What's new

Pakistan must seize the opportunities

VelocuR

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
6,188
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Pakistan must seize the opportunities

This past week has brought fascinating developments to surface that could provide an opportune moment for Pakistan to enhance its diplomatic options, provided we conduct ourselves with requisite skill and intelligence.

The recently concluded meeting of the Special Communications Organisation (SCO) leaders in Beijing confirmed the desires of both China and Russia to reinforce their ties with Pakistan, not only in the bilateral sphere, but on the multilateral plain as well. Summit related events also revealed growing unease in both capitals with the foreign policy trajectory of the Obama Administration. Not only has Washington virtually abandoned the much hailed ‘re-set’ in its policy with Russia, but some of its recent decisions demonstrate the absence of an understanding of Russia’s concerns, as evident from the Chicago Nato summit’s declaration that its ballistic missile defence (BMD) had achieved “an interim capability”. This raised fresh questions as to its true purpose, as the recently completed Deterrence and Defense Posture Review stated that “the supreme guarantee of the security of the allies is provided by the strategic forces of the alliance”.

Beijing and Moscow are also convinced that while developments regarding Iran’s nuclear programme and Syria’s human rights record are worrying, US strategic objectives in both countries could have adverse implications for them. Consequently, the Vladimir Putin-Hu Jintao meeting made it clear that SCO countries were strongly in favour of “all parties refraining from remarks and actions that could lead to the escalation of confrontation” on Iran. Similarly, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman confirmed that both countries “oppose external intervention in the Syrian situation and oppose regime change by force”.

More significantly, the Beijing summit was used by China and Russia to press the SCO’s claim to play a bigger role in Afghanistan, an impression confirmed by President Hu Jintao when he stated that the organisation favoured managing regional affairs within the family while “guarding against shocks from turbulence outside the region”. President Hamid Karzai took advantage of the summit to enhance his own options, confirming that the two countries were working on an agreement for the “creation of a strategic partnership”, while urging China to “play a very significant role in bringing Afghanistan and Pakistan together towards a cooperative environment in the war on terror and radicalism”. Clearly, China, which is already involved in a number of large projects, especially those in energy and copper, is set to move into the country in a far bigger way, including through the training of security forces.

Pakistan can find some comfort in the summit’s deliberations, as well as from recent visits to Islamabad by China’s foreign minister and by President Putin’s special envoy. While China used the occasion to reaffirm support and solidarity with Pakistan — pointedly asking the world to recognise its “huge sacrifices” in the war on terror — Russian envoy, Zamir Kabulov, came with an offer of economic help. The symbolism of these visits — especially at a time when Pakistan has been under tremendous pressure from the US and faces daily accusations by American leaders — was not lost on the region and far beyond. Pakistanis were not mistaken in seeing these gestures as reassuring, more so when viewed against the backdrop of American threats — many of which were made by senior officials while visiting India, revealing extreme insensitivity towards Pakistan’s concerns.

Symbolism can, however, take you only so far. Pakistan has to seize the new opportunities but not merely to fend off American pressure. It needs to recognise that genuine improvement of relations with Russia, along with further deepening of our ties with China would serve our interests well and also respond to the desire of many Pakistanis. But this will not be easy as relations with Moscow remain burdened by the legacy of a difficult past and misgivings about some aspects of our Afghan policy. Nevertheless, a genuine effort must be undertaken, for it would be in our interest as well as that of the region.


390689-russiachinaafp-1339135673-765-640x480.jpg


333452-HinaRabbaniphotoafp-1328764133-514-640x480.jpg


putin-gilani.jpg


rp.jpg


russia_-_cina.jpg


Published In The Express Tribune, June 13th, 2012.

russiachina052208.jpg


SCO Allies....
 
What happened to the SCO membership for Pakistan??....any update on that....we were suppose to get membership in this summit of SCO......:coffee:
 
What happened to the SCO membership for Pakistan??....any update on that....we were suppose to get membership in this summit of SCO......:coffee:

yaar, it is not fast progress. It takes long time to trust Pakistan and carefully analysts for the benefits of SCO memberships. Pakistan must proof why they need SCO membership or flop-flipping relations with US again.
 
Pakistani Islamists and Lefties will continue to push China and Russian into our faces. And yes in the process our country will go bankrupt for sure.

peace.

yaar, it is not fast progress. It takes long time to trust Pakistan and carefully analysts for the benefits of SCO memberships. Pakistan must proof why they need SCO membership or flop-flipping relations with US again.

SCO for Pak is not going to happen. At least not any times soon.

Careful analysis by Chinese and Ruskies? This is the biggest pile of dung.

Chinese want Turkmen gas all for themselves.

Russians want to export CIS gas only through them,

And here are Pakistanis supposedly settled in North America, having orgasms about things that do not exist.

The only country who is genuinely interested in setting up TAPI is America. Not for some higher calling, but simply to rest control from Russians and Chinese.

And yet us Pakistanis are shooting the very country that has technology and money to support us bring CIS resources (gas, electricity etc) to our energy starved society and at reasonable prices.

Iranians so-called brothers are charging 7-10 times the international gas prices, and they do not have money to fund our pipelines, and yet we go gaga lady gaga about Iranians.

This is indeed the most unrealistic thinking all thanks to Islamis and Socialism.


peace
 
Pakistani Islamists and Lefties will continue to push China and Russian into our faces. And yes in the process our country will go bankrupt for sure.

peace.



SCO for Pak is not going to happen. At least not any times soon.

Careful analysis by Chinese and Ruskies? This is the biggest pile of dung.

Chinese want Turkmen gas all for themselves.

Russians want to export CIS gas only through them,

And here are Pakistanis supposedly settled in North America, having orgasms about things that do not exist.

The only country who is genuinely interested in setting up TAPI is America. Not for some higher calling, but simply to rest control from Russians and Chinese.

And yet us Pakistanis are shooting the very country that has technology and money to support us bring CIS resources (gas, electricity etc) to our energy starved society and at reasonable prices.

Iranians so-called brothers are charging 7-10 times the international gas prices, and they do not have money to fund our pipelines, and yet we go gaga lady gaga about Iranians.

This is indeed the most unrealistic thinking all thanks to Islamis and Socialism.


peace

this is a serious thread please stop posting bull$hit

on topic : i fully support this article Pakistan must seize this opportunity & straighten its ties with Russia,China & the SCO
 
Iranians so-called brothers are charging 7-10 times the international gas prices

Iranian are charging us standard Asian rates at $18 per mmbtu, although better prices could be negotiated for long term contracts. The US prices are MUCH lower, but there are questions about US export policy and the usual strings attached.

Global LNG supplies to remain tight through 2015

U.S. prices have dropped to around $2.40 per million British thermal units (mmBTU), a fraction of the $18 per mmBTU price in the Asian spot market LNG-AS.
[...]
But there is debate in the United States around export policy and the government is under pressure to keep enough supply at home for industry and prevent price spikes.

Peter Oosterveer, president of Fluor’s energy and chemicals group, said he is not very bullish on the possibility of LNG exports from the U.S.
 
Excerpts from an article in "The Wall Street Journal" :

The Obama administration is telling Japan and other allied countries they will have to wait before moving forward on plans to buy American natural gas ...

But exports have become a hot-button topic for some lawmakers in Washington and have highlighted uncertainty about what kind of energy power the U.S. wants to become...

But the U.S. has told Japan, a leading military ally in the Pacific, it will have to wait, in large part because of the political sensitivities...

U.S. Gas Exports Put on Back Burner - WSJ.com

Importing American gas is far from easy. There's miles of red tape involved. There is no surety even for allies like Japan let alone Pakistan. Plus gas supply will be connected to our relations with the US and seeing our current partnership we should expect ups and downs in supply as well. And we'll be giving even more leverage to their negotiations.

China and Russia are importing fuel from Iran and we should at least consider that option as well. Gas is one thing, but Iranian oil could become a valuable resource for Pakistan once we ensure supply and lower rates.

And our SCO membership isn't done yet. I don't think that our present economic situation and under-developed infrastructure paints a very good image of us. Why would the SCO approve our request then?
 
Pakistan must strengthen its relationship with China & Russia at all cost & end all ties with the evil US but what's wrong over here is we have corrupt people like Zardari (PPP) & Nawaz Sharif (PML-N) crawling in Pakistan like leaches.
 
What happened to the SCO membership for Pakistan??....any update on that....we were suppose to get membership in this summit of SCO......:coffee:

Most of you think that you are already a member and that too prime member.
 
Had they used the gateway for business today they would have been rich and prosperous.

Access to C.Asia needs stability in Afghanistan. Unfortunately there has been no peace there for decades. And then we didn't have a sound economic policy since the 60s either.

And the term "gateway" refers to both: entrance and exit.
 
Pakistani Islamists and Lefties will continue to push China and Russian into our faces. And yes in the process our country will go bankrupt for sure.

peace.



SCO for Pak is not going to happen. At least not any times soon.

Careful analysis by Chinese and Ruskies? This is the biggest pile of dung.

Chinese want Turkmen gas all for themselves.

Russians want to export CIS gas only through them,

And here are Pakistanis supposedly settled in North America, having orgasms about things that do not exist.

The only country who is genuinely interested in setting up TAPI is America. Not for some higher calling, but simply to rest control from Russians and Chinese.

And yet us Pakistanis are shooting the very country that has technology and money to support us bring CIS resources (gas, electricity etc) to our energy starved society and at reasonable prices.

Iranians so-called brothers are charging 7-10 times the international gas prices, and they do not have money to fund our pipelines, and yet we go gaga lady gaga about Iranians.

This is indeed the most unrealistic thinking all thanks to Islamis and Socialism.


peace

Atlast A Courageous And A Sober Pakistani..... who doesn't see the world thru glasses of conspiracy And live in delusional world..... till ppl like you are there in pakistan it has a hope of coming out of the mess it has created for itself in last few yr......
Respect Bro from India.....:tup:
 
Iranian are charging us standard Asian rates at $18 per mmbtu, although better prices could be negotiated for long term contracts. The US prices are MUCH lower, but there are questions about US export policy and the usual strings attached.

Global LNG supplies to remain tight through 2015

U.S. prices have dropped to around $2.40 per million British thermal units (mmBTU), a fraction of the $18 per mmBTU price in the Asian spot market LNG-AS.
[...]
But there is debate in the United States around export policy and the government is under pressure to keep enough supply at home for industry and prevent price spikes.

Peter Oosterveer, president of Fluor’s energy and chemicals group, said he is not very bullish on the possibility of LNG exports from the U.S.

when you want to deal with a person or political group, you first have to understand what's their standing as a man or a group as a whole. you can't discuss right and wrong things for a very long if you know the intentions of other side is not good with you. you just can't deal with those who are mainly willing to destroy you, and at the same time they are discussing different right and wrong things with you just to get more opportunity to fulfill their 'set' intentions? :disagree:

Pakistan needs to move North and East for better future prospects, and at the same time Pakistan needs to defend itself from West at all the time. your only future group would be SCO and your foreign policy would be based on the terms agreed in SCO only. you need to make a foreign policy where China would be your friend number one and friend number two, the Russia. and in return of your firm support to SCO, you would ask the leaders of SCO to defend your national interests from western aggression :meeting:
 
Back
Top Bottom