What's new

Pakistan: an alternative democracy

A.Rafay

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Messages
11,400
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
In Pakistan, we have witnessed the complete failure of democracy, so much so that many now doubt if the country can survive if the present governance system continues for another few years. The national debt has more than doubled during a short period of five years, bringing the country to its knees. The inflow of foreign funds from expatriates settled abroad has barely saved us from bankruptcy. The corruption, however, continues at an unprecedented rate and national institutions are crumbling before our very eyes.
Some argue that the reason democracy has failed in Pakistan is that it was not given a chance to evolve and flourish due to interventions of military rule. There could be nothing farther from the truth. Military interventions were forced by the rampant corruption and misgovernance that brought the country to the brink of disaster each time. Take the case of the energy sector, for example. Pakistan has ample sources of energy, rivers flowing across the country, one of the largest coal deposits in the world and wind zones in the Gharo, Katti Bander, the Hyderabad triangles in Sindh and the coastal areas of Balochistan that have the potential of producing 50,000 MW of electricity.
As a result of sensible energy policies in the 1960s and 1970s, we invested in hydroelectric power. Construction of the Mangla Dam, an earth-filled dam on the Jhelum river, started in 1962 and was completed in 1967. It has a capacity of producing 1,000 MW of electricity. Construction of the Tarbela Dam started in 1968 and was completed in 1976. It is the largest earth and rock filled dam in the world, located on the Indus River about 50 miles northwest of Islamabad. It has a capacity of 3,478 MW of electricity and a water storage capacity of about 11 million acre feet (MAF). This had a tremendous impact at the time on boosting the agricultural and industrial output of Pakistan. With the construction of these two dams, affordable electricity was made available and in 1984, the energy mix was about 60 per cent hydel and 40 per cent thermal. In 1980, the electricity production capacity had reached 3,000 MW. We should have continued on this path and gradually replaced imported oil-based thermal plants by our own indigenous coal-based power plants. That is, alas, when corrupt leaders who came into power plundered the country — they decided to opt for imported oil as the main source of power for Pakistan. Experts have confided that the World Bank played a very negative role by exerting pressure on the government, presumably driven by ‘foreign masters’, to go for imported oil- based plants. The Asian Development Bank has recently also refused to fund power plants based on coal, although the form of coal present in Thar (lignite) is used in many countries in the world for power generation, including Germany. These agencies are influenced by foreign influences who do not wish for Pakistan to develop. We may find that China is our only true long-term friend.
In 1986, a project was proposed under which the Lakhra Coal Mine was to be developed by the private sector while the corresponding Lakhra Power Generation Plant was to be operated by Wapda. However, in 1988, the government banned Wapda or any other public sector organisation from setting up oil-based thermal power plants, allowing such plants to be established only by the private sector, opening the door to huge corruption. This was done ostensibly under the pressure of the World Bank and proved to be the death knell for future industrial development in Pakistan. Corrupt leaders entered into contracts with foreign private companies and the cost of energy production rose sharply, crippling industry and commerce, while huge kickbacks were taken by those in power. Some of the rental power plants are producing electricity today at the preposterous rate of Rs50 or even higher per unit — the devastation that has followed in the industrial sector due to the criminal acts of a few has destroyed the very fabric of this country.
Pakistan should have expanded its hydroelectric power which has a potential of 46,000 MW and increased coal-based power plants. Coal contributes only about 7.3 per cent in the primary energy mix whereas in India, about 68 per cent of electricity is based on indigenous coal fired power plants. In China, 79 per cent and in South Africa, 93 per cent of electricity is from coal-based power plants. The criminal acts witnessed in the power sector have almost destroyed the country. The obsolete rental power plants acquired more recently are the most recent example. The growth of nuclear power plants has also fallen prey to international pressures. The power sector is only one of several that have been systematically destroyed.
It has been shown over and over again that the present form of democracy just cannot function in a country where corrupt feudal landlords come into parliament and then into the cabinet. The result is that we spend only 1.7 per cent of our GDP on education, shamefully placing us among the bottom seven countries of the world. This ensures that about half the Pakistanis are illiterate and of the remaining half, most can barely sign their names. This ensures that feudal landlords can continue to come into power as the serfs under them are subjugated and illiterate. They then dance to the tunes of foreign powers in order to safeguard their vested interests and capital abroad.
What, then, is the answer? Surely, military rule is not. The parliamentary system of democracy can also not work in a country where the feudal system has its stranglehold on national politics. The problem with the parliamentary system is that powerful landlords spend hundreds of millions of rupees in the election process to come into power. Once in parliament, or better, in the cabinet, the ‘investment’ made in the election process is recovered by corrupt practices in major national projects. I advocate major changes in the Constitution that will result in a presidential system of democracy so that the best person is elected as president, as in the US, France and other countries. He then selects his own team of professionals in the cabinet. Members of parliament or Senate should be confined to lawmaking and oversight and they cannot become federal or provincial ministers. All persons contesting any election should be required to be approved by a “Judicial Council of Elders” on the basis of their eminence, honesty and competence for the positions.
Pakistan has tremendous potential. Over 50 per cent of our population is below the age of 19 and our children are among the brightest in the world. However, in order to migrate from the trap of a low value added agricultural economy and establish a knowledge economy, we must first get rid of the corrupt system of leadership before we can stand up with pride and dignity in the comity of nations.

