Reichsmarschall
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
- Messages
- 12,109
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even that half day will kill All Indian cheerleaders. Be matureIndia has 10 days of ammunition for two days war, according to CAG. Pakistan has for half day against even one front. lol
IAF is living in the past just like their army.pakistani fighter jets are now equipped with RAAD.there are anti radiation missiles as well.they are living in 80s.PAF can easily destroy indian military installations within minutes.it's about skill and using common sense.they believe in their hearts that there is no safety on border from pakistani side.they are the air force whose migs was shut down by a shoulder missile.how can they survive sams? living in past is living in nightmare.
Would you expect him to say anything else?........he is after all an indian.
Wouldn't take anything these guys say too seriously as these are the same people who vehemently proclaimed that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance.
If he really believed what he said then one should question & ask him what happened after mumbai 2008 and uri 2016? That too when india is at least 7x bigger than us and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege .
If PAF can easily destroy Indian instalations IMAGINE what IAF could do to Pakistani targets having three times as many modern fighters.
For every BVR missle PAF has IAF has 3
For every Raad there is a 3 brahmos
For Every F16 there is 3 SU30MKI
For every $1 billon Pakistan can spend on its military India will spend $7 billion
Bravado and chest thumbing will get you so far
Having nukes does not mean GREATNESS or RESPECT or CLOUT or PRESTIGE
Saudi has no nukes
South Korea has no nukes
Turkey has No nukes
Indoneasia has no nukes
Egypt HAS no nukes
Iran has no nukes
YET THEY ARE ALL MORE IMPORTANT MORE SUCCESFUL nations than PAKISTAN
ever wondered why ???????????????
YET THEY ARE ALL MORE IMPORTANT MORE SUCCESFUL nations than PAKISTAN
Just 1 questionIf PAF can easily destroy Indian instalations IMAGINE what IAF could do to Pakistani targets having three times as many modern fighters.
For every BVR missle PAF has IAF has 3
For every Raad there is a 3 brahmos
For Every F16 there is 3 SU30MKI
For every $1 billon Pakistan can spend on its military India will spend $7 billion
Bravado and chest thumbing will get you so far
ever wondered why ???????????????
Even that half day will kill All Indian cheerleaders. Be mature
what happened to missing indian asset in Afghanistan?
The PAF airbases are striking distance of Indian short range missiles. Unlike India, they do not have the luxury of strategic depth. They are at the borders. Either they are in the air in the event of war or never going to get airborne. The PAF is probably the asset that Pakistan least requires. National pride puts it on a pedestal. But realistically, its the most useless arm of the military. The Army, Navy have a better chance against India in war. PAF should really focus on peacetime operations and counter terror operations. Which they have adapted accordingly. Although, use of air power against domestic insurgents is debatable. No one likes bombs being dropped over their heads, especially if they are citizens of that country. Pakistan really has a good PR campaign to fight the morality of the issue.IAF is living in the past just like their army.pakistani fighter jets are now equipped with RAAD.there are anti radiation missiles as well.they are living in 80s.PAF can easily destroy indian military installations within minutes.it's about skill and using common sense.they believe in their hearts that there is no safety on border from pakistani side.they are the air force whose migs was shut down by a shoulder missile.how can they survive sams? living in past is living in nightmare.
Previous wars have proven that the PAF doesn't go on the offensive like the IAF does. The PAF will not "cripple" the IAF. The Pakistani army has a better chance with their missiles. India has a lot of SAM systems unlike Pakistan. BVR long range fighters. In order for the PAF to do well against its opponent like the IAF, Pakistan would have to be the first nation to attack. A preemptive attack like it did in 1965 and 1971. Infact judging by history, Pakistan always plans on the preemptive attack. India always manages regardless. The missiles however will deal with the airbases. Means Pakistan will have a tough fight. A quick, limited war would see technology being utilized. This is were PAF can obtain the upper hand. However, the long range Su-30's India has can do a lot of damage. They are both long range beyond Pakistans reach for the most part, and have very large payloads. So unless Pakistan cripples the IAF Flankers, I don't think IAF will be crippled.That is incomplete statement.
Complete fact is that Pakistan might not be able to sustain full scale operations against India beyond 10 days, BUT that is enough time for PAF to cripple IAF, which itself won't be able to do any significant ops against Pakistan.