What's new

Pakistan needs seven percent growth rate for survival: FPCCI

Is this true ?

Yes, but govt. always tries to manipulate figures. Contrary to India where govt., politicians and babus swells the figures so that they can suck on the funds meant for them.
 
Pakistan needs seven percent growth rate for survival: FPCCI



Shahnawaz Akhter Sunday, January 26, 2014
From Print Edition




KARACHI: Pakistan’s economic condition is on the verge of collapse and in order to survive, it needs a growth rate of seven percent over the next few years as against the present three to four percent, reads a paper prepared by the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI).


FPCCI has presented this study to the government in response to the Vision 2025 prepared by the Planning Commission for the revival of the economy. The report has been prepared by the Research and Development wing of the premier trade body of the country and says that future challenges can only be safeguarded against if the country has a double digit growth rate.


The paper states that the average growth rate of 5.1 percent during the past decade will not help resolve poverty, unemployment and other problems of Pakistan as no visible trickle-down effect is possible at the presently anaemic GDP growth rate.


“If this rate prevails for the next few years, it may create malnutrition problems as already 60 percent of the total population is living below poverty line at present,” said Dr. Ayub Mehar, who is the director general of FPCCI’s research wing.


He said that the IMF, World Bank and other international organisations had recommended seven percent growth rate for Pakistan to reduce the economic miseries of the people by the operation of the trickle-down effect.


The FPCCI recommends that all efforts and targets including the tax-to-GDP ratio, the budget deficit as a percentage of GDP as well as growth in investment, money supply and export targets should be tailored to achieving seven percent GDP growth rate. “It is a requirement for survival that should not be compromised,” the paper said.


The GDP growth rate in fiscal year 2013 was 3.6 percent, which was below the targeted rate of 4.3 percent. The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) in its recently released annual report predicted that the government would fall short of the targeted growth rate of 4.4 percent set for fiscal year 2014.


Mehar said that the present growth rate may not be sustainable in the long term for the country, which may default on its international obligations. “[With this], no money will be left for opening letters of credit for imports and the international community will also not come to our rescue,” said Dr. Mehar, who is also among the top five economists of the country.


The Economic Growth Framework prepared by the Planning Commission has also identified seven percent as the GDP growth rate that is required to absorb the growing population.


However, the FPCCI paper said that about 10 to12 percent rate of growth is required to revive the economy. “This will ensure that the economy of Pakistan turns around to the point it was before 1990 in term of per capita income in the region,” the research paper said.


The FPCCI paper said that the present fiscal policy failure was an outcome of the clashes and interests, which should be discouraged in future.


In the present conditions, foreign assistance and external debt will not be feasible options for the country, it added.


The government has been recommended to undertake development projects funded by foreign direct investment inflows in which investment by ex-pats will be an attractive option.


The FPCCI has proposed financial liberalization, which would be a soft option for resource mobilization to rehabilitate deteriorating infrastructure.


Over the long term, the FPCCI suggests regional economic integration that could be a key for a sustainable source of economic prosperity.


The report suggests changes in planning as past polices have resulted in the present economic crisis. The FPCCI has also criticized the “six regimes of planning in Pakistan”: conceptualization; foreign influence; ad hocism; construction of social accounting matrix and macroeconomic models by the Planning Commission; PCI and PCII culture; and ineffective organs. “Planning in Pakistan is based on the nexus of foreign influence, ideology and feudalism,” the FPCCI report said.


To achieve the desired level of economic growth, the FPCCI recommended private-sector led growth through incentivizing innovation, quality and productivity enhancement.

Pakistan needs seven percent growth rate for survival: FPCCI - thenews.com.pk

Pakistan needs to take advantage of its oil, gas and coal reserves which are present in Land and off shore as well. They can make a public-private company which would be doing all of this.

This can really helps us a lot.
 
why do you always post the bad news about pakistan "bhai zakir"

because of his ID and avatar ;) the whole idea of getting register with Muslim name is to tell Indian Muslims have access to internet and dislike Pakistan.
Reality is opposite, where Muslims cannot celebrate eid.
 
I've said this many times, democracy isn't Pakistan's problem, it's corruption and incompetent governance. A dictatorship would be just as bad, if not worse.

@BATMAN of all the things I've heard you say, this is by far the most unintelligent.

You must be mad for other reasons!

Do i need to post you facts and figures, comparing democracy of civilians vs democracy of general (which you don't call democracy)?
I don't know how many years of democracy, you have lived but a simple glance of recent history shows, that corruption is product of democracy.
Remember, Sharif invited army only to uproot corruption, where BB and Zaradri broke all records of corruption, in so called democracy.
Democrats of Pakistan and corruption is synonymous... we may have different POV but its no brainer, that corruption we see today was non existent 5 years ago.
 
You must be mad for other reasons!

Do i need to post you facts and figures, comparing democracy of civilians vs democracy of general (which you don't call democracy)?
I don't know how many years of democracy, you have lived but a simple glance of recent history shows, that corruption is product of democracy.
Remember, Sharif invited army only to uproot corruption, where BB and Zaradri broke all records of corruption, in so called democracy.
Democrats of Pakistan and corruption is synonymous... we may have different POV but its no brainer, that corruption we see today was non existent 5 years ago.

What a load of crap, if what you say is true, Pakistan and every single dictatorship in the world should be developed nations by now, and places like North America and Europe should be shit holes.

Corruption is everywhere, even during dictatorships. It existed since the birth of Pakistan and it has existed before the birth of Pakistan. What you say is nonsensical. Your love of Musharraf is sickening, he sold out Pakistan's sovereignty and tried to turn the PA into a mercenary army.

You continue to make false comparisons and using post-hoc logic.
 
What a load of crap, if what you say is true, Pakistan and every single dictatorship in the world should be developed nations by now, and places like North America and Europe should be shit holes.

Corruption is everywhere, even during dictatorships. It existed since the birth of Pakistan and it has existed before the birth of Pakistan. What you say is nonsensical. Your love of Musharraf is sickening, he sold out Pakistan's sovereignty and tried to turn the PA into a mercenary army.

You continue to make false comparisons and using post-hoc logic.

Talking of Musharraf, he implemented 5 tire International system to ensure democracy:

1: Local bodies govt. act. synonymous from Swiss system of Gemindi govt.
2: Elected Parliament, synonymous to British parliamentary system.
3: Referendum for selection of CE of state, synonyms to American democratic system
4: Election of senate
5: Presidential election
6: Institutional endorsement of degree holder and services.

In addition, Musharraf developed institutions like:
1- National security council
2- Disaster management authority
3- National Planning commission
4- Pakistan Higher Education commission
................. list is long

He put all loss making and corrupt state institutions to profit making.
1- Steel
2- PIA
3- PTCL
4- Railway
........... list is long.

Further more:
Development projects, defense projects, international defense co-operations and education.
 
Talking of Musharraf, he implemented 5 tire International system to ensure democracy:

1: Local bodies govt. act. synonymous from Swiss system of Gemindi govt.
2: Elected Parliament, synonymous to British parliamentary system.
3: Referendum for selection of CE of state, synonyms to American democratic system
4: Election of senate
5: Presidential election
6: Institutional endorsement of degree holder and services.

In addition, Musharraf developed institutions like:
1- National security council
2- Disaster management authority
3- National Planning commission
4- Pakistan Higher Education commission
................. list is long

All of these were pretty much worthless, mostly because everything was controlled by him and his supporters in the military. Having said that, he wasn't the first one in Pakistan to start using these ideas. Don't give him credit for something he didn't do.

He put all loss making and corrupt state institutions to profit making.
1- Steel
2- PIA
3- PTCL
4- Railway
........... list is long.

Further more:
Development projects, defense projects, international defense co-operations and education.

Mostly through US dollars which he got through selling out Pakistan's sovereignty. It's convenient that you seem to forget this part.

Again, you're making bad arguments.
 
Back
Top Bottom