What's new

PM decides to stay away from video leak controversy

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan on Monday decided to stay away from the video leak controversy involving accountability court judge Arshad Malik who had reportedly told a close aide to Nawaz Sharif that he had been “blackmailed and pressurised” to convict the former prime minister.

Meanwhile, Pakistan Muslim League vice president Maryam Nawaz claimed that the government had already got conducted forensic audit of the video tape and after being told that it was authentic, the prime minister had decided not to interfere in the matter.

In another development, judge Arshad Malik met Islamabad High Court’s acting Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and reportedly briefed him on the alleged video tape.

Read: No pressure on me to convict Nawaz Sharif, says judge Arshad Malik; calls videos 'fake, lies'

Communications Minister Murad Saeed and Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Accountability Shahzad Akbar confirmed at a joint press conference that the government wanted investigation into the video leak under the Supreme Court or the Islamabad High Court.

Maryam claims ‘forensic audit by government’ confirms authenticity of video tape; judge Arshad Malik meets IHC’s acting chief justice

On Monday, Prime Minister Khan chaired a meeting of his spokesmen and media advisers and decided that the government should not intervene in the video tape controversy because if investigations were carried out by the government, the opposition would never accept it and make it another issue for political gains.

The video tape purportedly showed judge Arshad Malik telling Nasir Butt that he was “blackmailed and coerced” into convicting Mr Sharif despite having no evidence against the former premier.

An insider told Dawn that the prime minister was of the view that video tape scandal must be investigated but on the initiative of the superior judiciary and not by the government. He said the judges and judiciary were working independently and not answerable to the government. “We want the judiciary should order forensic audit of the video tape and whatever decision the judiciary will take in this regard the government will fully facilitate it,” PM Khan was quoted as saying.

He said the government would not allow anyone to attack the country’s prestige and state institutions. “All conspiracy to make institutions controversial will be foiled,” he added.

The prime minister said the PML-N had a history of threatening and attacking the judiciary, but accountability of its leaders would continue.

Interestingly, before the prime minister’s decision to stay away from the controversy, leaders of the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf had been demanding forensic audit of the video tape.

On Sunday, judge Arshad Malik in a press release denied contents of the video and demanded action against those involved in making what he called “false, fake and concocted” video tape.

The judge had on Dec 4, 2018 convicted ousted prime minister Sharif in the Al-Azizia Steel Mills corruption reference, but acquitted him in Flagship Investments reference.

Maryam’s claim

The PML-N vice president said in a private TV talk show that she had information that the government had already got conducted forensic audit of the video tape and got to know that it was not fake. “Imran Khan sahib has taken another U-turn by deciding that the government will not interfere in it after he got to know that the video tape was ‘genuine’ and not ‘fake’,” she added.

Maryam disclosed that she also had another video tape and three audio tapes of judge Arshad Malik and that she would make public these tapes later.

At the press conference, Shahzad Akbar said the government had after a threadbare discussion decided that either the Supreme Court or the IHC should take action on the video leak. “The government wants its investigation but on the orders of the judiciary,” he added.

He claimed that more cases of corruption would be opened against the Sharif family members in the days to come. “Very soon [we] will expose that how Shairfs were involved in obtaining kickbacks and commissions in mega national projects,” he added.

Mr Akbar claimed that a couple of days ago Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly Shahbaz Sharif had visited the National Accountability Bureau office in connection with investigation into his cases, where he threatened NAB officials with dire consequences if they did not close down his cases.

Murad Saeed claimed that PML-N leader Ahsan Iqbal was involved in kickbacks and commission in development projects.

Meeting

Judge Arshad Malik held the meeting with Justice Aamer Farooq after attending the oath-taking ceremony of the latter. Justice Farooq took the oath as IHC acting Chief Justice after Chief Justice Athar Minallah proceeded on the summer vacation with effect from July 8.

According to sources, Mr Malik briefed Justice Farooq on the alleged video tape.

Published in Dawn, July 9th, 2019
 
. .
He has a lot of important stuff to see so an excellent decision. PM's advisor for Information can handle it in the media while the judiciary should focus on restoring its honour and dignity.
PM has a lot of very important engagements to attend to like meeting with US and Russian Presidents and deciding the course of relations and history.
 
.
He has a lot of important stuff to see so an excellent decision. PM's advisor for Information can handle it in the media while the judiciary should focus on restoring its honour and dignity.
PM has a lot of very important engagements to attend to like meeting with US and Russian Presidents and deciding the course of relations and history.
Unfortunately, we have 3rd class opposition. Pakistan need presidential form of govt.
 
.
Unfortunately, we have 3rd class opposition. Pakistan need presidential form of govt.
Well, we have it but it is the duty of PTI and the institutions to keep the rogue mafia called opposition in check and let PM focus on his job.
Yes, I agree. We need a presidential form of govt.
 
Last edited:
.
Well, we have it but it is the duty of PTI and the institutions to keep the rogue mafia called opposition in check and let PM focus on the his job.
Yes, I agree. We need a presidential form of govt.
PTI is dealing with moles and ages of PMLn faithful bureaucracy mafia. Like Rauf Kalasra said, Nawaz only trust the people of Kashmiri origin, means Butt and Mians .... royal blood of slaves.
 
Last edited:
.
Another twist in judges video scandal. Ex General Shoaib claims that original video for blackmail was bought by Pmln mafia for 5 crore and not establishment. That's how Nawaz Sharif got free in one reference (Flagship) and a weak judgment in another (Al Azizia) by the same judge Arshad Malik. But PMLN mafia was not happy about this outcome since Nawaz Sharifs bail in Al Azizia case was repeatedly refused by higher courts. So they sought vengeance against the same judge who took bribes and was was blackmailed by Pmln mafia in the first place
 
.
PTI is dealing with moles and ages of PMLn faithful bureaucracy mafia. Like Rauf Kalasra said, Nawaz only trust on people with Kashmiri origin, means Butt and Mians .... royal blood of slaves.
No, problem...they will all be busted. God's willing (inshaAllah)
 
.
Another twist in judges video scandal. Ex General Shoaib claims that original video for blackmail was bought by Pmln mafia for 5 crore and not establishment. That's how Nawaz Sharif got free in one reference (Flagship) and a weak judgment in another (Al Azizia) by the same judge Arshad Malik. But PMLN mafia was not happy about this outcome since Nawaz Sharifs bail in Al Azizia case was repeatedly refused by higher courts. So they sought vengeance against the same judge who took bribes and was was blackmailed by Pmln mafia in the first place

This raises another interesting question. Was it appropriate to mark such a sensitive case to such a judge, to begin with? Generally, the repute of judges is quite well known in the judicial circles. May be, then, Noon League used their backdoor influence to get this judge appointed to hear this case.
 
.
This raises another interesting question. Was it appropriate to mark such a sensitive case to such a judge, to begin with? Generally, the repute of judges is quite well known in the judicial circles. May be, then, Noon League used their backdoor influence to get this judge appointed to hear this case.
Yes the judge was chosen by Pmln after another judge Muhammad Bashir announced his verdict in Avenfield Reference. The judge was changed to bail Nawaz Sharif obviously.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom