What's new

Record-breaking PSLV mission has a downside: Ex-ISRO chief G. Madhavan Nair

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
BENGALURU: Buried in the flood of congratulatory messages that the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) received after its recent space feat is one discordant note raising some concern.

It is from none other than G. Madhavan Nair, the former chairman of the country's premier space body. Nair, during whose term the agency launched the Chandrayaan mission to the Moon, feels ISRO's latest Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) mission potentially has some hidden dangers to its own space assets.

On February 15, a PSLV released a flock of over 100 nano- and micro-satellites of overseas customers for a fee. Of them, 88 satellites called "Doves" belonged to Planet, a San Francisco-based startup. All these tiny satellites, each smaller than a briefcase, were lobbed into a polar orbit 506 km above the Earth by the PSLV in a flawless mission.

"I am somewhat concerned because the region where so many of these objects have been placed is the same where our own Earth observation satellites are, or will be," Nair told this correspondent over the phone.

The nano-satellites, Nair pointed out, have a short useful life after which they become junk that will keep floating in space for years in the same orbit with chances of colliding with ISRO's operational satellites sharing the same space.

"The debris that these nano-satellites will leave after their brief existence in space are potential source of damage to us. Safety of our satellites is more important," Nair maintained.

He cautioned that ISRO should carefully weigh a few million dollars of commercial gain from launching foreign nano-satellites into 500-km orbits against the potential harm to the present and future Earth observation satellites close to their lanes.

He also noted that in case of a future collision between the debris from any of these nano-satellites and a working satellite belonging to another country, India will have to pay for the damages. "Therefore, I do not know if we should do it," he said.

Nair was referring to the Space Liability Convention that entered into force in 1972, under which launching countries "should bear international responsibility" for all space objects launched from their territory "regardless of to whom the space object belongs".

Nair said that in his view, short-lived nano-satellites, if launched, should be put in much lower orbits -- below the operational region of remote sensing satellites. Any junk formed in such low-earth orbits will descend to Earth due to atmospheric drag and pose no problem to the working satellites.

"Also, this issue should be raised in the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space in order to arrive at a designated corridor for small and nano-satellites."

ISRO is a member of Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) which coordinates global efforts to reduce man-made and natural space debris by sharing research and identifying debris mitigation options.

While ISRO spokesman Deviprasad Karnik said his agency has "no comments" to offer to the concerns raised by the agency's former chairman, Planet spokesperson Rachel Holm dismissed any danger to ISRO's operating satellites as feared by Nair.

"At Planet, we designed our concept of operations with debris mitigation in mind," the company said in an email. "Our Doves fly at a self-cleaning orbit. After 3-5 years, gravity pulls our satellites down into Earth's atmosphere where they burn up completely."

Nair's concerns have, however, been echoed by space debris experts in different forums.

At a recent International Astronautical Congress in Toronto, Hugh Lewis, a leading space debris expert from the University of Southampton, said that since 2005, CubeSats have been involved in more than 360,000 close encounters, "many of these in Sun-synchronous orbits that are popular with remote sensing and Earth science satellites".

Lewis had warned that if CubeSats continue to be launched into long-lived orbits without any means of disposing them of, "they will contribute to the growing space debris hazard".

In 2014, the International Space Station had to move three times to avoid lethal chunks of space debris and, only a month ago, European Space Agency had reported that its Swarm-B satellite had a miraculous escape from space debris that came as close as 361 metres.

Experts predict that satellites -- just like drones -- are increasingly coming within reach of ordinary people. As the cost of getting them in orbit plummets, the risks of collisions in space "will grow," says a recent report from the US National Academy of Sciences.

Penny wise pound foolish India?
 
C3XfKj4WQAUa90L.jpg


Take some more

India retains fastest-growing major economy tag despite cash crackdown

 
this is worrying... isro is already asked to pay millions to a private co in different circumstance.
 
this is worrying... isro is already asked to pay millions to a private co in different circumstance.


As a Pakistani you need to get your information right. The satellites after launch are THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SATELLITE OWNER NOT THE LAUNCHER.
 
If we dont launch them some one else will,and we will have the same problem,atleast we have the money for launching them now.....
 
Donald Trump’s spy pick ‘shocked’ by India launching 104 satellites


US President Donald Trump’s top spymaster nominee has said he was “shocked” to read that India successfully launched more than 100 satellites in one go last month. “I was shocked the other day to read that India, on one rocket launch, deposited more than 100 satellites in space,” former Senator Dan Coats told lawmakers on Tuesday during his confirmation hearing for the position of Director of National Intelligence.

He said the US cannot afford to be seen lagging behind. “They may be small in size with different functions and so forth but one rocket can send up, I think it was 104 platforms,” said Coats, who if confirmed would be in-charge of all major American intelligence agencies including the CIA.


Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) on February 15 successfully launched a record 104 satellites on a single rocket from the Sriharikota spaceport in Andhra Pradesh.




