Hon Sir,
Many thanks for the link to the data. I quote the following from the US Energy Administration report that your good self quoted.
"The estimates of technically recoverable shale gas resources for the 32 countries outside of the United States represents a moderately conservative ‘risked’ resource for the basins reviewed. These estimates are uncertain given the relatively sparse data that currently exist and the approach the consultant has employed would likely result in a higher estimate once better information is available. The methodology is outlined below and described in more detail within the attached report, and is not directly comparable to more detailed resource assessments that result in a probabilistic range of the technically recoverable resource. At the current time, there are efforts underway to develop more detailed shale gas resource assessments by the countries themselves, with many of these assessments being assisted by a number of U.S. federal agencies under the auspices of the Global Shale Gas Initiative (GSGI) which was launched in April 2010."
Additionally a very important factor is the cost. You have stated that domestic Shale gas will cost $2- per million BTU. This is what the gas futures at the Nymex are trading at.
For reference Iran asked $12 per mm BTU for piped gas. Largest Middle East LNG producer Qatar want about 15% of the Dubai price for each million BTU. At $100 per barrel oil it comes to about $15 per mm BTU FOB.
From a new buyer such as Pakistan Qataris asked $18 per mm BTU. For the benefit of an ignorant man such as myself, I would be honoured if you could explain how this figure of $2 per mm BTU from domestic Shale gas was arrived at?
My point is that Pakistan as a country cannot and must not base her energy strategy; vital for industrial growth; on the data from a single source which the author admits is more or less guesswork. Also we need a very close look at the economics when the costs are being compared.
(1 barrel of oil roughly equates to 5.55-million BTU)