What's new

Pakistan at tipping point after Bhutto attack: analysts

Flintlock

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
0
News Update:
AFP: Pakistan at tipping point after Bhutto attack: analysts


Pakistan at tipping point after Bhutto attack: analysts

2 hours ago

KARACHI (AFP) — The bloodbath at Benazir Bhutto's homecoming has pushed nuclear-armed Pakistan to crisis point, both politically and in its US-backed battle against Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, analysts said.

Her carnage-strewn return from exile deepened the faultlines that threaten the Islamic republic of 160 million people, which has lurched from one existential threat to another in its six decades of independence.

The blasts could move Bhutto closer to a power-sharing deal with key US ally President Pervez Musharraf, which western nations have pushed as a solution to the militancy seeping from Pakistan across the world.

Bhutto pledged to take on Islamic extremism in a defiant speech after the suicide and grenade attack on her homecoming parade that killed nearly 140 people, adding that she did not blame the "state or the government."

But fingerpointing over the alleged involvement of former officials and spy agencies in the wake of the attack could still scupper a pact that would likely bring a measure of stability ahead of general elections in January.

Military ruler Musharraf meanwhile could yet break his promise to quit as army chief by November, eight years after the coup that brought him to power, if the Supreme Court overturns his recent victory in a presidential election.

His popularity has slumped since he tried to sack the court's chief justice in March -- while Islamic militants have paid him back for a bloody raid on the Red Mosque in Islamabad in July with 22 suicide bombings since then.

The militants too are at a crucial juncture, having taken control of the tribal belt bordering Afghanistan but fearing the move to civilian, democratic rule will foil their bid to spread Taliban-style Islamic sharia law.

"We are heading towards a major crisis," Moonis Ahmar, professor of international relations at Karachi University, told AFP.

Analysts said Pakistan itself now faces the choice Bhutto did when she returned home -- face a mortal risk at the hands of militants, or give in to extremists.

If the country chooses to go head-on at the threat, then political consensus will be vital, they added.

"Bhutto and Musharraf will be more vulnerable if they stand divided and pursue power separately," said Rasul Baksh Rais, a political science professor at the Lahore University of Management Sciences.

"We have to put the political house in order, because as long as we have political contests and rivalries we may not be able to sustain our fight against terrorism," he added.

A key step will be severing the militants' umbilical cord: their links to a network of rogue or former army and intelligence officials who offer financial and logistical support, analysts said.

Bhutto implicated such officials in the immediate aftermath of Thursday's Karachi attacks, while Musharraf admitted several months ago that some former spies were still backing the Islamists.

"Some of the rogue elements in the establishment who feel there is pressure on them for democracy want to create insecurity to deny mainstream political parties space," Karachi University's Ahmar added.

"They tried to kill two birds with one stone in Karachi."

Islamic militants have previously tried to kill Musharraf -- marked for death by Osama bin Laden in a recent video -- at least three times, including a bid to shoot down his plane during the Red Mosque crisis.

The election process itself, marred by violence at the best of times in ethnically and politically divided Pakistan, could now be at risk amid the current wave of violence, analysts said.

"Perhaps the political parties will have to redefine their strategy to conduct electioneering in the face of this very serious threat," said political analyst Shafqat Mahmood.

But a strategy to combat radicalism, especially in the tribal areas where it is mixed with Pashtun nationalism, is an even greater challenge -- with the use of force proving increasingly counterproductive.

Around 250 people, believed to include some civilians, died in fighting along the Afghan border earlier this month in battles between militants and the army.

"Unfortunately General Musharraf and Bhutto are seen by militants as adversaries, and the option of dialogue goes out of window. The only option left is use of force, which is not going to resolve the problem," Mahmood said.
 
Interesting speculations.

What has the Pak media to say on this issue?
 
Pakistani media isn't making any ominous claims, obviously it wants to paint a rosier picture.

But the international media is widely reporting Pakistan as being on the brink of disaster.

I for one am sure that Pakistan will survive, as history of the subcontinent as taught us.

Musharraf is losing popularity as he bombs his own land and is being seen as a US stooge.

Bhutto is gaining popularity but cannot hold rallies and definitely cannot win elections.

Musharraf for now will hold on to both Army and Presidency. I don't see that changing inspite of what the supreme court might have to say. But its all for the best imo.

Hopefully, Pakistan can emerge from this and Musharraf can eventually hold free and fair elections.
 
the international media has been saying that pakistan is on the brink of disaster for the past 60 years. Us pakistanis have become strangely accustom to this stupid speculation all the time. Pakistan is not on the brink of anything. even if we are on the brink of something then it is the brink on the restoration of democracy.
 
Stealth,

The Pakistan media isn't saying anything on the issue because we have gone through all of this before. The Western media has has only recently begun to be interested in Pakistan, and I still hear "expert analysts" talking about "Delta Force and the SEALS" raiding Pakistan's nuclear sites and "securing" the weapons. With analysis like that, most of this stuff should be taken with a grain of salt.

The Pakistani media isn't painting a "rosy" picture or staying silent, they probably have a better handle on Pakistani affairs than anyone else, though I disagree with a lot they have to say as well. The more notable analysts on the electronic media were referencing some of the more intricate details of the BB, Mush plan, coming out now, months ago.

If Musharraf falls, nothing will happen. The elections will be held (though not necessarily on the time table currently in place), Kiyani will be COAS, the military, and the country, will continue to run. Obviously it is preferable that nothing untoward happens before the elections.
 
I don't think there is any disaster in the offing.

The situation is indeed charged, volatile and fluid, but disaster? No.

Even if the Supreme Court overrules Gen Musharraf's election, there are still avenues by which he will be the President. Hence, status quo will prevail. BB will become the PM as per the power sharing deal and the terrorist activities addressedn the manner Gen Musharraf has deemed.

It is also a fact that terrorism will not vanish (as it has not worldwide), but hopefully will wane.

The situation in Pakistan is of concern, but Pakistan will survive and carry on with business as usual!

I believe that the Constitution allows the President to delay the election by an year in case an emergent situation arises.
 
the international media has been saying that pakistan is on the brink of disaster for the past 60 years. Us pakistanis have become strangely accustom to this stupid speculation all the time. Pakistan is not on the brink of anything. even if we are on the brink of something then it is the brink on the restoration of democracy.

Agreed.

However, it is a sad state of affairs that such speculation and even the terrorism Pakistan is facing is becoming the norm.
 
Pakistan is not at a tipping point. Much worse has happened in the past, this is hardly something to lose sleep over. The terrorists are getting hyper over their losing war against civilized people, so they're conducting such acts to deter their enemies. Won't work, and terrorism will be a thing of the past in Pakistan within 10 years. I'm not being overly optimistic.
 
It is not funny at all. Newsweek article is full of contradictions and extremely biased. IMO there is a concerted compaign in the US and Indian media to destabilise Pakistan and justify US attackes in Waziristan.

100% agreed. I wonder how people here who themselves dont count the western media when it comes to kashmir, are quoting all western media reports about pakistan being shown unstable. I hate double standards.:angry:
BB just will have what she wanted to the cases against her should be withdrawn. Yesterday Shaikh Rashid who sayings have been the most accurate, said that BB should stop dreaming about becoming the PM. He futhure said that BB had two options either the condition stopping from becomining the PM for the third time should be removed or the cases against her. She choose the second one and that too for obivious reasons as she was afraid of the cases against her in the foreign courts.
 
there is nothing new in the newsweek article we dont know already, lal masjid, rogue elements of ISI (retired or serving), taliban, sunni shia rift. this has been going on for the last 10 years at least. so suddenly we r the most dangerous country in the world. we all know where this is leading to...
our nuclear assets. they r scared s*** of them falling in the hands of the terrorists and at the same time the US admin confirms that the assets are very secure. typical US hypocrisy. i dont know what the indian media is saying but they certainly do give a lot of coverage to anything anti-pak.
 
Fatman,

This has not appeared in the Indian media so far.
 
It is not funny at all. Newsweek article is full of contradictions and extremely biased. IMO there is a concerted compaign in the US and Indian media to destabilise Pakistan and justify US attackes in Waziristan.

It is funny because what has been written is what all know and hardly anything earth shaking.

Indeed if there is any contradiction or biases, one should amplify those so that one is not carried away by what is written.

Foreign Media can hardly stabilise a country since the population would know better if falsehood is being dispensed. However, if truth is there in such reports, then it sure could change opinions!
 
niaz said:
It is not funny at all. Newsweek article is full of contradictions and extremely biased. IMO there is a concerted compaign in the US and Indian media to destabilise Pakistan and justify US attackes in Waziristan.
I think you are over estimating the level of corroboration between the media of both the countries.

I don't think anybody in their right mind can say that American or the Indian media doesn't portray Pakistan as a shambolic terror ridden state on the verge of collapse. Is some of this over dramatizing? Sure it is, but this doesn't mean that the media in each country doesn't do the same to exaggerate and pander to their local populace.

At the same time, I don't think anybody in their right mind can deny that Pakistan is indeed unstable right now and that there is a major problem in western Pakistan at the moment.

But to insinuate that there is a "concerted campaign [sic] between the Indians and the Americans is ridiculous.

there is nothing new in the newsweek article we dont know already, lal masjid, rogue elements of ISI (retired or serving), taliban, sunni shia rift. this has been going on for the last 10 years at least. so suddenly we r the most dangerous country in the world. we all know where this is leading to...
our nuclear assets. they r scared s*** of them falling in the hands of the terrorists and at the same time the US admin confirms that the assets are very secure. typical US hypocrisy. i dont know what the indian media is saying but they certainly do give a lot of coverage to anything anti-pak.
The US government doesn't want to admit to all the mistakes/mismanagement with its prior Pakistan policy; but at the same time there is a lot of fear about the nuclear arsenal falling into the wrong hands. Unfortunately the past does not bode well for the confidence in the command and control issues of the nuclear weapons on account of the rift between the political and military branches. In some ways it was a little more safer when the military had assumed full control of the political arena because the chances of a misunderstanding were greatly reduced. But now with the re-introduction of the troika model, the shortcomings of the past will be back into contention.
 
Back
Top Bottom