Like your source doesn't have a vendetta like you.

Antrix: Ex-ISRO chief Madhavan Nair banned from future govt job

In an unprecedented disciplinary action, four of the biggest names in the space community, including former chairman of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) G Madhavan Nair, have been barred from occupying any government position — current or in future — for their role in the Antrix-Devas deal, in which a private company was accused to have been wrongfully allotted S-band frequencies for radio waves.

A Bhaskarnarayana, former scientific secretary in ISRO; K R Sridharmurthi, former managing director of Antrix which is the marketing arm of ISRO; and K N Shankara, former director in ISRO's satellite centre, are the others who have been penalised, according to an order issued by the Department of Space on January 13, 2012.

Nair, during whose tenure the contract was signed, is the recipient of the Padma Vibhushan. He is the chairman of the board of governors of IIT Patna.

The order, a copy of which is with The Indian Express, is signed by Sandhya Venugopal Sharma, director, Department of Space. While it does not specify the allegations against these scientists, the order says that the decision comes after the government "carefully considered" the report of the high-powered review committee set up on February 10, 2011 and that of another team set up on May 31, 2011.

The order, sent to all Secretaries of the Government of India and Chief Secretaries of state governments and Union Territories, says that these "former Officers of the Department of Space shall be excluded from re-employment, committee roles or any other important role under the government".

Further, the order states that "these former officers shall be divested of any current assignment/consultancy with the government with immediate effect". Ministries and departments concerned have been asked to communicate necessary action taken towards the same to the Department of Space.

The deal involved a contract that Antrix Corporation — whose mandate is to market technologies developed by ISRO — had signed with Bangalore-based Devas Multimedia in 2005. The multi-million dollar deal gave Devas bulk lease — 90 per cent — of transponders on two yet-to-be-launched satellites for supporting a range of satellite-based applications for mobile devices through S-band frequencies. For this, the company was given access to 70 MHz of the 150 MHz spectrum that ISRO owns in the S-band.

The Cabinet approved the building of these two satellites — GSAT-6 for Rs 269 crore and GSAT-6A for Rs 147 crore — in 2009. The cost of the launch of satellites was to be Rs 350 crore. Interestingly, the Cabinet was not informed that these two satellites were meant to be used by Devas, a fact admitted by ISRO.

"Ideally, that should have been explicitly mentioned but it was not done," ISRO chief K Radhakrishnan had told reporters last year when the matter had broken out.

Following allegations that the contract was awarded to the company without competitive bidding, ISRO had set up a committee to review the contract in November 2009, soon after Radhakrishnan had taken over as ISRO chairman from Madhavan Nair.

On the recommendations of that committee, the deal had been scrapped. Devas has gone to court against that decision and the matter is pending in court.

While deciding to scrap the deal, ISRO was also guided by the fact that strategic and societal needs of the S-band spectrum had changed radically from 2005 when the contract was signed, and therefore, it was not imprudent to hand over such a large band of spectrum to a private company.

Former head of NASSCOM Kiran Karnik, who had served as an independent member on Devas Board, had, however, strongly defended the contract. In a letter to the Prime Minister, he had lamented the fact that the government had not done enough either to defend the agreement or the reputation of ISRO.

"In terms of processes, as far as I know, this agreement went meticulously through every step... If cabinet approval was not sought for the deal, the question is whether it was at all required and whether past transponder deals with private parties has gone through any such specific Cabinet approvals," Karnik had asked.

After the controversy broke out, Karnik resigned from the Devas Board. He had told The Indian Express that he did not have the time or the energy to spend on offering explanations, particularly to the media.

 
As a Pakistani you need to get your information right. The satellites after launch are THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SATELLITE OWNER NOT THE LAUNCHER.

Blabbering is not good for one's image:

He also noted that in case of a future collision between the debris from any of these nano-satellites and a working satellite belonging to another country, India will have to pay for the damages. "Therefore, I do not know if we should do it," he said.

Nair was referring to the Space Liability Convention that entered into force in 1972, under which launching countries "should bear international responsibility" for all space objects launched from their territory "regardless of to whom the space object belongs".
 
Madhaven had also criticized the mars mission on the grounds that it didnt advance Indian technical capabilities. I agreed with him but seeing the sort of publicity India got from the successful mission , had to change my mind.
Perception is very important . Look at the image chinese products have wrt the German or Japanese ones.
Madhaven is coming into the limelight in the wrong manner with his comments . If he feels victimised , he should challange the govt in court.
 
This is what happens when you just read a title that makes some negative sense about India's achivements. But dont try to understand whats been said.

The scenario thats been mentioned here is applicable to all, be it ISRO or be it NASA or be any other agency. Every satellite added to space is addition of junk into space that will have its short functional life span. Yes they are risk, but then those who are launching these plan accordingly on how to minimise this risk.

Smell some coffee and get back to real world.
 
Back
Top Bottom