Pappa Alpha
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2020
- Messages
- 862
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
no, it surely must be rocket science.Do you think these are simple mathematical problems?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, it surely must be rocket science.Do you think these are simple mathematical problems?
how many other nations have done the same?Do you think these are simple mathematical problems?
it is once you get in the decision making chairno, it surely must be rocket science.
how many other nations have done the same?
it is once you get in the decision making chair
almost all.
if you get out of it without proper settlement , you will end up paying a large sum after arbitration , this is not a shop where you can simply say by by .no, it surely must be rocket science.
name some stupid enough to do this!almost all.
If it was taunt ignore my comments if you really want to learn then it is based on one or few broken lots .Do you know what broken lots are ? Also still Qatari LNG is/will be cheapest as it is hedge to fuel basket @8% so if average fuel bucket is 40 US$ it comes to 3.2 US$ .For your information broken lots are one off events not regular buys .Good dayA question for the forum tooi wal!! why are we forcefully purchasing Qatari LNG? @volatile @Pakistan Space Agency @El Sidd etc..
Also still Qatari LNG is/will be cheapest as it is hedge to fuel basket @8% so if average fuel bucket is 40 US$ it comes to 3.2 US$ .
Hi,why are we forcefully purchasing Qatari LNG?
So the pissy excuse is, that NOW!! in the present prices are down globally!
BUT that doesn't explain. WHY we are in a CONTRACT to buy LNG from Qatar on a FIXED PRICE!
WHY?
well educate us. what are those technical jargon things and how does all of that tie us in a contract, which means we buy LNG at a high fixed price which is globally lower to add further? why did we buy ~$2 mmbtu now as compared to we MUST BUY AT FIXED PRICE FOR A LONG PERIOD!!If it was taunt ignore my comments if you really want to learn then it is based on one or few broken lots .Do you know what broken lots are ? Also still Qatari LNG is/will be cheapest as it is hedge to fuel basket @8% so if average fuel bucket is 40 US$ it comes to 3.2 US$ .For your information broken lots are one off events not regular buys .Good day
Hi,
It is because the great minds at work then, forgot to add the legal provision of force majeure in the contract, which could have been exercised in conditions like epidemics and quarantine conditions. Pakistan did exercise this clause with their Eni (11.95% of Brent for a 15 year term) & Guvnor (11.62% of Brent for a 5 year term) contracts and appeared to have cancelled/ postponed deliveries, and sourcing demand through spot market prices (ofcourse at a lower rate, not owing to great negotiation skills of our current lot of great minds, but because of dip in demand and abundance in availability and production of oil and gas in international markets). But, credit should be given to GOP for taking the decision to buy LNG from spot market and exercising postponement clause in ENI & Guvnor contracts.
That is how it is done globally. Still, 70-75% of LNG market is under fixed price long term contracts, which can be revisited after certain number of years (if applicable), like in our Qatar deal, which can be revisited after 10 years. Please note Qatargas II is a joint venture of Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil, it is not entirely a Qatar contract.
In my opinion, it is not the fixed price that is the cause of problem, but how it was fixed. Following points can be pondered upon for a healthier discussion.
1. 'take-or-pay' clause of the contract.
2. the higher percentage that is 13.37% (in contrast to 11.6 to 11.9% of Guvnor and ENI's contracts)
3. Overestimation of demand, while we didn't have sufficient infrastructure (regasification terminals) in place.
4. Limited or non existent volume flexibility.
do you see the featured in Green before the tile. IF this was just some nuisance then why did Mods decide to share this topic and thread on their social media to get this to a wider audience? Mods can easily close the topic down if they think its useless, sensational etc.What’s here to debate? You haven’t provided us any historical data or similar LNG deals to see a broader picture. Secondly, the article doesn’t mention 230% cheaper figure.
It’s really annoying people creating usless threads to spreads their monitize youtube videos with sensational headlines.
I request Mode to seriously consider banning these private youtube channel links on PDF, unless they are giving some benefit to PDF.
do you see the featured in Green before the tile. IF this was just some nuisance then why did Mods decide to share this topic and thread on their social media to get this to a wider audience? Mods can easily close the topic down if they think its useless, sensational etc.
Lets ask the Mods @WebMaster