What's new

Panama 2.0 = Will do all to dig out truth about Imran’s property: CJP

Mansoon

BANNED
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
-2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
Will do all to dig out truth about Imran’s property: CJP
By Hasnaat Mailk
Published: May 25, 2017

1418922-IMRAN-1495705907-630-640x480.jpg

PTI Chief Imran Khan. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar has said that the Supreme Court “will do everything” to dig out the truth about the purchase of 300 kanals of land in Bani Gala near Islamabad, owned by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan.

The remarks came on Thursday as a three-judge bench of the top court continued hearing of a petition filed by Hanif Abbasi, a Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader, seeking disqualification of the PTI chief for ‘illegal possession’ of properties and ‘tax theft’.

“We will do everything – like summoning the record or asking for a detailed probe – to find out the truth,” remarked the chief justice.

The bench raised almost a dozen questions over the money trail to the Bani Gala property presented before the court, as serious discrepancies have been found in the property purchase documents.

Naeem Bukhari, the counsel for the PTI chief, sought more time to answer the questions and said Imran’s former wife Jemima Khan would be requested to supply relevant banking transaction record.

However, Akram Sheikh, the counsel for the petitioner, objected to the grant of more time. Sheikh also pointed out that Rashid Khan – the man presented as agent for transferring the money from Jemima – was a director of the Bank of Khyber.

Bukhari, on his turn, contended that all the funds had been transferred via banking channels.

But Justice Faisal Arab wondered how Rashid could have paid the seller nine months before receiving the amount from Jemima.

Addressing Bukhari, the chief justice said, “You need to establish how Rashid paid the money to the seller even before receiving the amount from Jemima as you claim that Rashid acted as postmaster in this matter.”

The bench also raised questions over the construction documents, besides asking the PTI chief to provide Jemima’s complete bank statements. “Details regarding how she transferred the amount to Rashid’s account are missing. We do not know if Jemima paid the amount through cheque or cash.”

Dissatisfied with the revenue record regarding the transfer of land in Jemima’s name, the bench asked Imran to reconcile the record where Jemima is shown as his ‘wife’ even after the divorce.

The honourable judges also wondered why Imran failed to disclose his ownership of an offshore company – Niazi Services Limited – when filing nomination papers in 2002 as well as wealth tax statement.

Similarly, the bench noted how Jemima was returned the amount by an offshore company when Imran claimed that the company had no assets except the London flat.

The bench also directed the PTI chief’s counsel to inform the court about how offshore companies are formed and why they are created in the first place.

Meanwhile, the bench sought a complete record of the PTI’s foreign funding case from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

The hearing was adjourned till Tuesday.
 
. . .
How can it be a bigger joke when NS didn't even provide a money trail, except varying verbal speeches which infront of the SC his lawyer said that it was a just a political statement?


Caz khan has provided a friends effidavit as sole evidence similar to qatari khat...
No bank transactions to prove origin of miney
 
.
Imran submits money trail to Banigala land, London flat
By Hasnaat Malik
Published: May 23, 2017
393SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1416964-ik-1495533338-397-640x480.jpg

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan. PHOTO: AFP / FILE

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan has told the Supreme Court that it were the accusations like ‘Zionist lobby’ and ‘purchase of antique tiles’ levelled on Jemima Khan by the Sharifs “that ended their marriage in divorce and forced his former wife to leave the country”.

Khan was referring to the political campaign of the late 1990s launched against him by his political opponents. When they got nothing against him, he said, they found Jemima and targeted her Jewish family background, etc. It was in those days when a case was registered against Jemima for illegally exporting hundreds of antique tiles to the UK.

“In 2002, having been hounded by allegations of still being part of the Jewish lobby and a false case [instituted] by the Sharifs of illegally taking out antique tiles (which had [actually] been purchased in a shop in the federal capital and were anything but antique) for which an FIR was also filed, Ms Jemima Khan took our two children and moved back to Landon,” says Khan in his 10-page affidavit submitted in the apex court on Tuesday.




The affidavit was submitted in reply to a petition filed by PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi, seeking disqualification of the PTI chief for giving contradictory statements about the ownership of the Banigala land.

Will provide complete money trail for purchase of property in SC: Imran

Khan said parting ways with Jemima was ‘painful’, “however, Jemima and he still maintains a civilized relationship”.

Khan also submitted documentary evidence to establish the money trail to the ownership of the Banigala land wherein it is stated that he earned the money from playing cricket and purchased a flat in Landon in 1983.

The PTI chief said he was the sole owner of the flat and no other asset was placed under the Niazi Services Limited at any point except the London flat.

“At the time of the purchase of the London flat, an offshore resident did not have to pay Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on the sale of [his/her] flat. In 1983, he did not know whether he would be a resident in the UK.

Imran’s Bani Gala residence declared illegal

“[The] deponent was advised that the flat be placed under an offshore company which would not have to pay any CGT. In case of sale, the incorporation of the Niazi Services Limited merely [act] as a vehicle with subscribed capital of GBP9 and NSL was not an asset.”

According to the affidavit, the entire process was done by Barclays Private Bank and Trust Limited. Later, Khan benefitted from the Tax Amnesty Scheme 2000, the document says and adds “consequently, a form of undisclosed income, the price of acquisition and the flat itself was filed. The return and tax paid was accepted by income tax authorities and has never been an issue since”.

Imran stated that the Banigala land was purchased in March 2002, wherein Rashid Ali Khan was very helpful. “The land was declared as belonging to the dependent (Imran’s) wife. The contrary assertion that it was merely ‘parked in her name’ is incorrect”.

Imran says that when a malicious campaign was launched in 2002, Jemima shifted to the UK and gave money to purchase land at Banigala. Rashid Ali Khan, a close friend known to the PTI chairman since 1994, was entrusted with the task of receiving the amount sent in the dollars by Ms Jemima Khan to his Citibank account, the documents reveal.

CDA to resume survey of Bani Gala today

“To the best of the deponent’s recall instructions to City Bank London were issued by Jemima Khan which routed the money through City Bank USA to Rashid Khan’s account.”

The affidavit says that the entire land was mutated in Jemima’s name and it was her property for all intents and purposes.

“A sum of ‎£562,415,54 was transferred on May 7, 2003 by Imran through bank transfer to Jemima Khan, returning the bridge financing arrangement done by her in the interregnum.”

Regarding the Niazi Services Limited, Khan said it was kept alive because of litigation and to recover the costs awarded. However, he believed that keeping the Niazi Services Limited alive was actually a fruitless exercise after the sale of the flat.

Meanwhile, the counsel for the PTI, Anwar Mansoor Khan, contended before the three-judge bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar that the PML-N leader’s plea against foreign funding was not maintainable under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.

CDA – a spectator to unauthorised construction in capital

He also submitted that the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had no authority to determine the party’s funding, which were got through prohibited sources in 2010 to 2013 as it was a past and closed matter, adding the matter related to foreign aid could be decided by the federal government.

Anwar expressed his wiliness that the Supreme Court may form a commission to probe the prohibited fund. The bench, however, asked him to consult his client. The hearing will resume today (Wednesday).

9de4d330-1234-457b-8571-ef72711e44e9-1495534282.jpg


ea10c02b-84ac-4970-aa60-3d0bb1a52e7e-1495534292.jpg


96a5614f-ec9c-4e05-8299-b288eb09684c-1495534289.jpg


8b901a0f-4929-49fe-9201-cfbc7e2087c5-1495534279.jpg


84a6a735-c1fd-45a2-87de-ba8e71286520-1495534285.jpg






Caz khan has provided a friends effidavit as sole evidence similar to qatari khat...
No bank transactions to prove origin of miney

The difference is that the qatari letter was mere a letter of assumptions, while IK has submitted an affidavit, if you don't know what an affidavit is here is its definition for your convince

"a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court"

Another difference is that in the affidavit, Bank names and account numbers have been provided, while the Sharif family were unable to provide any such thing.

And you call this a bigger joke..........Seriously?
 
.
Seriously... money trail submitted by IK is bigger joke than that of NS

Its basically qatari khat 2.0 but with Imran Khan friend name, how ironic? I don't mind it, every parliamentarian should be held accountable. This shouldn't stop with IK and PM over politics.
 
.
Its basically qatari khat 2.0 but with Imran Khan friend name, how ironic? I don't mind it, every parliamentarian should be held accountable. This shouldn't stop with IK and PM over politics.

Did you miss my post above? that is the actual irony that even when given a proper comparison with proper reference to show the difference in between the two, you choose to turn a blind eye and carry on with your rants

Here is the qatari letter you can now compare it with what IK submitted

xImage-1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.3aKIRnK2sG.jpg


Also compare the above letter with what maryam chural said in her interview

In kay qol aur fale mai bohat tazad hai
 
.
Under arab laws qatari letter which is duely attested is equivalent to what we call an effidavit under british law
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom