REPORTSNo Ms Romila Thapar, even to a 15 year old student like me, you don’t make sense

[Hamza913]

Looks like you should follow your own advise...
Simple question - if is it imported, what happened to people and the Hinduism in place it was imported from? There must be some archaeological proofs existing, at least ONE proof in the place it originated to show it came from there??

For example, we can trace Islam from where it was born. We can see the evidences and trace it back to it's origins.
Same with Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism etc.
So, you must have some place you can trace Hinduism back, right? Can you share that place?

Some times lack of proof means it DID NOT HAPPEN..

I already told you, the pagan religions of other Indo-Europeans share remarkable similarities with Hinduism. Google it if you wish to find out in more detail.

 

[pothead]

Yet ALL the sanskrit literature and from INDIA..... there is NO sanskrit literature in rest of the world

Ever wonder why ?

Same with Hinduism.
No proof anywhere else except India, still it was a migrated religion.

Oh the desperation of deluded folks

 

[Advaitagrata]

Same with Hinduism.
No proof anywhere else except India, still it was a migrated religion.

Oh the desperation of deluded folks

Bigotry makes men act funny. That is just the way it is.

 

[Hamza913]

LOL.... is that suppose to be funny ?

I speak sanskrit and I speak Tamil and hindi and malayalam and urdu and english and a couple of more English languages. I do not need a white man to tell me the roots of my language.

That video only says the roots of European languages lie in Sanskrit.

Yet ALL the sanskrit literature IS FROM INDIA..... there is NO sanskrit literature in rest of the world

Ever wonder why ?

There is no evidence that people from Hindustan migrated to the rest of the world, therefore, the similarities can only be because people from other parts of the world migrated to Hindustan. This is substantiated significantly by genetics as well as archaeology. Nobody other than you guys believe otherwise, which should tell you something.

Bigotry makes men act funny. That is just the way it is.

Ironic coming from you.

What was it you said about that guy from the video again?

 

[Advaitagrata]

I already told you, the pagan religions of other Indo-Europeans share remarkable similarities with Hinduism. Google it if you wish to find out in more detail.

Which would mean that its the INDIANS who migrated to Europe and not the other way around.

But let not FACTS trouble you with your propaganda.

THIS is a more accurate and Detailed map of the Genetic migration. What does it tell you ?

There is no evidence that people from Hindustan migrated to the rest of the world, therefore, the similarities can only be because people from other parts of the world migrated to Hindustan. This is substantiated significantly by genetics as well as archaeology. Nobody other than you guys believe otherwise, which should tell you something.

Sure, NO "evidence"

Except Genetics AND Sanskrit.

Tell me, how many nations have their own history written in Sanskrit ? ALL of Indian history is written in sanskrit

 

[Hamza913]

Which would mean that its the INDIANS who migrated to Europe and not the other way around.

But let not FACTS trouble you with your propaganda.

THIS is a more accurate and Detailed map of the Genetic migration. What does it tell you ?

Alright genius, riddle me this, why is there no evidence of chariots prior to the Vedic era? Why did the languages and religion suddenly have a huge shift? Why is it that Europeans don't have DNA from Hindustan, but it is rather the other way around?

 

[pothead]

I already told you, the pagan religions of other Indo-Europeans share remarkable similarities with Hinduism. Google it if you wish to find out in more detail.

You sound like Romilla Thapar.

Europeans 2000 years back didn't have a language where as Indians were busy writing literature in Sanskrit and a host of other languages.

If Hinduism migrated from somewhere else, we should be seeing list of below things in some other place than India.

1. Old temples to Lord Shiva & Vishnu.
2. Hindu architecture similar to how you find all over India dating back to 3000 years
3. Literature mentioning a Single Hindu god in that place it migrated from
4. Language similarity

All Indian languages are related and have zero relation to any language in Europe, Middle East and East Asia. No Archaeological proof. No genetic proof.

At some point you have sit back and wonder.....

 

[Hamza913]

Which would mean that its the INDIANS who migrated to Europe and not the other way around.

But let not FACTS trouble you with your propaganda.

THIS is a more accurate and Detailed map of the Genetic migration. What does it tell you ?

Sure, NO "evidence"

Except Genetics AND Sanskrit.

Tell me, how many nations have their own history written in Sanskrit ? ALL of Indian history is written in sanskrit

No, a significant amount of Hindustani history is written in Farsi and Urdu, not Sanskrit.

Also, if Sanskrit is local, why does it have more in common with Avestan than the Dravidian languages of that time?

 

[Advaitagrata]

Alright genius, riddle me this, why is there no evidence of chariots prior to the Vedic era? Why did the languages and religion suddenly have a huge shift? Why is it that Europeans don't have DNA from Hindustan, but it is rather the other way around?

Which literature exist BEFORE "Vedic era" ?

But there is certainly ROCK PAINTINGS in India that show Horses.

As for rest of your questions....... europeas DO have dna as Indians

Finally WHAT LANGUAGE SHIFT ?

 

[Hamza913]

You sound like Romilla Thapar.

Europeans 2000 years back didn't have a language where as Indians were busy writing literature in Sanskrit and a host of other languages.

If Hinduism migrated from somewhere else, we should be seeing list of below things in some other place than India.

1. Old temples to Lord Shiva & Vishnu.
2. Hindu architecture similar to how you find all over India dating back to 3000 years
3. Literature mentioning a Single Hindu god in that place it migrated from
4. Language similarity

All Indian languages are related and have zero relation to any language in Europe, Middle East and East Asia. No Archaeological proof. No genetic proof.

At some point you have sit back and wonder.....

I'm sorry what?

The Europeans were flourishing at the time under the Romans, where as Hindustan was getting crippled by the Kushans.

Out of those 4 criteria you gave, 3 of them have been met.

 

[Advaitagrata]

No, a significant amount of Hindustani history is written in Farsi and Urdu, not Sanskrit.

Also, if Sanskrit is local, why does it have more in common with Avestan than the Dravidian languages of that time?

1. Dude the very Vedas are written in Sanskrit. And it describes INDIAN RIVERS and MOUNTAINS and SEAS.
2. The Ramayana that give a detailed geography of India is written in Sanskrit.
3. The Mahabharat that give a detailed History and Geography of India is written in Sanskrit.

THIS will give you a list of Indian texts ALL OF WHICH IS WRITTEN IN SANSKRIT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_historic_Indian_texts

 

[Hamza913]

Which literature exist BEFORE "Vedic era" ?

But there is certainly ROCK PAINTINGS in India that show Horses.

As for rest of your questions....... europeas DO have dna as Indians

Finally WHAT LANGUAGE SHIFT ?

IVC had their own language, and it is not the same as Sanskrit, that's for sure.

Horses existed in Hindustan prior to the Vedic era, but chariots didn't.

You can post all the maps you want, the fact is genetics and archaeology shows that the Indo-Aryan migrations occurred. Using them to support your argument shows how ignorant you are.

What language shift? Are you serious?

1. Dude the very Vedas are written in Sanskrit. And it describes INDIAN RIVERS and MOUNTAINS and SEAS.
2. The Ramayana that give a detailed geography of India is written in Sanskrit.
3. The Mahabharat that give a detailed History and Geography of India is written in Sanskrit.

THIS will give you a list of Indian texts ALL OF WHICH IS WRITTEN IN SANSKRIT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_historic_Indian_texts

1. That doesn't prove anything, Sanskrit came from a proto Indo-Iranian language which split into two branches, Avestan and Sanskrit.

2. Same as above.

3. Same as above.

Look, it's clear you don't understand the proof for the Indo-Aryan migrations. I would suggest you do further research, listen to what reputable scholars say, and then get back to me.

 

[Advaitagrata]

I'm sorry what?

The Europeans were flourishing at the time under the Romans, where as Hindustan was getting crippled by the Kushans.

Out of those 4 criteria you gave, 3 of them have been met.

Ya, Indians were getting "crippled" by the Kushans.

These are Kushan coins showing Indian gods

 

[Hamza913]

Ya, Indians were getting "crippled" by the Kushans.

These are Kushan coins showing Indian gods

Kushans assimilated into the local culture of Pakistan/Afghanistan, and as a result were great patrons of the religions of the region.

They weren't Hindustani, they came from China. Their descendants would also be Afghans and Pakistanis, not Hindustanis. The Hindustanis were only subjugated by them.

 

[Advaitagrata]

IVC had their own language, and it is not the same as Sanskrit, that's for sure.

Horses existed in Hindustan prior to the Vedic era, but chariots didn't.

You can post all the maps you want, the fact is genetics and archaeology shows that the Indo-Aryan migrations occurred. Using them to support your argument shows how ignorant you are.

What language shift? Are you serious?

Commons sense tells us that the language of the IVC was sanskrit. There is no evidence of any other language in that area apart from sanskrit or its various forms.

Evidence of chariot is the SPOKED WHEEL and guess what ? Found this 6000 years ago.

And YES , I ask again, WHAT LANGUAGE SHIFT ?

1. That doesn't prove anything, Sanskrit came from a proto Indo-Iranian language which split into two branches, Avestan and Sanskrit.

2. Same as above.

3. Same as above.

Look, it's clear you don't understand the proof for the Indo-Aryan migrations. I would suggest you do further research, listen to what reputable scholars say, and then get back to me.

LOL.... Avestan is impure sanskrit like Pali.

The evidence is their poor grammar.


"Get back to you" for what ? educate you further ? No Thanks.