What's new

Pakistan's Declining Economy Since 2008

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
In a guest post on Haq's Musings, Prof. Ashfaque Hasan Khan, Dean of Business School at National University of Science and Technology in Islamabad, reviews Pakistan's economic performance under the democratic government led by the PPP.

In addition to reviewing two years of economic performance of the present government, it discusses the following: What it inherited, what it informed the IMF and the people of Pakistan, why it went to the IMF, and where we stand now - in this article.

Here are some excerpts from it:

Pakistan positioned itself as one of the four fastest growing economies in the Asian region during 2000-07 with its growth averaging 7.0 per cent per year for most of this period. As a result of strong economic growth, Pakistan succeeded in reducing poverty by one-half, creating almost 13 million jobs, halving the country's debt burden, raising foreign exchange reserves to a comfortable position and propping the country's exchange rate, restoring investors' confidence and most importantly, taking Pakistan out of the IMF Program.

These facts were acknowledged by the present government in a Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies (MEFP) for 2008/09-2009/10, while signing agreement with the IMF on November 20, 2008. The document clearly acknowledged that "Pakistan's economy witnessed a major economic transformation in the last decade. The country's real GDP increased from $60 billion to $170 billion, with per capita income rising from under $500 to over $1000 during 2000-07". It further acknowledged that "the volume of international trade increased from $20 billion to nearly $60 billion. The improved macroeconomic performance enabled Pakistan to re-enter the international capital markets in the mid-2000s. Large capital inflows financed the current account deficit and contributed to an increase in gross official reserves to $14.3 billion at end-June 2007. Buoyant output growth, low inflation, and the government's social policies contributed to a reduction in poverty and improvement in many social indicators". (see MEFP, November 20, 2008, Para 1)"

"The present government inherited a relatively sound economy on March 31, 2008. It inherited foreign exchange reserves of $13.3 billion, exchange rate at Rs62.76 per US dollar, the KSE index at 15,125 with market capitalization at $74 billion, inflation at 20.6 per cent and the country's debt burden on a declining path. The government itself acknowledged in the same document that "the macroeconomic situation deteriorated significantly in 2007/08 and the first four months of 2008/09 owing to adverse security developments, large exogenous price shocks (oil and food), global financial turmoil, and policy inaction during the political transition to the new government". (Para 3 of the MEFP, November 20, 2008)"

"What went wrong? Why one of the fastest growing economies in the Asian region until two years ago has been totally forgotten in the region? Firstly, the speed and dimension of exogenous price shocks (oil and food) were of extraordinary proportions. Secondly, the present government found itself totally ill- prepared and clueless in addressing the challenges arising out of the shocks. While rest of the world was taking corrective measures and adjusting to higher food and fuel prices, Pakistan lurched from one crisis to another."

Despite peaceful election and a smooth transition to a new government, political instability persisted. For a protracted period there were no finance, commerce, petroleum and natural resources and health ministers in the country. The government lost six precious months in finding its feet. It gave the impression of having little sense of direction and purpose. A crisis of confidence intensified as investors and development partners started to walk away. The stock market nosedived, capital flight set in, foreign exchange reserves plummeted and the Pakistani rupee lost one-third of its value. In short, Pakistan's macroeconomic vulnerability had grown unbearable. It had no option but to return to the IMF for a bailout package. There were no Plan A, B and C. There was only one plan, that is, to return to the IMF.

While the country was moving rapidly towards the IMF, the ministry of finance had prepared the plan to bring $4 billion by June 30, 2008 through four transactions. A kick-off meeting was scheduled on April 23, 2008 at the ministry to give a final touch to the various roadshows. These transactions were canceled on April 20, 2008. Who ordered the cancellation of $4 billion transaction? This cancellation prompted balance of payment crisis and the rest became history."


Haq's Musings: Pakistan's Economic Performance 2008-2010

Haq's Musings: Why Is Democracy Failing in Pakistan?
 
I guess we have got democracy. So that means any decline in the economy can be tolerated. And that 7% growth for 5-7 years means nothing because it was done by the military.
 
Global GDP growth rates have declined, hence we will see a decline in our GDP growth rates. With increasing amounts of money spent on the WoT, the budget deficit has increased sharply and the economy is under huge strain.

Stop pinning everything on democracy.

World, Pakistan, Iran, India, Bangladesh and Srilanka GDP growth rates over the years (Generated using Google Public Data)

Do I see a trend, YES!. The global GDP growth rates have declined sharply since 2006. 2003-2005 were years with high global and exceptionally high south asian growth rates.
 
Global GDP growth rates have declined, hence we will see a decline in our GDP growth rates. With increasing amounts of money spent on the WoT, the budget deficit has increased sharply and the economy is under huge strain.

Stop pinning everything on democracy.

World, Pakistan, Iran, India, Bangladesh and Srilanka GDP growth rates over the years (Generated using Google Public Data)

Do I see a trend, YES!. The global GDP growth rates have declined sharply since 2006. 2003-2005 were years with high global and exceptionally high south asian growth rates.

It's an issue of competence and good governance rather than what form of government Pakistan has.

A key reason for history of failure of democracy has been the incompetence of the feudal politicians who get elected in Pakistan very predictably.

Pakistan's average economic growth rate was 6.8% in the 60s (Gen. Ayub Khan), 4.5% in the 70s(Zulfikar Bhutto), 6.5% in the 80s (Gen. Zia ul-Haq), and 4.8% in the 90s (Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif). Growth picked up momentum in the 21st Century under General Musharraf, and from 2000-2007, Pakistan's economy grew at an average 7.5%, making it the third fastest growing economy in Asia after China and India. There were 2-3 million new jobs created each year from 2000-2007, which significantly enlarged the middle class, and helped millions escape poverty.

Unfortunately, there is a troubling history of the democratic process in Pakistan resulting the election of leaders who are demonstrably both corrupt and incompetent. After surviving the lost decade of the 1990s under such leaders, and then thriving in this decade under a more competent dictator until 2007, Pakistan has once again returned to the bad old days of the 1990s. The economy is stagnating, inflation is high, there are shortages of everything from food to water and power and security, unemployment is rising, and many are slipping back into poverty.

It would be great if Pakistanis can have both competence and honesty in their leaders. However, I would personally insist on competence to deliver good governance as a minimum criterion for leadership positions, if I can't have both.

Haq's Musings: Why Is Democracy Failing in Pakistan?

Haq's Musings: Incompetence Worse Than Graft in Pakistan
 
It's an issue of competence and good governance rather than what form of government Pakistan has.

A key reason for history of failure of democracy has been the incompetence of the feudal politicians who get elected in Pakistan very predictably.

Pakistan's average economic growth rate was 6.8% in the 60s (Gen. Ayub Khan), 4.5% in the 70s(Zulfikar Bhutto), 6.5% in the 80s (Gen. Zia ul-Haq), and 4.8% in the 90s (Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif). Growth picked up momentum in the 21st Century under General Musharraf, and from 2000-2007, Pakistan's economy grew at an average 7.5%, making it the third fastest growing economy in Asia after China and India. There were 2-3 million new jobs created each year from 2000-2007, which significantly enlarged the middle class, and helped millions escape poverty.

Unfortunately, there is a troubling history of the democratic process in Pakistan resulting the election of leaders who are demonstrably both corrupt and incompetent. After surviving the lost decade of the 1990s under such leaders, and then thriving in this decade under a more competent dictator until 2007, Pakistan has once again returned to the bad old days of the 1990s. The economy is stagnating, inflation is high, there are shortages of everything from food to water and power and security, unemployment is rising, and many are slipping back into poverty.

It would be great if Pakistanis can have both competence and honesty in their leaders. However, I would personally insist on competence to deliver good governance as a minimum criterion for leadership positions, if I can't have both.

Haq's Musings: Why Is Democracy Failing in Pakistan?

Haq's Musings: Incompetence Worse Than Graft in Pakistan

The factors are far bigger than that. Incompetent governments are certainly a factor but you are generalizing too much. The '60s did not have the sanctions of the '90s. Trade sanctions do have a lot to do with economic conditions.

"At its height, during the first half of the 1960s, U.S. assistance was more than half of all foreign aid to Pakistan, covering one-third of Pakistan’s development budget and financing half its import bill."

You cannot rule out that factor. I'll try to scourge the inter-web but I remember seeing a figure like 11 or 14 billion USD as US aid to Pakistan between '59 and '65. Adjusted for inflation that's above 1 Trillion Dollars. That's like 173 Kerry Lugar Bills. So the issue at hands are far diverse to generalize. People have written dissertations on these, short paras can't do justice.

The slow growth rates can be best summarized as incompetent governments, global economic meltdowns (early '70s), trade sanctions, unfavorable investment scenarios and fallout of unnecessary wars.

I happen to have read your both columns earnestly quite a many times before and I certainly agree with you on many points. But I want to raise a point that dictatorship apologists and elitists serving their own self interest try to make a scapegoat of the democratic process itself. An evolutionary process takes time, requires our input and participation at all levels and certainly sees its bad days as well. What we should ensure is that we make these politicians accountable, make our voices heard, breed a new generation of leaders and inculcate tolerance in our people and stop feeding them twisted history which condones military intervention, glorifies war and distorts facts.

A jump start economy isn't possible. The red cloud over India held them back for many many years. We need to remove the cloud of International financial institutions and stop our blind policy of neoliberal adjustments. Neoliberal adjustments have brought temporary reliefs to say the least and their fallout has been seen for decades across developing countries.

P.S. What is the source for average economic growth rates. Is it the nominal increase in revenue generation or are we talking about real GDP (adjusted for inflation). I don't seem to see numbers to corroborate these values. Will be happy to see references.
 
In a guest post on Haq's Musings, Prof. Ashfaque Hasan Khan, Dean of Business School at National University of Science and Technology in Islamabad, reviews Pakistan's economic performance under the democratic government led by the PPP.

In addition to reviewing two years of economic performance of the present government, it discusses the following: What it inherited, what it informed the IMF and the people of Pakistan, why it went to the IMF, and where we stand now - in this article.

Here are some excerpts from it:

Pakistan positioned itself as one of the four fastest growing economies in the Asian region during 2000-07 with its growth averaging 7.0 per cent per year for most of this period. As a result of strong economic growth, Pakistan succeeded in reducing poverty by one-half, creating almost 13 million jobs, halving the country's debt burden, raising foreign exchange reserves to a comfortable position and propping the country's exchange rate, restoring investors' confidence and most importantly, taking Pakistan out of the IMF Program.

These facts were acknowledged by the present government in a Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies (MEFP) for 2008/09-2009/10, while signing agreement with the IMF on November 20, 2008. The document clearly acknowledged that "Pakistan's economy witnessed a major economic transformation in the last decade. The country's real GDP increased from $60 billion to $170 billion, with per capita income rising from under $500 to over $1000 during 2000-07". It further acknowledged that "the volume of international trade increased from $20 billion to nearly $60 billion. The improved macroeconomic performance enabled Pakistan to re-enter the international capital markets in the mid-2000s. Large capital inflows financed the current account deficit and contributed to an increase in gross official reserves to $14.3 billion at end-June 2007. Buoyant output growth, low inflation, and the government's social policies contributed to a reduction in poverty and improvement in many social indicators". (see MEFP, November 20, 2008, Para 1)"

"The present government inherited a relatively sound economy on March 31, 2008. It inherited foreign exchange reserves of $13.3 billion, exchange rate at Rs62.76 per US dollar, the KSE index at 15,125 with market capitalization at $74 billion, inflation at 20.6 per cent and the country's debt burden on a declining path. The government itself acknowledged in the same document that "the macroeconomic situation deteriorated significantly in 2007/08 and the first four months of 2008/09 owing to adverse security developments, large exogenous price shocks (oil and food), global financial turmoil, and policy inaction during the political transition to the new government". (Para 3 of the MEFP, November 20, 2008)"

"What went wrong? Why one of the fastest growing economies in the Asian region until two years ago has been totally forgotten in the region? Firstly, the speed and dimension of exogenous price shocks (oil and food) were of extraordinary proportions. Secondly, the present government found itself totally ill- prepared and clueless in addressing the challenges arising out of the shocks. While rest of the world was taking corrective measures and adjusting to higher food and fuel prices, Pakistan lurched from one crisis to another."

Despite peaceful election and a smooth transition to a new government, political instability persisted. For a protracted period there were no finance, commerce, petroleum and natural resources and health ministers in the country. The government lost six precious months in finding its feet. It gave the impression of having little sense of direction and purpose. A crisis of confidence intensified as investors and development partners started to walk away. The stock market nosedived, capital flight set in, foreign exchange reserves plummeted and the Pakistani rupee lost one-third of its value. In short, Pakistan's macroeconomic vulnerability had grown unbearable. It had no option but to return to the IMF for a bailout package. There were no Plan A, B and C. There was only one plan, that is, to return to the IMF.

While the country was moving rapidly towards the IMF, the ministry of finance had prepared the plan to bring $4 billion by June 30, 2008 through four transactions. A kick-off meeting was scheduled on April 23, 2008 at the ministry to give a final touch to the various roadshows. These transactions were canceled on April 20, 2008. Who ordered the cancellation of $4 billion transaction? This cancellation prompted balance of payment crisis and the rest became history."


Haq's Musings: Pakistan's Economic Performance 2008-2010

Haq's Musings: Why Is Democracy Failing in Pakistan?


The comparison of last 2 years is unjustified as the last 2 years have been highly trouble some for all over the world. Recession, Bad weather etc.

And for Pakistan the terriorismalso taking its toll on the economy and inventment.

Even Indian economy which is 2nd fastest growing big economy's growth rate have come down from 9% to around 7.5% in this period.

So one can't compare peacetime with war time.
 
Pakistan wins five World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders awards

The Financial Daily Reporter

Staff Reporter
KARACHI: The World Economic Forum (WEF) Wednesday announced its Young Global Leaders (YGLs) for 2010. This year, five Young Global Leader awards have come to Pakistan. The recipients are: Syed Mustafa Kamal Mayor of Karachi, Hamid Yar Hiraj Minister of State for Commerce, Amir Jahangir Chief Executive Officer of SAMAA TV, Muhammad Tabba CEO Lucky Cement, and Umar Saif, Founder of Saif Center for Innovation. The honour, bestowed each year by the Forum, recognises and acknowledges up to 200 outstanding young leaders from around the world for their professional accomplishments, commitment to society and potential to contribute to shaping the future of the world.
For 2010, the Forum has selected 197 YGLs from 72 countries. They were shortlisted from all the walks of life (business, civil society, social entrepreneurship, politics & government, arts & culture, and opinion & media).
 
I have read many such articles and invariably all of them originating from Pakistanis have always had a soft corner for Army rule. This is either a purposeful or a totally ignorant stance.This is very puzzling for Pakistanis and hence you still see many who see Army rule as a better alternative.

Firstly, let us get the facts better, In its existence as Pakistan, how may years has the country seen Democracy? Truth is democracy has never been given a chance and every time the country has come back on the path to democracy it has had to face tough obstacles laid out and also a sense of insecurity with its longevity. India is different across its length and breadth with multiple cultures, languages, faiths etc. We elect stupid people too. Today, India is growing and much is because of its democratic set up.

Secondly, Pakistan's economy is still highly dependent on agriculture. Other than its Telecommunication industry, there is little to cheer about. Foreign investment is the key!

Thirdly, In order to get foreign investment, democracy will play a huge role.

IMO democracy is the best way out for Pakistan, no amount of figures or numbers can disprove this fact.
 
The comparison of last 2 years is unjustified as the last 2 years have been highly trouble some for all over the world. Recession, Bad weather etc.

And for Pakistan the terriorismalso taking its toll on the economy and inventment.

Even Indian economy which is 2nd fastest growing big economy's growth rate have come down from 9% to around 7.5% in this period.

So one can't compare peacetime with war time.

Please... do not generalize... Pakistan economy was going up in last world recession.
Pakistan economy have declined sharply... immediately after new govt. started to take international loans on high markups...
Inidan currency is getting inflated and our is getting depreciated!!! so kindly compare this also!
Pakistan was leading india both in growth rate and projected growth rate...in 2005-6.
Pakistan economy even survived the high oil prices.. high demand of electricity and an earth quake in 2005.
 
The factors are far bigger than that. Incompetent governments are certainly a factor but you are generalizing too much. The '60s did not have the sanctions of the '90s. Trade sanctions do have a lot to do with economic conditions.

"At its height, during the first half of the 1960s, U.S. assistance was more than half of all foreign aid to Pakistan, covering one-third of Pakistan’s development budget and financing half its import bill."

You cannot rule out that factor. I'll try to scourge the inter-web but I remember seeing a figure like 11 or 14 billion USD as US aid to Pakistan between '59 and '65. Adjusted for inflation that's above 1 Trillion Dollars. That's like 173 Kerry Lugar Bills. So the issue at hands are far diverse to generalize. People have written dissertations on these, short paras can't do justice.

The slow growth rates can be best summarized as incompetent governments, global economic meltdowns (early '70s), trade sanctions, unfavorable investment scenarios and fallout of unnecessary wars.

I happen to have read your both columns earnestly quite a many times before and I certainly agree with you on many points. But I want to raise a point that dictatorship apologists and elitists serving their own self interest try to make a scapegoat of the democratic process itself. An evolutionary process takes time, requires our input and participation at all levels and certainly sees its bad days as well. What we should ensure is that we make these politicians accountable, make our voices heard, breed a new generation of leaders and inculcate tolerance in our people and stop feeding them twisted history which condones military intervention, glorifies war and distorts facts.

A jump start economy isn't possible. The red cloud over India held them back for many many years. We need to remove the cloud of International financial institutions and stop our blind policy of neoliberal adjustments. Neoliberal adjustments have brought temporary reliefs to say the least and their fallout has been seen for decades across developing countries.

P.S. What is the source for average economic growth rates. Is it the nominal increase in revenue generation or are we talking about real GDP (adjusted for inflation). I don't seem to see numbers to corroborate these values. Will be happy to see references.

Pakistan's economic growth data by decades I have shared with you is well known. It's from OECD and other sources.

Pakistani+Economy+Graphs.gif (image)

Many countries, particularly in Africa, have received far more aid as percent of their GDP than Pakistan, and yet, they remain extremely poor, hungry and backward. Dambisa Moyo, a former economist at Goldman Sachs, and the author of "Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa.", recently argued in a Wall Street Journal OpEd that "money from rich countries has trapped many African nations in a cycle of corruption, slower economic growth and poverty. Cutting off the flow would be far more beneficial."

Haq's Musings: Remittances Offer Lifeline to Pakistanis

Even India has received, and continues to receive, far more aid than Pakistan, and it is doing worse than Pakistan in terms of poverty, hunger and malnutrition.

Haq's Musings: Foreign Aid Continues to Pour in Resurgent India

The experience of most of the poor, underdeveloped nations in the world has shown that no amount of aid can compensate for incompetence and corruption. Though it's no fault of democracy as a system of governance, it's Pakistani political landscape dominated by feudals that has produced repeated election wins for the most incompetent and most corrupt leaders.

Haq's Musings: Incompetence Worse Than Graft in Pakistan
 
Even India has received, and continues to receive, far more aid than Pakistan, and it is doing worse than Pakistan in terms of poverty, hunger and malnutrition.

Links to show we get more aid than Pakistan please ?
Doing worse than Pakistan should be the norm is south asia given the high growth of Pakistan, right ?:azn:

Guys, let us not derail this thread by making such statements. You are having a good discussion and it will be useful if you don't digress from the issue.
:coffee:
 
For your kind information "Remittances" does not mean AID. foreign Remittances is the money sent by the diaspora to their kin. AID is a foreign government assistance.

He was not referring to remittances as Aid - you should have read beyond that line and looked at the link right below the paragraph you quoted:

Even India has received, and continues to receive, far more aid than Pakistan, and it is doing worse than Pakistan in terms of poverty, hunger and malnutrition.

Haq's Musings: Foreign Aid Continues to Pour in Resurgent India
 
Back
Top Bottom