What's new

Pakistan military's new combat drone is 'great national achievement'

Is Rustam-1 also a flying replica of CH-3 ?

Burraq Project was initiated 5 years ago. How hard it is to design a Canard pusher config UCAV ?


No there is no similarities between Rustam and Ch-3.

But Burraq is exact replica of Chinese CH-3 except paint. They could have easily said its assembled in Pakistan with Chinese ToT, but claiming to develop it is a insult to the people who were involve in the project. Which lab developed it and the designer?
 
.
Calling a spade a spade can save Pakistan from humiliation. A country with close to zero aerospace or space industry come up with a flying UCAV is difficult for any readers and poster to digest,hence raising valid questions. Atleast have some heart to accept as flying replica of CH-3.
I didn't know your arse is still burning after 2 days :blah::flame::flame:
 
.
No there is no similarities between Rustam and Ch-3.

But Burraq is exact replica of Chinese CH-3 except paint. They could have easily said its assembled in Pakistan with Chinese ToT, but claiming to develop it is a insult to the people who were involve in the project. Which lab developed it and the designer?

Rustom_prototype_profile.JPG


Then WTH is this ?

Check Burraq UCAV pool to find who,how when and what about it
 
.
Unable to resist to reply and repeating same heartburn one liners proves the shock to your system.
Demeaning others is not going to improve your condition..... at least your media and their readers are reading the writing on the wall.

No, the data is openly available and this UAV is also used in other countries like Nigeria than its more of a humiliation to claim that indigenous development.

drone-58.jpg


Rustom_prototype_profile.JPG


Then WTH is this ?

This is completely different, for example look at the canard, different design.


Show me one difference between Burraq and Ch-3.

Check Burraq UCAV pool to find who,how when and what about it

I have seen it, no info is there.
 
.
Is Rustam-1 also a flying replica of CH-3 ?

Burraq Project was initiated 5 years ago. How hard it is to design a Canard pusher config UCAV ?



Zumr-1 ER Payload. Datalink built locally, Missile built locally. Engine is from Austria. How come it is chinese when there is nothing chinese in it ? You seem to be suffering from a shock syndrome. Repeating same non-sense again and again without proving what is chinese in Burraq.
Rustam 1 is derived from NAL LCRA project(a Long-EZ design built in the 80s for research purposes)
In 1983-84, CSIR-NAL started the project to fabricate an all-composite aircraft using a kit bought from Rutan in USA. The project led by R B Damania, gave CSIR-NAL teams very valuable insights in building airworthy composite structures. The aircraft, called the Light Canard Research Aircraft (LCRA), was ready by the end of 1986. The LCRA, with Wg Cdr Askoka, HAL’s Chief Test Pilot, made its maiden flight on 26 Febraury 1987. After the LCRA success, CSIR-NAL seriously started the preparatory work to design and build a light aircraft. NAL-A Milestone in Indian Civil Aviation 
civilaviation1.jpg

lcra01.jpg


Rustom-1 -They removed pilot seat and controls.
1874500.jpg


PS:Read more and post less.
 
.
No, the data is openly available and this UAV is also used in other countries like Nigeria than its more of a humiliation to claim that indigenous development.

drone-58.jpg




This is completely different, for example look at the canard, different design.


Show me one difference between Burraq and Ch-3.

Check Burraq UCAV pool to find who,how when and what about it

I have seen it, no info is there.


What about data link, Sensors, payload, engine, Weapon system. Since it has been mentioned in UCAV pool and claiming no I don't find which proofs CH-3 and Burraq is dissimilar makes me wonder if you are suffering from dyslexia
 
.
If India would have done that I was saying the same thing. Its humiliating. For example Su-30 MKi is made in India with many Indian developed systems integrated with it, but still.... still its a Russian fighter.


Regards
 
.
Rustam 1 is derived from NAL LCRA project(a Long-EZ design built in the 80s for research purposes)

civilaviation1.jpg

lcra01.jpg


Rustom-1 -They removed pilot seat and controls.
1874500.jpg


PS:Read more and post less.


Oh, What a great post, READ MORE AND POST LESS. What do you know about Rabta data link, Zumr-1 E/O payload, Rotak Engine ? Barq weapon? Nothing, Zilch nada. Instead of going in a retard circle again and again, broke once and read literature about things which differentiates CH-3 and Burraq.

Oh A fun fact, Since you are so eager to proof CH-3 is burraq, Can you provide videos where CH-3 is firing on moving targets ?
 
.
What about data link, Sensors, payload, engine, Weapon system. Since it has been mentioned in UCAV pool and claiming no I don't find which proofs CH-3 and Burraq is dissimilar makes me wonder if you are suffering from dyslexia
Calling poster as dyslexia and sock syndrome etc etc doesn't help you mate.Stop abusing and prove us wrong.How come the CH-3 and Burraq looks so similar with same fairing and fuselage not to forget the landing gear ?
 
.
Calling poster as dyslexia and sock syndrome etc etc doesn't help you mate.Stop abusing and prove us wrong.How come the CH-3 and Burraq looks so similar with same fairing and fuselage not to forget the landing gear ?

Pakistan borrowed the design the from Shahpar UAV. Strengthen it and made it into Burraq. If CH-3 has a similar layout, Which law of nature says it would be CH-3 ?

You don't even have basic info about Pakistan UAV programs and you are arguing like you are authority on subject. Hilarious.
 
.
CH-3 is the air frame for Burraq, however the Burraq has a Rotax powerpack, Zumr-1 EOTS by GIDS, RAABTA data link and elements of SAR radar sensors used in Falco.

As long as it gives us the ability to track and kill Talidog's leaders, i'm cool with what we have. At least we are not importing.

@C130
 
.
CH-3 is the air frame for Burraq, however the Burraq has a Rotax powerpack, Zumr-1 EOTS by GIDS, RAABTA data link and elements of SAR radar sensors used in Falco.

As long as it gives us the ability to track and kill Talidog's leaders, i'm cool with what we have. At least we are not importing.
But those who are loosing there proxies try to calm themselves by saying that it is CH-3 lol, funny
"No matter cat is black or white until she catches mice"
 
.
CH-3 is the air frame for Burraq, however the Burraq has a Rotax powerpack, Zumr-1 EOTS by GIDS, RAABTA data link and elements of SAR radar sensors used in Falco.

As long as it gives us the ability to track and kill Talidog's leaders, i'm cool with what we have. At least we are not importing.

@C130

Hey homie can you provide a source for the toted engine ?
 
.
Oh, What a great post, READ MORE AND POST LESS. What do you know about Rabta data link, Zumr-1 E/O payload, Rotak Engine ? Barq weapon? Nothing, Zilch nada. Instead of going in a retard circle again and again, broke once and read literature about things which differentiates CH-3 and Burraq.

Oh A fun fact, Since you are so eager to proof CH-3 is burraq, Can you provide videos where CH-3 is firing on moving targets ?
You asked me about Rustom 1 and I gave you the origin.Now talking about CH-3.For your ease.....Look carefully the position and shape of all the components forget about the fuselage.Only thing missing in CH-3 is EO pod which can be attach anytime.
hdhd.jpg
 
.
Calling poster as dyslexia and sock syndrome etc etc doesn't help you mate.Stop abusing and prove us wrong.How come the CH-3 and Burraq looks so similar with same fairing and fuselage not to forget the landing gear ?

indian copy of ch-3 (just too inferior in performance) and still under development :

image.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom