What's new

Pakistan’s democracy is living on borrowed time

Al Bhatti

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
5,686
Reaction score
6
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
January 24, 2015

Pakistan’s democracy is living on borrowed time
Behind another sorry week for the population lies a long tale of official complacency and a worrying failure to hold ministers accountable

As millions of Pakistanis desperately searched for petrol across the south Asian country in the past week, Pakistan’s political landscape was becoming nothing comical yet again. The all too powerful accountant-turned-finance minister Ishaq Dar, a close confidante and relative of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, kicked off a telling salvo when he pronounced that the visibly acute shortages were caused by a conspiracy.

As if Dar’s claim wasn’t fit enough to become the butt of ongoing jokes, petroleum minister Shahid Khaqan Abbassi simply added to the confusion on Friday by holding Pakistan’s media responsible for causing a hype and provoking the worst petroleum shortage in the country’s history. Ironically, this latest crisis came at a time when the world is flush with cheap oil. Therefore, it must speak volumes over the failure of Sharif’s ruling structure to take charge of the Islamic world’s only country armed with nuclear weapons and oversee a period of increasing stability.

Welcome once again to another case of the multifaceted turmoil that engulfs Pakistan. Though ruling politicians eagerly washed their hands off any responsibility for the petrol crisis, their take was nothing short of an outright façade.

This latest crisis must also raise deeply troubling questions over the future of Pakistan’s democracy, more than six years after General Pervez Musharraf, the last military ruler, stepped down to pave the way for a return to civilian rule. While civilian politicians have arrived, their ability to tackle the multiple challenges faced by Pakistan and give the country a new direction remains in doubt.


To the extent that evidence is available, the latest crisis has yet again revealed Sharif’s determination to shield his ministers from responsibility. Though five officials down the line were suspended as the crisis unfolded, the regime is yet to accept political responsibility at a sufficiently high level. Given the magnitude of the crisis, its clear that the turmoil could have easily been avoided. Pakistan’s media, now in the regime’s firing line, reported months ago that the country’s main oil importing company was in serious financial turmoil. Eventually, the operations of the state-owned Pakistan State Oil (PSO), the oil importing company, came to a grinding halt when it failed to finance further oil imports. Consequently, Pakistanis have suffered acutely

Indeed, another energy crisis now appears to be staring Pakistan in the face, with recent reports of coming shortages of furnace oil, which are likely to further jeopardise Pakistan’s already strained ability to generate enough electricity. In an energy-starved country where some areas are already without electricity for 12 to 15 hours every day, a grim outlook for electricity supply is likely to just aggravate further.

Meanwhile, for Sharif, the petrol crisis should have been an eye opener. But clearly, it has only been just the contrary. The prime minister may be hoping for the turmoil to tide over as petrol supplies improve and Pakistanis return to business as usual. And yet, that may not necessarily prove to be the case. The failure to hold ministers accountable for their respective portfolios, raises some compelling questions over the country’s future. When Sharif took charge in a historic political transition in 2013, the event was widely celebrated as the coming of age of Pakistan’s democracy given that it was the first time ever that a democratically-elected government completed its tenure and handed power to another through the ballot box. And yet, subsequent events have cast doubts over the coming of age expectations.

Credentials undermined

Two areas have brutally undermined Sharif’s credentials. First, his failure to move decisively in carving out a new framework for national security has only come at the cost of more Pakistanis who were targeted in terrorist attacks. Rather than give a clear go ahead to escalate the fight against Taliban militants, Sharif chose to ignore his sceptics and preferred to seek a reconciliation with the militants.

Consequently, the element of surprise was lost as the prime minister, stricken by a visible sense of complacency, presided over meeting after meeting to discuss a half-baked peace process, which never took off. In the meantime, Taliban militants gained precious time to organise themselves against the Pakistan army. A fully-blown army campaign was finally launched in summer 2014 after a Taliban attack on Pakistan’s biggest international airport in Karachi, highlighted the rapidly building threat. In December 2014, a Taliban attack on a school in Peshawar resulted in about 150 lives being lost, most of them being schoolchildren. Equally important however, the attack clearly showed the fast-growing capacity of the Taliban to strike inside Pakistan’s urban areas, marking a substantial escalation in the country’s internal conflict.

At the same time, Sharif and his compatriots have clearly failed in managing Pakistan’s worsening economic challenge. The fuel shortages of the past week have only highlighted this gap. However, there are no visible signs of precious lessons having been learnt from this latest catastrophe. Behind another sorry week for Pakistan’s mass population, lies a longish tale of official complacency. In its 18 months since coming to power, Sharif’s government has pursued one mega project after another, centred mostly around Pakistan’s travel communication networks. Projects worth billions of rupees devoted to fancy bus, train and road links have driven such initiatives, though a large chunk of Pakistanis live in abject poverty.

Meanwhile, this period has coincided with clear signs of a collapse of Pakistan’s agricultural economy — a sector that serves as the lifeline for almost 60 per cent of the country’s population. Isn’t it time for Pakistanis across the grass roots to reach a logical conclusion — that Pakistan’s democratic journey is being squandered with a combination of growing insecurity and rising economic malaise.

Farhan Bokhari is a Pakistan-based commentator who writes on political and economic matters.

Pakistan’s democracy is living on borrowed time | GulfNews.com
 
Tatoo--loootoo-corrupt-loota regime oh sorry TAJARBAKAAR L team ruling the state....
 
There are some times when I think it's appropriate for Pakistan's civilian leadership to avoid claiming responsibility - in military affairs, for example, when they would be taking the responsibility for power they don't exercise. The fuel crisis appears to be a very different matter, however, and if someone in gov't doesn't own up responsibility soon - and in detail - then voters should give them the boot at the next election.
 
if someone in gov't doesn't own up responsibility soon - and in detail - then voters should give them the boot at the next election.

Yes, and bring in the previously tried people, again and again and again.
 
The fuel crisis appears to be a very different matter, however, and if someone in gov't doesn't own up responsibility soon - and in detail - then voters should give them the boot at the next election.

I agree with you 100%. However, the main issue is, the "vote" part. The Pakistani society MUST realize that it needs to keep the democratic system in place. You have too many x-military people on here, who, no matter what, support the Martial Law or a Military puppet government that takes people's right to vote away.

To these guys, the system is worthless and the military is somehow capable of running the economy and all, which is a seriously dangerous proposition and a super flawed judgment. The goal for Pakistan is to go towards modernization, democracy and peace, and the People need to decide who runs the country. Similarly, when someone doesn't deliver, at the end of the term, people boot it out.

Somehow, the society is so intense in nature that waiting for the next term is hard for people and short cuts are always recommended to over throw the government.
 
Yes, and bring in the previously tried people, again and again and again.
Bring the pee-pee-pee peeple back? No, I think Pakistan needs to develop new parties and leadership. The problem with Imran Khan is that there's only one of him and not a dozen others striving against each other in peaceful democratic competition/partnership.
 
Back
Top Bottom