What's new

Red star rising? China’s space ambitions skyrocket as the US loses ground in race

if you see anyone behave that way you have every right to do so irrespective of race.
you still have not answered my question. why do the chinese here behave like "insecure little shits"



@Dungeness do you see? and he will probably get his way
Chinese is the current title holder of world fastest supercomputer and it is Indian feeling insecure lagging behind trying everyday to badmouthing China :enjoy:

The insecure is you.
 
.
if you see anyone behave that way you have every right to do so irrespective of race.
you still have not answered my question. why do the chinese here behave like "insecure little shits"



@Dungeness do you see? and he will probably get his way


Yeah, you are their enemy, and Chinese are their buddy. What do you expect?

There is nothing Chinese need to feel insecure about. With the intelligence level of some of your countrymen demonstrated in that thread, there is nothing for Chinese to worry about. Chinese were just having a party there.
 
. .
. .
That's right, I guess.
Because we fought for their security.
when did you do that?

They said "the stupid opponents" is more helpful than the smart allies, especially when the opponents are "stupid insecure little shits" like those your countrymen. :partay:
there are indians who are "insecure little shits" but you guys outnumber them 20 to 1. i just wanted to know why.

any we need to get back to topic
 
.
when did you do that?


there are indians who are "insecure little shits" but you guys outnumber them 20 to 1. i just wanted to know why.

any we need to get back to topic


Pal, that is enough fun for the day. There is nothing constructive in talking with you, I feel I am getting stupid. Bye.
 
.
when did you do that?


there are indians who are "insecure little shits" but you guys outnumber them 20 to 1. i just wanted to know why.

any we need to get back to topic


Basically, we can do anything for them, and so do they.
Both of us have proved that.
 
.
Basically, we can do anything for them, and so do they.
Both of us have proved that.
yes but that is because you want india to waste its energy and political capital on its west instead of looking at the east.
in international relations, there are no friends only common interests. most pakistanis dont have the grey matter to see that
 
.
yes but that is because you want india to waste its energy and political capital on its west instead of looking at the east.
in international relations, there are no friends only common interests. most pakistanis dont have the grey matter to see that

That's not true for us.
 
. . .
Those reusable rocket is not going to match expendable heavy rocket, it still need have enough fuel for it to land back. In the end, as what I say expensive technology that literally not going to save cost and limit the payload. Tell me how many of those rocket has been reuse so far? Zero.
You can bet whatever pittance of a salary you are getting that control engineers all over the world, including Chinese, are mightily impressed with what SpaceX did. This is not about payload but about advancing an existing technology and this is where you missed the point. No surprise here.

You are looking at a leap in monitoring, feedback, and response loop system design and engineering, and that it is far better than anything your China have at this time. The SpaceX rocket launched, delivered a Japanese satellite, and landed VERTICALLY ON A SHIP.

Take a look at the map for China. It is dangerous for any Chinese capsule to effect a water landing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splashdown

We have wide open ocean spaces for our capsules to splash down. Your China do not have that luxury. To get away from shipping lanes and other countries, the Chinese capsules would have to land somewhere past the JPN and the Philippines. That is why your Chinese space program decided to land -- on land. A far more dangerous situation. The Chinese space program would love to do what SpaceX did.

And the fact US can't do a manned mission currently is correct.
So what ? How does this 'prove' that the US is 'behind' China ? We can argue that since China does not have a reusable vehicle program that spanned three decades, it is China who is behind US. And most likely Chinese scientists and engineers would agree. :rolleyes:
 
.
Chairman Smith Opening Statement: Are We Losing the Space Race to China

US officials are not as optimistic as American and Indian PDF users here.

I was waiting for you to drag us in, are you trying to Bash Indians in order to hide your inferiority to Americans?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom