PLA can be defeated in one Hour in nuclear war by US: Russian Expert

[ChineseTiger1986]

Indian supa powa quality, are you serious? LOLOL

Back in 1981, China has tested the full range DF-5 ICBM with a true megaton warhead, except the warhead at the end didn't detonate.

India is still far away from China's 1980s nuclear level.

No it is not that simple. Listen the original video. Russian expert says that chines device are very huge.

We ignited secondary device with boosted fission. Our case is difference. We are theoretically very sound. Look how our missile hit the target in first test itself with a great accuracy. We do not need so many tests to perfect our technologies.

Our first H-bomb was only 1 ton, which was still smaller than your current atomic bomb.

 

[HariPrasad]

Indian supa powa quality, are you serious? LOLOL

You can remain in denial and in fool's paredice. I do not have any remedy.

 

[BoQ77]

It will only make the PLA stronger than ever.

When you could win that "war" ?

 

[xunzi]

LMAO, the Trident II D5 has tested 150 times, and can you say that it is not more sophisticated than any Indian ballistic missile?

We test our ICBM routinely because the readiness of our ICBM is by far more close to the real time combat than any Indian missile.

Normally I judge a country ICBM strength by their mastery of space launch because the principle is the same, the rocket engine is the same. Now Indian is still at the 1-3 ton payloads which is the low end of the spectrum. Earlier they used Russian cryogenics engine to launch them. That same engine is used on their Mar mission. It is a low payload mission.

 

[HariPrasad]

LMAO, the Trident II D5 has tested 150 times, and can you say that it is not more sophisticated than any Indian ballistic missile?

We test our ICBM routinely because the readiness of our ICBM is by far more close to the real time combat than any Indian missile.

We have got an unparalleled accuracy. You can test missiles many time but can not get the sophistication what India have got.

Normally I judge a country ICBM strength by their mastery of space launch because the principle is the same, the rocket engine is the same. Now Indian is still at the 1-3 ton payloads which is the low end of the spectrum. Earlier they used Russian cryogenics engine to launch them. That same engine is used on their Mar mission. It is a low payload mission.

You exposed your ignorance and holes in your argument. You do not have factual information also.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Normally I judge a country ICBM strength by their mastery of space launch because the principle is the same, the rocket engine is the same. Now Indian is still at the 1-3 ton payloads which is the low end of the spectrum. Earlier they used Russian cryogenics engine to launch them. That same engine is used on their Mar mission. It is a low payload mission.

Agni V can only shoot 5000km with 1 ton of payload, and yet this missile weighs more than 50 tons, which is clumsy as fck.

With 1 ton of payload, most China's ICBM can now shoot beyond 13000km with a weight of less than 50 tons.

 

[KAL-EL]

What would happen if humans become extinct suddenly???

Some are of the opinion that it would be the best thing for nature to do a "hard reset"

 

[xunzi]

No it is not that simple. Listen the original video. Russian expert says that chines device are very huge.

We ignited secondary device with boosted fission. Our case is difference. We are theoretically very sound. Look how our missile hit the target in first test itself with a great accuracy. We do not need so many tests to perfect our technologies.

When people think of Indian, quality is the last thing they think of. You can't make anything! All your programs are delay or backward technology. But you Indian have very big mouth and love to boast because you think the West will not target you because they find you nonthreatening, submissive, and funny because of the way you guys eat curry. LOL

 

[Raphael]

Two points:

1. If the US was really capable of exterminating China via comprehensive nuclear extermination, and avoiding a second strike, they would have done so already. China is not under Russia's nuclear umbrella, so there would be no consequences for the USA. The fact that it hasn't happened casts OP's claims in irreparable doubt.
2. If China is not able to mount an effect second strike against the USA, we would have to follow an Israel-like "Samson option". That's why the 300 nukes in our possession would all be dropped on India (excluding IOK). There is an absolute doctrinal imperative to exact revenge, and demonstrate that our deterrence is not hollow, and that is why India would be erased.

 

[xunzi]

No it is not that simple. Listen the original video. Russian expert says that chines device are very huge.

We ignited secondary device with boosted fission. Our case is difference. We are theoretically very sound. Look how our missile hit the target in first test itself with a great accuracy. We do not need so many tests to perfect our technologies.

You cannot claim we haven't reach advance stage in ICBM when we could launch DF-41. When you can do MIRV like we can, then talk.

 

[HariPrasad]

Agni V can only shoot 5000km with 1 ton of payload, and yet this missile weighs more than 50 tons, which is clumsy as fck.

With 1 ton of payload, most China's ICBM can now shoot beyond 13000km with a weight of less than 50 tons.

Missile weighs 23 tons. Range is in excess of 8000 KM (I came to know when Chinese expert said that). Listen to the video , russian expert says otherwise regarding Chinese missile. He says that they are 70s technologies of Russia.

You cannot claim we haven't reach advance stage in ICBM when we could launch DF-41. When you can do MIRV like we can, then talk.

Russian expert say that you are far away from MIRV.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Missile weighs 23 tons. Range is in excess of 8000 KM (I came to know when Chinese expert said that). Listen to the video , russian expert says otherwise regarding Chinese missile. He says that they are 70s technologies of Russia.

This guy was talking sh1t.

Our current solid fuel propellant is even greater than NEPE (Trident II engine), and he was talking this out of his a$$.

JL-2 is now more advanced than D5

DF-41 and JL-2, which one is not top notch in the world?

 

[HariPrasad]

When people think of Indian, quality is the last thing they think of. You can't make anything! All your programs are delay or backward technology. But you Indian have very big mouth and love to boast because you think the West will not target you because they find you nonthreatening, submissive, and funny because of the way you guys eat curry. LOL

Have you replaced word China with India?

This guy was talking sh1t.

Our current solid fuel propellant is even greater than NEPE (Trident II engine), and he was talking this out of his a$$.

JL-2 is now more advanced than D5

DF-41 and JL-2, which one is not top notch in the world?

So far as believing is concern, I would believe 1000 times more to Russian expert than your BS.

 

[xunzi]

We have got an unparalleled accuracy. You can test missiles many time but can not get the sophistication what India have got.




You exposed your ignorance and holes in your argument. You do not have factual information also.

Although ISRO’s reliable and cost-effective space products and services have drawn many buyers, India is not among the major players in the global space launch market.

Lele attributes this to two factors. One is that India has just one satellite launch site with two operational launch pads, which restricts the number of launches it undertakes to between two and four each year. More importantly, India has failed so far to make GSLV a fully operational system.

To date, India has depended on the Polar Space Launch Vehicle (PSLV), which has proved a reliable workhorse in launching low earth orbiting (LEO) satellites with smaller payloads, usually less than a ton, and used for remote sensing, experimental and navigational purposes. However, the launch market is moving towards 3-7 ton payloads propelled into the geostationary orbit for telecommunications, broadcasting, and weather forecasting services.

ISRO needs to develop the capability to carry heavier satellites and into the geostationary orbit if it is keen to become a serious player in the multi-million dollar global space launch business, which is currently dominated by companies in Europe and China, the ISRO scientist observed.

Have you replaced word China with India?




So far as believing is concern, I would believe 1000 times more to Russian expert than your BS.

None of your supercomputers are in the top 10. You have no tech company in Fortune 500. Quality? my ***! LOL

 

[HariPrasad]

Back in 1981, China has tested the full range DF-5 ICBM with a true megaton warhead, except the warhead at the end didn't detonate.

India is still far away from China's 1980s nuclear level.



Our first H-bomb was only 1 ton, which was still smaller than your current atomic bomb.

Take this to comedy section. your posts better suited there.