Pakistan: an alternative democracy – The Express Tribune
 
.
Some argue that the reason democracy has failed in Pakistan is that it was not given a chance to evolve and flourish due to interventions of military rule. There could be nothing farther from the truth. Military interventions were forced by the rampant corruption and misgovernance that brought the country to the brink of disaster each time. Take the case of the energy sector, for example. Pakistan has ample sources of energy, rivers flowing across the country, one of the largest coal deposits in the world and wind zones in the Gharo, Katti Bander, the Hyderabad triangles in Sindh and the coastal areas of Balochistan that have the potential of producing 50,000 MW of electricity.

Nothing could be further from the truth than the portion in bold above.

Do ppl in Pak believe this ?

Dictators the world over intervene and over throw Govts for a variety of reasons. Chief among them being Personal ambition, threat to vital interests of a person or organization, precedence, disregard / contempt for the law of the land, Greed and last but not the least -religion.

The coups that happened in Pak meet all the above requirements.

If there was rampant corruption as claimed, did the Army rule fare any better ? The nation reels under the ill effects of misgovernance & short sighted religious policies of one dictator after another.

Military rule is like a steroid - its gives a feeling of well being yet cannot be taken for ever. The long term and often permanent side effects are bad.

How can you blame a system if all the kings horses and men gang up to make sure it does not happen.

The recent instances that have come to light about the systematic denial to BB where an Ex Army Chief was involved amongst others is indicative of the point I am trying to make.

Not to mention Gul who gloats on what he did.

Nothing grows in the shade, nations have to feel the heat to allow institutions to grow roots.
 
.
If there was rampant corruption as claimed, did the Army rule fare any better ? The nation reels under the ill effects of misgovernance & short sighted religious policies of one dictator after another.

A few people, very well educated folks I have met do say that in Ayub Khan era, corruption did decline, the crime rate did go down, and people feared the law.

Don't know that is it true or not, I was not born in Ayub Khan era!!! Anybody can verify those claims? MastanKhan might be old enough. So is Niaz I think. Can you give a first hand view of that era and crime rate?
 
.
The 'olden days ' are often better than the present.

The major issue is the institutional undermining of a system that started during Ayubs era.
 
.
The 'olden days ' are often better than the present.

The major issue is the institutional undermining of a system that started during Ayubs era.

That is precisely why I quoted the part of your post where you questioned whether Army rule did better for corruption or worse!

I am not questioning the other points of poor policies or bad governance.
 
.
I feel that our country shouldn't have the democracy it does now. I do not mean I want martial law, I believe Pakistan needs a Presidential Form of Government, something like the United States.
 
