
Taiwanese companies' investing in mainland China is not more honorable than its investing in Vietnam, or Chinese companies investment in Cambodia. These investments were profit driven, so comparing it to Marshall Plan is nothing more than self-serving.
 
.
废话。港资大多是注册在香港的海外资本,不一定是香港本地,东南亚很多公司都注册在香港, 欧美也很多。
谈台湾重建大陆经济是很搞笑的说法,国共内战根本没结束,关系时好时坏,而且台商投资企业基本都是技术含量较低的劳动力密集型的企业。台商企业总体而言在大陆名声很差,好一点的人才根本不会去台湾企业就业,典型的农民工和较低教育水平的群体扎堆的企业。

台湾是中华民族伟大复兴之路的一个障碍,竟然自诩是重建中国经济的大功臣,真是滑天下之大稽。这篇奇文放到知乎上必定被群嘲。脸面可以很多种方式来赢取,但肯定不是这种搞笑的腔调。

台湾要知道自己几斤几两,美国援助欧洲重建尚可说的过去,台湾重建大陆经济? WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING BECAUSE I ALSO WANT SOME...
Do you mind not going off-topic?

The question is very simple. I will ask you one last time.

Identify Hong Kong's major export from China that helps China earn vast amounts of hard currency for Chinese internal modernization.

In two attempts, your answer so far is that you can't name a single significant Hong Kong export from mainland China.

Let me make this easy for you. I will name a few Taiwanese exports from mainland China to help you get the gist.

Taiwans exports 150 million notebook computers from mainland China.
Taiwan's AUO has 8.5G LCD display manufacturing plants on mainland China that exports LCD displays all over the world.
Taiwan's TSMC and UMC have mainland Chinese manufacturing plants that produce computer logic-chips, which are embedded into electronic products and sold all over the world.
Taiwan manufactures digital cameras in mainland China for worldwide export.
Taiwan's PCB (ie. printed circuit board) companies manufacture PCBs in mainland China for export.
Taiwan MediaTek's yearly 800 million chips ("System-on-Chip solutions for wireless communications, HDTV, DVD and Blu-ray") are incorporated into electronic products assembled in Taiwan and mainland China for worldwide export (citation: MediaTek aims to ship 800+ million SoCs in 2015).

See? This is easy. I can keep naming Taiwanese production on mainland China that earns huge sums of export earnings for China.

Why can't you name a single important Hong Kong export from mainland China?

Are you willing to agree with me that Hong Kong is not a worthwhile investor in mainland China and has played no role in China's economic modernization?

Taiwanese companies' investing in mainland China is not more honorable than its investing in Vietnam, or Chinese companies investment in Cambodia. These investments were profit driven, so comparing it to Marshall Plan is nothing more than self-serving.
I disagree.

Taiwanese companies built the billion-dollar manufacturing plants on mainland China. This provides jobs to mainland Chinese construction companies.

Taiwanese companies pay annual real estate taxes. Those Taiwanese companies are an important part of the tax base for the municipality that they are located in.

Taiwanese companies provide jobs to millions of mainland Chinese employees. Employees with high-paying jobs spend money that invigorate the local economy.

Taiwanese companies pay local shipping companies to transport and warehouse their products. This means more jobs for mainland Chinese.

Taiwanese companies train the local mainland Chinese employees in high-tech. Over time, this results in competition for experienced mainland Chinese employees and wages go up.

Without the Taiwanese to provide the billions of dollars of investments and millions of jobs, China today would look like the poor China from 1949-1976.

Clearly, mainland China has benefited tremendously from the vast infusion of Taiwanese investment money and technology. Today's China has a yearly trade surplus of US$500 billion. Pre-1976 China had a trade deficit. What was the difference? Taiwan.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom