What's new

Pakistan sees Afghanistan’s Karzai as obstacle to peace with Taliban

UmarJustice

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Pakistan, seen as critical to efforts to stabilise Afghanistan, is finding it difficult to work with President Hamid Karzai due to mistrust and is reaching out to others to advance the peace process, senior Pakistani Foreign Ministry officials say.

Pakistan is uniquely positioned to promote reconciliation in neighboring Afghanistan because of its long history of ties to militant groups fighting to topple Karzai.

But Afghanistan has accused Pakistan of backing the Taliban to further its aims, fearful it will try to install a pro-Islamabad government in Kabul, a charge Pakistan denies.

“Right now, Karzai is the biggest impediment to the peace process,” a top Pakistani Foreign Ministry official told Reuters. “In trying to look like a savior, he is taking Afghanistan straight to hell.”

Karzai has said he wants peace on his own terms and could also be worried that the United States might cut a quick and risky deal with the Taliban, eager to get the bulk of its forces out of the country by the end of next year.

Either way, Pakistani officials say they are discouraged by what they call Karzai’s erratic statements and provocations, apparently designed to make him appear more decisive at home in dealing with the unpopular war, now in its 12th year.

Failure to reach an agreement between the Afghan government and insurgents would increase the chances of prolonged instability and even a push by the Taliban to seize power. The last time they did it, in 1996, it was with Pakistani help.

The stakes are also high for Pakistan, a strategic US ally seen as vital to Washington’s global war on militancy. It fears turmoil in Afghanistan could spill over the border and energize homegrown militants seeking to topple the government.

“I have absolutely no doubt that there will be complete chaos in Afghanistan if a settlement is not reached by 2014,” said the Foreign Ministry official. “Afghanistan will erupt. And when that happens, Pakistan will have to pay.”

Pakistan and Afghanistan have long been suspicious of each other. A recent period of warmer relations raised hopes they could work together to lure the Taliban to negotiations.

Aziz Khan, a former Pakistan ambassador to Afghanistan, said it was not right to pin all the blame on Karzai.

“Everyone is hedging their bets at this point: the Pakistanis, the US, the Afghan government and the Taliban,” he said. “No one has been clear about what they want in Afghanistan.”

Although Pakistan will maintain contacts with Karzai, it is stepping up engagements with opposition figures, the Taliban, Washington and other parties to promote reconciliation, Foreign Ministry officials said.

“There is no other option but reconciliation – with or without Karzai,” said the top Foreign Ministry official. “If he continues to be this stubborn, him and his High Peace Council will naturally be sidelined.”

Afghan Say Karzai Committed to Peace

A second senior Pakistani Foreign Ministry official cited several examples of how Karzai has blocked peace efforts. At a conference in January, for example, Karzai insisted there would be no more “back door” peace contacts.

The official also accused Karzai of delaying the opening of a Taliban office in Qatar that could be used in the reconciliation efforts. He did not say why.

Afghan officials say Karzai is fully committed to the peace process, but wants to ensure it is Afghan-driven.

Responding to the accusation that Karzai is an obstacle to peace, an Afghan government official said: “We totally reject this. It is a baseless allegation.”

Analysts say Pakistan has a long-standing fear of an Afghan government close to its old foe, India. Karzai has said “no foreign elements or entities should attempt to own Afghan peace efforts”. He also warned: “I am not going to allow other attempts to succeed.”

So far, Karzai has failed to secure direct talks with the Taliban. He has repeatedly asked for Pakistan’s support. Pakistan has helped Taliban representatives to travel to Qatar to make contacts with US officials.

At the same time, Pakistan has been building bridges with the Northern Alliance, a constellation of anti-Taliban figures who have traditionally been implacable critics of Islamabad, and close to India.

But Kabul wants Pakistan to hand over top Afghan Taliban leaders which could prove useful in the peace process.

“All Taliban leadership are sitting in Pakistan. We need full cooperation of Pakistan in order for them to be allowed to travel and be allowed to talk,” Afghan Foreign Minister Zalmay Rassoul told a news conference in Sydney.
Karzai’s remarks during interviews and in meetings with Pakistani officials have led Islamabad to conclude he has become too inflexible. They cite Karzai’s recent accusation that the United States was colluding with the Taliban.

“What does Karzai have to show for his effort to bring insurgents to the table? We’ve released prisoners. We’ve facilitated talks,” said another senior Foreign Ministry official.

Late last year, Pakistan released more than two dozen Taliban prisoners who could help promote peace. It was the clearest signal ever that Pakistan had put its weight behind the Afghan reconciliation process.

Pakistan’s army chief has also made reconciling warring Afghan factions a priority, military sources say.

After the prisoner releases, Afghan officials said Pakistan shared Kabul’s goal of transforming the insurgency into a political movement. Such remarks signaled unprecedented optimism from Kabul.

“Joker In The Pack”

But despite that, old suspicions that Pakistan uses Afghan insurgents as proxies to counter the influence of India have not been laid to rest.

Some Afghan officials believe Pakistan may still be hedging its bets and that even the prisoner releases were just a way to retain influence over the Taliban.
“The key fact here is that Pakistan has been investing in this dirty game of trying to control Afghanistan for the last thirty years through terrorist proxies,” said a senior Afghan government official.

“It is now trying to reap the harvest of its investments by waiting for what they see as the inevitable complete departure of the international community from Afghanistan and keeping their proxy assets, primarily the Taliban, for the post-2014 period.”

During talks last month at British Prime Minister David Cameron’s official country residence, Chequers, Karzai and Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari agreed to consult on future Afghan Taliban prisoner releases.

But Pakistani officials now complain that Karzai does not appreciate the goodwill gestures.

Another Pakistani Foreign Ministry official said the government was incensed by an interview Karzai gave to the British press after the Chequers meeting in which he said the peace process was being impeded by “external forces acting in the name of the Taliban”, a veiled reference to Islamabad.

So exasperated was Pakistan with Karzai that at a meeting this month between Zardari, the army chief and senior officials, one top leader described Karzai as “the joker in the pack”, according to an official who attended.

“He is trying to act as if he has many cards in his hands,” said the first Foreign Ministry official. “But he should realize he is only hurting his country.”

Pakistan sees Afghanistan’s Karzai as obstacle to peace with Taliban | Pakistan | DAWN.COM
 
May be he got mad because his term will getting over soon and his daddy is leaving
 
He is Zardari's best friend.. how can Zardari blame him?

On the otherhand.. Zardari is dictated by RAW.. if he really said so than some thing is seriously messed among Karzai and RAW.
 
exactly the same way pakistan points its finger at India for all its failures.... :P

And India does for all its failures. :rolleyes:

On topic: As long as Karzai is the puppet in charge there will be no peace because Taliban will not talk to Karzai for peace.
 
When I had read the lead article in Dawn, I did not know what to make of it, was this an expression of despair from the FO, was it a pressure tactic and why exactly was this made public - I still don't quite understand - can anyone shed light on this, what was the FO hoping to achieve by putting this out in public? If it was a signal to the US, why not privately, why publicly?, After all, is Karzai now supposed to soften his stance or to harden it?
 
if you look up the definition of 'snake' in the dictionary, a picture of karzai will be under it.
 
In reality, Hamid Karzai is a big obstacle in peace process of Afghanistan. He does not want a peaceful Afghanistan which is the policy of USA. USA and her alliance does not want peace in Pakistan. the enemy of pakistan use afghan land supported and funded by NATO and Afghan government
 
Why on earth would Pakistan want to make peace with Qatar backed terrorist talibans? Isnt the lesson of Syria enough for us already?

if you look up the definition of 'snake' in the dictionary, a picture of karzai will be under it.

And also of my uncle who is nicknamed "snake" in the family!
 
4-1-bad-karzai1.jpg
 
karzai should leave before 2014! if he wants some peace in his country!
 
he only cares about his brothers pile of drugs not peace, nuff said :coffee: !!!!
 
Can someone here confirm that Karzai once worked for a US-based oil company before the invasion of Afghanistan strated?
 
In reality, Hamid Karzai is a big obstacle in peace process of Afghanistan. He does not want a peaceful Afghanistan which is the policy of USA. USA and her alliance does not want peace in Pakistan. the enemy of pakistan use afghan land supported and funded by NATO and Afghan government

Dear Shehreyarkhan,

The reason you see our nations making every effort to move forward from our past debacles is because our shared will and desire to defeat terrorism holds the utmost importance. It is simply absurd to think that the U.S. would wish the opposite in Pakistan. Do you really think that we would want to risk all of our sacrifices by leaving behind an instable Pakistan? If anything, we’ve been criticized for asking the Pakistani government to go after the terrorist havens inside Pakistan. At the same time, do you really think that the Pakistani government would also be focused on creating a healthy partnership with the U.S., if they saw the U.S. working against its interests? We’ve said over and over that we cannot have a safe and stable region without a safe and stable Pakistan. We’ve learned from our differences, and the focus is on creating a healthy relationship. The bottom line is that it is in our best interests to remain unified against our common enemies. Please keep in mind that the U.S., Pakistan and Afghanistan are all victims of terrorism. We are fighting the same terrorists and suffering at the hand of the same terrorists. We simply wish to see the regional partners working together for the sake of restoring peace and stability throughout the region.

Ali Khan
DET, United States Central Command
U.S. Central Command
 
Dear Shehreyarkhan,

The reason you see our nations making every effort to move forward from our past debacles is because our shared will and desire to defeat terrorism holds the utmost importance. It is simply absurd to think that the U.S. would wish the opposite in Pakistan. Do you really think that we would want to risk all of our sacrifices by leaving behind an instable Pakistan? If anything, we’ve been criticized for asking the Pakistani government to go after the terrorist havens inside Pakistan. At the same time, do you really think that the Pakistani government would also be focused on creating a healthy partnership with the U.S., if they saw the U.S. working against its interests? We’ve said over and over that we cannot have a safe and stable region without a safe and stable Pakistan. We’ve learned from our differences, and the focus is on creating a healthy relationship. The bottom line is that it is in our best interests to remain unified against our common enemies. Please keep in mind that the U.S., Pakistan and Afghanistan are all victims of terrorism. We are fighting the same terrorists and suffering at the hand of the same terrorists. We simply wish to see the regional partners working together for the sake of restoring peace and stability throughout the region.

Ali Khan
DET, United States Central Command
U.S. Central Command

c.ntcom....
 
Back
Top Bottom