.
I feel that our country shouldn't have the democracy it does now. I do not mean I want martial law, I believe Pakistan needs a Presidential Form of Government, something like the United States.

Thats democracy.

I agree that the presidential form of Govt appears better than the parliamentary type.
 
.
The army rule was a patch work but the army was never sincere as it took no action against the corrupt political elite instead created means for them to thrive. Had military been tough and executed the likes of nawaz, zardari and altaf things would be much better.
 
.
Thats democracy.

I agree that the presidential form of Govt appears better than the parliamentary type.

It is better because Pakistan always looks to blame one man for everything. If that is so, then that one man must also have the power to actually make change.

Another reason is that it would mean that the landlord's would have reduced power.

The army rule was a patch work but the army was never sincere as it took no action against the corrupt political elite instead created means for them to thrive. Had military been tough and executed the likes of nawaz, zardari and altaf things would be much better.

Execution is not the answer. It is the public who must realise who is who and what is what. Would killing them have stopped our public from voting for their children? Did Zia's hanging of Bhutto not teach us that hanging one person makes no difference? It is the parties themselves that have the power. Would Altaf's death end the MQM? No, Altaf is a figurehead, the real decisions are made in Karachi. Altaf only speaks out on controversial issues.
 
.
Pakistanis are impatient bunch of people. My advice to them please trust your system and don't loose hope so easily. Democracy is a slow process and takes time to mature. Stick to it and in the long run it will give unbeliable results and produce a great nation and example for everyone. Pakistanis are confused and even after 3 coups they don't know whats good for them. Give democrats a chance and see results in the long term.
 
.
The 'olden days ' are often better than the present.

The major issue is the institutional undermining of a system that started during Ayubs era.

That's not the case actually, Ayub Khan Era, Zia's Era, and Musharaf's Era were far better then any Democratic Government. Problem with Democratic government is... they invest millions and then try to earn billions in return. While this isn't not the case for Army Personal. Where there are less number of people. The people who follow their whole life on the basis of deciple, unity.. They use their power to stop inflation, and control things by hook or by crock.

Surely Army is not a permanent solution for leadership and to run the country since this isnot their Job, neither they are meant for this.
 
.
All the parliamentarians Who were elected are governed by one individual who is zardari, Who didnt take part in elections and became president just because it was his party, this is plain dictatorship in democracy, I wish we have that presidential Form of democracy where two or more candidates Like Romney and Obama Debate and Discuss there policies and run for president and Other members are representives of Provinces elected by normal Election process!! That way is better We dont want puppet Prime ministers who actually obey orders from president who have no authority in this case!! We want president with authority and elected by people of pakistan!
 
.
Despite all its flaws, Democracy is the best form of government. We dont need to reinvent the wheel.
The people of Pakistan have already seen enough stupidities of the greedy generals during their dictatorship tenure.

The holy cows (men in uniform) should only do what is their original duty. And let the people of Pakistan run this country by their elected representatives. Don't worry , we read such columns written by retired generals in daily newspaper.
 
.
Despite all its flaws, Democracy is the best form of government. We dont need to reinvent the wheel.
The people of Pakistan have already seen enough stupidities of the greedy generals during their dictatorship tenure.

The holy cows (men in uniform) should only do what is their original duty. And let the people of Pakistan run this country by their elected representatives. Don't worry , we read such columns written by retired generals in daily newspaper.

:rofl:

We werent taking about Form of govt !!!


We were discussing Form of Democracy, The presidential one!

:rofl:
 
.
...............
Pakistan has tremendous potential. Over 50 per cent of our population is below the age of 19 and our children are among the brightest in the world. However, in order to migrate from the trap of a low value added agricultural economy and establish a knowledge economy, we must first get rid of the corrupt system of leadership before we can stand up with pride and dignity in the comity of nations.

Pakistan: an alternative democracy – The Express Tribune

Both statements in bold are self-evident and well-known for decades. Merely repeating them for the bazillionth time means little unless something is actually done.
 
.

Latest posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom