What's new

Prominent Muslim Rulers/Dynasties throughout South Asian history

Its a shame that many Pakistanis do not even consider the contribution of one Sher Shah Suri as one of the greatest Muslim administrators of South Asia. He was tolerant, bought in tax administration and ruling changes which were inherited by Akbar who was impressed by it and followed it for next 100 years till Aurengzeb decided to scrap and introduce many new taxes to fund his wars.
 
.
Great thread. Wish to read more. Out of curiosity, what is your source?

JazakALLAH,
Well quite alot of them but ill compile it for you guys.

Its a shame that many Pakistanis do not even consider the contribution of one Sher Shah Suri as one of the greatest Muslim administrators of South Asia. He was tolerant, bought in tax administration and ruling changes which were inherited by Akbar who was impressed by it and followed it for next 100 years till Aurengzeb decided to scrap and introduce many new taxes to fund his wars.

Indeed he was a great king and i will include his biography as well, you just have to be patient. I cant just go and copy paste wikipedia out.
 
.
Its a shame that many Pakistanis do not even consider the contribution of one Sher Shah Suri as one of the greatest Muslim administrators of South Asia. He was tolerant, bought in tax administration and ruling changes which were inherited by Akbar who was impressed by it and followed it for next 100 years till Aurengzeb decided to scrap and introduce many new taxes to fund his wars.
we are going in chronological order, you will see his details on the thread after Babur's rule, i am sure
 
.
It's amazing how Pakistan has flipped flopped between Eastern and Western Empired.
Indians are desperate to claim our history but we don't have the same history as them.
Gangadesh was never part of the Greek/Persian/Mongol etc dynasties. So how can we be the same people?
 
.
JazakALLAH,
Well quite alot of them but ill compile it for you guys.

Wa iyya Kum. Please take your time.

I am interested in which books/sources you used.

I have another series of threads on Islamic history, check them out once you have some time.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-sakas-scythians-kushans-hephthalites-white-huns.610977/

many Pakistanis do not even consider the contribution of one Sher Shah Suri

Don’t worry so much about what Pakistanis think.

Just read the thread and enjoy.
 
.
Feel free to open your own thread and propagate your ideas there.

Do not try to sabotage someone else’s thread.

I could refute your statements, but what is the point. I will wait for your thread on Pakistani history from your view.
I would love to start a thread. I am an old member but I still am not allowed to open threads here. Don't know why?
But try to see things from different angle.
I am not against the Muslim dynasties Infact I cherish them.
But I also cherish the Hindu, sikh and Buddhist Kings... Not Indian ones but those who ruled Pakistan..
They are our ancesstors no matter how hard you try to deny them.
Our ancesstors can be non Muslims and there is nothing wrong with that.
Before Islam came to sub continent our ancesstors may be Buddhist or Hindus and they later embraced Islam.
So if you want to make monuments why not make a monument to remember porus that only king successful enough to stop alaxander. A momument Can be erected in the very same field where the fight took place...
Why not make a monument for maharaja ranjit Singh, for if not for ranjeet Singh Pakistan would be limited to the border of the attock river.
Why not make monuments for Buddha who whole empire and university exist in this very land making it sacred for Muslims..

Remember that when there is a islamic sultanate in Delhi these bastards Afghans you glorify attacked the very same Muslim sultanate.
Had they not been doing that then the Mughals would not be so week and not perished that way and we would still be ruling hindustan...
Or even if you want to remember Muslim rulers why not celebrate sirajudullah who fought the British and tipu sultan who fought bravely.

Stop fancing about them..
70% of all Pashtuns are Pakistani, hence they have contributed greatly to the history of modern-day Pakistan.


Maharaja Ranjeet Singh and the other tyrants will never be accepted as our own, they turned our Masjids into stables, banned azan and halal-meat, persecuted Muslims. Rai Por (Porus) on the other hand is respectable and is revered/accepted by the general people of Pakistan.


You clearly need to go over history class again.


Read the title of this thread please.[/QUOTE]
So what do you mean?
70 percent of phustoons are Pakistanis then what do they have to do with afghan Kings?
I simply don't get the point. For example if a person killed, loot and plundered my own people but belong to the same ethnicity as myself then his crimes would be less or something... ?
What exactly have these afghans done except to weaken the Muslims sultanate ruling the Delhi.
And maharaja ranjeet Singh did nothing of the sort you allege. He is the loyal son of punjab irrespective of his religion. No Muslim mosque was plundered ever. His kingdom punjab consists of 4 entities namely Indian and Pakistani punjab, gilgit baltistan, kashmir and kpk. And his subjects are Muslims. His cabinate solely consists of Muslim. Even his second wife is a Muslim and he respected all here tradition.
They never destroyed any Muslim architecture or mosque. They have added to it.. Stop reading the biased version of histroy. Yes when punjab was divided and people were asked to move to respective sides bloodshed was expected and it happened.. Infact punjab and bengal were divided so that bloodshed happens. And the enmity remains where as in real that is not the case.
And yes Buddhist kingdom exist here and we should embrace our Buddhist past. Our ancesstors can be Buddhist as much as they are Hindus and there is no shame in that.
 
.
It's amazing how Pakistan has flipped flopped between Eastern and Western Empired.
Indians are desperate to claim our history but we don't have the same history as them.
Gangadesh was never part of the Greek/Persian/Mongol etc dynasties. So how can we be the same people?

Pakistan was a part of the Mongol empire ?
 
. .
No, but it was invaded numerous times and were repulsed by the Mamluk Sultanate with the support of local tribes and Kingdoms. Eastern part of modern-day Pakistan was briefly under Mongol occupation.

Allaudin Khalji repulsed them, I suppose. And you mean Western part I think. Rusty claimed that India wasn't a part of the Mongol dynasty, as if Pakistan was. So I wondered.
 
. . .
Pakistan was a part of the Mongol empire ?
See, this is how different we are.
You people claim we are the same people, but you don't even know our basic history.

DUeYHsIXUAAZrp8.jpg:large


999002958808403969
 
.
First remove the bastard Afghans kings from the list.
Stop fancing about them..
Also accept non Muslim Kings and rulers as your own who ruled your land such as maharaja ranjeet Singh, porus etc..
Even Iranians accepts xerxesas their king.
Also accept all the Buddhist Kings or Hindu kings too.
Budha was born here in Pakistan and even his bones are here...
Accept your non Muslim heritage that would not make you a less of a Muslim...

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Yeah, "lun per charh" chutiye...

Typical mentally challenged lonely loser libturd trying to get validation online by being "rATiONaL"

Look at the title of the thread you retarded cuck.

MUSLIM dynasties of S.Asia. What is so hard for you to comprehend?

And our ancestors in pre-Islamic times were non-Muslims. Those were times of jahaliya...Thank God for our ancestors who were smart enough to see the light of Islam and come out of dark age of extreme caste-ism and idol worship.

For the "buddhist and hindu kings"-----they can go f*ck themselves. Don't care about them one bit (just like 99.9999% of Pakistanis).
 
.
Allaudin Khalji repulsed them, I suppose. And you mean Western part I think. Rusty claimed that India wasn't a part of the Mongol dynasty, as if Pakistan was. So I wondered.
India wasn't part of the mongol empire, but as you can see by the map, western part of Pakistan was.
So again, how can we be the same people when Pakistan has flipped flopped between eastern and western empires while India never really did so, they mostly had indigenous empires that fought each other.
 
.
You people claim we are the same people,
May be a few northern and north-western states claim so, it would be an insult to us in NE India if someone were to compare us to you. We have better chance of people calling us Chinese than Pakistanis. Not for nothing our ancestors successfully warded off every invasion from your ilk.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom