WishLivePak
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 24, 2014
- Messages
- 4,424
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Your example is long and boring, I hate to tell you. I am surprised you decided to write such long example.Your example has no economic relevance or common sense, I hate to tell you. I am even surprised you decided to write such example.
A small country with smaller population and area, will need lesser schools, lesser hospitals, lesser roads and everything else and lesser revenue to enjoy a better lifestyle, compared to a country 4-5 times larger in area and population. Just think about it. Here are the top richest countries BY population (per Capita). You'll notice, the US, China, the UK, etc, aren't in the top 10 in multiple analysis by the CIA and the World Bank. Its because there are countries much smaller with much less population, which require less money to provide a better lifestyle to its citizens, and these countries are where people are the richest, per capita i.e.. When one country needs to cover a 100 mile area with roads for example, and has 100000 people living there, the schools, businesses, hospitals, overall infrastructure needs will be MUCH less than a country with 10,000 mile area and with 2 million people. Its really common sense to be honest with you. Check out this link below and read for yourself.
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Just say, "A city with 100 people is easier to manage than a city with 700 people."