My posts are not showing up in this thread. How many posts from me can you see ?
Re-Naming Akbar Road as Maharana Pratap Singh Road Is About Politics and Hindutva
- Thread starter INDIAPOSITIVE
- Start date
My posts are not showing up in this thread. How many posts from me can you see ?
Samudra Manthan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2015
- Messages
- 1,309
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
No one here is interested in Akhand Bharat. RSS does talk about Akhand Bharat but not in any immediate sense. They have something like a 1000 year objective of reuniting the whole land mass in a 1000 year's time. They are free to hold on to that fantasy.
This one and your last post.
LOL..... looks like someone is suppressing my posts about Akbar
..I have made a total of 6 posts in this thread.
Samudra Manthan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2015
- Messages
- 1,309
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
LOL..... looks like someone is suppressing my posts about Akbar
Most likely the Secular guy from WB.
LOL..... looks like someone is suppressing my posts about Akbar
I have made a total of 6 posts in this thread.
Try and repost them and I will quote them.
I have tried that, its not working.
Maybe it is triggered by some specific words. Will try to edit that and see.
Stephen Cohen
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 8,456
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
We should not rename it
It is ironical that erstwhile Sultans ; alamgirs and jahanpanahs
have only a Road named after them on which thousands of people walk
and also do dirty things
It is ironical that erstwhile Sultans ; alamgirs and jahanpanahs
have only a Road named after them on which thousands of people walk
and also do dirty things
ali_raza
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 3,850
- Reaction score
- -2
lol even better u know.atleast all ur bs of akhand bharat will go down in dustbin of his
lol u must be hiding behind the bush.dear there is no other reason why ur country don't resolve kashmir issue.cos they have eyes on pakistan.every now and then ur guys come here and talk about.(ye to lakeer ha ham to ek ha and all) .....get some air having some IT jobs will not change history and geography of the region.and btw why not try renaming hindu kush...i hope u know the meaning of that
Akbar had 5,000 $ex $laves in his H@rem. A concept which was foreign to India before the Islamic inva$ion. This is proudly mentioned in the Ain-i-Akbari, his court records.
IF this was not enough, this "great" emperor had men c@strated and made into eunuch$ so that they could guard this h@rem.
you can imagine the large number of eunuch$ required to guard such a large harem. Of course Akbar was not the only mughal to have eunuch$. The Mughal empire had plenty of eunuch$ who helped run the empire. Few of them even promoted to governership. After all, they could not have children and their loyalty would never waver.
Akbars h@rem of $lave girls grew with each conquest. He demanded women as gifts from the defeated rulers and nobles and their most beautiful daughters, who, together with their maidservants, would be installed in the luxurious royal zenana. Akbar even had this wonderful "Meena bazar" where every New Year the women of ALL households had to be paraded before Akbar for his choosing.
Least anyone be confused that the h@rem was a one time thing, it was constantly renewed by a flow of new concubine$ (kaniz), dancing girls (kanchni) and female slaves (bandis).
In fact during Akbars time, it was standard practice to raid villages or group of villages and make the inhabitants Slaves. One of his minor generals Abdulla Khan Uzbeg has the record of enslaving and selling 5,00,000 Men and Women.
Can you see them now ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Akbar's benevolence measured in the number of women he did not make as slaves ? the number of children he did not c@strate ? ...the number of slaves he did not make ?
Ashoka had 5 wives. Akbar had 300 wives.
Ashoka had no concubine$. Akbar had 5000 $ex $laves.
Ashoka was an educated man. Akbar was an illiterate.
Ashoka never c@strated children, Akbar c@strated children and made them eunuchs.
Ashoka banned slavery throughout his empire, Akbar encouraged slavery and selling Indian slaves to middle east for money.
Ashoka never killed innocent civilians, Akbar killed 30,000 civilians(women and children) in chittor alone.
Ashoka spread Dh@rma throughout India and outside India, Akbar destroyed Dh@rma in India.
Ashoka was a patron of schools and universities, Akbar destroyed schools.
Ashoka built temples, Akbar destroyed temples.
Ashoka treated all his citizens equally, Akbar imposed j@zia on hindus and treated hindus with contempt.
Ashoka spread buddhism through the world and made the world a better place, Akbar invented a foolish cult that no one took seriously.
Ashoka built Road, Akbar built tombs.
Ashoka built hospitals and rest rooms along his roads, Akbar built mosques.
Ashoka had public gardens planted and medicinal herbs grown, Akbar built private gardens for his debauchery.
Ashoka offered the people of Kalinga a victor's conciliation, erecting a monument in Kalinga which read "All men are my children, and I, the king, forgive what can be forgiven."
Akbar built a tower in delhi with the heads of the hindus he killed AFTER they were taken prisoners of war.
Only a world class moron would compare Ashoka with Akbar and claim Ashoka was more brutal than Akbar.
Finally the braver of Rajputs is not in question. The Road was not asked to be named "RAJPUT ROAD".
It was asked to be named "Maharana Pratap" road. A Man who's bravery and character is beyond doubt. A king who's nobility, courage, values, principles and character was impeccable and inspiring.
IF this was not enough, this "great" emperor had men c@strated and made into eunuch$ so that they could guard this h@rem.
you can imagine the large number of eunuch$ required to guard such a large harem. Of course Akbar was not the only mughal to have eunuch$. The Mughal empire had plenty of eunuch$ who helped run the empire. Few of them even promoted to governership. After all, they could not have children and their loyalty would never waver.
Akbars h@rem of $lave girls grew with each conquest. He demanded women as gifts from the defeated rulers and nobles and their most beautiful daughters, who, together with their maidservants, would be installed in the luxurious royal zenana. Akbar even had this wonderful "Meena bazar" where every New Year the women of ALL households had to be paraded before Akbar for his choosing.
Least anyone be confused that the h@rem was a one time thing, it was constantly renewed by a flow of new concubine$ (kaniz), dancing girls (kanchni) and female slaves (bandis).
In fact during Akbars time, it was standard practice to raid villages or group of villages and make the inhabitants Slaves. One of his minor generals Abdulla Khan Uzbeg has the record of enslaving and selling 5,00,000 Men and Women.
Can you see them now ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Akbar's benevolence measured in the number of women he did not make as slaves ? the number of children he did not c@strate ? ...the number of slaves he did not make ?
Ashoka had 5 wives. Akbar had 300 wives.
Ashoka had no concubine$. Akbar had 5000 $ex $laves.
Ashoka was an educated man. Akbar was an illiterate.
Ashoka never c@strated children, Akbar c@strated children and made them eunuchs.
Ashoka banned slavery throughout his empire, Akbar encouraged slavery and selling Indian slaves to middle east for money.
Ashoka never killed innocent civilians, Akbar killed 30,000 civilians(women and children) in chittor alone.
Ashoka spread Dh@rma throughout India and outside India, Akbar destroyed Dh@rma in India.
Ashoka was a patron of schools and universities, Akbar destroyed schools.
Ashoka built temples, Akbar destroyed temples.
Ashoka treated all his citizens equally, Akbar imposed j@zia on hindus and treated hindus with contempt.
Ashoka spread buddhism through the world and made the world a better place, Akbar invented a foolish cult that no one took seriously.
Ashoka built Road, Akbar built tombs.
Ashoka built hospitals and rest rooms along his roads, Akbar built mosques.
Ashoka had public gardens planted and medicinal herbs grown, Akbar built private gardens for his debauchery.
Ashoka offered the people of Kalinga a victor's conciliation, erecting a monument in Kalinga which read "All men are my children, and I, the king, forgive what can be forgiven."
Akbar built a tower in delhi with the heads of the hindus he killed AFTER they were taken prisoners of war.
Only a world class moron would compare Ashoka with Akbar and claim Ashoka was more brutal than Akbar.
Finally the braver of Rajputs is not in question. The Road was not asked to be named "RAJPUT ROAD".
It was asked to be named "Maharana Pratap" road. A Man who's bravery and character is beyond doubt. A king who's nobility, courage, values, principles and character was impeccable and inspiring.
Samudra Manthan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2015
- Messages
- 1,309
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Aree ajeeb zabardasti hai. This is like a jilted rejected lady who is languishing for her ex-lover to come back for her even though he is happily married and enjoying his life elsewhere. India does not care about Pakistan. There is nothing in Pakistan that India wants or India needs. It is a desert land for the most part and populated by the dumbest people on Earth. India is doing fine the way it is.
@Rajaraja Chola This is your great Akbar.
Is Akbar's benevolence measured in the number of women he did not make as slaves ? the number of children he did not c@strate ? ...the number of slaves he did not make ?
Ashoka had 5 wives. Akbar had 300 wives.
Ashoka had no concubine$. Akbar had 5000 $ex $laves.
Ashoka was an educated man. Akbar was an illiterate.
Ashoka never c@strated children, Akbar c@strated children and made them eunuchs.
Ashoka banned slavery throughout his empire, Akbar encouraged slavery and selling Indian slaves to middle east for money.
Ashoka never killed innocent civilians, Akbar killed 30,000 civilians(women and children) in chittor alone.
Ashoka spread Dh@rma throughout India and outside India, Akbar destroyed Dh@rma in India.
Ashoka was a patron of schools and universities, Akbar destroyed schools.
Ashoka built temples, Akbar destroyed temples.
Ashoka treated all his citizens equally, Akbar imposed j@zia on hindus and treated hindus with contempt.
Ashoka spread buddhism through the world and made the world a better place, Akbar invented a foolish cult that no one took seriously.
Ashoka built Road, Akbar built tombs.
Ashoka built hospitals and rest rooms along his roads, Akbar built mosques.
Ashoka had public gardens planted and medicinal herbs grown, Akbar built private gardens for his debauchery.
Ashoka offered the people of Kalinga a victor's conciliation, erecting a monument in Kalinga which read "All men are my children, and I, the king, forgive what can be forgiven."
Akbar built a tower in delhi with the heads of the hindus he killed AFTER they were taken prisoners of war.
Only a world class moron would compare Ashoka with Akbar and claim Ashoka was more brutal than Akbar.
Finally the braver of Rajputs is not in question. The Road was not asked to be named "RAJPUT ROAD".
It was asked to be named "Maharana Pratap" road. A Man who's bravery and character is beyond doubt. A king who's nobility, courage, values, principles and character was impeccable and inspiring.
I guess it was the words. Site has become prudish.
Samudra Manthan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2015
- Messages
- 1,309
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
GOOD GOING INDIA this is what exactly pakistanis did and look at them now
There is a small difference. India is Hindu majority, pakistan is muslim majority and THAT makes ALL the difference.
ali_raza
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 3,850
- Reaction score
- -2
then why bothered to be on site
Similar threads
