What's new

Power Struggle: China’s electric vehicle pitted against Japan’s hydrogen car

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Power struggle
Source:Reuters Published: 2015-10-28 19:23:01

China’s electric vehicle pitted against Japan’s hydrogen car

It's China versus Japan in the fight for the future of the auto industry. Asia's two auto-motive superpowers are striving to advance different technologies that might eventually replace the internal combustion engine. For a decade, China has pushed for electric vehicles to become the car of the masses. Japan, on the other hand, has poured money into hydrogen fuel-cell technology in a bid to foster its dream of creating a "hydrogen society." Automakers in both countries are leveraging their respective advantages, though each technology faces its own challenges.


713e63f7-2d55-4827-80b4-fc83913f65e9.jpeg

Photo: CFP

Asia's two autos powerhouses, Japan and China, are jostling for supremacy in how future electric cars should generate their power - from batteries or hydrogen-powered fuel-cells.

In a potentially high-stakes clash reminiscent of Sony versus Panasonic in the Beta-VHS video war in the 1980s, the winner could enjoy years of domination if their technology is adopted as a global standard by other manufacturers.

This time, though, there should be a place in the car market for both electric battery and hydrogen fuel-cell cars. The key question is which will power more mainstream cars - the market dominated today by the likes of Toyota, General Motors (GM) and Volkswagen.

"We're reaching a crossroads," said James Chao, Shanghai-based Asia-Pacific managing director for industry consultant IHS Automotive. "It's difficult to exaggerate the significance of the choice between batteries and hydrogen. Billions of dollars will be invested in one or the other and may determine which companies will lead the industry through the end of this century."

Rival visions

China, a major oil importer and blighted by air pollution, is pushing for all-electric cars, offering incentives to buyers, forcing global automakers to share their technology and opening its market to tech firms and others to produce electric vehicles (EVs).

For a decade, China has pushed for the EV to become a mass-market car, hoping a low barrier to entry will allow its relative late comers to close a competitive gap with global rivals who have a century's head start in traditional combustion engines.

"President Xi Jinping explained it very well, saying that developing new-energy vehicles is the Chinese auto industry's only road to grow from being big to being strong," said Xu Heyi, chairman of Beijing Automotive Group.

Japan, though, sees the future differently and is investing heavily in fuel-cell technology and infrastructure as part of a national policy to foster what it calls a "hydrogen society," where the zero-emission fuel would power homes and vehicles.

Toyota especially is keen to maintain the alternative propulsion lead it established a decade and a half ago with the full hybrid electric Prius.

"It's not that we're not doing anything about the EV. Technically speaking, EV is a relatively easier technology," said Koei Saga, Toyota's senior managing officer in charge of vehicle powertrain technology.

"But it needs to evolve. If you're looking for the ultimate solution, the EV probably isn't it."

To be sure, China and Japan are not alone. GM has joint research with Honda on hydrogen cars, while BMW is Toyota's fuel-cell partner. Daimler in Europe and Hyundai Motor in South Korea are also carrying out their own research and development on a hydrogen car.

Adding affordability

Honda Motor unveiled a "mass market" hydrogen fuel-cell car at the Tokyo Motor Show on Wednesday, which will go on sale in Japan in March 2016, to be followed by launches in the US and Europe, key potential markets for the technology.

Honda believes the car, dubbed the Clarity Fuel Cell, has reached the affordability range where a "fairly typical mainstream consumer could stretch to buy one," Toshihiro Mibe, a Honda operating officer, told Reuters. "We want this car to be the trigger for the 'hydrogen society.'"

The Clarity, which will retail for 7.66 million yen ($63,970) before government subsidies, follows this year's launch of Toyota's hydrogen-powered Mirai - meaning "future" in Japanese. Mirai buyers benefit from subsidies totaling around 3 million yen ($24,915) per vehicle.

Honda's main advance on Toyota's technology is to have shrunk the fuel-cell stack - the ensemble of fuel-cell, motor and transmission - by a third from a 2008 model it leased to a few private buyers in California in a subsidized trial deal.

That allows Honda to store the whole stack under the hood, and package the car as "roomy enough to comfortably sit five adults," said Kiyoshi Shimizu, chief engineer for the new car, though it still sacrifices trunk space to accommodate a bulky hydrogen fuel tank.

"With this, we now hope to make a hydrogen powertrain an option across our product line," Shimizu said.

Tailing Tesla

China, meanwhile, is running full tilt at EVs, and has opened its automotive industry to deep-pocketed technology firms to invest.

The move has bred more than half a dozen Chinese-funded EV start-ups, backed by the likes of Baidu, Alibaba, Xiaomi and Tencent, as well as LeTV, a streaming video and Web-connected television provider.

Some, such as LeTV-funded Atieva and Faraday Future, have set up operations in California, in part to skim off talent and expertise that Tesla and others have developed there. Both aim specifically to create plush electric cars to compete with Tesla's Model S in the next two to three years.

While this looks ambitious, one industry official said it should be taken seriously given the start-ups' funding clout.

In a carrot-and-stick policy, China provides subsidies for private buyers of more than $25,000 on an all-electric battery car and more than half that on a heavily electrified, so-called plug-in hybrid.

It has also toughened fuel economy rules in a bid to force automakers to introduce more electric cars, and encourages global automakers operating in China to share electric car technology with their local partners.

At the center of the new wave of China's EV producers is Jia Yueting, the 42-year-old billionaire founder of LeTV, who has funded Atieva, Faraday and his own EV efforts.

Jia wants to build a high-performance electric car, a potential "Tesla killer" he has christened Le Supercar. He has also ploughed hundreds of millions of dollars into Atieva and Faraday, while LeTV has partnerships with State-owned Beijing Auto and with British sports carmaker Aston Martin, which could accelerate his efforts to put high-performance electric cars on the road in the 2017-18 period.

Other Chinese-funded EV start-ups also have Tesla in their sights. NextEV is backed by three Chinese Internet entrepreneurs and Tencent, while Pateo started out as a digital marketing agency before developing smart, Internet-connected car technology. It now aims to create its own smart electric car.

@Martian2 , @Shotgunner51 , @cirr , @terranMarine , @opruh , @Beidou2020 , @Place Of Space , @ChineseTiger1986
 
Hydrogen car? I dont want to get myself killed......
Stop being bias, if China bets on hydrogen you would say different. EV is not future green tech, it hydrogen is. The Hydorgen cars just need more filling stations while EV still have difficulties remain such as not many of charging stations, take hours to day to re charge, is not green tech the battery composition are dangerous chemichals and hard to dispose.
 
Stop being bias, if China bets on hydrogen you would say different. EV is not future green tech, it hydrogen is. The Hydorgen cars just need more filling stations while EV still have difficulties remain such as not many of charging stations, take hours to day to re charge, is not green tech the battery composition are dangerous chemichals and hard to dispose.

I actually work in this field and I can tell you that if China bet on hydrogen I would still say its a horrible choice. The US department of energy office of basic sciences agrees and is defunding research in this area. Hydrogen's disadvantages are numerous but let's just get down to 1: how do you actually make hydrogen?

Solar cells can be up to 40% efficient while photoelectrochemical cells are only 7% efficient. Hydrogen from fossil fuels is more polluting and less energy efficient than just directly burning the fossil fuels.
 
Stop being bias, if China bets on hydrogen you would say different. EV is not future green tech, it hydrogen is. The Hydorgen cars just need more filling stations while EV still have difficulties remain such as not many of charging stations, take hours to day to re charge, is not green tech the battery composition are dangerous chemichals and hard to dispose.

I will wait until Vietnam will produce solar powered cars that run at night.
 
I actually work in this field and I can tell you that if China bet on hydrogen I would still say its a horrible choice. The US department of energy office of basic sciences agrees and is defunding research in this area. Hydrogen's disadvantages are numerous but let's just get down to 1: how do you actually make hydrogen?

Solar cells can be up to 40% efficient while photoelectrochemical cells are only 7% efficient. Hydrogen from fossil fuels is more polluting and less energy efficient than just directly burning the fossil fuels.
How do you hydrogen? That problem has already been solved. They are now constructing hydrogen power stations in west coast of u.s.

Hydro can be produced from solar, wind, fossel, nuclear...etc. the problem is cost for hydrogen power station.

What about battery, how can you make a container truck runs on battery? How do you dispose battery without damage environment? How do you make battery with green tech, no dangerous chemicals?

Imagine a poor country like Vietnam how are they going to dispose battery? It requires high tech country to dispose battery without damage environment. In case electronic vehicles is popularize the poor countries such as Vietnam will take all the harms. With no proper tech to handle battery disposion. Chances other rich countries will make poor countries as disposal backyard.
 
Last edited:
Stop being bias, if China bets on hydrogen you would say different. EV is not future green tech, it hydrogen is. The Hydorgen cars just need more filling stations while EV still have difficulties remain such as not many of charging stations, take hours to day to re charge, is not green tech the battery composition are dangerous chemichals and hard to dispose.

Erm, hydrogen fuel cell vehicle IS a type of electric vehicle. The name difference between "hydrogen car" and "electric car" is misleading because both types of vehicle run on electricity.

The main difference between the two types of vehicle is the source of electricity:
Hydrogen car uses a supply of hydrogen and oxygen to fuel chemical reactions (non-combustion) which converts the chemical energy into electricity at between 40% to 60% efficiency.
The type of vehicles commonly referred as electric vehicle is powered by a rechargeable battery such as lithium ion batteries. The efficiency for lithium ion charging can get close to 100%.

Both technology has its use. Using hydrogen fuel cell for personal vehicle is actually kinda of an overkill. Currently, hydrogen fuel cell's main advantage is its high endurance per mass. The electricity production from hydrogen fuel cell to drive the motor is an more efficient process than internal combustion through gasoline which is mostly a mechanical process instead of electro-magnetic. It doesn't quite shine on personal vehicle because storage of hydrogen, especially liquid hydrogen require specialized instruments, but if properly developed it will be great for aerospace/maritime applications where endurance per mass is very important.

For personal vehicle, however, hydrogen fuel cell's advantages is overshadowed by the fact rechargeable battery just plain cheaper. While hydrogen does have a much higher availability than gasoline, it is still more expensive than electricity simply because electricity is generated at dedicated stations, which by default has higher efficiency than personal vehicles. Of course, this is on top of the fact that the most economical hydrogen production process IS electricity based. Basically, to get hydrogen, you need to spend the electricity in the first place and simple thermodynamic means there is no way for any hydrogen produced by electricity based methods to exceed the efficiency of just charging the battery directly with the electricity. The main disadvantage of the battery is its limited range, but that is less relevant for personal vehicle use.

And implementing the support infrastructure is easier for battery based electric vehicle too. The reason is that electricity is simply safer to use than an actual combustible substance. The investment for a hydrogen pump and storage significantly cost significantly more than electric charger. In fact, charger is inexpensive enough it can be owned by individuals, while the hydrogen pump station certainly can't.

To sum it up, both type of technology are being developed. However, battery is looking to be more suitable for personal vehicle while fuel cell is more suited by aerospace or heavy vehicle applications.

How do you hydrogen? That problem has already been solved. They are now constructing hydrogen power stations in west coast of u.s.

Hydro can be produced from solar, wind, fossel, nuclear...etc. the problem is cost for hydrogen power station.

What about battery, how can you make a container truck runs on battery? How do you dispose battery without damage environment? How do you make battery with green tech, no dangerous chemicals?

Imagine a poor country like Vietnam how are they going to dispose battery? It requires high tech country to dispose battery without damage environment. In case electronic vehicles is popularize the poor countries such as Vietnam will take all the harms. With no proper tech to handle battery disposion. Chances other rich countries will make poor countries as disposal backyard.

Hydrogen fuel cell and hydrogen power station are completely different technology. Hydrogen fuel extract electricity through non-combustible reactions such as proton conduction. Hydrogen power station operates through old-fashioned combustion. They are not remotely the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Erm, hydrogen fuel cell vehicle IS a type of electric vehicle. The name difference between "hydrogen car" and "electric car" is misleading because both types of vehicle run on electricity.

The main difference between the two types of vehicle is the source of electricity:
Hydrogen car uses a supply of hydrogen and oxygen to fuel chemical reactions (non-combustion) which converts the chemical energy into electricity at between 40% to 60% efficiency.
The type of vehicles commonly referred as electric vehicle is powered by a rechargeable battery as lithium ion batteries. The efficiency for lithium ion charging can get close to 100%.

Both technology has its use. Using hydrogen fuel cell for personal vehicle is actually kinda of an overkill. Currently, hydrogen fuel cell's main advantage is its high endurance per mass. The electricity production from hydrogen fuel cell to drive the motor is an more efficient process than internal combustion through gasoline which is mostly a mechanical process instead of electro-magnetic. It doesn't quite shine on personal vehicle because storage of hydrogen, especially liquid hydrogen require specialized instruments, but if properly development it will be great for aerospace/maritime applications where endurance per mass is very important.

For personal vehicle, however, hydrogen fuel cell's advantages is overshadowed by the fact rechargeable battery just plain cost less over time. While hydrogen does have a much higher availability than gasoline, it is still more expensive than electricity simply because electricity is generated at dedicated stations, which by default has higher efficiency than personal vehicles. The main disadvantage of the battery is its limited range, but that is less relevant for personal vehicle use.

And implementing the support infrastructure is easier for battery based electric vehicle too. The reason is that electricity is simply safer to use than an actual combustible substance. The investment for a hydrogen pump and storage significantly cost significantly more than electric charger. In fact, charger is inexpensive enough it can be owned by individuals, while the hydrogen pump station certainly can't.

To sum it up, both type of technology are being developed. However, battery is looking to be more suitable for personal vehicle while fuel cell is more suited by aerospace or heavy vehicle applications.



Hydrogen fuel cell and hydrogen power station are completely different technology. Hydrogen fuel extract electricity through non-combustible reactions such as proton conduction. Hydrogen power station operates through old-fashioned combustion. They are not remotely the same thing.

Bro, it's informative but unfortunately that the viet troll will not read your post and will still argue with you
 
I actually work in this field and I can tell you that if China bet on hydrogen I would still say its a horrible choice. The US department of energy office of basic sciences agrees and is defunding research in this area. Hydrogen's disadvantages are numerous but let's just get down to 1: how do you actually make hydrogen?

Solar cells can be up to 40% efficient while photoelectrochemical cells are only 7% efficient. Hydrogen from fossil fuels is more polluting and less energy efficient than just directly burning the fossil fuels.

To be fair, hydrogen fuel cell does have its advantage---------------just not for personal vehicles. It packs a lot of work potential in a relatively small mass which makes it good for applications such as aircraft or space exploration, but it is by default (a lot) more costly than stored electricity because for any method that utilize hydrogen in a personal vehicle, you can use the same hydrogen in a dedicated power station and get much more energy efficiency.

Bro, it's informative but unfortunately that the viet troll will not read your post and will still argue with you

I just thought it really should be obvious considering that vast majority of the countries are researching into batteries-based electric personal vehicles. A lot of these countries actual do have extensive research done on hydrogen fuel cell, but later abandoned it in favor for battery.

And no offense to the Japanese, but they have a very long history of obsession and not know when to quit.
 
Bro, it's informative but unfortunately that the viet troll will not read your post and will still argue with you
So who does not agree with you or has Chinese propaganda mind set consider as troll? I have feeling that youre totally brainwashed that everything comes out from your government or anything positive of Chinese you will praise it to sky high, anything that not inline with Chinese propaganda or negative about Chinese you trash it and consider as troll ..etc.

And in case you not know, BMW, Honda, Toyota, GM all support hydrogen. No chance for electric batteries vehicles such as Tesla.

Erm, hydrogen fuel cell vehicle IS a type of electric vehicle. The name difference between "hydrogen car" and "electric car" is misleading because both types of vehicle run on electricity.

The main difference between the two types of vehicle is the source of electricity:
Hydrogen car uses a supply of hydrogen and oxygen to fuel chemical reactions (non-combustion) which converts the chemical energy into electricity at between 40% to 60% efficiency.
The type of vehicles commonly referred as electric vehicle is powered by a rechargeable battery as lithium ion batteries. The efficiency for lithium ion charging can get close to 100%.

Both technology has its use. Using hydrogen fuel cell for personal vehicle is actually kinda of an overkill. Currently, hydrogen fuel cell's main advantage is its high endurance per mass. The electricity production from hydrogen fuel cell to drive the motor is an more efficient process than internal combustion through gasoline which is mostly a mechanical process instead of electro-magnetic. It doesn't quite shine on personal vehicle because storage of hydrogen, especially liquid hydrogen require specialized instruments, but if properly development it will be great for aerospace/maritime applications where endurance per mass is very important.

For personal vehicle, however, hydrogen fuel cell's advantages is overshadowed by the fact rechargeable battery just plain cost. While hydrogen does have a much higher availability than gasoline, it is still more expensive than electricity simply because electricity is generated at dedicated stations, which by default has higher efficiency than personal vehicles. Of course, this is on top of the fact that the most economical hydrogen production process IS electricity based. Basically, to get hydrogen, you need to spend the electricity in the first place and simple thermodynamic means there is no way for any hydrogen produced by electricity based methods to exceed the efficiency of just charging the battery directly with the electricity. The main disadvantage of the battery is its limited range, but that is less relevant for personal vehicle use.

And implementing the support infrastructure is easier for battery based electric vehicle too. The reason is that electricity is simply safer to use than an actual combustible substance. The investment for a hydrogen pump and storage significantly cost significantly more than electric charger. In fact, charger is inexpensive enough it can be owned by individuals, while the hydrogen pump station certainly can't.

To sum it up, both type of technology are being developed. However, battery is looking to be more suitable for personal vehicle while fuel cell is more suited by aerospace or heavy vehicle applications.



Hydrogen fuel cell and hydrogen power station are completely different technology. Hydrogen fuel extract electricity through non-combustible reactions such as proton conduction. Hydrogen power station operates through old-fashioned combustion. They are not remotely the same thing.
I believe the article is very clear on Battery EV and Hydrogen even though Hydrogen fuel cell may be EV. The main arguement here is battery vs fuel cell.
 
Nissan Leaf is the best selling electric car in the world.

Nissan is a Japanese company. This makes Japan THE global leader in the full EV car market by sales.

Hydrogen cars are stupid and being heavily pushed by the energy lobby that is deathly scared of losing their oil cash-cows. They want to replace one unsafe, expensive fuel with another. Full EV is the future for sure. Tesla Model III will conquer the consumer market when it comes out and bring a revolution.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom