What's new

Pakistan ready to listen to India's concerns on Indus Waters Treaty

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
Excavators are being used at the dam site of Kishanganga power project in Gurez, Srinagar, June 21, 2012. — Reuters/File


  • Decision to be taken once Pakistan hears concerns at PCIW level.
  • Officials say IWT's sanctity cannot be damaged.
  • Existing treaty will be in place unless changes are introduced bilaterally.







ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has carefully responded to India's notice sent on Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) 1960, saying it was ready to listen to New Delhi’s concerns at the level of the Permanent Commission of Indus Waters (PCIW), The News reported citing sources in attorney general’s Office.

India earlier issued a notice to Pakistan on January 25, seeking modifications in the treaty two days before the hearing of the Court of Arbitration in The Hague that took place on January 27-28. India had extended the notice by invoking Article 12 of the treaty.

The officials said Pakistan was ready to listen to Indian concerns on the treaty at the level of the Permanent Commission of Indus Waters (PCIW). They said Pakistan was a lower riparian country while India is upper riparian and the lower riparian country couldn’t flout the Indus Water Treaty’s provisions or commit any material breach.

The officials also said that the decision about the parleys on changes to the treaty will be taken once Pakistan heard India’s concerns at the PCIW level.

However, they said under Article 12 of the treaty, the existing treaty will continue to reign unless the parties to the dispute — Pakistan and India — bilaterally introduce changes to the pact.

The sanctity of the existing Indus Waters Treaty cannot be damaged between the two nuclear countries as the whole world cannot afford it, the official said, adding that Pakistan did not commit any material violation of IWT, which is why the Indian notice to introduce changes to IWT is uncalled for.

 
Excavators are being used at the dam site of Kishanganga power project in Gurez, Srinagar, June 21, 2012. — Reuters/File


  • Decision to be taken once Pakistan hears concerns at PCIW level.
  • Officials say IWT's sanctity cannot be damaged.
  • Existing treaty will be in place unless changes are introduced bilaterally.







ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has carefully responded to India's notice sent on Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) 1960, saying it was ready to listen to New Delhi’s concerns at the level of the Permanent Commission of Indus Waters (PCIW), The News reported citing sources in attorney general’s Office.

India earlier issued a notice to Pakistan on January 25, seeking modifications in the treaty two days before the hearing of the Court of Arbitration in The Hague that took place on January 27-28. India had extended the notice by invoking Article 12 of the treaty.

The officials said Pakistan was ready to listen to Indian concerns on the treaty at the level of the Permanent Commission of Indus Waters (PCIW). They said Pakistan was a lower riparian country while India is upper riparian and the lower riparian country couldn’t flout the Indus Water Treaty’s provisions or commit any material breach.

The officials also said that the decision about the parleys on changes to the treaty will be taken once Pakistan heard India’s concerns at the PCIW level.

However, they said under Article 12 of the treaty, the existing treaty will continue to reign unless the parties to the dispute — Pakistan and India — bilaterally introduce changes to the pact.

The sanctity of the existing Indus Waters Treaty cannot be damaged between the two nuclear countries as the whole world cannot afford it, the official said, adding that Pakistan did not commit any material violation of IWT, which is why the Indian notice to introduce changes to IWT is uncalled for.

What if India decide to change it unilaterally, what is Pakistan going to do or can do ?
 
This is a good development, and shows that sanity has prevailed. Let us not forget that, Pakistan going for two kinds of arbitration set this notice off in a way.

No need to create issues with a treaty, that has stood strong through years of conflicts and wars too.

Hope two sides have a proper discussion and set a better mechanism, where there is no more confusion.

What if India decide to change it unilaterally, what is Pakistan going to do or can do ?

No India will never do that, it will hurt our standing. Unilateral withdrawal from International agreements is never good.
 
This is a good development, and shows that sanity has prevailed. Let us not forget that, Pakistan going for two kinds of arbitration set this notice off in a way.

No need to create issues with a treaty, that has stood strong through years of conflicts and wars too.

Hope two sides have a proper discussion and set a better mechanism, where there is no more confusion.



No India will never do that, it will hurt our standing. Unilateral withdrawal from International agreements is never good.
This is most generous water treaty on globe. If Pakistan is not happy, you are going to spoil which is already good. The more u talk abt it, more people in India will know about this (like me) and they will put pressure on Indian Govt to suspend this very partial(which is quite in favour of pakistan) treaty which was forced by World Bank in 1960's and Stupid Nehru
 
This is most generous water treaty on globe. If Pakistan is not happy, you are going to spoil which is already good. The more u talk abt it, more people in India will know about this (like me) and they will put pressure on Indian Govt to suspend this very partial(which is quite in favour of pakistan) treaty which was forced by World Bank in 1960's and Stupid Nehru
No use in crying over spilt milk, but we can't just change treaties or abrogate them unilaterally. I am sure the people there who aren't like ones on here, understand the intricacies of international agreements. I don't think they will jeopardize it.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom