Pay for anti-separatist drive: B'desh minister to India

[idune]

Babur was arrested during the caretaker government, not during the AL regime.

You have lied and faked enough anout BNP involement in arms case, where is damm proof of your claim? Without any proof you are plain and stright liar paddling Awami lies and killing in disguise.

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

You have lied and faked enough anout BNP involement in arms case, where is damm proof of your claim? Without any proof you are plain and stright liar paddling Awami lies and killing in disguise.

not only that to please the bhartis he posted outdated data on people living below poverty line.

 

[idune]

not only that to please the bhartis he posted outdated data on people living below poverty line.

I have a stange feeling about who he really is and I think you got the idea.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Y

Did you even care to check whether these are present or backdated data? Before posting anything you should check these are present data or not... if not then it is better not to show up your ignorance. Poverty rate in india is between 32 to 77% as it is measured recently. In bangladesh it is 31%. In india government is not sure still what should be the level of poverty.... they set it 30 rupees a day this year saying this are enough to buy food, cover education and health cost. But due to protest they had to withdraw it... but even with 30 ruppes a day they got 32% poverty rate. Definitely if the poverty line is increase it will increase more poor... sorry if I heart your bharati dalali ego.

Where are you getting your facts from? Did you not see the page? Where are your sources of your claims? Yes, according to WB data, poverty in Bangladesh has fallen, but there is a long way to go.

It says:
Source: CIA World Factbook - Unless otherwise noted, information in this page is accurate as of January 1, 2011

Are you implying that you are a more credible source than the CIA?

You have lied and faked enough anout BNP involement in arms case, where is damm proof of your claim? Without any proof you are plain and stright liar paddling Awami lies and killing in disguise.

And you fail to explain just how did that arms haul got there.

Ask Barrister Munshi and General Tiki.

I have a stange feeling about who he really is and I think you got the idea.

Yeah, I also happen to be a RAW agent.

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

Where are you getting your facts from? Did you not see the page? Where are your sources of your claims? Yes, according to WB data, poverty in Bangladesh has fallen, but there is a long way to go.

It says:
Source: CIA World Factbook - Unless otherwise noted, information in this page is accurate as of January 1, 2011

Are you implying that you are a more credible source than the CIA?



And you fail to explain just how did that arms haul got there.

Ask Barrister Munshi and General Tiki.



Yeah, I also happen to be a RAW agent.

CIA gets all its data from World Bank, IMF etc...

For India the 25% BPL is based on 2007 ... n for Bangladesh 40% BPL is based on 2005 data.

You should have gone through what we have already talked ... n what is the present condition... before posting from a random source...

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html

Population below poverty line:

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
25% (2007 est.)

Bangladesh has updated the 2010 data on 2011 and published it....

Bangladesh - Poverty Declined to 31.5 percent in 2010 from 40 percent in 2005

Even your CIA has not updated data yet...

So, check your facts before posting.

 

[LaBong]

CIA gets all its data from World Bank, IMF etc...

For India the 25% BPL is based on 2007 ... n for Bangladesh 40% BPL is based on 2005 data.

You should have gone through what we have already talked ... n what is the present condition... before posting from a random source...

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html

Population below poverty line:

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
25% (2007 est.)

Bangladesh has updated the 2010 data on 2011 and published it....

Bangladesh - Poverty Declined to 31.5 percent in 2010 from 40 percent in 2005

Even your CIA has not updated data yet...

So, check your facts before posting.

From the same world bank source poverty in India was 29% at 2000, now rant.

---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 PM ----------

By the way Hasina is really doing good for BD if poverty has decreased by 10% in 5 years. Hail Indian stooge dalal La-Hasina!

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

From the same world bank source poverty in India was 29% at 2000, now rant.

---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 PM ----------

By the way Hasina is really doing good for BD if poverty has decreased by 10% in 5 years. Hail Indian stooge dalal La-Hasina!

hassaina came in power in late 2008... During BNP time things were moving towards positive direction... n everyone was expecting to achieve 7% gdp growth on 2007 from 6.7% on 2006. But during caretaker government everything gone backward and during awami duration it has yet to achieve 7% gdp growth this year which should have been achieved on 2007. So, if you really need to praise anyone it should be the BNP led government. Though corruption was the black spot during BNP time but definitely they did better then Awami league in terms of economy so far that we have seen.

N that world bank data was based on the data that Indian government provided... it isnot like that if it is 29% it can not be increased. Indian government is still not sure what should be the BPL thats why they needs to withdraw the new proposed BPL of 30 rupee.

India's official poverty line doesn't measure up | Jayati Ghosh | Global development | guardian.co.uk

N your previous world bank data of 1.25 dollar is not a valid measure to define poverty because in Bangladesh food price is cheap due to government subsidy ... so BD people can buy more food with same amount or same amount of food with less then 1.25 dollar then India and this access to food is one of the most important measure to define poverty. Education is free for both India and Bangladesh. That is why BD had 40% people below poverty line in 2005 despite 50% people used to earn less then 1.25 dollar if that was indeed a valid data. So far what I have seen India provide subsidy only to the people BPL.

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

This is one recent article on food subsidy...

Bangladeshi govt on food alert

 

[jayron]

Ha ha ha ha. I thought only indians are baniyas!

This seems like a good technique to earn money without doing much.. We should probably train some terrorists to attack Bangladesh and then ask BD government money to leash them.

 

[Zabaniyah]

CIA gets all its data from World Bank, IMF etc...

For India the 25% BPL is based on 2007 ... n for Bangladesh 40% BPL is based on 2005 data.

You should have gone through what we have already talked ... n what is the present condition... before posting from a random source...

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html

Population below poverty line:

Field info displayed for all countries in alpha order.
25% (2007 est.)

Bangladesh has updated the 2010 data on 2011 and published it....

Bangladesh - Poverty Declined to 31.5 percent in 2010 from 40 percent in 2005

Even your CIA has not updated data yet...

So, check your facts before posting.

Yes dear, I know about the very recent WB data. But then, there is a difference between 31.5% and 25%.

As far as being the poverty rate in India going between 32%-77%, those are wild numbers. And come from multiple sources using different criteria.
Letters to the Editor sent to WEEK, THE - Poverty debate: Justice Lens by Ranjani, Chennai, India

So, we can't really say if those numbers are reliable. For now, we'll just rely on WB data. So for now, poverty in India is at 25%.

Nonetheless, Bangladesh still has the highest poverty as a percentage of the population in South Asia alone according to WB data, ignoring Afghanistan (since there is a war going on there). Much of that population consists of children. So, there is a lot of room for improvement.

And if you were paying attention, this thread is about paying for anti-seperatist drives, not Indian poverty vs. Bangladeshi poverty.

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

Yes dear, I know about the very recent WB data. But then, there is a difference between 31.5% and 25%.

As far as being the poverty rate in India going between 32%-77%, those are wild numbers. And come from multiple sources using different criteria.
Letters to the Editor sent to WEEK, THE - Poverty debate: Justice Lens by Ranjani, Chennai, India

So, we can't really say if those numbers are reliable. For now, we'll just rely on WB data. So for now, poverty in India is at 25%.

Nonetheless, Bangladesh still has the highest poverty as a percentage of the population in South Asia alone according to WB data, ignoring Afghanistan (since there is a war going on there). Much of that population consists of children. So, there is a lot of room for improvement.

And if you were paying attention, this thread is about paying for anti-seperatist drives, not Indian poverty vs. Bangladeshi poverty.

Yes from multiple source but Indian government accepted the tendulkar report and that said it clearly india has 37% below poverty rate..

India last year abandoned previously held data of 27%... n increased it to 37% based on Tendulkar report ... n this year India set a new below poverty line of 30 rupee earning a day... n that reduced the figure from 37% to 32% ... but due to heavy protest from different quarter Government had to withdraw the data... n if they increase the poverty line from 30 rupee income a day it will definitely increase the people below poverty line more...

It not only represent the position of different source but also Indian government position. This is not wild imagination.

India's official poverty line doesn't measure up | Jayati Ghosh | Global development | guardian.co.uk

In recent times, various committees led by economists have come up with different ways to measure the extent of poverty. The official line delivers a poverty rate of around 32% of the population. A committee under Suresh Tendulkar estimated it at 37%, while another led by NC Saxena said 50%, and in 2007 the Arjun Sengupta commission identified 77% of Indians as "poor and vulnerable". The World Bank's PPP estimate of Indian poverty was higher than 40% in 2005, while the Asian Development Bank arrived at almost 50%. The UNDP's Multidimensional Poverty Index finds the proportion of the poor to be higher than 55%.

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

N for your info apart from India if you exclude Afghanistan... Nepal has more poor people then Bangladesh... even then India. So, do not post anything that does not show the up to date data.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Yes from multiple source but Indian government accepted the tendulkar report and that said it clearly india has 37% below poverty rate..

India last year abandoned previously held data of 27%... n increased it to 37% based on Tendulkar report ... n this year India set a new below poverty line of 30 rupee earning a day... n that reduced the figure from 37% to 32% ... but due to heavy protest from different quarter Government had to withdraw the data... n if they increase the poverty line from 30 rupee income a day it will definitely increase the people below poverty line more...

It not only represent the position of different source but also Indian government position. This is not wild imagination.

India's official poverty line doesn't measure up | Jayati Ghosh | Global development | guardian.co.uk

In recent times, various committees led by economists have come up with different ways to measure the extent of poverty. The official line delivers a poverty rate of around 32% of the population. A committee under Suresh Tendulkar estimated it at 37%, while another led by NC Saxena said 50%, and in 2007 the Arjun Sengupta commission identified 77% of Indians as "poor and vulnerable". The World Bank's PPP estimate of Indian poverty was higher than 40% in 2005, while the Asian Development Bank arrived at almost 50%. The UNDP's Multidimensional Poverty Index finds the proportion of the poor to be higher than 55%.

A blog? Seriously?

Why are the GoI sensitive about the data?

 

[CaPtAiN_pLaNeT]

A blog? Seriously?

Why are the GoI sensitive about the data?

Which blog you are talking about??? I have quoted from Guardian.

 

[TopCat]

Guys guys, you dont need to look at all those poverty limit and numbers. In this sub continent its safe to assume that the farmers are the poorest of poors. (Not talking bout land lord though). In India 52% still employed in agro and producing food for 100% people yet falling short. Cant you assume anything from that???