What's new

Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

Skeptic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

The head of U.S. Central Command said Sunday that Al Qaeda is no longer operating in Afghanistan, with its senior leadership having moved to the western region of Pakistan.

Gen. David Petraeus said affiliated groups have "enclaves and sanctuaries" in Afghanistan and that "tentacles of Al Qaeda" have touched countries throughout the Middle East and northern Africa. But he said the terrorist group has suffered" very significant losses" in recent months, and agreed with Afghan President Hamid Karzai's recent assessment that there is no Al Qaeda based in his country.

Still, he said he believes Usama bin Laden and his No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri remain in charge of the terrorist network.

"They surface periodically. We see communications that they send out," Petraeus said.

Though Petraeus said nobody can provide an accurate location for either terrorist, he said Al Qaeda senior leadership clearly is now rooted in the border region of western Pakistan.

"There's no question that Al Qaeda's senior leadership has been there and has been in operation for years," Petraeus said.

The head of U.S. Central Command, speaking on "FOX News Sunday," warned of the severe threat extremist groups now pose to Pakistan but praised the U.S. ally for what he described as a coordinated campaign to beat back an uprising of Taliban forces.

He said that the Taliban's effort to extend its territory beyond the northern Swat valley seems to have "galvanized all of Pakistan" against the group.

"There is a degree of unanimity that there must be swift and effective action taken against the Taliban in Pakistan," Petraeus said, warning of the dire consequences of a Pakistan defeat.

"This is not a U.S. fight that Pakistan is carrying out at this point ... This is a Pakistani fight, a Pakistani battle, with elements that as we've mentioned threaten the very existence of the Pakistani state."

Petraeus spoke Sunday on "FOX News Sunday" and CNN's "State of the Union."
 
.
Does this mean shifting of the fulcrum of aggression to Pakistan.

A prequel to more Drone attacks and American direct involvement in Pakistan?
 
.
"Does this mean shifting of the fulcrum of aggression to Pakistan.

A prequel to more Drone attacks and American direct involvement in Pakistan?"


Does this question mean that you're a disingenuous troll seeking to provoke as there's no indication of such by Petraeus?

Thanks.
 
.
"Does this mean shifting of the fulcrum of aggression to Pakistan.

A prequel to more Drone attacks and American direct involvement in Pakistan?"


Does this question mean that you're a disingenuous troll seeking to provoke as there's no indication of such by Petraeus?

Thanks.

Bravo sir, thank you... Your impartiality is what i like best about you. :)

From the horses mouth:

Army General David Petraeus, head of US Central Command, pointed to Pakistan’s intensifying offensive against the Taliban in the Swat valley as a sign its political leaders, people and military were united against the militants.

‘The actions of the Pakistani Taliban seem to have galvanized all of Pakistan,’ he told the ‘Fox News Sunday’ program.

‘There is a degree of unanimity that there must be swift and effective action taken against the Taliban,’ he added.

Source: DAWN.COM | World | Pakistan ?galvanized? to fight Taliban: Petraeus
 
.
"Does this mean shifting of the fulcrum of aggression to Pakistan.

A prequel to more Drone attacks and American direct involvement in Pakistan?"


Does this question mean that you're a disingenuous troll seeking to provoke as there's no indication of such by Petraeus?

Thanks.


Since you beleive in replying to questions via questions, I'll tread the same path.
So you want to imply that AQ in Pakistan will have no consequences?

Is US comfortable with AQ finding a new home in Pakistan and plans to do nothing about ir?

If not then what exactly was reason for US launching an offensive in Afghanistan?

Can you ensure that Drone activity will not follow AQ?

Has troll policing taken over your reading and comprehension skills?:chilli:
 
.
"So you want to imply that AQ in Pakistan will have no consequences?"

Imply? Did you just hatch from an egg? Al Qaeda has been under attack in Pakistan since at least 2005. Petraeus, OTOH, makes no suggestion that we'll increase attacks of PREDATOR. None.

"Has troll policing taken over your reading and comprehension skills?:chilli:"

Quit trying to be cute and focus on improving your discourse. It sucks as is...

Thanks.
 
.
mission acomplished now US should leave Afghanistan

and every thing will be normal
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom