What's new

Permanent seat for Pakistan in UN security council.

jaydee

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
Pakistan
World wide there is a population of around 2 billion muslims representing more than fifty muslim countries and as minority in many other countries.It is an irony that there is no representation for muslims in security council.There are only two countries worth their salt to represent muslim interests in security council viz Pakistan and Turkey.But since Pakistan has always tilted balance of power in Asia and has always stood up for muslim interests from Bosnia to Brunie.It rightfully deserves permanent seat at security council with full veto power.But since India is also aspiring to get permanent seat at security council despite not adhering to the Security council resolutions,Pakistan felt the need to oppose the move but coordianting with like minded countries.Pakistan has been contributing highest number of troops for UN peace keeping.Should Pakistan change it's policy and garner the support of muslim countries and other countries willing to support Pakistan whenever there would be debate on increasing the number of permanent seats at security council ?
 
Since Arabic is one of the official UN languages, an Arab nation should definitely be part of the Council. The nation with the best economy, the best influence and the most modern military- Saudi Arabia.
 
Lets be real. I don't think Muslim nations especially the Arab ones are going to choose Pakistan as their representative.
 
Yes a permanent seat of a Muslim nation should be there ...

KSA is a good option ,, since it have influence over all islamic world
other options includes Turkey , Indonesia and Pakistan
 
In the present state of affairs there is a higher probability of a UNSC resolution for an operation in Pakistan vis-a-vis Pakistan getting a permanent UNSC seat.
 
-
Yes a permanent seat of a Muslim nation should be there ...

KSA is a good option ,, since it have influence over all islamic world
other options includes Turkey , Indonesia and Pakistan
KSA doesnt have that kind of great human rights record.

Absolute monarchy, religious intolerance, if KSA was not ally of USA, I definitely can say some sanctions or resolution in UN will be there.
 
World wide there is a population of around 2 billion muslims representing more than fifty muslim countries and as minority in many other countries.It is an irony that there is no representation for muslims in security council.There are only two countries worth their salt to represent muslim interests in security council viz Pakistan and Turkey.But since Pakistan has always tilted balance of power in Asia and has always stood up for muslim interests from Bosnia to Brunie.It rightfully deserves permanent seat at security council with full veto power.But since India is also aspiring to get permanent seat at security council despite not adhering to the Security council resolutions,Pakistan felt the need to oppose the move but coordianting with like minded countries.Pakistan has been contributing highest number of troops for UN peace keeping.Should Pakistan change it's policy and garner the support of muslim countries and other countries willing to support Pakistan whenever there would be debate on increasing the number of permanent seats at security council ?
Short answer.: The UN doesn't represent religions. It represents countries.
 

Back
Top Bottom