‘Pig, go back to India’: Indian origin CEO abused by Donald Trump supporter in US

[T-72M1]

Lord Manavan is an internally displaced Hindu Mallu.

He's not scared.

He's frothing at the mouth about rice bag Christian converts.

Cheers, Doc

The church does run its conversion operations across sub saharan Africa, India, and other destitute poor and rural parts of the world like a corporate sales wing.

The Jeebis system is just another predatory Abrahamic system which, regardless of what the sangh says, should be expelled, exiled and banished from these fertile shores forever.

What is Mallu?

Keralite muzzies, they are the original sub continental ones, first to get infected, pre bin qasim even (I think?)

but the racist arab organization of ISIS designated a few of them to be worthy only of being toilet cleaners lol

 

[Loafer]

This looks like a lefty media hit job. Trump rocks!!

I am with trump on erasing lefties and seculars from this earth.

 

[war&peace]

Malayali.

Cheers, Doc

Sorry, I don't even know this one..
Thanks anyway

 

[Nilgiri]

This is actually no different to rabid sanghis telling an Indian Parsi to go back to Iran because he believes the sangh and the BJP are poison to the secular fabric of Indian society regardless of whether the country does well economically or not.

Not everything translates to money. There are things that cannot be sacrificed at the altar of prosperity.

This is something only Indians who live on the motherland get .... for the most part.

@Nilgiri @Roybot

Cheers, Doc

Well another (arguably just as important if not more so given what it can spawn long term) issue arises in the labelling of all "sanghis" as such....in both countries (and world at large more generally). Some are indeed truly bad (for the very reason you explain in your post), but does not mean you can extrapolate to everyone that identifies as sanghi or doesn't but get labelled as such anyway etc because of whatever trait x,y,z believes is some complete marker.

It's way more nuanced, diverse and complicated than that....similar to saying all those that are not sanghis are rabid anti-nationals.

This labeling/extrapolation phenomenon (past the actual realised violence part of it by both sides which was always brewing behind the scenes) has really immersed the US lately more than I thought could happen, its kind of scary....esp combined with the way identity politics and utter ignorance pile on top of it.

I know very many good people on the right side and left side (here in Canada and US) who can have good debates about all subjects of note that delineate them into left and right in first place.....but many of them are physically being pulled away from the earlier conducive environment to one of quite harsh polarisation based on absolute labels...sometimes over complete non issues (if one for example actually looks at say the % prevalence of neo-nazi and supremacist types in the larger conservative fold and the same for the ANTIFA et. al. thugs on the left). Sad sad sad.....cry the beloved country indeed.

 

[salimpheku]

This is actually no different to rabid sanghis telling an Indian Parsi to go back to Iran because he believes the sangh and the BJP are poison to the secular fabric of Indian society regardless of whether the country does well economically or not.

If not for the so called 'Rabid Sanghis', you know exactly what would have happened to Parsis.
Oh wait, you want the whole world to be blind to what the seculars did to parsis all over the world except India?

A parsi is a Minister in Sanghi Cabinet.
A Jain is the President of Sanghi Party.
An OBC is the PM of the country and a Sanghi.
A Dalit Sanghi is the President of the country.
A South Sanghi Dravidian is the Vice-President of the country.

YET, Sangh is communal & the so called Seculars, who have exterminated the Parsis all over the world are the good people

How do you sell this snake oil doc?

Christians and Muslims were never liked by the hardliner nutjobs anyways.

One of them have been converting & killing us for 200 years.
The other has been killing & converting us for 1000 years.

Oh yeah, before Sangh was formed, we were all like BEST BUDDIES, right doc?

You ill-read cave-dweller, they've already started attacking southies.

The 'I am above you' secular pretends that the recent Dalit murders by Seculars in Kerala did not happen.
I am sorry my lord for exposing you.

 

[padamchen]

If not for the so called 'Rabid Sanghis', you know exactly what would have happened to Parsis.
Oh wait, you want the whole world to be blind to what the seculars did to parsis all over the world except India?

A parsi is a Minister in Sanghi Cabinet.
A Jain is the President of Sanghi Party.
An OBC is the PM of the country and a Sanghi.
A Dalit Sanghi is the President of the country.
A South Sanghi Dravidian is the Vice-President of the country.

YET, Sangh is communal & the so called Seculars, who have exterminated the Parsis all over the world are the good people

How do you sell this snake oil doc?



One of them have been converting & killing us for 200 years.
The other has been killing & converting us for 1000 years.

Oh yeah, before Sangh was formed, we were all like BEST BUDDIES, right doc?



The 'I am above you' secular pretends that the recent Dalit murders by Seculars in Kerala did not happen.
I am sorry my lord for exposing you.

The only thing of interest in your post pheku ....

Which "Parsi" is a member in the Sanghi cabinet?

Also Parsis were exterminated by Muslims (am assuming in the Sanghi nutjob's mind that's who he calls "seculars") "all over the world"? Could you point out the general geography of "all over the world" Parsis were exterminated from?

Gish Galloping away to glory as ever Pheku ....

Cheers, Doc

Well another (arguably just as important if not more so given what it can spawn long term) issue arises in the labelling of all "sanghis" as such....in both countries (and world at large more generally). Some are indeed truly bad (for the very reason you explain in your post), but does not mean you can extrapolate to everyone that identifies as sanghi or doesn't but get labelled as such anyway etc because of whatever trait x,y,z believes is some complete marker.

It's way more nuanced, diverse and complicated than that....similar to saying all those that are not sanghis are rabid anti-nationals.

This labeling/extrapolation phenomenon (past the actual realised violence part of it by both sides which was always brewing behind the scenes) has really immersed the US lately more than I thought could happen, its kind of scary....esp combined with the way identity politics and utter ignorance pile on top of it.

I know very many good people on the right side and left side (here in Canada and US) who can have good debates about all subjects of note that delineate them into left and right in first place.....but many of them are physically being pulled away from the earlier conducive environment to one of quite harsh polarisation based on absolute labels...sometimes over complete non issues (if one for example actually looks at say the % prevalence of neo-nazi and supremacist types in the larger conservative fold and the same for the ANTIFA et. al. thugs on the left). Sad sad sad.....cry the beloved country indeed.

You'll feel right at "home" this winter in India then.

Only, we're a stronger more distilled version of you.

Cheers, Doc

 

[MultaniGuy]

What happened to the Indian was racist.

 

[salimpheku]

The only thing of interest in your post pheku ....

Which "Parsi" is a member in the Sanghi cabinet?

Also Parsis were exterminated by Muslims (am assuming in the Sanghi nutjob's mind that's who he calls "seculars") "all over the world"? Could you point out the general geography of "all over the world" Parsis were exterminated from?

Gish Galloping away to glory as ever Pheku ....

Cheers, Doc

So, Parsi's original inhabitants of Iran, where have they vanished from Iran?
That you deny the persecution of your kind reminds me of Stockholm syndrome.

Still, you conveniently avoided all the minorities in top positions of Sangh where as the secular parties are controlled by FAMILIES - Irony is not that secular parties are actually family parties. Irony is you trying to sell the snake oil that they are secular.

Oh, YOU conveniently sidestepped the fact that Hindus & Muslims & Christians have not been getting along much before Sangh came into existence.
Or may be you think Hindus actually hitting back in the same coin is the problem - May be you like the old ways where the massacre was a one way street.

 

[padamchen]

So, Parsi's original inhabitants of Iran, where have they vanished from Iran?
That you deny the persecution of your kind reminds me of Stockholm syndrome.

Still, you conveniently avoided all the minorities in top positions of Sangh where as the secular parties are controlled by FAMILIES - Irony is not that secular parties are actually family parties. Irony is you trying to sell the snake oil that they are secular.

Oh, YOU conveniently sidestepped the fact that Hindus & Muslims & Christians have not been getting along much before Sangh came into existence.
Or may be you think Hindus actually hitting back in the same coin is the problem - May be you like the old ways where the massacre was a one way street.

Gish Galloper -

1) Does Iran qualify in your mind for "all around the world" extermination by "seculars"?

2) You said a Parsi was there in the Sanghi cabinet. Who?

Cheers, Doc

 

[T-72M1]

said a Parsi was there in the Sanghi cabinet. Who?

Smriti Irani.

She's Parsi by wedlock, no ?

 

[padamchen]

Smriti Irani.

She's Parsi by wedlock, no ?

There's no such thing as Parsi by wedlock.

Smriti is Hindu.

Her husband is a Parsi.

Period.

Man or woman, your Parsi line ends with you once you marry a non Parsi.

A Parsi is by blood. You are born one. You don't become one. Same as Vedic Hindus, before the bloodlines started getting mixed.

@Gadkari can explain. He's an expert on Parsis. Among a host of other things.

Cheers, Doc

 

[KRAIT]

Feel good thread for desperates. Nothing more.

 

[padamchen]

Did you feel good?

Cheers, Doc

 

[T-72M1]

There's no such thing as Parsi by wedlock.

Smriti is Hindu.

Her husband is a Parsi.

Period.

Man or woman, your Parsi line ends with you once you marry a non Parsi.

A Parsi is by blood. You are born one. You don't become one. Same as Vedic Hindus, before the bloodlines started getting mixed.

@Gadkari can explain. He's an expert on Parsis. Among a host of other things.

Cheers, Doc

Right, so her husband's no longer a parsi either ?

I know of a parsi girl who married a sikh, her brothers actually grew their hair and beards out and tied a pug for the wedding (not converted, just for fun) it raised a few sikh eyeballs but they were just trying to be included/inclusive? .. the goofuses

zoroaster have mercy on your dwindling lot.

 

[padamchen]

Right, so her husband's no longer a parsi either ?

I know of a parsi girl who married a sikh, her brothers actually grew their hair and beards out and tied a pug for the wedding (not converted, just for fun) it raised a few sikh eyeballs but they were just trying to be included/inclusive? .. the goofuses

zoroaster have mercy on your dwindling lot.

No the guy continues to be a Parsi.

The girls are excommunicated though no one actually used that non PC term ...

But yes. They stop wearing the sudreh and kusti and cannot enter the fire temple anymore. Though I suspect in their hearts and homes and spiritually and culturally they are still Zoroastrian and pray at home and continue all the same rituals.

It's very weird in families where half the cousins are Parsi and half are not. The Parsi cousins will go into the fire temple, the non Parsis will do something else (mall, restaurant) while their Parsis cousins are done and come out.

Same with the Navjote ceremony. They'll wear the same clothes, topi, etc. eat the same sev and dhai and ravo, but ask their Parsi cousins what happened "inside" .

I really have no answers man. Just telling you as it is.

Cheers, Doc