What's new

Prangis

Samandri

BANNED
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,959
Reaction score
-10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
When i started search on Prangi tribe , i realized that there is not much material available on them on internet and in Books. This tribe has significance in the sense that it has produced the first Pashtun Sultans of Delhi. Bahlol Lodhi, his son Sikander Lodhi and his grandson Ibrahim Lodhi belonged to the Prangi division of Lodhis. I was expecting great deal of information on them, but not much is known about them as they no longer exist in Afghanistan or Pakhtunkhwa. Some of their descendents live in India who by no means can be called Pashtuns. As mentioned in the article, they used to live in Daman (Tank district of KPK) but were defeated and decimated by the Lohani tribes (Who are also Lodhis) in mid-16th century. If you have heard about Nawab of tank family, they belong to this Lohani division of Lodhis who destroyed their cousins, the Prangis. Prior to that, they used to live in present day Afghanistan from where they must have been expelled by Ghilzais. These Pashtun tribes were devouring each other, pakhtunkhwa was like Royale Rumble of wrestling, weaker tribes were getting knocked out and thrown out of the Ring without any mercy.

Prangis were one of the earliest tribes who settled in the plains of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in 13th century during times of Shahabudin Ghauri. They lived in Daman area for about three and half centuries, its quite a long period if you think about it. Unlike Lohanis and Ghilzais, they were not nomads and lived a settled life, they cultivated lands. They were frequently travelling to Punjab and rest of India, for trade and other purposes, as their settlement in Daman was located near the border with Hind , river indus being the historical boundry.

Prangis, along with other Afghans of other tribes, were favorite mercenary soldiers of Sultan Balban of slave dynasty, he garrisoned forts in Punjab with them for the purpose of defense against Mongol invasions. Lodhis were the most active participants in affairs of Hind among all Pashtun tribes even before they established their rule on india in 1451 AD. They accompanied invading armies of Ghaznavi and Ghauri to Hind. After that they were arriving in India for trade or were getting enlisted in the armies of Turkish sultans.I can assume prangis were relevant to affairs of Hind from very early on, its possible that Shahabudin Ghauri himself might have encouraged settlement of Prangis, Suris and Sarwanis in DI Khan for geostrategic reasons. Afghans gained more prominence in India when Turkish slave dynasty was replaced by Khilji (who were most probably ghilzais) in 1290 AD. During Tughlaq period, Afghans became large part of their nobility, we read that Malik Shahu Lodhi in 1341 AD gathered a force of his tribe and rebelled against governor of Multan and slew him. It is not mentioned but i think this Malik Shahu Lodhi was ancestor of Bahlol Lodhi, progenitor of Shahu Khel clan of Prangis. When Muhammad Shah Tughlaq marched against him, Malik Shahu Lodhi withdrew to the across the indus region which could be Tank or some other place in Afghanistan.

Prangis along with the other Lodhi tribes like Sarwanis, Niazis etc were invited by Amir Taimoor to join his Indian campaign. This greatly weakened the position of Turks and strengthened the position of Afghans in India. Sayyids were made governors of Punjab to rule on behalf of Timurids. Sayyids mostly relied on Afghans for army and adminstration. The remants of Tughlaqs, who were ruling Delhi and surroundings also relied heavily on Lodhis, their commander in chief being a Lodhi in 1412 AD, Daulat Khan Lodhi who also sat on throne of Delhi for 2 years after demise of Tughlaq dyansty. Meanwhile Prangis settled in large numbers in Multan , Bahlol's family being their chiefs. Later they were granted jagir in Sirhind, As Prangis bodily moved into Daman from Afghanistan at the start of 13th century so its safe to say that the Prangi colony of Multan getting established there in 14th century, was originated from Tank district of KPK.

When Bahlol Lodhi became sovereign of India in 1451 AD, he invited Pashtuns near border to assist him in his wars against sharqi dyansty, his tribe Prangi would have obviously responded to his call. From 1451 to 1526 AD, Prangis in Tank migrated en mass to India so that the remnants were not in powerful position to defend themselves against the Lohanis in 1556 AD. Today there are no traces of Bahlol Lodhi's clan in Tank or Afghanistan, it is said that descendents of Prangis can be found in some parts of India. In the lineal tree of Lodhis, Prangi is quite senior so in 15th and 16th century they must have been quite numerous.
http://jodigul.blogspot.com/2015/02/prangi-extinct-tribe-of-pashtuns.html
Shedding light on the history of Pashtuns: Prangi - an extinct tribe of Pashtuns
Prangis | History of Pashtuns
 
.
The Prangis disappeared in the annals of history. They are an eye witness to the same process that is happening to the Niazis and already happened to the Rohilla's. Rohillas are a pashtun tribe that settled in what is now India or my region Lucknow. Slowly their pashto language disappeared and they can no longer speak it. Even after partition those Rohillas who migrated to Pakistan became urdu speakers or muhajirs (a mistake I maintain.)

I think in reality that is our/their ethnic identity instead of urdu speaker or muhajir. Moving from one place to another does not make one a muhajir. I think the real identity is lucknowi, deccan or for the rohillas Pashtun. They should reclaim their original identity though in reality reclaiming identity means learning a new language and adopting new customs. It can be hard but it can do away with a lot of confusion and identity problems.

Also the Niazis and Tareens are very much facing what Rohillas once faced. They have forgotten pashto for Seraiki, urdu or hindko. During the name change of FATA to KPK the Hindkowans (many or all of whom have Pashtun ancestry-like the tareens or jadoons) they demanded a seperate province or a cancellation of the name change
 
.
A read a little about 1857 sepoy mutiny... It's Interesting that punjabis and others considers "hindustanis" as inferior to an extent that they hated them .. this hatred was bolstered after Punjab was defeated by british using soldiers from bihar,awadh (which comprises the Bengal army)... The Sikh punjabis started believing in a quote by their guru .. Which said something about "western forces coming,Khalsa supporting them and how Khalsa woul prosper,there would be a woman in every house etx... The Gurkhas again held contempt for the "hindustanis"... Same goes for the Pubjabis and Pashtuns all of these groups were more interested in plundering the "hindustanis" and hence were recruited heavily in the british army..

A small example (result of the recruitment on 1903 -- a trend that continued till the Brits ...)

image.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Dude, the future lies in how they live tomorrow not how they lived yesterday.

All you can learn is their mistakes.
 
.
The Prangis disappeared in the annals of history. They are an eye witness to the same process that is happening to the Niazis and already happened to the Rohilla's. Rohillas are a pashtun tribe that settled in what is now India or my region Lucknow. Slowly their pashto language disappeared and they can no longer speak it. Even after partition those Rohillas who migrated to Pakistan became urdu speakers or muhajirs (a mistake I maintain.)

I think in reality that is our/their ethnic identity instead of urdu speaker or muhajir. Moving from one place to another does not make one a muhajir. I think the real identity is lucknowi, deccan or for the rohillas Pashtun. They should reclaim their original identity though in reality reclaiming identity means learning a new language and adopting new customs. It can be hard but it can do away with a lot of confusion and identity problems.

Also the Niazis and Tareens are very much facing what Rohillas once faced. They have forgotten pashto for Seraiki, urdu or hindko. During the name change of FATA to KPK the Hindkowans (many or all of whom have Pashtun ancestry-like the tareens or jadoons) they demanded a seperate province or a cancellation of the name change

Niazis and Tareens are different, their ethnic identity is strong. Plus there are not other people going around claiming to be Niazis and Tareens. I think enough fake people claimed pashtun identity among muhajirs that it no longer matters anyway. But in India actual decendents of pashtuns still exist who now have forgotten pashto but still identify as pathans in rural areas of UP/Bihar.

Or those of them who migrated to Pakistan punjab after partition are still known as pathans. Many pathans migrated from east punjab to west punjab, like Imran Khan family for exemple.
 
.
A read a little about 1857 sepoy mutiny... It's Interesting that punjabis and others considers "hindustanis" as inferior to an extent that they hated them .. this hatred was bolstered after Punjab was defeated by british using soldiers from bihar,awadh (which comprises the Bengal army)... The Sikh punjabis started believing in a quote by their guru .. Which said something about "western forces coming,Khalsa supporting them and how Khalsa woul prosper,there would be a woman in every house etx... The Gurkhas again held contempt for the "hindustanis"... Same goes for the Pubjabis and Pashtuns all of these groups were more interested in plundering the "hindustanis" and hence were recruited heavily in the british army..

A small example (result of the recruitment on 1903 -- a trend that continued till the Brits ...)

View attachment 195216

I don't really know how true is hatered of hindustanis by punjabis because they helped British. I was reading Gujranwala gazetter (British gujranwala included current day Sialkot and Hafizabad district as well) and how muslim bhattis, chatha, lodike and tarrar tribes helped British against sikhs. Few decades back sikhs had taken away lands from same tribes one by one. So they saw perfect oportunity to reclaim their lands with the help of British which they did.

They provided important information and also fought on side of British against sikhs in both wars.

Edit: Another thing i found interesting in gazetter is that Gujranwala muslim tribes were loyals to British at that point but Sahiwal muslim tribes raised against empire in 1857 mutiny which didn't last long. But after that British decided to recruit Gujranwala sikhs in 1857 who were at that point ignored. Sikhs joined British army in large numbers to settle score with hindustanis? I don't think so, i think muslim and sikhs from punjab joined British for monetary reasons only.

Also there is sikh Sardar Jodh Singh Waraich joined British in 1848-49 against sikhs, there are probably more. Though i don't know why this sikh sardar sided with British. Most likely for land/money once again.
 
Last edited:
.
Niazis and Tareens are different, their ethnic identity is strong. Plus there are not other people going around claiming to be Niazis and Tareens. I think enough fake people claimed pashtun identity among muhajirs that it no longer matters anyway. But in India actual decendents of pashtuns still exist who now have forgotten pashto but still identify as pathans in rural areas of UP/Bihar.

Or those of them who migrated to Pakistan punjab after partition are still known as pathans. Many pathans migrated from east punjab to west punjab, like Imran Khan family for exemple.

Where have the muhajirs tried to claim Pashtun identity. Perhaps this might partly be the truth for those who settled outside Karachi, Lahore or Hyderabad, they adopted culture of Punjabis or Sindhis (ie memon community) And if they claim it I think that is the correct identity rather than muhajir. Muhajir is just a dumb word for people to refer to themselves. If moving from one place to another makes us Muhajir well then everyone in the world is a muhajir because they moved from somewhere.

I do not believe in muhajir identity. Either we are lucknowi, gujrati, Deccan etc or we are Pashtun Punjabi etc.
 
.
Prangi
Jawwad Khan Marwat
Publishing Date: Wednesday, February 25 2015

Ibrahim alias Lodhi had three sons, Siarnaey, Niazaey and Dotanaey. Prangaey , the Siarnaey's eldest son, is progenitor of the Prangi tribe that consists of a number of tribes , Malik Shahu and his great grandson Sultan Bahlol, the first Pashtun sovereign of Delhi, descended. Prangis were initially located in western Afghnaistan. Later they, along with their Suri and Sarwani kinsmen, moved to the eastern outskirts of Koh-i-Sulieman during the times of Shahabudin Ghori. Prangis settled in Tank/Daman while Suris were holding Rori.The Sarwani settled south of the Luni in Draban and Chandhwan

The Prangis (Lodhis) lived a settled life in Tank, the fertile soil made them prosperous. Daulat Khels used to come , though occasionally , to pass the winters in plains. Disputes would arise between them and the Prangis as a result of damage done to the Prangi's cultivated lands by the flocks and herds of the nomad Daulat Khels. This created bad blood between two tribes. When emperor Babur deposed the Lodhis in Hind, the Prangis, the Lodhi's kinsmen , gradually lost their importance around Tank. Shehbaz Khan Kati Khel decided to get rid of them once and for all. According to "Hayat-e-Afghani" (p-287 and 293-4), during emperor Babur's period, he got togather the Lohani clans, namely, the Daulat Khels, Taturs, Miya Khel while the Marwats and other Powindah clans that had also suffered at the hands of the Prangis, readily joined his lashkar. After several battles, Shehbaz Khan succeeded in utterly defeating the Prangis. The latter were massacred in great numbers and the survivors were reduced to utter helplessness. The Lohanis drove out the Prangis from Tank tract. Sher Muhammad Mohamnd, writes that in 1556 AD, the oust Prangis were ousted from the area by Shehbaz Khan Kati Khel (p-14). Munshi Charanjeet Lal writes that the Daulat Khels ousted the Prangis before emperor Akbar's period.(Tawarikh-e-Dera Ismael Khan pp-201-2). Sher Muhammad Khan Gandapur , on p-616 states that Jabal Khan Gandapur supported Shehbaz Khan against the Prangis. Jabal Khan Gandapur was contemporary of Emperor Babur.


In the late 14th century, Lodhi tribes were militarily strong enough to catch the attention of Amir Taimoor. The latter, in 1398 AD, invaded India. He asked the local tribes to join his force. The contribution of Prangi and other Lodhi tribes in reduction of India was of material importance. Lodhis took maximum advantage of the chaotic situation that prevailed in the wake of Amir Taimoor's invasion of India. Taking advantage of favorable circumstances, Prangis established themselves in Hind and became the first Pashtun sovereigns of Delhi.

Prangis are now almost extinct in Afghanistan, but some of them are still found in different parts of India, especially in Deccan, Ropar and Lodhiana, where they are known as Lodhi Afghans. Bahlol Lodhi was eighth in lineal descent from Prangaey and belonged to the Shahu Khel clan of Lodhis.


Subtribes

1. Zaitun Khel

2. Arand

3. Raidi

4. Umar Khel

5. Ishaq

6. Shahu Khel

7. Yusuf Khel

8. Yaseen Khel

9. Ahmad Khel

10. Mahmud Khel

11. Marchi Khel

12. Tatar Khel

13. Daulat Khel

14. Rustam Khel

15. Shamuzai

16. Ishaqzai

17. Shiekhzai

18. Hasanzai

19. Pyara Khel

20. Umarzai

21. Majeed khel

22. Gadli Khel

23. Mahmudzai

24. Zakriya Khel

25. Alf Khel


Sources:
1. History of the Pathans: The Ghurghushti, Beitani and Matti tribes of Pathans by Haroon Rashid
2. Panjab Castes, Being a Reprint of the Chapter on "The Races, Castes, and Tribes of the People" in the Report on the Census of the Panjab
3.Afghanistan and Its Inhabitants by Muḥammad Ḥayāt Khān
4. A Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North-West ..., Volume 3
5. Pukhtana Kabilay Opejanayi by Dr. Latif Yad

Prangi
 
.
Where have the muhajirs tried to claim Pashtun identity. Perhaps this might partly be the truth for those who settled outside Karachi, Lahore or Hyderabad, they adopted culture of Punjabis or Sindhis (ie memon community) And if they claim it I think that is the correct identity rather than muhajir. Muhajir is just a dumb word for people to refer to themselves. If moving from one place to another makes us Muhajir well then everyone in the world is a muhajir because they moved from somewhere.

I do not believe in muhajir identity. Either we are lucknowi, gujrati, Deccan etc or we are Pashtun Punjabi etc.

No muhajir have adopted culture of punjabis, they settled in urban centers of Punjab. And about changing identity, its quite normal and not restricted to muhajirs only. Most of punjabis change surnames from other biraderi when moving to city. I can tell you that bhatti and khokhar is most abused surname by punjabi chuhras/musalis even in rural areas. And when rural people move to city they change surnames/biraderi if they belong to artisan or menial castes as British used to say. And they are most likely to move to cities now days before other rural biraderis.

Memon/lohana are not your typical Gujarati people, they are sindhis ethnically but ones who moved to Gujarat speak Gujarati. You can say they are like pathans/baloch of Punjab.
 
.
An article on another pashtun tribe, naghars, who dwindled with time.

Naghar
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom