What's new

Pakistan could have up to 250 nuclear warheads by 2025, says report | Janes

That does not answer my question at all. Can you quote what part you are referring to? I am asking about the Uranium and Plutonium Stockpile of Pakistan.
As in, Pakistan needs a source for Uranium and Plutonium to make weapons from, where is that source? Is Pakistan mining Uranium? Because to make HEU you need normal Uranium first.
uranium deposits are located in central and southern part of Pakistan such as in Bannu Basin, Sulaiman Range, Dera Ghazi Khan, Issa Khel, Mianwali District and Kirther Range. First uranium deposit was discovered in Sulaiman Range in 1959 then in 1970 many small deposits discovered in Dera Ghazi Khan district and in 2000/2001 Taunsa was also discovered in this district. So the area of Dera Ghazi Khan is important regarding uranium production and this area lies in Sulaiman Range.
Similarly in Bannu Basin and in Salt Range small deposits Qabul Khel and Kalar Kahar respectively were also discovered.
In north of Dera Ghazi Khan District dozen of small uranium deposits discovered such as Baghal Chur, Rakuchur, Rakhi Munh, Nangar Nai, Kaha Nalo, Rajanpur and Taunsa.
 
. .
Given the way India is arming herself - thanks to the USA, Russia, Israil, France etc. - every particle in the Pak nukes is Helal!!!! I have no qualms in my mind that without the nukes Pak would have been subjected to relentless Indian attacks supported by the almost rest of the world irrespective of race or religion!!!!! Try to make as many as possible.....

Are you confusing posts?
I stated clearly you can have large yields with boosted fissian devices which you stated wasn’t possible.
Where did I say disagreed with FAS scientists? You started the whole thing about credibility off, which is a joke considering the person you’re trying to dismiss. I was wrong about your posts being ridiculous they are actually outright stupid now.
The rest of it I didn’t even question, you bought up the whole yield stuff.



Have you seen his posts about how the IAF can destroy the PAF in one day lol.
It it hilarious seeing our illustrious Indian keyboard experts here trying to tear into respected scientists about their credibility. It’s something they do when they are in the wrong I.e. character assassinate. I’m Not going to reply to him now.
I was little surprised when the Pak folks were distributing sweets in the place I lived then after the nuclear tests!!!! Now, I know why....

008:060
Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
As for the repayment part, inshaAllah it might start soon....
 
.
Just need to destroy your wheat belt, rest will perish out of famine and cancer. Let's not go there shall we.

No matter how much fallout is present, it will decay within 2-3 weeks to safe levels. Give it a month. A month after explosion, you can even walk into Ground Zero and still expect to live a full life. Then, depending on the amount of fallout left, you either plough the field several times or replace half a feet of the top soil. If it rains, even better. And then you plant your wheat and watch it grow. In 3-6 months after an explosion you will have wheat again.

The only thing one has to be careful about is contaminating ground water. But even that's a small problem.

The amount of propaganda against nukes is downright stupid to the point where it defies logic.

The major effect of a nuke is the initial explosion, which is effective at killing people. But the aftermath is highly exaggerated.

Fallout follows the 7-10 rule. Every multiple of 7 times since an explosion, the fallout reduces by 10 times. So an area with 1000R/hr will have reduced to 1R/hr in less than 2 weeks. And this area is generally very small. Say, less than 1Km radius from Ground Zero. And fallout carried by the wind is generally dispersed and decays rapidly to the point where any that reaches the ground is largely harmless or too little to do significant damage, even noticeable damage. A large chunk of it decays while it's still harmlessly floating around.

As for cities, even after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, the unaffected areas of the cities continued functioning. Out of some 100,000 people affected by radiation, only 700 died of cancer. And only 40 babies were known to be malformed. All of this has been very well recorded. And there was no effect in farmlands around the cities. Compared to the two Japanese cities, Indian cities are massive and the major farmlands will be far away from Ground Zero.
 
.
No matter how much fallout is present, it will decay within 2-3 weeks to safe levels. Give it a month. A month after explosion, you can even walk into Ground Zero and still expect to live a full life. Then, depending on the amount of fallout left, you either plough the field several times or replace half a feet of the top soil. If it rains, even better. And then you plant your wheat and watch it grow. In 3-6 months after an explosion you will have wheat again.

The only thing one has to be careful about is contaminating ground water. But even that's a small problem.

The amount of propaganda against nukes is downright stupid to the point where it defies logic.

The major effect of a nuke is the initial explosion, which is effective at killing people. But the aftermath is highly exaggerated.

Fallout follows the 7-10 rule. Every multiple of 7 times since an explosion, the fallout reduces by 10 times. So an area with 1000R/hr will have reduced to 1R/hr in less than 2 weeks. And this area is generally very small. Say, less than 1Km radius from Ground Zero. And fallout carried by the wind is generally dispersed and decays rapidly to the point where any that reaches the ground is largely harmless or too little to do significant damage, even noticeable damage. A large chunk of it decays while it's still harmlessly floating around.

As for cities, even after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, the unaffected areas of the cities continued functioning. Out of some 100,000 people affected by radiation, only 700 died of cancer. And only 40 babies were known to be malformed. All of this has been very well recorded. And there was no effect in farmlands around the cities. Compared to the two Japanese cities, Indian cities are massive and the major farmlands will be far away from Ground Zero.
lol. your posts are outright stupid.

stop making up crap. Even what you have described, if India is hit by a 100 Pakistani nuclear weapons, India would be destroyed.

Infrastructure destroyed, roads destroyed, water supplies poisoned, farmland destroyed.
 
.
Exactly how many do we need to saturate all of hindu india?
We need H-bombs to turn India into a wasteland..... but unfortunately we don't have any...we have atom bombs, Pakistan nuclear stance is small yield tactical nukes... neither Pak or Ind have tested H-BOMB!
 
.
Whatever helps you sleep at night. Your country, your decisions. That said it hardly matters whether you have 100 or 300 or 1000, you are never going to get Kashmir, assuming that is your endgame.

Nukes are not meant for waging war to win Kashmir. As far as Kashmir is concerned, if Kashmir won't join or can't join Pakistan, An Independent Kashmir with the People free from the Indian army would be satisfactory over staying under Indian Occupation.

https://www.kashmirnewz.com/n000406.html

This is a report from 2010, but you get the general trend.
 
. . .
Exactly how many do we need to saturate all of hindu india?

By the way the most important question is this , from where Pakistan imports Uranium ? Does Pakistan Nuclear Scientists enrich Uranium from Pakistan made reactors or just they get the Enriched Uranium from the Chinese. Does Pakistan Nuclear Scientist can produce Nuclear Centrifuges, Nuclear Reactors or the Pakistanis are using the old type of Russian and Chinese reactors even now ?

Why Pakistan Establishment are taking help from the Chinese Nuclear Scientists, Does Pakistan Scientists needs even Chinese assistance for Hydro power on disputed territories.

Listen, buddy we have enough to destroy all major Indian cities and industrial centres.

Do you think Hindu civilization would survive that kind of devastation?


And you are thinking all this because of the outdated SCUD and M11 missiles ?


As always you will talk about electromagnetic bomb. But i dont think that one electromagnetic bomb can disable Indian Ballistic Missile Shield.

electromagnetic bomb is a weapon that uses an intense electromagnetic field to create a brief pulse of energy that affects electronic circuitry without harming humans or buildings. At low levels, the pulse temporarily disables electronics systems; mid-range levels corrupt computer data.

Too many to produce. Even all of the nuclear weapons of the world right now cann't do that.


To launch even ballistic missile , Pakistan needs to protect itself from Indian Armed Forces Cyber Cell who are aware about electromagnetic bomb and we Indians are having first hand experience in Cyber warfare. Something around 31 more satellites ISRO is going to launch.
 
Last edited:
.
As always you will talk about electromagnetic bomb. But i dont think that one electromagnetic bomb can disable Indian Ballistic Missile Shield.

electromagnetic bomb is a weapon that uses an intense electromagnetic field to create a brief pulse of energy that affects electronic circuitry without harming humans or buildings. At low levels, the pulse temporarily disables electronics systems; mid-range levels corrupt computer data.

Its all about the timing.
 
.
Just need to destroy your wheat belt, rest will perish out of famine and cancer. Let's not go there shall we.

Its all about the timing.
The clown you are talking to thinks that India can easily sustain a nuclear war and can easily rebuild a city hit by nukes in just few years.

No need to give explan the obvious o this joker. Just pity the intellect of such creatures from India and be happy that we don't have such clowns.
1 nuclear device, on each river's entry point.

Problem solved.

Ajit DovaL Respond on Pakistani’s threat of Dropping NucLear BomB on INDIA

 
.
Its all about the timing.

Timing or planning ?

Carrying out cyber attacks on Government installations means cyber war only in which satellites are being used and even here placing of satellites in the higher orbit is what matters the most and then protection of the servers and breaching of firewalls.
 
.
Timing or planning ?

Carrying out cyber attacks on Government installations means cyber war only in which satellites are being used and even here placing of satellites in the higher orbit is what matters the most and then protection of the servers and breaching of firewalls.

Thats paranoia. You should Check it out
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom