fatman17
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 32,563
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
- Location
comment: Reflections of a loser Munir Attaullah
The people have been led to believe a new era of adl-o-insaf is around the corner that will also be cheap, expeditious, and ghareeb awam-friendly. The reality is that justice, excepting the Taliban variety, nowhere in a modern complex society, can ever be cheap or expeditious, more or less by definition
Growing up in my teens, I learnt much, both consciously and subliminally, from my father. To deal with a then cocky, Mr Know-all of a son (detractors will say I have not changed much since), who disagreed with him on many an issue, could not have been easy. For he was a man of high and austere moral principle; and such people usually tend to be pretty inflexible in their thinking.
But he handled these disagreements with great common sense and large doses of tolerance. It was mostly reasoned argument and gentle persuasion, rather than gruff displeasure and aloof diktat. That approach encouraged self-appraisal of ones own stance. And it was a valuable lesson on how to soften, mitigate, and hence gracefully survive even unbridgeable differences of opinion. A man of no mean intelligence, he instinctively thought in terms of the positives of a given situation.
Nor, for a parent, did he often succumb to the powerful temptation of offering unsolicited advice. And, even when asked, he would usually do so only obliquely, mostly through analogy and by engaging you in a two-way discussion. I offer you but just one typical example of the many I remember of what I mean by all the above.
My father had just bought a new car when I was about fourteen and keen on learning how to drive. One summer afternoon, as everyone was resting, I sneakily purloined the keys of the car, planning on some practice in the broad and ample driveway. But, in backing out of the narrow garage, I badly scratched one side of the car. Sheepishly, I confessed my demeanour as the family gathered at teatime.
Mother was naturally upset and angry, and proceeded to scold me at length on how it would cost thousands of rupees to repair the damage, and on my generally irresponsible behaviour etc. etc. She then turned to my father (who had listened to the tirade quietly) and said, Why dont you also say something and knock some sense into this stupid boy?
Father laughed, and said lovingly to my mother, Actually, you should be happy, not angry, that he has had this accident. Think of it this way: The lessons he will draw for himself from this accident have been cheaply bought: just a few thousand rupees. Without this early accident as a salutary warning, his self confidence would likely have, in due course, led to him having a much more serious first accident. And that might have cost a life or a limb
The argument left mother spluttering of course, but it was impossible even for her to suppress a bemused smile. Everyone else laughed, the tension dissipated, and an un-bruised (and, therefore, receptive) ego was left to draw some valuable conclusions. For one thing, will it surprise you to know that, as a careful and rule abiding driver ever since, I have never had a car accident in more than 50 years of driving?
If by now you think todays column is about my father, you are mistaken. For, what I actually want to discuss are some random thoughts on the events of the last fortnight surrounding the Long March. So why do I start with a lengthy digression?
Here is a hint: the preamble has the same relevance to what you are about to read as the Objectives Resolution has for our Constitution. And if that sounds suitably mystifying, thats as should be. Anything worth saying should never be said with such clarity as to leave no room for different parties not to find a suitable interpretation that suits their particular purpose.
For, readers will no doubt remember and some gleefully so that I have ended up being comprehensively on the losing side of the divide on an issue that aroused so much passion in so many. Did I not argue many a time in these columns that, for all the gross injustice done by the ex-President to CJ Chaudhry and his colleagues, forcing a restoration to the status quo ante through a long drawn-out political agitation on the streets was to both focus on the wrong issue and adopt the wrong methods? Did I not also argue against being overly enamoured of judicial activism as a valuable tool in fighting many a social and political evil?
Such exhortations for restraint were drowned in a flood of public political passion. If the people reject your viewpoint then, to a large extent, it is irrelevant whether you were right or wrong. The sensible thing to do is to respect and accept that decision whatever be ones private misgivings. For every such stumble can also be an occasion to re-assess strengths and weaknesses and be guided thereby; and every such setback treated as an opportunity to advance, but in a more sure-footed manner. The deed is done; and what is done cannot be undone. But, can everyone now, suitably chastened, please move on?
For, with passion spent, there is every reason to fear that what happened on the Ides of March may not be the end of a story but simply the prelude to a new chapter in our history of political confrontation, infighting, and turmoil. The fractious lot that we are always on the lookout to teach someone a lesson, seek revenge, and extract the very last ounce of our presumed rightful pound of flesh who will bet that the protagonists, both the victorious and the humbled, will do anything other than draw only those conclusions that suit them from all that has transpired?
The legal fraternity itself faces the toughest challenge to its future thinking and conduct. What will it now do, without an external one-point agenda to focus its energies upon? The people have been led to believe a new era of adl-o-insaf is around the corner that will also be cheap, expeditious, and ghareeb awam-friendly. The reality is that justice, excepting the Taliban variety, nowhere in a modern complex society, can ever be cheap or expeditious, more or less by definition. Nor is the suo moto jurisdiction the great answer to every bit of injustice.
As for the SC, it is now likely to be flooded by a spate of constitutional petitions of one sort or another, seeking judicial resolution of essentially political disputes. Is a trial of the ex-president for his misdeeds, and the re-opening of the NRO issue, really the way forward?
The PMLN, having tasted blood, is even more unlikely now to opt for the politics of conciliation rather than confrontation. And why should it? Is there not further political mileage to be gained by agitating over the 17th amendment and targeting the President and the Punjab Governor?
As for the media, the already smug self-righteousness (as the authentic voice of the people) of many a leading personality therein, will surely have received a not insubstantial confirmatory ego boost by the success of their stellar role in forcing an eventual climb down by the government. Dont expect modesty in their future oracular activity.
The writer is a businessman. A selection of his columns is now available in book form. Visit munirattaullah.com
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
The people have been led to believe a new era of adl-o-insaf is around the corner that will also be cheap, expeditious, and ghareeb awam-friendly. The reality is that justice, excepting the Taliban variety, nowhere in a modern complex society, can ever be cheap or expeditious, more or less by definition
Growing up in my teens, I learnt much, both consciously and subliminally, from my father. To deal with a then cocky, Mr Know-all of a son (detractors will say I have not changed much since), who disagreed with him on many an issue, could not have been easy. For he was a man of high and austere moral principle; and such people usually tend to be pretty inflexible in their thinking.
But he handled these disagreements with great common sense and large doses of tolerance. It was mostly reasoned argument and gentle persuasion, rather than gruff displeasure and aloof diktat. That approach encouraged self-appraisal of ones own stance. And it was a valuable lesson on how to soften, mitigate, and hence gracefully survive even unbridgeable differences of opinion. A man of no mean intelligence, he instinctively thought in terms of the positives of a given situation.
Nor, for a parent, did he often succumb to the powerful temptation of offering unsolicited advice. And, even when asked, he would usually do so only obliquely, mostly through analogy and by engaging you in a two-way discussion. I offer you but just one typical example of the many I remember of what I mean by all the above.
My father had just bought a new car when I was about fourteen and keen on learning how to drive. One summer afternoon, as everyone was resting, I sneakily purloined the keys of the car, planning on some practice in the broad and ample driveway. But, in backing out of the narrow garage, I badly scratched one side of the car. Sheepishly, I confessed my demeanour as the family gathered at teatime.
Mother was naturally upset and angry, and proceeded to scold me at length on how it would cost thousands of rupees to repair the damage, and on my generally irresponsible behaviour etc. etc. She then turned to my father (who had listened to the tirade quietly) and said, Why dont you also say something and knock some sense into this stupid boy?
Father laughed, and said lovingly to my mother, Actually, you should be happy, not angry, that he has had this accident. Think of it this way: The lessons he will draw for himself from this accident have been cheaply bought: just a few thousand rupees. Without this early accident as a salutary warning, his self confidence would likely have, in due course, led to him having a much more serious first accident. And that might have cost a life or a limb
The argument left mother spluttering of course, but it was impossible even for her to suppress a bemused smile. Everyone else laughed, the tension dissipated, and an un-bruised (and, therefore, receptive) ego was left to draw some valuable conclusions. For one thing, will it surprise you to know that, as a careful and rule abiding driver ever since, I have never had a car accident in more than 50 years of driving?
If by now you think todays column is about my father, you are mistaken. For, what I actually want to discuss are some random thoughts on the events of the last fortnight surrounding the Long March. So why do I start with a lengthy digression?
Here is a hint: the preamble has the same relevance to what you are about to read as the Objectives Resolution has for our Constitution. And if that sounds suitably mystifying, thats as should be. Anything worth saying should never be said with such clarity as to leave no room for different parties not to find a suitable interpretation that suits their particular purpose.
For, readers will no doubt remember and some gleefully so that I have ended up being comprehensively on the losing side of the divide on an issue that aroused so much passion in so many. Did I not argue many a time in these columns that, for all the gross injustice done by the ex-President to CJ Chaudhry and his colleagues, forcing a restoration to the status quo ante through a long drawn-out political agitation on the streets was to both focus on the wrong issue and adopt the wrong methods? Did I not also argue against being overly enamoured of judicial activism as a valuable tool in fighting many a social and political evil?
Such exhortations for restraint were drowned in a flood of public political passion. If the people reject your viewpoint then, to a large extent, it is irrelevant whether you were right or wrong. The sensible thing to do is to respect and accept that decision whatever be ones private misgivings. For every such stumble can also be an occasion to re-assess strengths and weaknesses and be guided thereby; and every such setback treated as an opportunity to advance, but in a more sure-footed manner. The deed is done; and what is done cannot be undone. But, can everyone now, suitably chastened, please move on?
For, with passion spent, there is every reason to fear that what happened on the Ides of March may not be the end of a story but simply the prelude to a new chapter in our history of political confrontation, infighting, and turmoil. The fractious lot that we are always on the lookout to teach someone a lesson, seek revenge, and extract the very last ounce of our presumed rightful pound of flesh who will bet that the protagonists, both the victorious and the humbled, will do anything other than draw only those conclusions that suit them from all that has transpired?
The legal fraternity itself faces the toughest challenge to its future thinking and conduct. What will it now do, without an external one-point agenda to focus its energies upon? The people have been led to believe a new era of adl-o-insaf is around the corner that will also be cheap, expeditious, and ghareeb awam-friendly. The reality is that justice, excepting the Taliban variety, nowhere in a modern complex society, can ever be cheap or expeditious, more or less by definition. Nor is the suo moto jurisdiction the great answer to every bit of injustice.
As for the SC, it is now likely to be flooded by a spate of constitutional petitions of one sort or another, seeking judicial resolution of essentially political disputes. Is a trial of the ex-president for his misdeeds, and the re-opening of the NRO issue, really the way forward?
The PMLN, having tasted blood, is even more unlikely now to opt for the politics of conciliation rather than confrontation. And why should it? Is there not further political mileage to be gained by agitating over the 17th amendment and targeting the President and the Punjab Governor?
As for the media, the already smug self-righteousness (as the authentic voice of the people) of many a leading personality therein, will surely have received a not insubstantial confirmatory ego boost by the success of their stellar role in forcing an eventual climb down by the government. Dont expect modesty in their future oracular activity.
The writer is a businessman. A selection of his columns is now available in book form. Visit munirattaullah.com
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan